Here are the Salary Cap estimates for the coming year as of Jan. 14, 2013 according to the source linked below:
I. Here is the order sorted from the most space to the least:
II. Here are the teams ranked in alphabetical order:
NOTES:
• The Cap estimates I've read so far are 120.6 and 120.9 million dollars.
• Remember that there is a salary cap minimum threshold of 89% of the cap to meet this year.
• This means that teams that are more than approximately $13.3 million beneath the cap have to spend the amount of money that they have free under the cap to reach that mandated floor number.
• According to the list above, there are 14 teams that are more than 13.3 million dollars under the cap.
• Those teams will be especially active this offseason in the free agency market to meet the minimum required salary cap floor number, which is between approximately $107.334 million and 107.601 million using the numbers listed above.
• Expect those clubs with money to spare, especially those at the top, such as Cincinnati, Cleveland, Indianapolis, Miami, Tampa Bay, Jacksonville, Buffalo, and Tennessee to be the most active in free agency approximately 2 months from now.
• Meeting the salary floor isn’t a problem for the Giants.
• They are going to have to cut and/or restructure some players’ contracts to get under the cap (according to this chart they are $4.7 million over the 2013 cap).
REMINDER ABOUT RESTRUCTURES WORK:
• You don’t restructure overpaid players.
• A restructure is when you take salary that a given player is due to earn, & then turn it into a guaranteed bonus.
• It's something you do with a core player who you expect to be around for 3 more years, or so (e.g., players who the Giants have done this with in the recent past are Eli Manning, Chris Snee, Corey Webster, and Antrel Rolle).
• It is significant to note that teams can only do it every 12 months with a given player, so if player X restructured his contract last year in June, then he can’t restructure his contract again until June of this year.
• I suspect that they’ll do it again with Rolle, Webster, or Snee. Chris Canty is also a likely candidate for a restructured contract since his cap hit will be $8.2 million.
WHAT TO DO WITH UNDERPERFORMING PLAYERS WHO AREN'T CANDIDATES TO HAVE THEIR CONTRACTS RESTRUCTURED?:
• Flat out cut the given player with the intention of not re-signing him. Depending on how much the Giants think David Diehl has left, he may become a victim of this.
• You can threaten to cut the player with the intention of re-signing him, and then use that leverage to get him to agree to a lower salary (this happened to Rocky Bernard and Brandon Jacobs 2 years ago; Jacobs refused to do it again last year, so the Giants cut him). Once again, David Diehl is a prime candidate for this, and so may be Ahmad Bradhsaw, but it probably won’t come down to that with him since his cap hit is not big compared to the low amount of cap space that the Giants have allocated with respect to the running back position overall.
• You’ll be forced to deal the reality of your decision and deal with the mistake that you made, and hope that his play improves. This is the most difficult situation to be in. The Jets are presently dealing with this with Mark Sanchez and Santonio Holmes.
WHAT TO POSSIBLY EXPECT GOING FORWARD:
• Michael Boley, David Baas, and Justin Tuck merit keeping an eye on this offseason with regard to their contract situations. Boley and Tuck are entering the final years of their deals. I suspect that Tuck will remain, but the same may not be the case with Boley. Baas has 3 more years left on his deal, so he may be a candidate for a re-structured contract.
• Giants Salary cap expert, Kevin Abrams, will have his hands full this offseason for sure.
WHAT TO LOOK FORWARD TO WITH RESPECT TO FREE AGENCY AS IT HAS TO DO WITH THE SALARY CAP :
• He’ll have to deal with pending 4 RFAs, most notably Victor Cruz & Stevie Brown, and then have to see if the Giants can sign anyone in UFA at the expense of someone currently on the roster, particularly the O-Line since there are 2 starters who will be free agents in March. Money will have to be carefully allocated there.
• The Giants will look to re-sign their own players who they project decent production for going forward. As always, the Giants set a price for these players. If they demand more than what the Giants think they’re worth, the Giants will cut bait with them (e.g, see Kevin Boss and Steve Smith).
• The Giants don’t go crazy money-wise in UFA, but will identify glaring areas of need, and then act quickly to fill these needs in come March if the price is right.
• They did so right away last year when they signed Marty B to play TE after the position was depleted with the injuries in the SB 46 to Ballard and Beckum.
• They did the same in going into 2010 with Rolle, Boley, & Bernard. In 2005, most famously, they signed Kareem McKenzie, A. Pierce, and Plexico to fill glaring needs on the roster at RT, MIKE, and WR respectively.
• Look for them to do so this year on the following positions: OL, LB, TE (re-sign Bennett here), and possibly CB.
• There will free agents who are likely to not be back (Kenny Phillips and Osi), for whatever the reason, and players who may be cut (Diehl or Boley).
• The Draft is easier to deal with because of the salary slotting system now in place brought about as a result of the 2011 CBA. There isn’t as much spent on draft picks as their used to be. Especially higher first round picks.
• Don’t look for the Giant to make a lot of moves, but instead target areas of need, and players who won’t break the structure of their salary cap going forward.
• As Jerry Reese himself said last year in an interview with Bob Pap and Ross Tucker on SiriusXM NFL Radio, the Giants don’t plan ahead by a single year. They do everything looking 2 or 3 years down the line. Keep that in mind this offseason as the Giants look to secure their younger core players going forward who will be coming off of their rookie deals (e.g., JPP, Cruz, Nicks, Linval Joseph).
• Tough decisions have to be made, and it is inevitable that teams will lose players—sometimes very good ones—but such is life in today’s NFL. The plus side, is that if a team sticks to a plan, and manages the cap carefully, they’ll be able to have both short-term and long-term success. Teams like the Giants, Steelers, and Packers are excellent examples of this, since they’ve won 4 of the last 6 Super Bowls.
NFL Cap Space - Nate Bouda - January 14, 2013 - (
New Window )
forget gresham. they have a very promising TE in orson charles too.
they have an awesome, physical OL. Very deep in the secondary. They even have vontaze burfict on a rookie deal whom, from the looks of things, seems like a major upgrade over maulaluga. They have another great press potential corner in dre kirkpatrick waiting in, damn
tremendous collection of talent and drafting with an incredibly bright future. daltons lack of arm may keep them from ever being a legit superbowl contender. they just need to get more speed at RB/LB
55 million in cap space, that they have to spend. my oh my
I think I did it right, but I'm not sure. All those bonuses can easily throw you one off.
Regarding Tynes - If he thinks he can do better, then good riddance.
Lotta work involved for NFL Front Offices w/respect to managing the cap.
Since Webster is in the last year of his deal there's no acceleration from future years. If the workout bonus is due on a certain date, and neither that nor any part of his salary are guaranteed, then the savings would be $7.25M.
Free Agent Kickers
If he wants to go let him. His missed kick in Washington was costly. looking at the list linked above, off the top of my head I'd take either Rob Bironas or Steven Hauschka. Hauschka is a young player from close by, in Massachusetts, so if he comes here, he'd be much closer to home then where he is now in Seattle.
fkap : 4:58 pm
and then subtract the bonuses? In the case of webster, Total cap hit is salary + signing bonus + misc bonus (let's assume for argument's sake that he gets the misc regardless) or 7,000,000 + 875,000 + 2,100,000 = 9,975,000. If he gets booted, his cap hit should only be the bonuses, or 2,975,000, which means the total team cap amount is reduced by 7 mil. It's an easy calculation when you're in the last year of the contract and don't have to add up amortized bonuses. It makes no sense to subtract bonuses from the salary, because the salary is not the cap hit currently being counted. I'm betting Pat transposed two words - subtract from that vs subtract that from.
The bonuses are guaranteed. I just figured that they ($2.975 mill) would be the only part subtracted from the cap hit ($9.975 mill), making it an even 7 million bucks.
If he is cut it is 4M saved.
Bigger issue is there are no CB to be had. Top guys cost a ton. Dallas set the bar last yr for 5yr 50M for Carr
I think they extend him a year and get his salary cap number in line.
Canty when he is healthy is a tremendous player. I think they keep him and find a vet min backup
Boley was great for 1/2 yr and fell off - he might be a casualty
if he weren't carry a very high cap figure you can deal with that. I'd rather have a lesser player for 16 games healthy than Canty playing maybe 6 full-go games at that price.
Phillip Wheeler is a young productive LB with the Raiders who also is worth remembering.
Canty is worth a re-structure. He's an impact player who has a few more good years left.
Webster is an interesting case. You've got to look at what's out there first before you consider cutting him. Check this list of FA CBs out:
Free Agent Cornerbacks
None of them stand out to me. Cutting may not be as optimal as some consider it to be.
that's my story, I'm sticking to it.
If you are going to keep Webster and extend him a year, 2 for 8-10 say. Would you be better off offering Jenkins 6-7m - would it be enough
Curious what others think
79.2 QB rating against.
They made the classic post-SB mistake of keeping a bunch of injured and/or old players around rather than cutting them.
As said.. Diehl and Boley make way too much. Bradshaw makes too much and Webster does as well.
Extending Webster to cut his number in half makes more sense then cutting him.
We have Jacquian Williams i believe ready to replace Boley and Keith Rivers can prob be brought back cheaper and he has higher upside.
Also don't sleep on Brewer and Mosely on the oline.
Canty could be restructured.
Kenny Phillips and Osi are goners.
Despite Canty's high cap hit, he was a beast over 2 games when healthy. The trick will be monitoring his health this off-season. The Giants are thin at DT - I don't see Bernard in the picture anymore, and hve no clue about the huge lunk from Cleveland.
By doing that they'd be comfortable with him going forward, and chalking 2012 up to being nothing more than an aberration. Personally, I think Corey can still play. He's suffered from confidence issues in the past. Fewell's defense isn't exactly the best defense for him. Add to the fact that this year's FA class of CBs isn't anything to get excited about, and you've can make a strong argument that he stays.
Tuck, will probably stay, but this year (the last of his contract) will most likely be his last with the Giants.
Snee's predicament is interesting: He's oft-injured, and is getting older. Pro-Bowl nomination aside, he's almost done. Will the combination of factors that (1) his contract is bloated (there are 2 years left on his deal), (2) that the OG position is thin as can be on the current roster, and (3) that he's TC's son-in-law affect how they view him going into 2013?
I think he should probably go, but those factors may make the Giants keep him, and hope he plays better for at least another year before they cut bait with him.
Extending Webster and reducing his cap hit is likely, imo. B Walsh laid out the analysis, and I'd wager the team doesn't believe he's lost a step yet.
I highly doubt Tuck and Snee are as near to the end as many believe, that and they carry big time gravitas with the team's brass and owner. They're safe, but it's time to get fixed and healed up.
1. Cut TT - save $2.25M (now $2.45M over)
2. Cut Osi - save $1M (now $1.45M over)
3. Cut Boley - save $4.5M (now $3.05M under)
4. Cut Diehl - save $4.35M (now $7.4M under)
Other moves that could free up cap space:
1. Restructure Canty - current cap hit $8.2M in 2013
2. Extend CWebb for 1-2 seasons - current cap hit $9.975M
3. Extend Tuck for 1-2 seasons - current cap hit $5.65M
4. Restructure/extend Eli - current cap hit $20.85M (extension would provide an extra year to spread the new guaranteed money over and lock him up through 2016)
5. Restructure Rolle - current cap hit $9.25M
Numbers from Spotrac
That should be plenty of room for them to keep the guys they want and add a couple impact players.
I've always been somewhat suspicious of these salary cap stories for this reason. Are these details actually made public somewhere or are people just guessing?
Pat, can you help?
Most of the time "Restructure Bonuses" also seem to be included in the Misc column as well, though I've seen them occasionally listed in the Signing Bonus category.
The final piece of the Misc column is money earned through incentives, though I've only seen this on rare occasions.
I thought Eli restructured in March and thus his deal can again be restructured in March 2013?