for display only
Big Blue Interactive The Corner Forum  
Back to the Corner

Archived Thread

2014 NYG Draft Preview - Defensive Tackle

Sy'56 : 4/10/2014 8:23 am
Current Defensive Tackles on the NYG Roster:

Cullen Jenkins – 33 – Signed through 2015

Mike Patterson – 31 – Signed through 2014

Jonathan Hankins – 22 - Signed through 2016

Markus Kuhn – 28 – Signed through 2015


Where They Stand:


While the free agent acquisition period is not over yet, this appears to be the group that NYG will enter draft weekend with. It’s a very thin group that will hold this team back as it currently stands. Jenkins and Patterson are both overachieving, reliable veterans that can wear a few hats for their front. While I wouldn’t call them difference makers, they are at the very least guys that can be counted on. Hankins and Kuhn are the wildcards here, as they will be given the opportunity to fill the shoes of the departed Linval Joseph. I don’t have confidence in either of them to be the guy that needs to be in there for 80%+ of the defensive snaps, making opponents game plan around them. This group as a whole needs a fresh body or two that can contribute right away.


Top 10 Grades:

1 - Aaron Donald – Pittsburgh – 6’1/285: 85

2 – Rashede Hageman – Minnesota – 6’6/310: 80

3 – Stephon Tuitt – Notre Dame – 6’6/304: 79

4 – Brent Urban – Virginia – 6’7/295: 79

5 – DaQuan Jones – Penn State - 6’4/322: 78

6 – Timmy Jernigan – Florida State – 6’2/299: 78

7– Louis Nix III – Notre Dame – 6’2/331: 78

8 – Dominique Easley – Florida – 6’2/288: 76

9 – Taylor Hart – Oregon – 6’6/281: 76

10 – Kelcy Quarles – South Carolina – 6’4/297: 73


Day One Target:

Aaron Donald – Pittsburgh

I had a hard time accepting the fact that Donald was indeed one of the top players in the draft. I usually want guys with size inside, guys with consistent power presence that cannot be moved. But after watching almost 10+ games of Pittsburgh dating back to last year, I’m convinced Donald will be a star. He is the pass rushing presence that NYG has lacked inside for a long time and I think he is a better run defender than most will give him credit for. It’s easy to look at his size and say he can’t handle the physical power needed to anchor a position against the run. But when I scout him, I see a guy that can not only maintain position, but push linemen back, get off their blocks, and chase down the ball carrier like a linebacker. Donald will likely be my pick for NYG should be available at #12.

Runner Up: Rashede Hageman – Minnesota


Day Two Target:

Stephon Tuitt – Notre Dame

Tuitt could easily grade out as a first rounder if you go by is 2012 tape. He’s had a few physical issues over the past year and I did factor them in to his grade. Now with that said, I only have so much access to his medical information but from everyone I have spoken with and everything I have read, he should be at 100% by this summer. Tuitt played outside in ND’s 3-4 front, but I think he can easily move inside and play a Chris Canty-type role in a 4-3. He is enormous and very hard to move but also shows the short area quickness to beat blockers one on one. He is certainly a matchup problem because he can beat you a few different ways. If NYG ignores the defensive line in round one, Tuitt will likely be the guy I want in round two if he is still there.

Runner Up: DaQuan Jones – Penn State


Day Three Target:

Brent Urban – Virginia

Some view Urban as a 3-4 only player, but I disagree. When looking for defensive linemen, I am always looking for versatility. Urban can play outside in certain looks, even in a 4-3, but he can also play a three-technique role and control a couple inside gaps. I’ve even seen him play the A gap and make a difference. Urban plays a similar role and style as JJ Watt. While I don’t think he has the same upside, Urban could be a day three steal and I think he’ll be available early round 4. I love his ability to bend and pursue. He uses his hands and long arms to control blockers and he can get off them consistently. I can see him doing well here right away as a rotational defender and eventually becoming an every down difference maker because of his size, movement, and versatility.

Runner Up: Taylor Hart – Oregon


Most Overrated:

Anthony Johnson – LSU (59)

Johnson was one of the top recruits out of high school a few years ago, and rightfully so. I can remember watching his first college game and thinking he would eventually be a top 5 lock. But Johnson has failed to progress and if anything, he’s gone backwards since that first game. He looks the part and he’ll deliver some bone jarring hits here and there, but he is a poor defender play-to-play. He doesn’t anchor against single, straight blockers let alone double teams. He can’t reach the QB consistently, and he doesn’t have a long enough lasting motor. Nothing about his game is appealing to me, and I have him graded in the 7th/UDFA area. I see some labeling him a possible 2nd round pick and I question if that is simply a result of him being a top tier recruit years ago.

Runner Up: Daniel McCullers – Tennessee (64)



NYG Approach:

When looking at what is currently on the roster, I can’t see how anybody can refute the enormous need for another able body inside. NYG needs one of these rookies that can come in and contribute right away, and that’s not even accounting for any injuries to their current tackles. While they have a couple of serviceable, able bodies in there, none of these guys will alter the game plan of any offense. There is a severe lack of presence inside. This is not a group that linebackers will want to play behind nor will they take pressure of the ends against the pass. This class is a solid group of defensive tackles for days 1 and 2 of the draft and I am confident the right value will be there with one of their first three picks. The sooner the better, as I would put the need for a DT right up there with the offensive line as the top targets for the weekend.
Pages: 1 2 3 | Show All |  Next>>
Excellent as always Sy. I agree with your assessment of the current  
Victor in CT : 4/10/2014 8:39 am : link
DTs. It is why is I was very disheartened when they didn't match for Linval Joseph. I'd Like Hankins a lot better with LJ here and Jenkins/Patterson as rotation fodder. I get the cap thing and prioritization , but DT was one of the few strong points on the roster and now it is a question mark.

I still think they have to go OL in the 1st round.
Great write up,  
barens : 4/10/2014 8:39 am : link
Nice write up on Urban too.
Seems like slim pickings outside of Donald and Tuitt.  
Curtis in VA : 4/10/2014 8:43 am : link
.
Great stuff...  
Dunedin81 : 4/10/2014 8:45 am : link
curious as to your take on Hageman. I don't see value for the 12th pick, but is he a Top 20 or Top 25 guy in your opinion?
I'd look at Tuitt and Jones at #43  
JonC : 4/10/2014 8:49 am : link
otherwise the position probably waits, I doubt we go this route at #12.
Dunedin  
Sy'56 : 4/10/2014 8:51 am : link
That is exactly right. Hageman won't even be a consideration at #12 overall, but should they find themselves drafting somewhere in the mid-to-high 20s, he may be an option.

Hageman is a gamble, definitely not a safe pick. He has elite tools and some tape where he looks unblockable. Very good get off at the point of attack and he can really move. My issue with him is the lack of consistency and it appears he doesn't care much about technique and the little things. He spent a lot of time on the sideline relative to most starting defensive linemen of his caliber, so thats a bit odd. But if he can put some things together, he can be a big time player.
Needs to become more consistent  
Mike in NY : 4/10/2014 8:53 am : link
but thoughts on Jay Bromley out of Syracuse?
Mike in NY  
Sy'56 : 4/10/2014 8:56 am : link
Bromley can play. I gave him a 69...an area reserved for guys in the round 5 area. He is worth taking at that point because he moves well and plays stronger than his listed size. If he can gain some bulk to his frame, I think he can be a player.
I'd be really happy  
illmatic : 4/10/2014 8:57 am : link
to nab Donald at 12. Screw Ebron and Evans.
NY Giants  
gidiefor : Mod : 4/10/2014 8:58 am : link
Last Year
8th in Defense
30th in Offense

Now where should there priority be - especially considering that Donald does not fit the stated profile of Giant on the line
thats true gidie,  
Curtis in VA : 4/10/2014 9:02 am : link
but given the hole in the defensive line right now I doubt the defense could finish 8th again this year.

Conversely, given the additions made to the offensive line I doubt the offense would finish so low as 30th too.
What's your take on Hankins?  
GIANTSr01 : 4/10/2014 9:02 am : link
From that writeup you don't seem confident that he can step into the starting spot. Is that just caution (i.e he has to prove it first) or are you not high on him?
gidiefor  
Sy'56 : 4/10/2014 9:04 am : link
That is extremely shortsighted.
RE: NY Giants  
GIANTSr01 : 4/10/2014 9:04 am : link
In comment 11613837 gidiefor said:
Quote:
Last Year
8th in Defense
30th in Offense

Now where should there priority be - especially considering that Donald does not fit the stated profile of Giant on the line


But they lost arguably their best player along the DL in Joseph and Ayers/Kiwi is a step down from Tuck. Granted they massively upgraded the secondary, but it's hard to look at the DL right now and expect them to be as good as last years.

My Draft Prescription:
#12 - Donald
Rds 2-6: offense
Jones size is intriging  
Reale01 : 4/10/2014 9:05 am : link
What are your thoughts on him? He seems to fit the NYG profile for a DT.
Runner Up: Daniel McCullers – Tennessee  
Motley Blue : 4/10/2014 9:06 am : link

This dude is freaking huge. 6'7" 352lbs.
I seriously doubt Donald would start this year  
gidiefor : Mod : 4/10/2014 9:06 am : link
either
gidie  
GIANTSr01 : 4/10/2014 9:07 am : link
They also upgraded 2 spots on the OL with Schwartz and Walton (3 if you anticipate Pugh taking a step forward) and upgraded the RB position. They still have some work to do (TE, OG, maybe #1 WR), but the offense is already improved.
Sy,  
Big Blue '56 : 4/10/2014 9:07 am : link
likelihood that Jernigan is our pick at 43 if Tuitt is gone and we have not gone DT at 12?
RE: I seriously doubt Donald would start this year  
GIANTSr01 : 4/10/2014 9:08 am : link
In comment 11613853 gidiefor said:
Quote:
either


Nope. Jenkins and Hankins are the likely starters. But TC loves rotating his DTs and there's probably 20-30 snaps available for Donald right from the start.
gidie,  
Curtis in VA : 4/10/2014 9:10 am : link
but there's no guarantee that an O-lineman or WR or TE would start either.

And I don't think Donald has to start. He would make the rotation in the middle much healthier though. He can still have a big impact, not only on his own but also in keeping the old farts (Patterson, Jenkins) fresh. =)
Sy what's your take on Vincent Valentine?  
Spark Em Up 22 : 4/10/2014 9:13 am : link
I know he was just a freshman last year, but he's hard to miss on the field. Do you think he will be a high draft pick one day?
Pugh started  
gidiefor : Mod : 4/10/2014 9:15 am : link
last year

if you want to know where the most immediate impact would be from a rookie position it's one that will make Eli better

there are only two positions that will make Eli better right now - a very good Offensive Lineman and a tall downfield receiver that can go up for the ball

Those have to be the primary targets at pick #01 with preference for the line because the receiver won't start right away either - the lineman can probably start

I think Donald is a great player - but I seriously doubt they pick that way in the first round this year
Who cares if Donald starts...  
Wonderphil11 : 4/10/2014 9:17 am : link
it's about immediate impact and he has that in spades....he is a pocket disrupter who consistently beats his man to his spot and moves the QB of his spot....IMO, that is THE most important aspect in disrupting a passing game, as was proven in the Super Bowl this year and both of the Giants recent Super Bowl wins.
Heavy percentages against a rookie starting  
JonC : 4/10/2014 9:17 am : link
take the BPA, don't pass up a talent by reaching for a lesser talent.
Make that....  
Wonderphil11 : 4/10/2014 9:21 am : link
moves the QB "off of his spot".

One more thing, what was the worst part of the Oline this year? One could certainly argue it was Beatty but I would suggest it was the interior.....and, look at the kind of season Eli had with all that pressure up the middle.
Even if the Giants think Donald is a year away from real impact...  
Dunedin81 : 4/10/2014 9:24 am : link
(as some of their recent DT picks have been handled), if they think he's an impact 3-technique I still think they pull the trigger. A GM who wants to keep his job has at least a 2-3 year horizon.
When I see tape of Nix  
WillieYoung : 4/10/2014 9:24 am : link
I immediately think Vince wolfolk. He's be a great get at 43.
Great insight  
SamdaGiantsFan : 4/10/2014 9:29 am : link
really appreaciate the time to lay this out for us BBI faithful. I am excited at the potential of grabbing Donald, he can really change this defense. Would have liked to hear your analysis into Hageman, because I am a fan and if Donald goes in the top 10-which I'm starting to think could very well happen-I think Hageman represents a potential pick for us at 12. A bit of a reach at 12 no doubt, but a classic Reese like upside pick would not surprise me.
Giantsr01  
Sy'56 : 4/10/2014 9:30 am : link
I wasn't high on Hankins as a prospect a year ago, so yes I am a little nervous about his ability to be the guy inside. He showed a couple things last year that I liked, but it wasn't enough for me. He can be a nice option, but he isn't a guy that I am basing draft weekend decisions around.
just saw  
SamdaGiantsFan : 4/10/2014 9:31 am : link
your Hageman comment, nevermind
Thanks Sy  
sjnyfan : 4/10/2014 9:31 am : link
I think this is a sneaky good DT class this year with several starters over the next few years, but none better than Donald. I really, really want him in blue. He'll change the defense for the better almost immediately.

What are your thoughts on Princeton's Caraun Reid? I think he would be a nice consolation to Donald if for whatever reason he doesn't reach us. I've been high on him since last season and I think he's the best defensive player from the Ivy since Marcellus Wiley back in '97.

Also thoughts on Zack Kerr from Delaware? Another Day 3 pick, but I think he can be a very successful run stuffer with some pass rush ability as well.

Sy- glad you see it too!  
GmenDynasty : 4/10/2014 9:33 am : link
Quote:


Day One Target:

Aaron Donald – Pittsburgh

I had a hard time accepting the fact that Donald was indeed one of the top players in the draft. I usually want guys with size inside, guys with consistent power presence that cannot be moved. But after watching almost 10+ games of Pittsburgh dating back to last year, I’m convinced Donald will be a star. He is the pass rushing presence that NYG has lacked inside for a long time and I think he is a better run defender than most will give him credit for. It’s easy to look at his size and say he can’t handle the physical power needed to anchor a position against the run. But when I scout him, I see a guy that can not only maintain position, but push linemen back, get off their blocks, and chase down the ball carrier like a linebacker. Donald will likely be my pick for NYG should be available at #12.


We may not agree on alot of evaluations on other guys namely Dennard (who I think will be better than Gilbert),Gilbert (lack of football instincts), Mack (who I still can't beleive you have Mosley rated equally or slightly better).

Anyone who watches enough film of Donald and has even the slightest eye for football talent can not deny how much this kid jumps off the screen with his talent.

Alot of these first round picks this year in this loaded draft are likely going to be very good and even pro-bowlers. Donald though has the look of a once in a decade type talent. He will likely be clear cut BPA when we pick should he make it to 12.

Reale: DaQuan Jones  
Sy'56 : 4/10/2014 9:33 am : link
I think he is really good, and could be a borderline elite run defender. Not a guy that will show up at the pro bowl every year, but certainly a guy that makes a difference with his ability to eat space, blockers, and make the occasional pay behind the line.
Sy  
The Natural : 4/10/2014 9:35 am : link
These draft previews are the best. I don't watch a lot of college ball so these summarize players I haven't seen.
Thank you.
BB'56  
Sy'56 : 4/10/2014 9:36 am : link
Jernigan at 43 is a possibility. He is a similar type player to Donald...a little undersized but plays big and is often too quick for most interior guys to handle one on one. He doesn't hold the point of attack as well though, and I think his play to play contribution will be limited at the start. But the upside is there. Definitely an option for round 2.
I think our Defense would have also  
beatrixkiddo : 4/10/2014 9:36 am : link
ranked higher had we not had one of the worst offenses.

How many times did we turn the ball over on our half of the field? What was the average time of possesion for Offense? Yeah, our Defense was absolutely better than 8th if you take this into consideration.

I'm more inclined to say that improving our Offense is a greater priority with our first selection, either an OL or an big time weapon will also help our defense by keeping them off the field.

I really like Tuitt and I think he is a better fit and less of a gamble for the Giants over Donald. He fits the mold of a Giants DL, he is versatile and the Canty comparison is spot on IMO. He's the earliest consideration I'd say for taking a DT this early though.

I have some later rd. DT that I think can come in and provide what we need even as rotational players this year. Carauen Reid, Jay Bromley, Will Sutton; all players I think can be had 4th rd and later and can develop into capable starters. I'd love your analysis on these guys Sy'.

Overall, while I think our DL needs some help and depth, I think there are just too many other glaring needs on Offense. I think there will be better value for other Defensive positions at the top where I'd rather the giants go, like a Borland or Shazier in rd. 2 instead. I think Rd.4 is where I'd target anyone of those guys I listed above for a DT.

gidiefor  
Sy'56 : 4/10/2014 9:39 am : link
Again...very shortsighted. Starting or not....Donald would make a huge impact on this team in year one. The starting lineup is about as important as what round a QB is drafted in when looking back on their career and evaluating.

If you restrict yourself to just 2 or 3 positions for a first round pick, you limit yourself. You can't limit yourself when trying to build a team via the draft, it's foolish.
sjnyfan  
Sy'56 : 4/10/2014 9:43 am : link
Reid and Kerr both finished with a 69, actually. #16 and #17 overall DTs on my board. I wouldn't call them consolation if Donald isn't in blue, but I get what you are saying.

They both have a presence about them and I think they could have a Barry Cofield type impact as rookies. They are strong enough to handle the strength/size of the NFL, but also they do the little things right. I'd be disappointed if NYG waited untiul round 5 to make a DT pick though. They could, however, be a second DT brought in because NYG could use a couple.
Thanks  
sjnyfan : 4/10/2014 9:48 am : link
and I agree
Sy, I agree about both Donald and Anthony Johnson.  
yatqb : 4/10/2014 9:58 am : link
I think Donald will be a force from day one, and that Johnson's play just does not live up to the reputation his name generated over the last few years.
Thanks Sy  
BillT : 4/10/2014 10:05 am : link
Unless the Giants don't see Donald's obvious talent transferring because of his size (and I think that's not likely) he'll be the pick at 12 if he's still there. It would be a huge plus for the Giants to get this kind of talent where they are drafting. It seems perfectly set up for the Giants with a number of QB, OL and other star talent being obvious choices for the top 10 teams. Hope this works out for the Giants.
I think  
Eric from BBI : Admin : 4/10/2014 10:22 am : link
Johnathan Hankins is going to be a very good player for us.
The Giants have been looking for a bona fide 3-tech for years, now.  
Klaatu : 4/10/2014 10:38 am : link
Aaron Donald is clearly the best one in this draft. If he's still on the board when they're up at 12 and they pass on him, I hope that's not a decision they'll come to regret.
RE: I think  
GIANTSr01 : 4/10/2014 10:39 am : link
In comment 11614024 Eric from BBI said:
Quote:
Johnathan Hankins is going to be a very good player for us.


I agree with this. I think he'll be a better player than Joseph, if not this year then certainly by 2015.
RE: I think  
GmenDynasty : 4/10/2014 10:49 am : link
In comment 11614024 Eric from BBI said:
Quote:
Johnathan Hankins is going to be a very good player for us.


I think big Hank is going to be a pretty darn good player too!
RE: The Giants have been looking for a bona fide 3-tech for years, now.  
GmenDynasty : 4/10/2014 11:07 am : link
In comment 11614048 Klaatu said:
Quote:
Aaron Donald is clearly the best one in this draft. If he's still on the board when they're up at 12 and they pass on him, I hope that's not a decision they'll come to regret.


it's pretty clear under TC/Reese Giants crave pass rush from as many positions possible.

Sintim/Kiwi at hybrid LB/DE, O'Brien Schofield for that ridiculous 8 mill contract. The 3 techs we drafted in the top 3 rounds Austin,Alford.

This guy will bring a very rare and unique ability to create rush up the middle on a consistent basis. Getting this type of talent at 12 would be amazing.

DEs and OLBs have nothing to do with the obvious need for a 3-tech.  
Klaatu : 4/10/2014 11:29 am : link
If it's not Donald, then we'll have to see how things shake out. Might be another 2nd-rounder, might be later on.

As for Hankins, I like him much more than Sy does, but he's still only one guy. Jenkins and Patterson are clearly not in it for the long haul, and who knows what we'll get out of Kuhn?
Always been a fan of larger DTs  
Mike fr Warwick : 4/10/2014 11:43 am : link
But this guy is the exception. Bring him play him in a bunch of under fronts and turn him loose.
RE: DEs and OLBs have nothing to do with the obvious need for a 3-tech.  
GmenDynasty : 4/10/2014 11:50 am : link
In comment 11614150 Klaatu said:
Quote:
If it's not Donald, then we'll have to see how things shake out. Might be another 2nd-rounder, might be later on.

As for Hankins, I like him much more than Sy does, but he's still only one guy. Jenkins and Patterson are clearly not in it for the long haul, and who knows what we'll get out of Kuhn?


The point is Giants place a great premium on pass-rush ability. So whether it's a 3-tech or a 1-tech with above avg. pass rush ability, an LB or hybrid LB/DE , draft history shows they want a guy with potential for great pass rush ability (and will sometimes reach for them).
Pages: 1 2 3 | Show All |  Next>>
Back to the Corner