As a win and a loss. It goes back over 40 years to a year the Steelers had less wins than the Giants but they had 3 ties and no losses. The Giants had more wins but 1 loss.
In those days, a tie wasn't scored at all, so the Steelers had a better winning percentage because they had no losses, 1.000%.
As you can imagine, there was a big outcry from Giant fans.
on how the person running the pool sets the rule. In mine, the 96 who took Philly advanced, as the rule is a tie advances, just as a win would.
As long as the rule is determined at the beginning of the year, regardless if a tie is considered a win or a loss, there shouldn't be any arguements over it.
In most, if not all, survivor pools, you must successfully select one team to win each week. If that team doesn't win you are knocked out. In this scenario, a loss and a tie have the same impact; the team didn't win.
(Nice to see you)..
In those days, a tie wasn't scored at all, so the Steelers had a better winning percentage because they had no losses, 1.000%.
As you can imagine, there was a big outcry from Giant fans.
Is it based on the winning percentage of all games played?
Only 3 people left in the one I am in and I'm one of the 3!!
As long as the rule is determined at the beginning of the year, regardless if a tie is considered a win or a loss, there shouldn't be any arguements over it.
10-5-1 is a better record than 10-6.
The Eagles break any ties with that tie. That's a plus for them. The negative is that they tied the Bengals and that doesn't bode well for the future.