I was reading an article today about the offensive line and how durable they have been that made reference to Tom Coughlin's perception of injuries. In case you don't remember, when he came in he stated that they were a "state-of-mind" and something he thought he could help the Giants overcome.
After seeing guys like Cal Ripken in baseball or Diehl on our own Giants, I can't believe that these guys are just lucky. I think there has to be some mental aspect to playing that allows players such as these two to remain healthy for so long. Likewise, I find it hard to believe certain players are so unlucky that they are seemingly always injured.
On the other hand, in the NFL, you have guys 300+ lbs going at 4.4 speed, and it seems almost probable that someone should get hurt each game with that kind of impact.
Personally, I'd say that injuries are about 35% (bad) luck and 65% player-specific (Thanks rock).
Everyone has a different pain threshold.
This is one area where Coughlin seems to have changed since he took the HC job.
Make no mistake - there are guys is the NFL that like to coast and collect a paycheck. Specifically, a player who has already signed for a huge guaranteed sum who subsequently can't practice. (Plaxico Burress anyone?) It's hard to believe to Joe Diehard that would give anything for a shot in the pros. But it's true. And then, there are guys who do whatever it takes to be on the field. Regardless of financial situation. (Eli Manning or Justin Tuck come to mind, for example.)
Coughlin's point was that you need the latter. As he put it, you don't want guys "lingering in the training room". You want to make that training room the least desirable place to be, in the world.
Can you prove that? I certainly don't recall him ever saying that.
No one, I mean no one showed more guts that Plax playing on one leg almost the entire 2007 season...Please never use Plax as an example of a malingerer..Think what you want about Plax, but lack of fortitude and grit was not a shortcoming
- can anyone really know how much pain someone else is experiencing
- say the extent of an injury is downplayed or even not publicly known, the player guts it out and when his performance suffers he "sucks"
- are there players that could handle the pain but not the inabilty to perform at 100%?
- where is the line drawn line between being a gamer and being selfish? are you playing to satisfy your ego or to keep some streak alive?
- are you helping or hurting the team playing hurt?
- long term vs short term considerations
- I don't know if I'd consider a headache or flu an injury, an amputated finger I think I might
And Cantey, who I believe had never missed a game before, and is being paid millions of dollars, out 4 games with a "bruised" calf. They should give that injury another name, cause bruised just doesn't sound serious enough.
Playing hurt is a part of life , playing injured is not smart
Coughlin's dumb "state of mind" quote - ( New Window )
A partial tear.... sure, you can perhaps work through the pain.
So it depends on the injury. State of mind does effect injury propensity it seems. If you feel you will get injured you are probably much more inclined to get injured. MInd attitude effects injury, ability to get injured, and ability to recover, and time to recover, but seemingly in not all cases.
Terrel Owens recovered fron a ankle injury that defied all medical knowledge about how soon someone can recover from that injury. But he was still not able to play for quite a few weeks regardless due to that injury.
So it affects but not absolutely.
When playing football, you often play through pain and slight injuries (slight sprains, even broken parts in casts sometimes) but at the same time you can't/shouldn't play through certain injuries that NEED time to heel--hamstrings, high ankle sprains, etc.
Coughlin's point was that some players need to know the difference and sometimes suck it up and play even though it might be painful. C'mon...think, fellas?
the quote I asked about was never made.