I don't want to sound like an a**hole but I want to discuss Mark Hezlich from strictly a football perspective. I'm trying to understand why people are adamant about the fact that he can be a starting caliber MLB in the NFL? His comeback story is nothing short of incredible and I understand he was a very good college player prior to his health issues but since he's returned to the field, I simply don't see it.
His senior yr at Boston College, Herzlich was an okay player that ultimately went undrafted. In games he's played for the Giants, he seems to consistently get pushed around and simply doesn't seem up to the task.
Now I do understand that due to the severity of his health issues it may take him more time than usual to return to top form but is there anything that you guys have seen since 2010 that make you think he could be a legit starter for us? I, like most of us, wish him the best and really would love to see him become that player but I just feel like people love the story more than the actual player. Am I wrong here?
His play in the NFL has been erratic. In some stretches he shows a terrific nose for the football, solid play recognition and anticipation, uses his hands well to defeat blockers, explodes to the flats to track ballcarriers, and will explode through them when tackling, and looks natural playing in pursuit from the backside. He plays with confidence and looks like he did his film homework.
More often, he looks lost, is slow off snap and slow to read, disengage from blockers, gets lost in the pursuit wash, etc. Surely, some of it is a lack of confidence (didn't prepare well enough, the offensive front is kicking his/our arses, etc) and a lack of foot speed.
My expectations have lowered on expecting more than a solid player, given his suspect combine testing, lack of being drafted, and unable to unseat some ordinary veteran LBs ahead of him in the NFL.
I also recognize that there aren't going to be stars at every position. The Giants place a premium on DL & secondary. the LB's merely have to do their job. I don't expect him to be outstanding or a star, but I absolutely think he can be serviceable. it's his position to lose right now, it seems, and it is time for him to prove all of the doubters wrong if he can.
Anyone ever notice how crappy our defense played in 2011 when we had someone who was not familiar calling the defense as the Middle LB. We brought back Chase because he knew the defense in and out and put them in the correct position to defend the offense.
2)His Rookie season, he was a year removed from cancer, so he was not in the correct shape to be the badass linebacker that warranted a first round draft choice. After 2 years of a pro lifting system, I think he should have the muscle back that he needs to be at least a descent MLB in the NFL. (It certainly seems like he has been working his ass off to get in the best shape he can be in)
I find it odd that somebody actually creates a post asking this question. You know how many border-line starters there are in the NFL on teams with mediocre to poor units?
Sure, he has shown some flashes but overall he has been inconsistant and mediocre at best. But the fact he is only in his third year, has been without injury/illness for sometime and the fact that the staff and other players believe in him makes me believe he can be the starter.
That original statement was not meant to be condescending, I said it only because t's just the fact that they know better than us because they see him day in and day out, while we have seen limited, sporadic snaps in the NFL. If it were someone who has started consistantly in the past, like Chase, it would be a different statement. But the only way you can think herzy can be the starter is by trusting in the staff, at this point.
There are only 2 reasons I can think of that Herz may start:
1. Connor is new to the system and needs the reps - yet, based on reports, Herz is getting most of the snaps.
2. Based on the timing of his cancer, surgery and rehab he would reasonably seem to be at his peak about now. I'm assuming he will never be 100% of wht he would have been, but is as good physically as he will be.
That said - I'll still be very surprised if its not Connor at MIKE.
Though, IMO, Herz has as good a chance as anyone to play WILL (Big LB in our system)
And, the staff may also think that Herz at MIKE and Connor at WILL (with Jacquain) is our best alignment
As a point of reference, do you know how many receptions Amani Toomer had after 2 seasons? Seventeen...and ended up as the Giants all-time leading receiver.
Everyone is so quick to rush to judgment...playing LB in the NFL isn't the easiest thing in the world and there's a learning curve.
It wasn't long ago that this kid was voted the best defensive player in the ACC. The NFL is the most sentimental place in the world and if the Giants coaches didn't think he could play he wouldn't be on the roster much less be penciled in as starter.
Lets watch this thing play out. It takes some guys a longer time to develop than others.
Racer... Had a feeling Goff was on the cusp of becoming that thumper in the middle who showed legit signs of improvement but injuries obviously didn't allow that. Was pretty dissapointed when he went down.
If Chd Jones signed with the Giants and played like dogshit, you'd probably have people waiting for him to get better as he healed, and with good reason.
I'm all about having the best players possible on the field at all times, if Herz happens to be that this year then sounds good to me, just a bit skeptical that is going to be the case. We shall see.
In the case of Herzlich, if the lack of strength and speed can be attributed to his comeback from Ewing's Sarcoma then I agree it's too early to make any judgments. But I have no idea if it takes more than 4 years to be fully healthy from that. I think this training camp and preseason will tell us a lot about whether he will continue to improve or if he's peaked and the talent simply isn't there. I'm hoping for the former.
I thought Goff really made it clear that he was getting it when once a game (it seemed to me) he anticipated the flow of a running play and shot through his gap to make a tackle for a loss.
Obviously I want to be wrong.
Great story but still need work to become and average NFL LB as he still struggle to be just perfunctory.
What we've seen might be his ceiling or it might not even scratch the surface of what he's capable of. That's why debating it seems like an exercise in futility to me.
If we always just appealed to authority and didn't discuss or question anything because we always assumed that the coaches would make the right decisions, there would be no point in having this board because it would eliminate like 85% of the discussion.
Herzlich may flop out as you think. Or the team might be seeing how his 3rd year pans out for him because he's quite knowledgeable now regarding the system. And as time has passed he's become stronger physically following his dealing with cancer.
However, what you see on TV watching the games once, versus what the teams sees in the games (many times over in actual game film) plus what they see in practice and everywhere else, multiplied by their vast knowledge in things football making yours pale in comparison tends to make we sway in their direction.
This was a good conversation about our potential starting MLB until you started chirping about nonsense as usual. If you want to contribute to a good conversation, then feel free to do so. If you want to continue to chirp then do it on a NFT. Thanks.
If you asked me why I believe Webster or Tuck could rebound this year or why Kiwi will succeed at DE, saying trust in the staff is a cop-out. But in this case, I don't think we have anything to go on rather than trust in the staff and what they are saying, unless you are going to answer "he's not" and that is not what i think at this time.