I know Jerry is the GM who has helped us get to two Super Bowls over the last six years. However, the 2007 SB belongs to Ernie Accorsi as much if not more than Jerry Reese.
Tha said, during last night's game, all I could think of is why Jerry has left us so thin at many critical positions:
OL, LB and RB to be exact.
We have not made significant additions to our OL since Reese arrived until this year. Our LB are a disgrace, although they play hard. The RB situation is just awful in that we do not have a reliable RB.
I love Jerry but if everyone is on notice this year then he has to be held accountable also.
That said, we turned the ball over six times and still only lost by 5, still had 500 yards of offense and scored 31 pts.
But what team has no weaknesses?
The problem is we missed on too many mid-round draft picks lately.
And it's too soon to say he neglected the RB position after Brown's injury because we don't know that his plans are complete. Being hamstrung by the salary cap, there are games that must be played, including the waiting game until after the week 1 guarantee to players' salary passes. We will see what Reese, along with Coughlin, decides to do about bringing in a veteran RB or sticking with what we have.
Yes all teams ahve weaknesses, I am not saying Jerry has to be perfect, but we are thin is soooooo many areas. I am simply saying we always blame the HC, OC, DC etc. I am blaming the GM for giving these coaches little depth to work with.
Once you make the call to go to the $20 million level at QB, you have to build your team around it. We need good WRs and we have them. But you can't be expensive everywhere and a couple of big contracts tied to under-performing players can knock everything else out of alignment.
Certainly Reese is far from perfect - there are obvious holes on the roster and he's made some mistakes. But you have to consider the constraints and the tradeoffs that any GM makes. Resources are not infinite.
In 2007 he brought in Droughns and similarly needed a vet this season.
Just to address the OP: Why does Jerry Reese need some blame? How would he use it if the Maras gave it to him? How would it make the Giants a better team? I think what you mean is, you need to blame Jerry Reese. That's fine; he's the boss, and the buck stops with him (or John Mara). But if you're going to blame him for every loss and every hole in the roster, what's up with attributing the SB XLII title to Ernie Accorsi?
He's kinda heading in the wrong direction.
biggest knock on Jerry this year is keeping Snee but that probably had more to do with politics than personel
Agree that LB spot has been awful and the type of OL player that may be smart/reliable etc. but isn't the type of mauler that wins one on one battles (i.e. the kind that allow you to win on 3rd and 1).
But again, great GM.
If you've got $20 million at QB, unless you're racking up lots of cap-wins with cheap guys, you really need a good passing game that's among the strongest parts of the team. It's not going to happen in Baltimore this year.
You can't address everything in a salary cap era. Again with the LB's, who is this long list of LB we keep passing on in the draft or FA that is tearing the league up.
Reese, Newsome, Thompson and Colbert are all at the top - there is no best, but a group of 4 or 5 who are clearly better than others
He instead banked on Wilson making a quantom leap, Brown being healthy, and two scrubs.
The issue is that Reese prioritizes WR/RB/CB/DL over all other positions. So that will leave gaps at OL/LB/TE, which he tries to fill with FA or projects. It hasn't worked in recent years, and the gaps have become exaggerated.
But other than that, he is excellent.
The LB of past that so many on BBI wanted as FA such as Lofton, Ryans, Tulloch have done nothing
i also concur that he seems to be going in the wrong direction as of late. its pretty clear this years team is far weaker than the 2007-2012 versions, and there were some awful years interspersed in that time frame as well (cc brown, aaron rouse, bill sheridan).
and reese currently has so much money tied up in the baas-snee contracts it will likely be difficult to retain solid core guys like nicks and joseph. so it's not just whiffing too often in the drafts, it's also questionable allocation of cap dollars. i've been one of snee's biggest fans, but 11 million dollars for a right guard is just awful, especially when that player appears to clearly be the worst of the 5 starting OL.
Banking on health from A. Brown is very clearly a gamble. Nobody, including Reese, is surprised that he got banged up again. And it was very clear the moment he went down that the only legitimate option was to give Wilson the whole load. I just think that's a very poor decision.
I'd have to go back and look at who was out there this summer to give a fully informed critique....but was there really nobody who could come in and provide more than Darell Scott/Ryan Torrain?
i believe had the chad jones draft pick worked out, rolle would not currently be on the team. as for snee and baas, it seems to be a combination of neglecting the OL position in the draft (selecting clint sintim over max ungar, for example) and nepotism (paying the declining right guard 11 million because he's the coaches relative). the nepotism claim is obviously speculative, but by my admittedly layman's eye, snee played particularly poorly last night, as he did most all of last season.
i think reese opted not to part with snee despite his prohibitive cap hit because of 1) respect for coughlin and his family, and 2) not investing enough resources into the OL beyond further hamstringing the cap with baas' contract. again, the nepotism angle is speculative on my part. i am not making a definitive claim on the matter.
- BBI
the packers have a terrible offensive line and terrible defense but have the best QB on this planet to make up for their deficiencies. and until this year they have had terrible RBs