than boom. Bradshaw was nice, just like the Pats picking Brady was a sweet find for them, but for every 1 of those guys you're discarding two dozen run of the mill 6th/7th rounders.
I'm against the move, but mostly because I think we're done this year. Why anyone would be optimistic we could still make some noise, but think this is a bad move, is beyond me. I don't like dumping picks for washed up LBs by any stretch, but we've got garbage out there. If he's an improvement and you think we're still alive, you have to pull the trigger.
I would almost prefer using Bradford in that spot.
Though I will say, lumping Beason in with Curry and Rivers is a little unfair, he is coming off a tough injury and surgery, but Beason has at least performed very well at the pro level - the other two guys can't say that.
1) the Giants are desperate
2) this was the best that was available
3) their current in house options were awful + Herzlich could be hurt worse than we know
4) with the NFC East sucking, the Giants aren't ready to give up on the season, even at 0-4
We've seen this with Reese for a while now, he goes for these older LBs to see if he can squeeze anything out of them. This feels like a Keith Bulluck type move to me.
We wasted two picks on a QB in the 4th
Kyle : 11:54 pm : link : Delete
I'm hardpressed to get angry at this waste of a 6th or 7th rounder, by comparison.
That train of thought is how teams get bad in a hurry.
Eric - Kuhn being the #3 spoke a lot more to the dearth
was a solid player his rookie year but I would necessarily say he was a great 7th round pick. The Giants gave him every opportunity to take the safety job but the guy made a lot of mental mistakes and held on to that job longer than he should have. I think the jury is still out on Cox and Kuhn though Kuhn did flash last year. I tend to remember Stoney Woodson, DeAndre Wright, Andre Woodson, Rhett Bomar, Adam Koets, Matt Mcants, Eric Herman. 6th and 7th Round picks are a crapshoot. Not to say I agree with the trade because I dont but this team needs to do more than bank on a 7th round pick working out...This team need to sign a couple of big time free agents next year like Alex Mack and Aqib Talib.
I understand each pick counts but look at how many picks just don't pan out. We need help now. It's a risk on both ends. A draft pick???And a former pro bowler who has injury concerns who may pan out?? Both risks.
If you get a two-year starter at safety with a 7th round pick, that's a great pick for where you got it. Johnson also started 5 regular season games in 2007 and had a role in the secondary on the Super Bowl team.
Just because a guy isn't here 10 years doesn't mean it's not a great pick for where you got him (7th round).
43 total tackles in the past 3 seasons. he is broken. I understand the desperation but they are better off taking a flier on a LB who is younger and healthier in the draft.
Are about the same as a 7th round pick being productive for us. I think our season is donezo so I'd rather keep as many picks as possible, but I don't see this as a huge deal.
teams? You don't pick up Bradshaws on a consistent basis that late into the draft. Look at how long it took a guy like Darelle Scott to see the field, those 6th rounders are not starters, and their only shot at contributing would be on special teams. I'm indifferent about this trade, I'm really weary of buying back refurbished, beaten down linebackers.
Them trading doesn't worry me too much (so long as we're talking 6th or 7th - if this is a 5th, I'll be pissed).
What concerns me is the worst unit on this team seems to be the OL, but we just traded for a LB. Don't kill me for this, but even with our mediocre LBs I didn't think they were a massive liability. Clearly, Reese was concerned enough with either the depth or the ability of who we've got there that he made this move.
Which means he thought LB was worse off, which scares the SHIT out of me. Could be that either guys are more banged up than we know about, or we've seen these guys playing over their heads and they could possibly be worse than we've seen thus far.
And I'll admit, he made a play In the SB run and was serviceable in 08. But his the second year he started we had one of the worst defenses in the NFL.
I just wasn't a fan of his other than on special teams. I see your point in that we got a lot out of a 7th round pick and heck we probably wont get anything out of Beason but I just dont think a 7th round pick is something to get too bent out of shape about. However I dont agree with the trade.
I just wasn't a fan of his other than on special teams. I see your point in that we got a lot out of a 7th round pick and heck we probably wont get anything out of Beason but I just dont think a 7th round pick is something to get too bent out of shape about. However I dont agree with the trade.
You get bad fast by blowing early and mid-round picks
but why trade a draft pick for 1 year rental? Could we receive some sort of compensation pick if we void his contract and he signs elsewhere after this year?
I'm against the move, but mostly because I think we're done this year. Why anyone would be optimistic we could still make some noise, but think this is a bad move, is beyond me. I don't like dumping picks for washed up LBs by any stretch, but we've got garbage out there. If he's an improvement and you think we're still alive, you have to pull the trigger.
Though I will say, lumping Beason in with Curry and Rivers is a little unfair, he is coming off a tough injury and surgery, but Beason has at least performed very well at the pro level - the other two guys can't say that.
Having said that, I don't get the deal...
1) the Giants are desperate
2) this was the best that was available
3) their current in house options were awful + Herzlich could be hurt worse than we know
4) with the NFC East sucking, the Giants aren't ready to give up on the season, even at 0-4
We've seen this with Reese for a while now, he goes for these older LBs to see if he can squeeze anything out of them. This feels like a Keith Bulluck type move to me.
Cox looks like our #2 back of the future.
We wasted two picks on a QB in the 4th
Kyle : 11:54 pm : link : Delete
I'm hardpressed to get angry at this waste of a 6th or 7th rounder, by comparison.
That train of thought is how teams get bad in a hurry.
:)
Again, you get seven picks. Each one is critical.
If you get a two-year starter at safety with a 7th round pick, that's a great pick for where you got it. Johnson also started 5 regular season games in 2007 and had a role in the secondary on the Super Bowl team.
Just because a guy isn't here 10 years doesn't mean it's not a great pick for where you got him (7th round).
He wasnt a steal or a stud by any means but he was very solid as a backup in 2007.
What concerns me is the worst unit on this team seems to be the OL, but we just traded for a LB. Don't kill me for this, but even with our mediocre LBs I didn't think they were a massive liability. Clearly, Reese was concerned enough with either the depth or the ability of who we've got there that he made this move.
Which means he thought LB was worse off, which scares the SHIT out of me. Could be that either guys are more banged up than we know about, or we've seen these guys playing over their heads and they could possibly be worse than we've seen thus far.
Physical tomorrow.
Voidable contract at end of year.
One year rental.
lalalalala : 10/3/2013 11:46 pm : link
if he comes in and earns a job it's an indictment on the guys that are already here
Which is why the Giants want him, they seem to love getting guys past their prime
http://www.nfl.com/player/michaeljohnson/2507247/profile - ( New Window )
You also get bad fast by having massive blind spots in scouting and evaluation for parts of the roster (OL, LB).
This certainly doesn't help, but it's a rather small symptom.
He wasn't the best guy out there but he was boom or bust.
Again, you don't expect a lot from a 7th rounder and the giants got a lot of value out of him.
Granted he didn't have a long stay thereafter.
And no way he played 160 halves...