for display only
Big Blue Interactive The Corner Forum  
Back to the Corner

Archived Thread

What is left to gain in 2013 (long post)

Matt in SGS : 10/11/2013 11:01 am
I think that at this juncture, even the most wide eyed optimist can realize that you can throw dirt on the 2013 Giants team. This thought that they can still hang around because of how putrid the NFC East is, while enticing, is just not going to happen. To even play .500 ball the rest of the way will put them at 5-11.

So with 10 games to go, the Giants should take a step back and look at what they need to do to put themselves in the best position to rebound in 2014. Forget that damn Super Bowl countdown clock that was put in the locker room. That will be up there with Jim Fassel's "sign the shovel" tactic in 2003 that showed a severe disconnect between what the team was really capable of and what the front office/coaches thought they could do.

1) Play the young core who will be considered part of the team's future. I put that emphasis in there because some of the young players on this team are not going to go anywhere in the future (ie- Cordle or Herzlich). Guys I'm specifically referring to:
- Justin Pugh: the playing time he's getting now will be invaluable down the line. He is either going to figure in as a guard or as a tackle opposite Beatty in the future.
- Will Hill: Did he blow his coverage against Marshall last night on one of his TDs? Probably, but he's also a guy who hits like a truck at safety and I'd rather he learn by fire this year and get ready to take over for Rolle next year.
- Prince Amukamara: Prince looks like the next in the line of physical corners the Giants have had along the lines of Mark Haynes, Mark Collins, and Phillippi Sparks. Keep matching him up on the best receiver on the other team and let him continue to develop into one of the best corners in the NFC
- Rueben Randle: Boom or bust with this kid. Randle can be a game breaker, great physical talent. But he's been inconsistent, blew the coverage read last night on the Pick 6, got lucky on the frustration spike that could have been a fumble. However, if Nicks ends up leaving as a free agent, they need him ready to step up. If the Giants can get him to progress the rest of the 10 games, you step back and realize he's only 22 years old.
- Jonathan Hankins: Hankins looks like he's the guy who will end up taking over for Joseph if he decides to bolt in free agency. Only 21 years old, he's been pretty active in the past 2 games he's played. Give him more time on the field and see if they have at least one DT spot locked down for the next 5 years
- Damontre Moore: DaMonster looked good against the Steelers, has shown some flashes, but he keeps getting hurt. It would be a huge boon to go into 2014 and feel that the Giants will have another strong pass rushing DE to pair up with JPP (who I believe is still making his way back from that back injury and now has a knee to go along with it)
- David Wilson: His neck injury is worrisome on many levels, but from a personnel standpoint, the Giants need to know if this guy is going to be who they thought they were getting in the first round. Wilson has an explosiveness and big play ability at running back we haven't seen since Meggett. But the fumbles got him in the dog house. I can only hope that his neck will not keep him out long and we get to see him more involved in the games to find out if RB will be a huge need in 2014. I'm not writing him off yet.
- James Brewer: It's put up or shut up time with this guy. Can he be an NFL offensive lineman or not. Snee is not coming back next year. Boothe is a journeyman. This is his chance to show that he can play at this level and be a starting guard. Unless there is a feeling that he is going to be a risk to Eli's health, I sit Diehl or Boothe and put him out there and see what he can do. The Giants had a talented guy in William Roberts who failed as a tackle and turned into a Pro Bowl guard.
- Marcus Kuhn: On PUP, but if his knee is sound, there is no reason to keep him there. Let him get more experience and see if he can build on what was a promising rookie season before his ACL tear.

2) Trade some veterans: The Giants aren't going anywhere, and tied to point 1 above, some of these vets made more sense before the roof collapsed. The Giants should be sellers here and they actually have some pieces teams would want, specifically on the defensive line

- Shaun Rogers
- Mike Patterson


Will they get a first round pick back? No, they won't get a second day pick either. However, I see no reason to have Rogers and Patterson around at the expense of playing Hankins and (if healthy) Kuhn. Teams are always needing help at DT, I would think the Giants could net a 6th or 7th for these guys...regroup the 7th dealt for Beason.

While trading Tuck might make some sense, particularly if he's blocking Moore at all, I don't see the Giants doing that. I think as captain and for what he's done in the past, they will keep him around to finish out this season.

If Reese really wanted to put a shock into the team, he puts Nicks on the block. I have long said that as Nicks goes, so goes the Giants offense. However, Nicks has been a guy who is always held back from his potential due to injury. To be honest, from what I've seen this year, he seems to be a guy who is making some business decisions on the field looking at his free agency coming up. If the Giants are not going to lock him up long term and will see what happens in the off season (knowing they can tag him), I would put feelers out there to see if anyone would be interested in a trade. Nicks should fetch a pretty decent return, certainly nothing less than a 2nd rounder.

3) See what veterans have anything left in the tank and can they be counted on in 2014. This is pretty self explanatory. But for me, the following guys are putting themselves on film now to see if they should return next year:
- Beason
- Kiwi
- Thomas
- Paysinger
- Jernigan

4) Other than the obvious guys (Eli, Cruz, JPP, etc) All the rest for me can come or go. I think we will see some big name warriors see their final 10 games with the Giants, namely Tuck, Diehl, and Webster.

5) The coaching question. The final piece of the equation. I think the evaluation in the next 10 games will say a great deal if Coughlin is even in consideration to come back or not. Again, my own personal opinion is that Coughlin will retire and had more or less made up his mind before the season. However, lets look at this from the Giants standpoint, and assuming the team doesn't look like they flat out quit (ie- Handley late 1992 and Fassel in 2003). And you must now factor in Coughlin's age to this decision as well. He's 68 years old. The Giants must decide if 2013 is a bump in the road and just one of those years or the sign that this team now needs some major work done on it to get back on track. If the Giants feel that this was just one of those things, and injuries and shit luck got them, then I think Coughlin might well survive this. But again, that's on Mara/Tisch and Reese to decide that this year was a fluke and they will be right in the hunt in 2014. However, if the organization feels that this team really needs a lot of work and a lot of retooling, bringing Coughlin back is a stupid move. Nothing against TC, he has been a great Giant, has brought us 2 Super Bowl championships and has been nothing but class. However, if the transition is so deep and needed, the Giants owe it to the organization and fans to turn the team over to a younger coach who will lead them through the next 5 or so years, through the end of Eli's career. If TC only has one more year in his tank, and the team's fixes will take longer, they have to move on.

To me, they might as well take down that stupid clock. There will not be a playoffs this year, no magical run. This is about 2014 and beyond, and they shouldn't waste the opportunity over the next 10 games to feel good about a 6-10 or 7-9 season if things break right and still miss the playoffs.
Pages: 1 2 3 | Show All |  Next>>
As long as  
Josh in the City : 10/11/2013 11:03 am : link
Gilbride and Fewell are both gone after this season, this debacle will be somewhat more tolerable.
excellent analysis  
Les in TO : 10/11/2013 11:09 am : link
i fully agree that the rest of the season should be about giving meaningful time to the future giants - i would add holsey and robinson to that list, should they ever get healthy, as well as cox.

i would rather lose big with our young guys getting a chance to develop than lose by a smaller margin with the diehls, pascoes and herzlichs.
TC will NOT call it quits nor will he be asked to re-sign or  
Big Blue '56 : 10/11/2013 11:12 am : link
worse case scenario, fired..You should know John Mara by now..Hard to believe that he'd feel a 2X SB winning HC and future HOFer has lost it in 20 months..Of course, as with the 2009 debacle, people will say that he's lost the team or grown stale..

Fewell will be easy. He has no contract after this year, so they will most likely let him walk..No idea what Mara's thoughts are re Gilbride..

Reese is solid, he really is..Ozzie Newsome has made plenty of mistakes, some huge(one off the top of my head is letting Boldin go. They HAD to find a way to keep him) and he is acknowledged as the best or right up there..He may have an opportunity to really make a dent if our draft position for each round is really high..He'll also finally be able to offer younger FAs longer than a 1 year deal...



Time to let go of the nostalgia  
Bill in UT : 10/11/2013 11:13 am : link
TT, Aaron Ross, Webster, Kiwi, Tuck, Snee, Diehl, Jacobs are not the future of this team. I don't know if you're going to be able to trade any of them, especially the guys who will be UFAs at the end of the season. Give the kids some playing time as long as you can do it without putting Eli at risk. Hey, has anyone mentioned that hit Charles James had on specials?
BB56  
Les in TO : 10/11/2013 11:17 am : link
if the gmen go 4-12 or worse and continue to lose in self-destructing ways, then mara and tisch will absolutely pull the trigger if coughlin doesn't resign first.
And remember,  
Big Blue '56 : 10/11/2013 11:17 am : link
whether you like it or not, if you don't show enough in a week-long practice, you are NOT going to see the field for many snaps. That could be the case with Hankins..As long as TC is here, that is how it's going to play out and after 10 years, people should already know that that won't chnge, imv..
I wholeheartedly endorse the first 2 posts  
LG in NYC : 10/11/2013 11:17 am : link
in this thread.
Kuhn hasn't played football in about a calendar year.  
Ten Ton Hammer : 10/11/2013 11:19 am : link
There are 10 more games to play. Be careful trading away every DT on the team just to get a look at a guy who's going to need to be worked back into the mix slowly.

.  
Danny Kanell : 10/11/2013 11:19 am : link
Just an phenomenal post, Matt.

I pretty much agree with everything.
Seems to me  
Giantfan in skinland : 10/11/2013 11:19 am : link
the Bears would actually be a very logical trade partner for our DTs. Injuries have ravaged their interior DL to the point of even bringing our running game back to life! Now that our game with them is out of the way...we should be picking up the phone.
Some  
AcidTest : 10/11/2013 11:19 am : link
thoughts:

Randle's biggest problem is Kevin Gilbride, and his ridiculously complex offense. There is a debate about whether Randle or Eli was responsible on the pick six. The answer is Gilbride was responsible. He's ruining Randle. I also don't care about the spike fumble. No, it shouldn't have happened, but he's trying to make a play. Randle has enormous talent IMO. Gilbride is ruining him.

I'd love to see Brewer play. How can we not know what he's got after three years in the league? But that's where we're headed.

Thomas is done IMO. A great story, but one too many ACL tears I'm afraid.

Whether we like it or not, JJ is at least coming to camp next year, especially if Nicks leaves, which I think he will.

I'd leave Kuhn on PUP, and then transfer him to IR.

I'm OK with trading Rogers and Patterson, but I doubt you'd find any takers for either.

Tuck, Snee, Diehl, Boothe, Cordle, Baas, Herzlich, Rivers, Thomas, Rolle, Myers, and Painter should be cut or not resigned. I might bring Webster back since his salary is only $1M, but I think the Giants will cut him. Ross as well.

I'd fire Coughlin. He's ultimately responsible for this mess, and refusing to play younger players over aging, injured, veterans. At a minimum, Gilbride and Fewell have to go. I'd also insist that Reese take over TOTAL control of player acquisition. He makes all the picks (not Ross after the first round), with little input from Coughlin.

Eli is coming back. I'd like to see what he can do with a less complicated offense.
Les please don't say "absolutely."  
Big Blue '56 : 10/11/2013 11:19 am : link
It didn't work in 2006 and 2009 and it won't work now..The Mara's at worst will most likely give TC another year and chalk this up to a blip, albeit a big blip
BB  
Matt in SGS : 10/11/2013 11:20 am : link
I don't know, I have this sneaking suspicion that TC had decided before the season that he is going to walk retire. I will say, TC is a competitor and if this thing goes right in the crapper and they finish below 4-12, he might not want to go out this way.

Back in 1992, when I was a freshman at Boston College, TC was in his 2nd year at BC. The NFL was after him (including the Giants), and he was considering leaving. However, Notre Dame put an ass kicking on BC, beat us 54-7 or something, including Holtz running a fake punt when he was up 38-0 (Holtz was a dick and ND wanted to run it up on the upstart BC team). TC said he made up his mind that day that he was going to come back and beat them the next year, and BC ruined their national championship, beating them at South Bend. Once he did that, he felt like he was clear to go to the pros and ended up in Jacksonville (even though there was no team to coach in 1994).

So I think the competitive fire might be there that he won't want to go out like this. A strong finish by the team, maybe he'll feel better about it and retire However, if this is not a one year/shit happens thing, Mara and Reese will need to make an uncomfortable decision.
RE: And remember,  
Les in TO : 10/11/2013 11:23 am : link
In comment 11272272 Big Blue '56 said:
Quote:
whether you like it or not, if you don't show enough in a week-long practice, you are NOT going to see the field for many snaps. That could be the case with Hankins..As long as TC is here, that is how it's going to play out and after 10 years, people should already know that that won't chnge, imv..


i don't like it - especially if and when the giants are mathematically eliminated from the playoffs. you give the future giants some real playing time which will only make the team stronger for next season. enough with the stubborn nonsense that will result in 4/5 seasons of no playoffs.
Matt,  
Big Blue '56 : 10/11/2013 11:25 am : link
I couldn't really disagree all that much with your post just above this one, Matt..

I just don't know how you would even think that TC made up his mind before the season started to leave. His wife knows and has said he's better off NOT retiring/being home..Prior to this year, he was beaming from ear to ear. He love and lives for this..Now, is it possible if we end p with just a few wins he might walk away from the stress of it all, from the profound disappointment of it all? Sure..

I just don't see it
Tom's going to keep playing his guys and trying to win ballgames  
Ten Ton Hammer : 10/11/2013 11:25 am : link
The directive to play the kids is going to have to come from above. That's an organizational decision and probably won't happen until the bye, if at all.
RE: Les please don't say  
Les in TO : 10/11/2013 11:26 am : link
In comment 11272288 Big Blue '56 said:
Quote:
It didn't work in 2006 and 2009 and it won't work now..The Mara's at worst will most likely give TC another year and chalk this up to a blip, albeit a big blip


2012 was a blip when he continued to trot out a gimp nicks who couldn't run when randle and barden played effectively in his absence

2010 was a blip when the team crapped the bed to end the season after a hot start

2009 was a blip

2008's playoff performance was a blip

2006's sh*t show was a blip

put all those blips together and you have a complete blop.
Then Les,  
Big Blue '56 : 10/11/2013 11:26 am : link
pray that he retires or gets fired, because it's NOT changing..You know TC by now
RE: RE: Les please don't say  
Big Blue '56 : 10/11/2013 11:28 am : link
In comment 11272324 Les in TO said:
Quote:
In comment 11272288 Big Blue '56 said:


Quote:


It didn't work in 2006 and 2009 and it won't work now..The Mara's at worst will most likely give TC another year and chalk this up to a blip, albeit a big blip



2012 was a blip when he continued to trot out a gimp nicks who couldn't run when randle and barden played effectively in his absence

2010 was a blip when the team crapped the bed to end the season after a hot start

2009 was a blip

2008's playoff performance was a blip

2006's sh*t show was a blip

put all those blips together and you have a complete blop.


And TWO SBs..Name one coach in the
last 10 years that has done that
BB56 a lot can change in a couple of years  
Les in TO : 10/11/2013 11:36 am : link
blackberry was the dominant player in the smartphone industry 5 years ago with over 50% market share, it's stock price was over $100; shareholders were ecstatic and the future was bright. then apple came along with the iphone, samsung with the galaxy, and blackberry failed to anticipate this and adapt thinking that these new devices would never impact its core b2b customers because of their superior security. well, new software/encryption technology levelled the security playing field so IT departments are now buying non BB devices; blackberry's stock price is now hovering around $7, it's for sale and most likely going to be broken up into its assets/patents and sold off.

tom coughlin is blackberry; a coach with past successes, who has not adapted to the times, not stayed ahead of the reality with his personnel and stubbornly keeps trying to do the same things that he did a couple of years ago even though clearly that is not the right strategy.

hopefully he walks out on his own so the team doesn't have to fire him.
Giants floating  
area junc : 10/11/2013 11:38 am : link
stories about Coughlin being here next year to keep the players heads in it, see whos 4 real
BB  
Matt in SGS : 10/11/2013 11:38 am : link
I get that, but TC is not a dumb man. I think he is going to see the bigger picture as well. I also wonder if the messages that are coming from above that he will make his own decision to come back or not, are kind of a nudge from above. I don't think Mara wants to fire him, but it might be the case that after 10 years, it's just time. Coughlin won't want to hang around where he's not really wanted but the organization is in a tough spot because he's one of the immortal coaches who will be part of the legacy. They want to handle this properly.

I would think they'll have him doing something in the front office with the team, so he won't be at home, driving his wife crazy all day long. He'll have time to spend with his grand kids, but I would see him staying active with the organization. Helping with scouting, maybe helping out in advance game preparation, etc. I don't think he'd take some senior exec title and do nothing.
All very obvious points  
oldutican : 10/11/2013 11:38 am : link
The one I hesitate at is writing off Nicks. No one knows his intentions and I'm not comfortable when people say he is coasting on his way to another contract. I also see him making plays. Eli is not Brady or Peyton. He needs talented WRs, and his best seasons have come when he has 3 of them. Randle is promising, but if Nicks goes, getting another quality WR becomes another priority. There are already too many needs to fill.

As for Coughlin, I sure hope he retires. I'm not worried about finding a replacement. This is among the best jobs in football. A new coach inherits an established QB and knows he is working for one of the most stable coach-supportive teams in the NFL. Giants should be able to get cream of the crop.
what about  
area junc : 10/11/2013 11:40 am : link
tom coughlin as GM?
This team needs a major turnover  
Steve in South Jersey : 10/11/2013 11:47 am : link
of the bottom half to 3/4 of the roster. They need a infusion of young hungry players. Too many guys on this team are too comfortable or over the hill. Love Coughlin but he isn't there right guy for a couple of years of rebuild now.
Matt, This team, with its star QB(yeah, I know) and core in tact,  
Big Blue '56 : 10/11/2013 11:54 am : link
could easily win the division next year..We're not a helpless franchise years away from making a concerted run..

That said, if they decide to make a change with TC, I will support their decision. I won't like it, but I will support it because of the tremendous respect for the success this organization has brought to me as a fan..

I'm really looking forward to seeing what Reese can finally do(should our season continue like this) with high draft picks and a good cap situation..

Btw, the ONLY "good" news for me about how this season has played out to date, is that there will be NO FLEX GAMES unless who we play is in the thick of it..That would be less late games..
RE: All very obvious points  
Matt in SGS : 10/11/2013 11:55 am : link
In comment 11272381 oldutican said:
Quote:
The one I hesitate at is writing off Nicks. No one knows his intentions and I'm not comfortable when people say he is coasting on his way to another contract. I also see him making plays. Eli is not Brady or Peyton. He needs talented WRs, and his best seasons have come when he has 3 of them. Randle is promising, but if Nicks goes, getting another quality WR becomes another priority. There are already too many needs to fill.


There have been whispers about Nicks' intentions for months. He said he skipped the voluntary workouts because he didn't want to get hurt and wanted to stay healthy. A cause we can all get behind, no doubt. Unless you take a step back and realize that Nicks his heading towards post rookie contract, which is the one that players have their chance to make their big money. They all know this, everyone does.

Here was an article from ESPN before the season

Quote:
Nicks is the critical piece of the wide receiving corps. When he's not at full strength, defenses can devote more resources to disrupting Cruz. Cruz can't replace Nicks as the passing game's big, do-it-all receiving (and blocking) threat on the outside, and to this point second-year man Rueben Randle hasn't shown that he can, either. Nicks must be on the field and fully healthy in order for the Giants' passing game to function at its best.

So with that in mind, and fully aware that he has yet to play all 16 games of an NFL season, Nicks has become the most careful dude in the room. If he didn't look to be going all-out in the preseason games you watched, it's likely because he was determined not to go all-out in the preseason games. He won't admit this, but the clues are all there if you've been watching and listening to him for the past month. His goal is to be healthy this regular season, and if that means taking it slow in games that don't count, or spending 10 extra minutes getting his legs stretched out before it's time to start running routes in practice, so be it.


Now, I don't think he's dogging it, but as I said, I think he's making some business decisions out there. Not going after that slant against Philly heading into traffic and the back breaking pick? Remember, this is a guy who saw Steve Smith blow a great contract for himself and watched Cruz get paid (even if it was below market value). Looking at what his trade value is, should not be out of the question, particularly if he is bent on testing the market.
http://espn.go.com/blog/nfceast/post/_/id/55700/hakeem-nicks-is-being-very-careful - ( New Window )
RE: BB  
Jon T : 10/11/2013 11:55 am : link
In comment 11272378 Matt in SGS said:
Quote:
I get that, but TC is not a dumb man. I think he is going to see the bigger picture as well. I also wonder if the messages that are coming from above that he will make his own decision to come back or not, are kind of a nudge from above. I don't think Mara wants to fire him, but it might be the case that after 10 years, it's just time. Coughlin won't want to hang around where he's not really wanted but the organization is in a tough spot because he's one of the immortal coaches who will be part of the legacy. They want to handle this properly.

I would think they'll have him doing something in the front office with the team, so he won't be at home, driving his wife crazy all day long. He'll have time to spend with his grand kids, but I would see him staying active with the organization. Helping with scouting, maybe helping out in advance game preparation, etc. I don't think he'd take some senior exec title and do nothing.
Good post Matt and I'd agree this can be a very delicate situation to handle if TC told Mara he wasn't quite ready to retire yet but the team was ready to move on.. It is a critical time for the fracnhise as Eli likely has 5-6 good years left and you have to be careful about how you want to handle those, in other words you really wouldn't want a situation where you bring in a new coach as E is in the last year or 2 and in decline. You hope to bring in a guy for the next decade seeing E thorugh the end of his career and hopefully a new QB for those next 4-5 years. No one is bigger than the team and I agree it sometimes it's 'just time' and you don't want to wait too long to make a move.

If you gave TC a presser to annouce his retirement if I"m John Mara you talk about how long his Dad waited a decade + to finally hire TC, how much he's meant to the organization and you have those 2 lombardi's right on the dais as a reminder and an FU to all the press who were trying to run him out of town in 06 and late 07. You say there is lots of debate on radio and online about TC's legacy as his tenure had it's up's and downs but you simlpy point to each of the trophys and say that's his f***kin legacy; case closed.
Please let TC go  
Dan in WNY : 10/11/2013 11:55 am : link
I love him but 10 yrs is an eternity in the NFL. It's an absolute joke and travesty that there are STILL communications issues with this offense after almost a decade in the same system. And this is TCs system all along. No more, please for Eli's sake and Wilson's.
Randle  
Bleedin Blue : 10/11/2013 12:01 pm : link
should take a lesson from Eli! Eli says the mistakes are on him. Randle says Eli threw the ball behind me, then goes on to say we just weren't on the same page! I'd like to ask Randle which one of you weren't on the same page? Eli who's been doing it for ten years or him!
Randle - ( New Window )
A great post by Matt and follow-up by Jon T  
jcn56 : 10/11/2013 12:01 pm : link
Coughlin's legacy isn't this season if he retires, it's almost two decades of NFL head coaching, from building a franchise from the ground up as GM/coach in Jacksonville to bringing two Lombardi trophies to New York. A Hall of Fame worthy resume, something that one shitty last season wouldn't come close to derailing.

My only problem with the 'maybe it was just shit luck' scenario is if they keep TC around another season, they're likely to keep the coordinators too. If not, how do you attract quality coordinators to the spot knowing that TC has an offensive scheme he ascribes to and that he's a lame duck should the team not perform well again.

TC's done a hell of a job, and I hate that it would have to end for him like this, but it's time for him to move on to the next stage of his career.
JCN  
Bleedin Blue : 10/11/2013 12:06 pm : link
I agree with what you said about the coordinators, If TC stays so does Fewell and Gilbride. That's why I believe there may be a behind the doors talk with ownership and TC for him to bow out gracefully.
Either one of two things will happen  
bceagle05 : 10/11/2013 12:08 pm : link
over the next 10 games - we'll tank completely and be in a position to nab Clowney, or we'll fight the good fight and play .500 ball down the stretch, finishing with a 5-11 record. The latter will give TC the opportunity to step away with a little more dignity, while the former will give us Clowney, a stud OL or an opportunity to trade out for more picks. There are positives to either scenario. I love Coughlin, but if keeping him means keeping Gilbride and Fewell...ugh.
Tremendous post.  
mstyles22 : 10/11/2013 12:10 pm : link
At lot of people keep pointing to the Super Bowls, as they should. But if TC didn't win a SB in 2011, I believe that he would already be canned by now.

What to do with TC is the messiest part of this whole debacle. I agree with all of the other points 100%. And I'm glad you didn't mention anything stupid like trading Eli to the Texans or starting Nassib next week.

What sucks about the Giants having so many positions of need for the draft, is that you can't really justify taking a game changer like Sammy Watkins, even if Nicks walks.

Can you...? haha
I want to go back to 2nd part  
oldutican : 10/11/2013 12:11 pm : link
of my post. There is always risk in change, but I really believe Giants could get cream of the crop to replace TC. Do people not trust Reese and owners to make best choice?
By the way...  
mstyles22 : 10/11/2013 12:11 pm : link
It's insane to think that if the Giants play "solid" the rest of the season, they'll be 5-11.
The only reeason we made the playoffs in 11  
Ten Ton Hammer : 10/11/2013 12:12 pm : link
was on the strength of Eli nutting up and producing 4th quarter comebacks and 70+ yard pass plays with Cruz.

It's not like Tom C gave them the ol' win 1 for the gipper speech and willed them to win.
Eh, that's the old 'and if my aunt had balls she'd be my uncle'  
jcn56 : 10/11/2013 12:13 pm : link
There's no what if, they did win the SB.

I think Matt's suspicion that TC told them he was in for one last year makes a lot of sense when combined with our handling of the roster. It seemed like Reese made one last push for that 07 core, to see if they could repeat some of their magic. Obviously, that was a miscalculation, but I wonder if maybe part of that wasn't TC saying he was in for one more year, with his core group to see if they could get it done.
RE: All very obvious points  
Giants Fan in Steelers Land : 10/11/2013 12:14 pm : link
oldutican said:
Quote:
The one I hesitate at is writing off Nicks. No one knows his intentions and I'm not comfortable when people say he is coasting on his way to another contract. I also see him making plays. Eli is not Brady or Peyton. He needs talented WRs, and his best seasons have come when he has 3 of them. Randle is promising, but if Nicks goes, getting another quality WR becomes another priority. There are already too many needs to fill.

As for Coughlin, I sure hope he retires. I'm not worried about finding a replacement. This is among the best jobs in football. A new coach inherits an established QB and knows he is working for one of the most stable coach-supportive teams in the NFL. Giants should be able to get cream of the crop.


Greats points. They would need a new OC to change the system if Nicks walks otherwise 3rd WR becomes a big hole to fill that is tough to fill because of the complexity of the offense. Its tough to quickly get young guys up to speed in this offense.

If TC is not here next year suddenly NY becomes THE destination for a head coach. You get Eli, Cruz, Randle, and some other young promising pieces like JPP plus a ton of cap space and great drafting position. A starting head coach usually doesn't get that much to work with in an offseason and still have a franchise qb.

Sidenote: First time using the reply feature!
I was citing 5-5 down the stretch  
bceagle05 : 10/11/2013 12:15 pm : link
as the best case scenario, with a 2003-like tank job as the worst case scenario. Good feelings towards TC aside, could ownership really justify bringing back TC, Gilbride and Fewell off a 3-13 season and four out of five non-playoff seasons? It is a performance business, after all.
You guys overlook the obvious  
Phil from WNY : 10/11/2013 12:33 pm : link
The Super Bowl is at Metlife Stadium this year. Clearly, the Giants wanted to play in it and thought their best hope was to play the old 2007/2011 core. They held onto guys instead of going with untried guys because they wanted to make a run. It didn't work.

The record is ugly but there is a pretty good nucleus on this team. Re-vamp the offensive line, cut some dead wood and watch this team come back quickly. A remake of the Oline will do wonders.

I'd like to see what they have in Brewer but I'd also like to see what Mosely can do.
Nicks  
Phil from WNY : 10/11/2013 12:35 pm : link
is a tough call. He's perfect for this offense but he does look like he's dogging it. Too bad because it's going to hurt him in the pocket when he goes trolling for the big payday.
Agree that Nicks can't be helping his value.  
bceagle05 : 10/11/2013 12:38 pm : link
Obviously staying healthy and putting up numbers is better than a season-ending injury, but he's not exactly taking the league by storm here, and he has an injury history whether he survives this year or not.

Also agree that Brewer should get a long look at guard. If Clowney ends up being the pick in the first round because he has "too much value to pass up," that's one less resource used for building the OL back up. Brewer proving he doesn't suck would be a nice safety net.
I'm not a fan of Clowney  
Phil from WNY : 10/11/2013 12:45 pm : link
He may be making a business decision but I think you win Super Bowls with guys who have heart and talent. Unfortunately, there are signs that Nicks fits that bill to an extent.
The only thing wrong with Nicks is that he gets beat up too much.  
Ten Ton Hammer : 10/11/2013 12:48 pm : link
Is he making a couple business decisions? Yeah, probably. A bad hit this year might cost him 5-10 million in total contract value.



But we know how he played in the postseason when he absolutely needed to. If they bring him back, his business decisions won't be a problem.
this notion  
mako J : 10/11/2013 12:48 pm : link
that TC stays with new coordinators is absurd. Fewell is in his last year and will not be retained, but if TC is head coach in '14, bet every dollar you have that Gilbride remains OC.

With that being said, I wouldn't be shocked to see a coach added to the offensive staff with play calling/coordinating experience....


great thread Matt.
The problem with Fewell (for us, anyway)  
bceagle05 : 10/11/2013 12:54 pm : link
is that Reese seems to be in his corner. At least he was when things got a little rough in 2011, and his faith was validated with the playoff run. I'm hopeful the bloom is off the rose in his eyes, or that ownership understands that the architects of this mess - Reese, Ross, TC, Gilbride and Fewell - can't all come back for an encore. If I had to guess, I'd say Ross and Fewell are the two most likely departures this offseason, but there may be more.
I don't think Tom Coughlin is any kind of a lock for the Hall of Fame  
nomad1986 : 10/11/2013 12:55 pm : link
too many bad seasons, winning percentage of .545 which will keep going down as long as he hangs around. Jimmy Johnson isn't in the hall of fame. Mike Shanahan (wining pct of .568) has a better record than Tom Coughlin is he going to be in the hall of fame? The only lock right now is Belicheck.
Keep in mind  
81_Great_Dane : 10/11/2013 12:57 pm : link
that the way the Giants treat TC will influence who they can get as his successor. This isn't like the end of Tom Landry's career, when Jerrah came in with his pal Jimmy Johnson. There's nobody ready to step in; they'll have to recruit a coach. So the Giants will not want to embarrass/humiliate TC. He will be given every opportunity to make changes on the team and to step aside gracefully if the team decides to make a change at head coach.
Great thread Matt - completely agree  
Optimus-NY : 10/11/2013 12:58 pm : link
Your 11:38 am post is especially important with respect to that nudge from above regarding Coughlin getting the chance to choose his own fate. I read that as management's way of graciously ushering TC out as the HC of the NYG.

If they do have to fire him though, they will, they'd just rather him understand which way the wind is blowing and take the easy way out. Either way, he's going to wind up on the outside. HOW that goes down (i.e., him retiring instead of being fired) is up to him.
Pages: 1 2 3 | Show All |  Next>>
Back to the Corner