When will the league take exception to Flozell Adams' BS?

that's one more for the file there..

...

playing for the Cowboys?

bunch of cheating MF'ers.

Now what would have happened if Peppers got hurt on that play, would Fuckzell still have gotten a $12K fine. Unbelievable.

He must have had about 3 or 4 penalties last night, this ass lacks discipline.

*

with him and Roy Williams on the same team for years, is there any question why the Giants always used to come out of the cowboys game so banged up.

even on often dirty players (and hated division rivals) like Dawkins. But last night when Adams went down on that big Cowboy run, I didn't give a shit if he was injured or not.

I hope the NFL takes notice on this guy. I guess it " no injury no foul."

.

Flossie's day is coming.

It's not at all silly to say that, either. An NFL GM this past week also said the league needs to consider a suspension here.

IWe need to send a copy of this link to the NFL...attention head of officiating.

on the play against Adams. 2 weeks - 2 fines. They need to suspend him a game for him to get the message.

Look - they went out and named a new freakin' penalty after Roy Williams, and managed to issue a whopping 1 game suspension after the guy racked up 3 in a row. Flozell isn't going to be dealt with by the league.

I sure hope Tuck gets a good piece of him though.

1. Cowboys win.
2. Adams' injury wasn't serious.

which was a pretty obvious one. I don't think Adams was called for the one on that gif.

when you get beat.

Adams was already fined after weeks 1 and 2. If he gets fined again this week, that would be 3 weeks in a row. Time for a suspension.

But a suspension for a long time serves the same purpose, especially since he wouldn't be paid! Ouch!

So if the league won't take him off the field, an injury might have to.

Nothing at all wrong with wanting to protect other players from this dirtbag's tricks.

when he does it....big wuss

Last week's fine was for two incidents: One on Tuck and one on Osi.

as obviously a fine does nothing (pocket change, why should he care?). To keep doing it repeatedly after being flagged/fined is terrible, and proof that a fine won't stop it. Even more egregious is his act that he isn't doing anything wrong.

Likely nothing happnes though.

this is a sign his skills have diminished greatly if he has to resort to this type of thing. The league, I would suspect, will be watching him closely which means a possible suspension for future infractions.

The result will be that he will be beaten more cleanly and Romo will get punished more as Adams has to stop this tactic in order to avoid fines, penalties, suspensions. This increases the chance that Romo will get hurt.

he should get a 2 game suspension.

I hope his leg breaks off next game.

if Flozell actually connected with all of his strength and at the right angle, he would/could put a player out for a very long time with a very serious injury.

I never wish injuries on someone, but with Flozell's continued history of this, I have to admit I was alittle disappointed he was able to walk off last night.

Sue me.

was done for the year, as well.

Fuck him.

hope this guy is injured."

to that piece of shit.

I hope he's healthy for our second game with Dallas. So does Justin Tuck.

you're kidding, right?

This dip shit is going to end someone's career with his BS.

He should finish his first.

the hatred for flozell clearly stems from him being a repeat offender of that leg whip. he very well could have forced us to miss both Osi and Tuck for a few games, and he wasn't all that remorseful either. it's his insistance that he's going to keep using that leg whip where all this is coming from.

I can't think of a situation involving a player sustaining a serious injury being a positive. Ever.

..

When the player is question has none, you can throw ethics out the window.

Can someone post it on tinypic.com?

your own ethics, that's what works for you.

I'm never ok with saying, "This guy has murdered so many people, we should murder him because murder is wrong."

there's nothing unethical about being glad he's off the field.

anyone else.

shows disregard

and kill Hitler, but Doc was like, "Roads? Roads?"

Or is it just an emotional, bloodthirsty response and craving for revenge?

so he doesn't do it again.

these are emotional responses

it comes to the point where would you rather have one guy out there repeatedly trying to seriously injure guys, or would you rather just have the one guy injured, so multiple other guys won't be seriously injured.

If the guy in question didn't have along history of this, then it wouldn't be fair. But the fact is he has a long history of doing this, and even after being fined last week, still tries the same shit the very next game.

So yes, I'd much rather the one guy injured than a bunch of other (innocent) guys getting taken out.

You have to shoot yourself for that to happen, or start a dog fighting ring in your back yard.

I don't care how he's dealt with.

He's a repeat offender.

Adios Flozell, one way or the other.

Ethics is all about holding steady despite the circumstances. Either it is ok to cause injury or wish injury upon someone or it is not. Regardless of the situation.

The league should get Adams off the field with a suspension. If they don't, an injury that would get Adams off the field is the next best thing. Doesn't mean I'm rooting for someone to intentionally injure Adams. Since we know he is trying to injure people, it would be better if he were injured first, to remove the threat to other players.

Enough with the self-righteous bullshit.