Is there really a big difference in both QB's?
Will this be another case of Manning vs Leaf when it's all said and done?
Who would you pick if you were the Colts?
If you asked me, I would take Luck. RG3 reminds me a lot like Vick. Better accuracy but I cant say I'm sold on him. Both Luck and RG3 have similar stats but stats doesn't always translate to intangibles. I think it would be a draft day shocker if the Colts took RG3 which in turn shifts Luck to Washington. What say you?
Both are going to be very, very, very, very good.
Leaf flamed out because he was a head case with serious maturity issues; both Luck and RG3 are upstanding young men.
RGIII is a great athlete and I think will be at a minimum a very good player in the NFL. If I believe the hype, he is very smart and a very good guy. If he is mentally tough, he will be an excellent QB.
Do the Colts still take Luck #1 or would they opt for a healthy RG3?
I don't think either will be a failure ... how much of a franchise QB either of them turn out to be is still open ...
Them going 1 and 2 makes a lot of sense with Luck going 1 probably the correct choice for Indy ...
Peyton was can't miss ... Leaf did have some question marks ... neither of these 2 have the Leaf potential ...
I think people see the athletic side of RG3 as being more of an upside, but just take a look at the top 10 QB's in the NFL and see where they make their money. Pocket presence, awareness, accuracy, making changes at the LOS. I'd take all of that above "being athletic". That's why Luck is the better prospect with better upside IMO.
He's shown to be a smart kid and a quick learner ...
but then again ... he's going to Washington ... where even wet dreams can become painful ... Rather than develop him in learning those aspects to become a successful NFL QB, they may just have him do his thing ... to his and the Skins long term detriment ...
The pressure will be on Luck also ... as he actually is becoming the new Peyton Manning ... but the system is in place for him to succeed ultimately and they do know it's the start of a rebuilding process there ...
I also don't see being as athletic as RG3 as being more of an upside. I see it as a positive, but can mean absolutely nothing unless he learns how to play QB in the NFL.
Luck is plenty athletic to escape the pocket and be a bigger version of Aaron Rogers. He's also going to take less of a beating as someone above mentioned.
2) I hate people who see RG3's speed and immediately compare him to Vick. He is nothing like Vick. In fact, I honestly believe he could come in this year and immediately be a better QB than Vick. Why?
He is much more accurate, number one. Two, he is a smarter QB on and off the field. He makes better reads and decisions. He has a better touch; he throws a better ball. He doesn't rely on his speed or think of himself as a runner. He is a pocket passer who happens to be fast. That may mean occassionally, when the rush is on him and coverage is tight he may take off. But, he is always looking to throw.
Someone above didn't like the vick comp either. I've never seen him play so hoping to get an idea and highly athletic QBs have been pretty mercurial in the pros. I thought maybe Newton but the pure physical difference seems too great.
Cunningham? I don't have a great memory for his being accurate or not.
Link - ( New Window )
is fleener expected to do everything?