could be this team's undoing. Neither this coach or player should've been brought back based on there recent performances which were both well below average.
If we donot have a RT ready to start on this team and are to rely on Deihl,it will limit every aspect of this offense from maximizing it's potential.
Fewell's defenses have been plagued with miscommunication throughout his time here.
I truly hope Pugh and/or Brwer is the answer at RT otherwise we will fall short yet again.
It first assumes that the people requested to be fired/cut are incompetant, which with some of the ass-backward football acumen exhibited daily on this site, makes it a longshot that a proper evaluation has happened.
Secondly, it assumes that TC has loyalty to people instead of feeling they are a decent fit for the job. It also assumes that TC is loyal in the face of information that would undermine the team.
Thirdly, it assumes that some random poster (and actually one named Geeman who is usually a moron of pretty decent proportions), has some knowledge that places his awareness above that of lifelong football people.
Fourthly, it assumes that a DC who has a Super Bowl win, either lucked into that win or somehow lost a lot of skill in the interim
Fifthly, it assumes that Diehl and Fewell being incompetant is an established fact and failure to act on this information is the issue.
I'll go with an easier assumption. Geeman has as much football sense as the shit I just took, and keep in mind, I had corn yesterday...
Their first TD was a total fluke, should have been a TO. Second TD was a combo of a great throw, great catch, and Hosley just being all turned around.
I saw blitzes actually hitting home and getting to the QB, run defense was much better yesteday. Only beef was distance that the corners were playing off, but that's an easy fix.
Defense was not the problem.
The plays their starters made on us, we had a guy in position pretty much each time.. the Wayne TD never should have happened.. that should have been an INT but Ross couldn't hold on. Hosley was also in position twice but just wasn't able to make a play. All Fewell can do is put the players in those positions.. the rest is up to them.
But as is usually the case.. facts will never get in the way of a good Fewell bashing.
Though you aren't adhering to the spirit of letting the idiots run free.
Stupid.
Read more: http://www.nydailynews.com/sports/football/giants/vacchiano-fewell-starting-feel-pressure-article-1.1430516#ixzz2cRh3398L
This defensive coach has got to go.
Oh.. so defenses are ranked SOLELY on yards allowed now? Not points allowed? Not turnovers forced? Not sacks? Just yards.. and nothing more? Cool story.
Your waiting for another 9-7 season to go by the boards before you formulate an opinion???
I guess it's a whole lot easier to stick your head in the sand...smfh
Who said Coughlin was incompetent or stupid?
News flash brainpower....everyone makes errors....and with him sticking with these 2 IMO is an error. Let's not pretend he hasn't made mistakes no matter how good his overall track record has been.
Patience people. Patience.
Maybe this is a "back in my day" rant, but back in my day, I was taught to take significant information and evaluate it before making any comments that might demean people in authority.
It was easy to do that with you - you are consistently a poor poster with some horrendous logic (which is probably attributed to the rush to throw your opinion out there) as if the world desperately needs it.
It is a lot more difficult to do that when evaluating my favorite team and advocating that people be fired or released. I'd think that to make that claim, I should at least have some sort of greater knowledge than just sitting on my couch and yelling like a fucking pansy.
I don't claim to have some magical mind. What I do claim is to be able to pretty reliably tell when others have shit-for-brains. Nobody likes being told they have shit-for-brains. And yet, it just emboldens them to be stronger in their idiocy. You sound emboldened to me...
arcarsenal : 3:44 pm
Quote:
The Giants’ defense ranked 31st in the 32-team NFL last season.
Oh.. so defenses are ranked SOLELY on yards allowed now? Not points allowed? Not turnovers forced? Not sacks? Just yards.. and nothing more? Cool story.
is retarded. I'm not saying I agree with the notion in the original post but that quote is full of stupid. No, it's obviously not the only barometer but it sure as shit is a big one. And 31st in yards allowed is a blatant indication that things need to be fixed.
Or is he just getting soft in his older years?
Could also be that he hasn't made any decisions regarding Diehl yet, and that he's seen enough of the defense to know that maybe it's more on the roster than on the scheme at this point (hence the defensive flushing that came about after last season)?
Obviously nothing can be done about Fewell right now. He's the Giants Dc for better or worse for the 2013 season.
I wanted him gone at the end of last season, stats aside, did anyone just by watching the 2012 Giants defense have confidence that it was a playoff caliber defense?
forget the points, TO and yardgae ranking...the defense had real issues and major inconsistencies to go along with constant miscommunication which is all on the DC. That's just how it is. There was definitely talent to be better but that keeps bringing us back to INCONSISTENCY and MISCOMMUNICATION. That is the responsibility of the DC.
I sincerely hope it gets turned around this season, but I'm not overly optomistic about that.
I'm not a fan of Fewell's defensive schemes - I think he's too conservative, too predictable, too inflexible/slow to adapt, tries to be too cute at times instead of leveraging the strengths of his players and is responsible for the confusion in alignment and miscommuniations that led to easy allowed touchdowns last year.
Our offense scored 17 or less in 6 losses last year. Yet there are 500 threads complaining about our defense for every one there is on the other side of the ball
Since Fewell came here (2010) we are 3rd in takeaways, 2nd in sacks, and in the top half in points allowed (though just barely at 16th, not helped by some of our own offenses turnover issues either). We've been an average defense with a penchant for making big splash plays. You can win a lot of games with that type of defense, especially when our offense is playing to its potential.
Fuck David Diehl though
He has an obligation to his employers to preserve and increase the value of the family's most valuable asset.
If you think he doesn't take those obligations seriously, you haven't been paying attention to Coughlin the man, at all.
If you think he would compromise those responsibilities out of stubbornness, I think you way, way off base.
More likely, he realizes that Diehl worked hard in the offseason, and that rewarding Diehl's combination of experience, leadership and dedication has value to the team and the organization.
Giving Diehl first crack at a starting spot early on in preseason (and it is early on, despite the rending of garments by the washer women that apparently populate BBI) was the right thing to do.
Personally, I think Diehl looks horrible, and I hope changes are made. But I would have unquestionably penciled in Diehl as the starter because it was the right thing to do, which is where we are right now.
Same analogy holds with any profession that you aren't an expert in like, say, doctors.
Learn football. Players need to execute. They get paid millions. You cannot blame Fewel for missed tackles, arm tackles and lack of hustle.
Learn football
It's not some Pop Warner league. It's the NFL...
you sound like you struggle to formulate an opinion on your own. You don't have enough info on Deihl and Fewell over the last few years to formulate an opinion?....smh
Don't come at me because your comfortable with putting your head in the sand.
Your trying to judge me but you need to worry about learning how to think for yourself.
I'm waiting for the thread where someone bitches about how many fantasy points Diehl gave up...
2013 is the first year in awhile where there's more cap space spent on offense than defense (only one team in 2011 and 2012 in the NFL had a higher percentage of their cap spent on defense than the Giants did) and the Giants over the last five years have spent more picks on defense than offense -- both in quantity and rounds 1-3.
No need to rationalize the offenses inconsistency away. They were a joke at times last year
Or should I just say fuck everyone because I'm pissed off we lost a preseason game or missed the playoffs?
Maybe I'm waiting for some evidence of loyalty instead of just assuming it.
Hell, the answer is actually more simple than that. I'm just waiting for some moron to start a thread that has little substance and reads like a bitchfest from a whiny cunt and give the thread the comeuppance it deserves.
This isn't about my knowledge, it is about your blatant lack of it.
But hey, you had an opinion and got to write it. How's that working out for you?
This could've been a dynasty era IMO. 9-7 is not a bad season, however underachivement for a team with higher expectations then most isn't good by our standards. That's why I love Reese, he absolutley keeps it real and doesn't hold back. He knows this team can do better every season and he runs it that way.
We are obviously not a perfect football team, but way too many arguments on BBI are either made in a vacuum, done with horrendous logic, or simply are shit ideas that aren't even valid.
It actually makes the valid arguments hard to find.
And yes, I do give some rope to TC since he's gotten us 2 SB's. I think that is worth a little rope. Reese and TC aren't above criticism, but they should be above the petty comments directed at them, the players and the staff and instead, we should have a better discussion on the points worth making. Blame fuckwads like Geeman for making that exercise a lot more difficult to locate and undertake.
Perhaps we would like intelligent discussions on the subject? Don't find too many of those around here, especially after games. And this is a pre-season game.
There are legitimate criticisms about this team. I even mentioned one in my post, about loyalty not always leading to the correct outcomes.
I'm just assuming you glossed over that part? Or the posts in the past where I've criticized some of the teams decisions regarding the kicking game?
Imagine if these guys laughed at Pam Oliver getting smacked in her chops by a football! Immediate ban.
Fewell is a bright coach but I can't help but believe his scheme is too complicated and takes away from a defender's aggression.
multiple turnovers in the road Dallas game, San Francisco, Carolina and final game of the season....but then there were also droughts where there were no turnovers, no third down stops, and could not get the offense off the field. i don't know enough to say whether it's inconsistent effort in practices/film studies of the tendencies of offenses, bad matchups, but it's a bit baffling that the gmen can go into san francisco and just a maul a very good offense one week and then make brandon weeden look like joe montana the next.
He has been a great Giant and has won 2 Superbowls with us. I'll always be appreciative of the time hes put in here and the successes hes had. Again I just hope he can regain his old form.
Listen last year, offense sucked at times, defense sucked at times, specials sucked at times, eli sucked at itmes, Coughlin sucked at times,.... so basically it was a team effort why we didnt make the playoffs.
I see no reason why posters should want to be ranked better than 31st in yards allowed. More 3 and outs, more chances for Eli. I think we can all agree that will gives us more wins, and a chance to make noise in the playoffs.
I'm just providing the evidence. You can take it or leave it.
And what points will he articulate better? Look at the first post on the thread. Inflammatory remarks aside, it addresses a lot that someone should probably take into consideration. And he blindly ignores the advice.
Why continue to try when someone digs their heels in with their position?
Think of it in terms of Eli and that year he had all those interceptions. Who was more right about the level of his play that year, the individuals who focused on the number 25 or those who dug deeper into the numbers and causes?
kickerpa16 : 4:26 pm
...
simply adds nothing to this board and makes you seem like a jackass. If you don't care, then so be it and I'll just continue to pray for an ignore button in the future.
Any one who has ever coached at any level is not likely to do that, but to suggest that someone at the level of Tom Coughlin with his resume would do so, is ridiculous
Josh in the City : 4:41 pm
now we're coming after me? My threads are fantastic and provide either information about the giants or provide my own formulated opinion based on facts.
And there isnt even a close 2nd.
In the NFL, loyalty, though with its faults, builds a cohesive and unified locker room. Players knowing that they won't be at the whims of fans can build potential discounts during later contracts, which is very important for continuity and in the salary cap era.
Likewise, fucking around with a staff constantly can lead to negative results. Constant tinkering can lead to problems. I have my own issues with PF, but who do we expect can come in to lead this group to a significantly better outcome? Certainly no one in these next few weeks.
You also have to take into account that bringing someone in who would be undoubtedly better would lead to growing pains, which could ruin a 16 game season. Remember Spags? We were getting lit up constantly.
Remember our most recent SB? How well did some pretty prolific offenses do against us?
Arguing, for the sake of argument, that getting rid of PF would be the better thing, I doubt that we would have seen a significantly better outcome last night. And most of this discontent is generated from a poor performance. A performance that's probably not predicated on all of our calls and formations being installed or used.
There are issues, but proclaiming that loyalty is a weakness ignores the importance of loyalty in a professional locker room.
Yup Fewell and DD should have lifetime exemptions from any critique or questions about their ability to keep their jobs.
But, notice, I don't pollute your threads because I've learned that, in some cases, it would require too much sarcasm...
As far as Diehl, this is a tough one for me. Diehl is one of my favorite Giants because he never bitches, has always worked his ass off and was a solid player for us. It's clear, however, that he's nothing more than a turnstyle out there and he can't compete with the speedy, athletic pass rushers of today's NFL. I really don't know what the Giants can do to address it though. Pugh isn't ready most likely, and it doesn't seem that the coaching staff has much confidence in Brewer either. It's an unfortunate situation.
Just stop responding to me. I wouldn't care if you did.
As to Diehl, if he proved himself willing to try over the off-season, I see no problem to place him at starter. And he certainly did that.
Pugh's concussion certainly may have helped him, as well as Brewer's lack of progress.
Yea, sounds just as fucking retarded coming from me as it does from you.
Dallas is desperate for O-Line help, and can't get it. So are plenty of other teams. We picked up someone from the scrap heap last year who ended up helping us before blowing out his knee, and he eventually got in over Diehl (though, due to injuries...).
I'm not quite so sure there's anyone better out there, and Pugh may not be ready.
And throwing someone into the fire can have adverse consequences as well.
Fucking romper room ham n egg nonsense on BBI today.
QBs being cut after a ball gets thrown to the sideline during warmups.
Ross getting cut after a fluke TD.
Diehl and Fewell employed solely out of loyalty from TC.
Fucking bizarro world today.
Again, you read into shit that's not there. Bravo, but that's not my cup of tea. It's not about being wrong, it's about invention.
It seems like I aggravate you, so just don't respond to me. I'm not going to weep over that outcome. Please?
I think geeman considers his view the correct one even though he has no "REAL" information. AS he grows more adamant, I start to understand the saying"
"Like assholes, everyone has an opinion. Some just stink more than others."
I recognize Geeeman has a right to his opinion even though he disguises it as fact. But I also realize that his opinion is like an asshole really stinks.
High on assumption, low on fact and review of TC's history of loyalty vs replacement shows that while Geeman really has every right to defend his opinion history contradicts his statement Reese's and TC's actions show otherwise but c'mon man use some deoderent!!
B in ALB : 4:51 pm
and David in LA the same person? Serious question.
is calling me out. Alluding to the fact that I'm posing as another poster b/c I have the same opinion as him isn't me being paranoid. It's me getting annoyed at your foolish opinion that you felt warranted being posted.
Cutting vets, even if we think they are done, can have adverse outcomes on rookie learning. Cutting Diehl so that we don't have an experienced RT does what, at this point? Do we expect Brewer to impart his wisdom on Pugh?
Or, more to the point, does having a vet on the team, even if he's starting, deliver some pointed instructions to the younger players benefit us in the long-run?
But vets can provide some useful service, even if they are getting long in the tooth (or have already arrived there).
You always hear about the benefits of Sam Madison and Deon Grant. Yet we want to cut Diehl, when he can help mentor Pugh.
a) is David Diehl a good player?
and
b) is Perry Fewell a good Defensive Coordinator?
Yes or no.
2007 25 total def turnovers, 53 sacks, 21.9 ppt/gm
2008 22 total def turnovers, 42 sacks, 21.9 ppt/gm
2009 24 total def turnovers, 32 sacks, 18.4 ppt/gm
2010 39 total def turnovers, 46 sacks, 21.7 ppt/gm
2011 31 total def turnovers, 48 sacks, 25 ppt/gm
2012 35 total def turnovers, 33 sacks, 21.5 ppt/gm
Pleased with the turnovers in the last few years. Points pretty much the same.
I am most frustrated about lack of ability to get of field on 3rd down, defense not being able to get off field (which hurts our offense's chance of scoring points) and last year we led the league and giving up the most big plays. However, in 2011, we gave up the least big plays.
And....I'm done with this thread too.
Fewell needs to stay on this course.
He also needs to realize that on 3rd and short and you are bringing it with your front 7 you can't have your CBs in "off" coverage.
Sometimes you gotta trust your guys and risk a big play in order to be a shut down Defense.
B in Alb, how in the world am I lumped in with Josh? What opinions have we both shared on this topic? I'm usually really patient with our players and curb my expectations and lets things play out. My stance on Diehl is a byproduct of 3 years of him being a liability in pass protection. Advanced stats seem to match what my eyes have been telling me. I've said my deal on Fewell as well, his system has large tradeoffs. Turnovers for yards being the biggest . I think the personnel wasn't as good as advertised last season, and we couldn't execute the things we wanted to do on the field because of that.
I said "seems like". That's not a declarative statement.
Why do you think I'd care that you're laughing at me? That's a rather peculiar stance to take, unless you think that people are more than nameless handles on here...
Just stop it.
David - you're a good poster here and my question wasn't meant to offend either of you. So my apologies to you. The other guy can kick rocks.
Yes he's a friend and I value who he is..Thus, I find much of what he writes to be hysterical and quite cogent.. You may disagree. You may not even like what he posts or what you perceive he stands for.
But this is what I know: The man works and has much contact with trainers all over the country. He has dealings with Professional trainers and team staffs. He hears things. He knows things. He is far more aware of what goes on within a training and team facility than most if not all of us..
As I said, feel free to disagree with his opinions. But don't be foolish enough to believe you are more aware of the inner machinations of what goes on with injuries, preparations and the like. With that, you'd be clearly out of your league, imv..
Remarkable. No way could the games against Oakland, tampa bay, and Kansas city skew the stats that much.
but the defense did play some good games against Arizona and san diego. but wow
Can't imagine how those words would sting if they actually meant something...
Man. I'd love to feel macho and talk about someone being a pussy behind a computer screen. Talk about the testosterone build-up! But, alas, my estrogen levels prevent it.
For someone who claims that everyone is just a name on the screen, you sure do have your finger on my pulse.
I think ranking defenses on yards allowed alone is much stupider. But to each their own.
When a guy like Ralph or posters here continually call the Giants the "31st ranked defense" without providing context, they're claiming that there were 30 defenses in the NFL that were bar-none better than the Giants were. If you believe that.. well, you don't watch much else of this league because that simply isn't true.
Everyone raves about how great the 49ers defense is.. yet in their 3 playoff games last year, they gave up 30ppg.
People don't understand that shut down defense doesn't exist in todays NFL the way it had in years past.
The Giants gave up an identical amount of points per game as the Super Bowl Champion Ravens did in 2012. Yet everyone thinks the Giants defense was one of the worst in the NFL and thinks the Ravens were one of the best.
-The Doctor
And I'm sorry, but saying you seem aggravated is now a jab?
Alright. Guess I've got to read up on how little it takes to insults people now. I get it, you think I'm a pussy, or something, based on extensive research. Trust me, I'll not lose any sleep over that belief.
But keep on bringing the gold. I'll now know what to use as ammo. Such wit shouldn't be wasted.
Once was on a shitty diamond deal, or so you said. I could care less, but it's funny.
1) They drafted an OT in the first round.
2) He got a concussion.
3) This is preseason.
4) As much as Diehl has slipped, he is probably a better backup for multiple positions than most other OL they have available.
Do any of you see a potential link between those four points that does not require excess loyalty from Coughlin toward Diehl?
And as far as the defense is concerned:
1) The LB's were awful last year.
2) The DT's were awful last year.
3) Webster was awful last year.
4) Tuck was awful last year, and their second best DE in recent history played hurt for just about the entire season.
Is that all on Fewell? Really?
a) He has in his big pinkie.
b) He has in the rest of his body.
c) Dave Diehl
d) Perry Fewell
e) Geeman has in his brain.
I'm done. Continue questioning what you want about me. I'll let someone else indulge you with a 51st and Park type invitation.
But bravo on the attempts to rile me up. 15 years ago they would have stung tremendously.
The sky is the limit David. But, seeing how saying someone seems "aggravated" is a jab, perhaps I'm putting too much faith in you.
Under the kinder, gentler BBI, I have to expose myself to getting beat over the rope.
Curl up in the fetal position during a merciless onslaught, and hope for the protection of the mods.
Did that sound deep? I'm working on being deep and a man of mystery.
It's not going too well.
That's JerseyJoe's territory!
I feel like the giants addressed the line situation this year and i expect big things from guys like marvin austin and cullen jenkins to force pressure up the middle. This is something we have seen consistently throughout the preseason that is encouraging. If the linebackers can be decent and if players stay healthy for the most part, this defense could be flat out scary.
As far as David Diehl goes, i don't have much to say about him besides his time as a starter is done. He needs to take the role of a veteran and help guys like Diehl, Pugh, brewer, and mosley develop.
Trying to drag them off the field and turn them into player-coaches (as reserve players) won't happen willingly. We see the players trying to come back into the game after serious injuries.
The defense has to drastically improve over last year. I don't care what the turnover stats are, if you're 31st in yards allowed and the only team below you allowed the most yardage ever (and YES, we know it was Spags' defense), then you need to DRASTICALLY improve. There is no doubt about that. Players, coaches, the offense as it relates to time of possession-a lot of stuff needs to get better so that the defense can get better.
I am a Giant fan. We are all Giant fans. Nobody on here (well maybe some... It can be scary) wants the team to lose. I personally think Fewell is shitty overall, but he is certainly capable of commanding a top 20 defense that can get turnovers, and that might be all we need. I PRAY that I am wrong about him and that he can lead a dominant unit like he did during the playoff run, and that we have the players capable of pulling that off as well.
Just because you question the effectiveness of a coordinator doesn't mean you're a moron. I just hate when that opinion gets developed thanks to threads like this one. Automatically anyone who questions what they've seen for 4 years (and admit it-turnovers and all, it was a pretty fuckin awful defense last year for huge stretches) is a "Fire Fewell" mouth breather. That isn't true. Coaches can suck. It happens. I hope ours doesn't, I've seen evidence that he is fantastic and evidence that he is horrendous. I hope we put it together this year in every way on that side of the ball.
The D was historically bad (from a Giants' standpoint) in 2011. As in worse than the 2009 Sheridan D. As in worse than the Rod Rust 1992 D.
It was even worse in 2012.
The D had that magical 6 game awakening at the end of 2011 that NOBODY has been able to explain - or replicate.
I'd like to not be screwed when we're not getting turnovers.
Not giving up points is great - but when you're doing it by playing "bend but don't break" and not getting the opposing O off the field, you're shortening the game, which I don't think you should be doing in most cases when you have an O like ours.
So all that said, I'd love it if someone could explain to me how 2013 is going to be different. Hell, I'd settle for a top 20 D. You can't tell me that we don't have better D personnel than at least 12 other teams.
Isn't the goal to keep teams out of the endzone?
Also.. how do we know that it was always the defense that couldn't get off the field instead of the offense not being able to sustain drives and stay ON it? Watch the 4th quarter of the Steeler game last year and you'll see exactly how the offense can be at fault for the lopsided TOP by doing nothing but moving backwards, failing to get one 1st down and punting 3 times.
Seriously ?
Also, the defense was not great in any of the last couple of years, but judging it by yards allowed is an outdated way of looking at things.
This is an offensive league where the owners have made no secret of wanting to drive up scoring, make it hard to play defense, and make it easier to play Quarterback.
Everybody gives up lots of yards, and we play in a conference that has a large number of really good quarterbacks.
But it is impossible for a mere fan to defend a post that states that the reason any particular player or coach is still on the team is strictly because of a head coach's loyalty. That being absolutey true, this was indeed a silly post as some have already suggested.
Sorry Geeman, but you can't possibly know what is in TC's head regarding this issue. You should have also very easily realized that there are too many other possible reasons why Diehl and Fewell are still here. That would have at least prevented you from making such a strong statement that you know it is because of TC's loyalty.
The Giants have to decide if PF is close to getting this team on track and if he has that ability. And if that tact is better than bringing in someone else and perhaps starting from scratch.