...my personal preference is to bulk up the LOS with premium draft picks, but maybe the Giants select this MLB out of Georgia.
With Alec Ogletree, the Giants D takes a step in TWO right directions:
(1) Plugging a hole in our run defense;
(2) Plugging maybe even a bigger hole in the middle-of-the field pass defense.
Also, if nothing else, maybe our defensive unit will get a much needed injection of bad attitude from a young player who is not afraid to get nasty and physical.
It is well recognized that Jerry Reese has not spent super premium draft picks at the LB position, but history here may only be a "guide"... not an absolute, cut-and-dried blueprint.
Maybe we see this Bulldog in Blue next season?
If he is available in the 2nd yes - but not with the 19th pick
Pass.
Big Rick in FL : 9:59 am
Failed a drug test at the combine. Will Hill failed many. Bradshaw was arrested for a few things in college. Serving jail time in the NFL. Diehl & Kareem McKenzie were both arrested for a DUI. I want a guy who had 111 tackles, 11.5 TFL, 3 sacks, 5 pass breakups and an INT in 10 games.
Any of those guys with college troubles 1st round picks? Hell, Bradshaw went in the 7th and Hill went undrafted.
The Giants are sticking with Fewell, then get him a LB that has proven himself in a Tampa Cover 2 Defense. Arthur Brown in the second and a true road grading OL in the 1st, perhaps a DT in the 3rd (Bennie Logan), I'd be more happy with that.
None of the ILB are worth the 19th pick
And these were SEC RBs.
That said, I am personally in favor of going offensive or defensive line in Round 1, especially if someone like Datone Jones, Sheldon Richardson, Bjoern Werner or Jonathan Cooper are there at 19.
The fact that Brown weighed in at 241 at the Combine appears to open up the possibility for him to stay in the middle, as long as he hasn't compromised his athleticism and sideline-to-sideline range. And if that's the case, he'd be the No. 1 ILB option for us, IMO.
To give an oversimplified explanation as to why I'd prefer Brown to Ogletree, he'd provide similar three-down capability with superior instincts and comparable, if not better athleticism -- depending on how he's adapted to the weight gain -- but without the explosive tackling that Ogletree is capable of providing. Not to mention that he doesn't come with the significant character baggage of Ogletree.
At least Chase Blackburn has a pirate name.
We don't just need a sideline to sideline LB. We need an instinctive, smart LB that knows how to line up his teammates, read the QB/ball carrier, fill the gap AND shed blockers. If teams want to get suckered into speed demons who can't block or the inevitable media circus that will be Te'o, that's fine but I don't want it to be Big Blue. Reese always preaches need and value. With that philosophy I'd much rather have someone like Kevin Reddick from UNC or Vince Williams from FSU in the middle rounds instead.
Sorry to miller this thread...
2013 BBI Mock Draft Sign-up Thread - ( New Window )
Ogletree in 10 games had 11 tackles with 11.5 tackles for loss and 3 sacks, 5 QB hurries.
Compare to Arthur Brown who had 100 tackles in 13 games with 7 tackles for loss and 1 sack, 1 QB hurry.
Ogletree, of course, played with better talent up but saying he makes all of his plays down-field is erroneous.
I will also readily admit that he doesn't shed blocks all that well, but personally I think he does play physically.
My take is that in the way the NFL is evolving beating OL one on one is Much less important than it used to be.
You need a guy who can rush the passer (which he can), not be a huge liability in coverage (and he's very good in that area), and a guy who can run sideliene to sideline well(which he can also do). Very few players in the NFL get by anymore with stacking, shedding, the blocker and making plays on a consistent basis, and most of them that do that are liabilities in other areas.
Most of the big plays in the run game are made by guys who are unblocked or terrific athletes who can up space in a short time. And big plays is what wins football now.
Just my two cents.
It's even likely that we 'miss' an opportunity to draft a player who seemed to fall to us, for a player more adept at that scheme.
Ogletree? If they ARE interested, JR will have a LONG talk with MReich(sp) about him. Is McClain still available:-)?
One I'd like to reiterate (in my own words):
The idea of LBs taking head on NFL linemen and stoning them in their tracks in order to make a tackle just doesn't happen all that much.
Even one of the greatest NFL LBs of all time -- Ray Lewis -- couldn't really do that very well.
I suspect a lot of fans have in their minds a mental image of Dick Butkus cold-cocking a OG and then close lining a running back around the neck.
But there's one thing entirely out of place with that image: Dick Butkus was nearly as big as the OL he took on.
But that's just not reality today.
Ogletree played behind two 350-pound nose tackles who clogged up the middle and rotated in and out of games to keep each other fresh. One of those nose tackles, John Jenkins, is widely viewed as a 2nd rounder.
Jarvis Jones was the player every opposing offense was most concerned about in each and every game Georgia played. He was a legitimate Heisman candidate who was the most feared pass rusher in all of college football not named Jadeveon Clowney.
Cornelius Washington, a third round prospect, was one of the starting DEs in their 3-4 alignment.
On the other hand, Brown was the unquestioned leader of a K-State defense that ranked 24th in the country in points allowed despite playing in a conference known for its high-powered offenses.
It also goes without saying that prospects shouldn't be compared by collegiate stat lines. Discussing how a prospect's skill set translates to the next level is far more productive. If we were going by stat lines, Damontre Moore would still be viewed as a possible Top 5 pick in the eyes of most draftniks who initially had him ranked that high.
As for the traits you specifically praised Ogletree for -- pass coverage and having sideline-to-sideline range -- Brown has those in spades. And he's a more instinctive player who doesn't come with the character baggage. Not to mention the fact that he's being discussed as a 2nd round option, while Ogletree is a player some are hoping for at 19.
Watch the tape of Nebraska and tell where he made 1 play where you said this guy can play in the NFL vs being the 19th pick overall.
Just because he can run does not mean he is a good cover LB.
In later rounds maybe, but not with the 19th pick
i question ogletrees football instincts. they arent elite. its not a bad thing overall, but for an ILB, its a terrible thing for a first round prospect.
From Doug Farrar of Yahoo!:
Stays with the quarterback when in coverage, and his diagnostic skills would make him a natural for defenses in desperate need to counter read-option quarterbacks. Has the lateral movement skills to be placed as the only player at his depth and close to either side.
It should be slot receivers, not shot receivers.
For the record I have both Brown and Ogletree as 1st round picks, but I think people are being unfair to Ogletree and his reputation
I have watched the tape...He makes a Lot of impact plays all over because he is supremely athletic in terms of his ability to change directions, play sideline to sideline and close spaces fast.
Brown is more instinctive but has limlitations too. If we want to cherry pick games we should discuss Brown's very poor performance against Oregon (good thing Chip Kelly won't be in the Giants division moving forward...!).
I think both are very good players, but I thin Ogletree has more upside, more versatility, and is a better prospect (though like I said I personally think both are 1st round prospects)
Link - ( New Window )