for display only
Big Blue Interactive The Corner Forum  
Back to the Corner

Archived Thread

2013 Salary Cap estimates for all 32 clubs

Optimus-NY : 1/17/2013 1:45 pm
Here are the Salary Cap estimates for the coming year as of Jan. 14, 2013 according to the source linked below:




I. Here is the order sorted from the most space to the least:




II. Here are the teams ranked in alphabetical order:




NOTES:
• The Cap estimates I've read so far are 120.6 and 120.9 million dollars.
• Remember that there is a salary cap minimum threshold of 89% of the cap to meet this year.
• This means that teams that are more than approximately $13.3 million beneath the cap have to spend the amount of money that they have free under the cap to reach that mandated floor number.
• According to the list above, there are 14 teams that are more than 13.3 million dollars under the cap.
• Those teams will be especially active this offseason in the free agency market to meet the minimum required salary cap floor number, which is between approximately $107.334 million and 107.601 million using the numbers listed above.
• Expect those clubs with money to spare, especially those at the top, such as Cincinnati, Cleveland, Indianapolis, Miami, Tampa Bay, Jacksonville, Buffalo, and Tennessee to be the most active in free agency approximately 2 months from now.
• Meeting the salary floor isn’t a problem for the Giants.
• They are going to have to cut and/or restructure some players’ contracts to get under the cap (according to this chart they are $4.7 million over the 2013 cap).


REMINDER ABOUT RESTRUCTURES WORK:
• You don’t restructure overpaid players.
• A restructure is when you take salary that a given player is due to earn, & then turn it into a guaranteed bonus.
• It's something you do with a core player who you expect to be around for 3 more years, or so (e.g., players who the Giants have done this with in the recent past are Eli Manning, Chris Snee, Corey Webster, and Antrel Rolle).
• It is significant to note that teams can only do it every 12 months with a given player, so if player X restructured his contract last year in June, then he can’t restructure his contract again until June of this year.
• I suspect that they’ll do it again with Rolle, Webster, or Snee. Chris Canty is also a likely candidate for a restructured contract since his cap hit will be $8.2 million.


WHAT TO DO WITH UNDERPERFORMING PLAYERS WHO AREN'T CANDIDATES TO HAVE THEIR CONTRACTS RESTRUCTURED?:
• Flat out cut the given player with the intention of not re-signing him. Depending on how much the Giants think David Diehl has left, he may become a victim of this.
• You can threaten to cut the player with the intention of re-signing him, and then use that leverage to get him to agree to a lower salary (this happened to Rocky Bernard and Brandon Jacobs 2 years ago; Jacobs refused to do it again last year, so the Giants cut him). Once again, David Diehl is a prime candidate for this, and so may be Ahmad Bradhsaw, but it probably won’t come down to that with him since his cap hit is not big compared to the low amount of cap space that the Giants have allocated with respect to the running back position overall.
• You’ll be forced to deal the reality of your decision and deal with the mistake that you made, and hope that his play improves. This is the most difficult situation to be in. The Jets are presently dealing with this with Mark Sanchez and Santonio Holmes.

WHAT TO POSSIBLY EXPECT GOING FORWARD:
• Michael Boley, David Baas, and Justin Tuck merit keeping an eye on this offseason with regard to their contract situations. Boley and Tuck are entering the final years of their deals. I suspect that Tuck will remain, but the same may not be the case with Boley. Baas has 3 more years left on his deal, so he may be a candidate for a re-structured contract.
• Giants Salary cap expert, Kevin Abrams, will have his hands full this offseason for sure.

WHAT TO LOOK FORWARD TO WITH RESPECT TO FREE AGENCY AS IT HAS TO DO WITH THE SALARY CAP :
• He’ll have to deal with pending 4 RFAs, most notably Victor Cruz & Stevie Brown, and then have to see if the Giants can sign anyone in UFA at the expense of someone currently on the roster, particularly the O-Line since there are 2 starters who will be free agents in March. Money will have to be carefully allocated there.
• The Giants will look to re-sign their own players who they project decent production for going forward. As always, the Giants set a price for these players. If they demand more than what the Giants think they’re worth, the Giants will cut bait with them (e.g, see Kevin Boss and Steve Smith).
• The Giants don’t go crazy money-wise in UFA, but will identify glaring areas of need, and then act quickly to fill these needs in come March if the price is right.
• They did so right away last year when they signed Marty B to play TE after the position was depleted with the injuries in the SB 46 to Ballard and Beckum.
• They did the same in going into 2010 with Rolle, Boley, & Bernard. In 2005, most famously, they signed Kareem McKenzie, A. Pierce, and Plexico to fill glaring needs on the roster at RT, MIKE, and WR respectively.
• Look for them to do so this year on the following positions: OL, LB, TE (re-sign Bennett here), and possibly CB.
• There will free agents who are likely to not be back (Kenny Phillips and Osi), for whatever the reason, and players who may be cut (Diehl or Boley).
• The Draft is easier to deal with because of the salary slotting system now in place brought about as a result of the 2011 CBA. There isn’t as much spent on draft picks as their used to be. Especially higher first round picks.
• Don’t look for the Giant to make a lot of moves, but instead target areas of need, and players who won’t break the structure of their salary cap going forward.
• As Jerry Reese himself said last year in an interview with Bob Pap and Ross Tucker on SiriusXM NFL Radio, the Giants don’t plan ahead by a single year. They do everything looking 2 or 3 years down the line. Keep that in mind this offseason as the Giants look to secure their younger core players going forward who will be coming off of their rookie deals (e.g., JPP, Cruz, Nicks, Linval Joseph).
• Tough decisions have to be made, and it is inevitable that teams will lose players—sometimes very good ones—but such is life in today’s NFL. The plus side, is that if a team sticks to a plan, and manages the cap carefully, they’ll be able to have both short-term and long-term success. Teams like the Giants, Steelers, and Packers are excellent examples of this, since they’ve won 4 of the last 6 Super Bowls.




NFL Cap Space - Nate Bouda - January 14, 2013 - ( New Window )
Pages: 1 2 | Show All |  Next>>
Its important to note  
Brandon Walsh : 1/17/2013 1:48 pm : link
that Giants number includes Terrell Thomas option which will not be picked up and should clear about $4 million
55 million for Cincy?  
Big Blue '56 : 1/17/2013 1:48 pm : link
Mike Brown hasn't changed all that much, has he?
Webster  
jv : 1/17/2013 1:52 pm : link
is on the last year of his deal... No way to restructure unless you extend him. Based on his play this year that's pretty unlikely...
B. Walsh - great point  
Optimus-NY : 1/17/2013 1:54 pm : link
I bet you Clayton didn't factor that into the numbers listed.

BB - Cincy is Cincy, lol. The members of their scouting department could probably fit into a Pinto. How far has the apply fallen from the tree in the case of Mike Brown? He must take his number one draft picks to the McDonald's closest to the Bengals' team facility to welcome them each year.
jv - spot on. Thanks. My mistake there.  
Optimus-NY : 1/17/2013 1:55 pm : link
Here's a great link to refer to for the players' contractual breakdowns and cap hits.


Corey Webster - Giants Cornerback - ( New Window )
Cinncy has picks and Money....  
Young Elijah : 1/17/2013 1:59 pm : link
With that young team they can really build a strong base for the future.

Indy is also interesting, they have the Wayne, Freeney, and Mathis trio tied up and a lot of money to play with. If they had a LB and another offensive weapon they will be hard to reckon with also.
So if Webster is cut, his cap hit is only 875,000, correct?  
BlueLou : 1/17/2013 2:02 pm : link
His base salary and misc. bonuses are not guaranteed, right?

The almost 10 mil "cap hit" in ONLY if he makes the team, right?
With Webster  
Brandon Walsh : 1/17/2013 2:06 pm : link
The Giants and Webster have the option of finding a fair spot between his current contract (which is overvalued) and his marketvalue.

If the Giants offer something fair, then Webster doesnt have to risk taking his chances on the open market and end up with a one year prove it contract, like Jacobs. Webster gets probably a little more then he would on the open market, most likely guaranteed $, stay at home with the only organization he knows. He knows he'll have a shot at starting and rebounding to make more money going forward. If he tests the market, he has no guarantee at all in what type of contract he will get in terms of guaratneed money or position on the roster. I dont know if that a smart risk to run, just ask Brandon Jacobs.

The Giants reduce his salary, and if they truly believe this year was an abberation, and he has something less, then they get a starting calibar cornerback, a position they will not be able to address in FA due to the high market value of free agent cornerbacks.

Its a win-win for all involved.
My cap casualties are  
sjnyfan : 1/17/2013 2:07 pm : link
Diehl, Boley, Webster and Canty. Their cap numbers combined with their play, recent injury history and years (or year) remaining on their contracts it just makes fiscal sense. Combined with T2's voided contract (and with the help of spotrac) that saves around $26 million if my capology is correct. That's enough money to not only keep Cruz, Bennett, Beatty and a few choice free agents we have but also a higher tier free agent in a position of need.
I wouldn't mind bringing those four back  
sjnyfan : 1/17/2013 2:08 pm : link
at a reduced and cap friendly price of course
Who needs Canty....  
Emlen'sGremlins : 1/17/2013 2:18 pm : link
....when we have Marvin Austin?

"Top 15 talent"!!
Lots to digest here  
GregN : 1/17/2013 2:19 pm : link
Looking forward to analyzing it more later. Thanks for taking the time to post.
There are 14 teams that need to spend money to reach the cap floor  
Optimus-NY : 1/17/2013 2:19 pm : link
There are ten teams that are over the cap (the Giants being one), although the T2 contract looks to be a big reason why.

As a result of the salary floor, playoff teams from this year w/lots of salary cap room, like the Bengals and Colts, can't help but to continue to improve.

Lou - Let me look at Corey's numbers
Just another reason to really admire the Pats  
nomad1986 : 1/17/2013 2:24 pm : link
They never have a down season have a franchise QB to pay and they still have a great Cap situation.
Here are Corey's numbers  
Optimus-NY : 1/17/2013 2:24 pm : link


His cap hit for 2013 (the last year of his deal) is going to be $9,975,000. Something has to give here.


Corey Webster - Giants Cornerback - ( New Window )
Help me with this fellas:  
Optimus-NY : 1/17/2013 2:29 pm : link
If I'm understand this correctly, the cap savings for cutting Corey Webster would be $7 million, wouldn't it since the bonuses (signing and miscellaneous already are guaranteed and already count)?

Cap Savings would be $4 Million  
Brandon Walsh : 1/17/2013 2:37 pm : link
7 million (Saved) minus the Apporx 3 Million (Bonus) in dead money= $4 million saved
BW  
JonC : 1/17/2013 2:44 pm : link
I asked the question regarding T2's option being included on the other sticky thread ... do you have a source confirming he is included in the OP's figure for NYG?
Pats  
eleven : 1/17/2013 2:45 pm : link
Are amazing at everything. Strong team every year and never in the red.
Webster  
SLIM : 1/17/2013 2:45 pm : link
Optimus's logic appears to be correct. He is in the last year of his deal. Cutting him would result in a net savings of his complete salary.

It is a different story for someone with multiple years left as the unamortized bonus would be accelerated into that year. (Ex. Player was given a signing bonus of $8m for a 4 year deal. Player is going into his 3rd year ($4m left) with a salary of $3m that year. Cutting him would result in a net increase (not savings) of $1m to the cap ($3m salary - $4m remaining bonus).

BW  
JonC : 1/17/2013 2:46 pm : link
Also, good analysis on Webster, I keep forgetting he's a last year contract.
Optimus  
Pat from Inside Football : 1/17/2013 2:53 pm : link
The cap savings on a player is calculated by adding up the remaining part of the prorated signing bonus and then subtracting that from the base salary and workout bonus (assuming of course the player is cut before the start of the workouts on April 15).

Meanwhile the balance of the prorated signing bonus counts against the cap as "dead money". Also for those wondering about the cap credit reflected, those are likely incentives from various player contracts that weren't earned, e.g. percentage of snaps played, number of sacks, etc.
.  
Danny Kanell : 1/17/2013 2:55 pm : link
LOLJETS
Also  
Pat from Inside Football : 1/17/2013 2:56 pm : link
I have to think that the numbers shown are projecting the tenders for Victor Cruz and Stevie Brown, both RFAs. I say that because by my count, the Giants don't have the "Top 51" set. I also don't think that number reflects the forthcoming voiding of Osi's final year and of T2's deal.

My gut feeling is that Beatty is going to get the franchise tag if they can't get him signed before then.

Of the UFAs, the one I'm semi concerned about departing is Lawrence Tynes. I had heard they tried to extend him this year, but he wanted to test the market. So we'll see how that one goes.
Thanks Optimus  
Giants-Bama in CO : 1/17/2013 3:09 pm : link
for the information
A big question to me re Webster  
I wanna be Torbor, sucka : 1/17/2013 3:13 pm : link
Can you get someone better than Webster with the money you save from cutting him? Corners are a premium position in today's passing NFL and are therefore expensive. I'd be much more inclined to draft a CB in the first 2 days and have him work under Webster for another year, and then let Webster walk and go with Prince, Hosley, and the second year CB.

Webster was hideous the last part of this year. But the free agent we could afford that would replace him would probably be worse, have never shown top-corner ability, and would need to learn the system.
Who would replace Webster ?  
PEEJ : 1/17/2013 3:30 pm : link
Who knows? But , you can't keep Webster at his current cap number.
Does this number include OSI and TT?  
Dry Lightning : 1/17/2013 3:31 pm : link
That could be about 10-12 million right there. Remember, Osi was signed to a two year deal. PLus, Diehl is a probable cut as well. I don't think our cap situation is dire.
Thanks Pat  
Brandon Walsh : 1/17/2013 3:51 pm : link
JonC- Thank you. Pat was my source regarding T2 and she is normally spot on regarding the cap.
You're the best Patti  
Optimus-NY : 1/17/2013 4:11 pm : link
Thank you for the info.

That's interesting about Beatty and Tynes
Can you see if I did this correctly Pat?  
Optimus-NY : 1/17/2013 4:13 pm : link
If the Giants cut Webster, would his cap savings be $6,375,000 as I worked it out below, or did I mess something up?





Optimus I think its more. I think the "miscellaneous bonus" cited  
BlueLou : 1/17/2013 4:40 pm : link
for CWeb was not part of the "signing bonus" and therefore IS NOT guarranted money and would be saved as well. It's usually a "roster bonus plus work out type bonuses" ie not signing bonus stuff.
I don't think Tynes will get 10 cents more on the open market  
BlueLou : 1/17/2013 4:41 pm : link
than from JR. Dude, hit a 45 yard field goal once in a while, eh?
Interesting note from that data  
EricB in NYC : 1/17/2013 4:44 pm : link
Only one team that is projected to be over the cap next year made the playoffs this year (Washington), and they were a one-and-out.
So long Webster  
JerseyCityJoe : 1/17/2013 4:44 pm : link
Thanks for the memories.
cincys talent on rookie contracts are already ridiculous  
Neverend : 1/17/2013 4:50 pm : link
forget aj green. they have two young studs in marvin jones and sanu at WR.

forget gresham. they have a very promising TE in orson charles too.

they have an awesome, physical OL. Very deep in the secondary. They even have vontaze burfict on a rookie deal whom, from the looks of things, seems like a major upgrade over maulaluga. They have another great press potential corner in dre kirkpatrick waiting in, damn

tremendous collection of talent and drafting with an incredibly bright future. daltons lack of arm may keep them from ever being a legit superbowl contender. they just need to get more speed at RB/LB

55 million in cap space, that they have to spend. my oh my
awesome work Optimus, thank you  
mfsd : 1/17/2013 4:54 pm : link
and my first reaction was also something along the lines of LOL Jets
Lou - I'm beginning to understand it better now  
Optimus-NY : 1/17/2013 4:55 pm : link
The bonuses are what throw me off. I'm sticking to Pat's formula that she cited above:

Quote:
(Sum of Base salary and workout bonus) - remaining part of pro-rated Signing bonus = TOTAL CAP SAVINGS


I think I did it right, but I'm not sure. All those bonuses can easily throw you one off.

Regarding Tynes - If he thinks he can do better, then good riddance.
Shouldn't you take the total cap hit  
fkap : 1/17/2013 4:58 pm : link
and then subtract the bonuses? In the case of webster, Total cap hit is salary + signing bonus + misc bonus (let's assume for argument's sake that he gets the misc regardless) or 7,000,000 + 875,000 + 2,100,000 = 9,975,000. If he gets booted, his cap hit should only be the bonuses, or 2,975,000, which means the total team cap amount is reduced by 7 mil. It's an easy calculation when you're in the last year of the contract and don't have to add up amortized bonuses. It makes no sense to subtract bonuses from the salary, because the salary is not the cap hit currently being counted. I'm betting Pat transposed two words - subtract from that vs subtract that from.
My head is spinning, lol  
Optimus-NY : 1/17/2013 5:07 pm : link
I'll wait for Pat to make sense of things, no disrespect intended to anyone else of course.

Lotta work involved for NFL Front Offices w/respect to managing the cap.
fkap is correct....  
Ryan : 1/17/2013 5:08 pm : link
The prorated bonus amount is included in the cap figure so the cap savings would be the: cap # - current year prorated bonus - any acceleration of unamortized bonus + any non-guaranteed payments/bonuses yet to be paid that are included in the current year cap #.

Since Webster is in the last year of his deal there's no acceleration from future years. If the workout bonus is due on a certain date, and neither that nor any part of his salary are guaranteed, then the savings would be $7.25M.
Correction....  
Ryan : 1/17/2013 5:09 pm : link
...The non-guaranteed bonuses/payments would not be added back in if they're already in the cap #.
Lou - I agree w/you about Tynes  
Optimus-NY : 1/17/2013 5:10 pm : link
Check out this list of FA kickers below:
Free Agent Kickers

If he wants to go let him. His missed kick in Washington was costly. looking at the list linked above, off the top of my head I'd take either Rob Bironas or Steven Hauschka. Hauschka is a young player from close by, in Massachusetts, so if he comes here, he'd be much closer to home then where he is now in Seattle.
I think that if part of the misc. bonuses  
DP : 1/17/2013 5:14 pm : link
in Webster's contract are roster bonuses, they won't count against the cap if he is released.
I was told...  
Klaatu : 1/17/2013 5:43 pm : link
There would be no math.
this makes sense  
Optimus-NY : 1/17/2013 5:54 pm : link
Quote:
Shouldn't you take the total cap hit
fkap : 4:58 pm
and then subtract the bonuses? In the case of webster, Total cap hit is salary + signing bonus + misc bonus (let's assume for argument's sake that he gets the misc regardless) or 7,000,000 + 875,000 + 2,100,000 = 9,975,000. If he gets booted, his cap hit should only be the bonuses, or 2,975,000, which means the total team cap amount is reduced by 7 mil. It's an easy calculation when you're in the last year of the contract and don't have to add up amortized bonuses. It makes no sense to subtract bonuses from the salary, because the salary is not the cap hit currently being counted. I'm betting Pat transposed two words - subtract from that vs subtract that from.


The bonuses are guaranteed. I just figured that they ($2.975 mill) would be the only part subtracted from the cap hit ($9.975 mill), making it an even 7 million bucks.
If a roster bonus is included in a player's contract  
DP : 1/17/2013 6:43 pm : link
and he is cut he doesn't get the bonus. If he is cut on day 1 of the roster year and his contract included workout bonuses, he doesn't get them and they and the roster bonuses are not part of the cap hit.
Webster's contract is ugly  
Ten Ton Hammer : 1/17/2013 7:10 pm : link
At the height of his powers he wasn't a 9 million dollar player. That really has to change.
Canty can go too. I'm a fan, but he's never healthy.  
Ten Ton Hammer : 1/17/2013 7:12 pm : link
the pats are always cap-positive because they don't get sentimental. They slash and burn.
Webster  
stretch234 : 1/17/2013 7:23 pm : link
His savings is salary less all bonuses. His high misc bonus came from restructuring previously.

If he is cut it is 4M saved.

Bigger issue is there are no CB to be had. Top guys cost a ton. Dallas set the bar last yr for 5yr 50M for Carr

I think they extend him a year and get his salary cap number in line.

Canty when he is healthy is a tremendous player. I think they keep him and find a vet min backup

Boley was great for 1/2 yr and fell off - he might be a casualty
Pages: 1 2 | Show All |  Next>>
Back to the Corner