I have these giant filthy stains on a nice pair of slacks I bought last week. Anybody have any tips on how to free these slacks of these giant filthy stains?
I will not be silenced.
Until I figure out how to get rid of these stains, that is
maybe removing the offending stain and then letting the guy wearing the pants know not to stain them again would be appropriate.
Or just throw the pants away.
Good point, I told the pants store owner this and he said since the guy wearing the pants has been wearing pants for quite some time, he should have known not to stain the pants to begin with. Suffice to say, the owner is a bit of a blowjob. Nice store though.
maybe removing the offending stain and then letting the guy wearing the pants know not to stain them again would be appropriate.
Or just throw the pants away.
Good point, I told the pants store owner this and he said since the guy wearing the pants has been wearing pants for quite some time, he should have known not to stain the pants to begin with. Suffice to say, the owner is a bit of a blowjob. Nice store though.
Still a bit weird. It's not like even a guy that wears pants every day would know which stains would cause the most trouble, especially considering the amount of stains we see on pants around here daily.
Some stains evidently cause less trouble than others, even if they're the same variety. A wearer wouldn't know until after the stain had set , tho.
maybe removing the offending stain and then letting the guy wearing the pants know not to stain them again would be appropriate.
Or just throw the pants away.
Good point, I told the pants store owner this and he said since the guy wearing the pants has been wearing pants for quite some time, he should have known not to stain the pants to begin with. Suffice to say, the owner is a bit of a blowjob. Nice store though.
Still a bit weird. It's not like even a guy that wears pants every day would know which stains would cause the most trouble, especially considering the amount of stains we see on pants around here daily.
Some stains evidently cause less trouble than others, even if they're the same variety. A wearer wouldn't know until after the stain had set , tho.
Oh well. Back to wearing shorts I guess.
The guy who was wearing the pants didn't even wear them to work because he knew they wouldn't be safe there. He told me, and anyone else who was near him and his pants that these pants weren't safe for work. But I guess pants can still get dirty no matter how many precautions you exhaust.
since this pants have been around forever, should you really throw them out because they should know better? Or should you cut them some slack, since they've been around forever, and earned that right?
I doubt the guy even knows that there is a stain at this particular time.
He's gonna go to put them on tomorrow morning and find out about the mess then.
Then what's he gonna do? It's not like he can just get a new pair of pants at that hour.
He can always go to the thrift shop and find himself a new pair of pants altogether, but he's been through a lot with these particular pair of pants that he almost holds a sentimental value towards and that people have come to recognize him by. Without these pants, he's not himself.
But I never really liked his pants anyway, so no biggie. Thrift shop it is.
It's not worth it. They'll just get thrown out again for something like a pulled thread, or a missing button, or frayed cuffs...
I guess, but you always feel like these new pair of pants will be different from previous pants. Maybe seeing a tailor every so often and giving these new pants some TLC instead of just getting rid of them after a few nicks and stains can make a world of a difference into the quality of pants from here on out.
and said that he will forever be linked to the Mets and the Jets. Then he went out in a blaze of banhammer glory.
jcn.. Yes I heard that - he did declare that it was over between him and the Braves and declared his everlasting allegiance to the Mets - but I think he was stuttering a little there that made Mets, Mets, Mets!!! Sound like Mets, Jets, Mets!!!
Filthy posted a thread with a link to an article that had another link that led to naked gash with an airplane stuck in it.
Somebody clicked on aforementioned link, got offended by the cooch and emailed Eric. Then somebody else did the same thing.
Eric banned Filthy. A few people blamed the mods and said that it was okay for the mods to make use of ads with cooch pictures, but poor filthy got banned for it.
Shawn set them straight and let them know that Gary is the one who sets up the cooch ads.
Cam accused Shawn of throwing Gary under the bus.
Then you came on and asked what's happening and I told you.
Filthy posted a thread with a link to an article that had another link that led to naked gash with an airplane stuck in it.
Somebody clicked on aforementioned link, got offended by the cooch and emailed Eric. Then somebody else did the same thing.
Eric banned Filthy. A few people blamed the mods and said that it was okay for the mods to make use of ads with cooch pictures, but poor filthy got banned for it.
Shawn set them straight and let them know that Gary is the one who sets up the cooch ads.
Cam accused Shawn of throwing Gary under the bus.
Then you came on and asked what's happening and I told you.
Now you're up to date.
Go get me a beer.
You think you're so fucking good. Where do my dirty pants play into all of this, Dor Vinci?
Fucked Filthys mom at a BBI get together and came all over her stomach, to where she proceeded to clean the mess with the nearest thing - Filthy's pants. From that day on they became more than just a pair of dirty pants and rnargi was literally a motherfucker.
He should know that posting a SFW link that has a link that leads to NSFW material would be clicked on by someone who apparently doesn't know when they're reading an article about a vag would lead to a picture of a vag.. then email Eric about it..
He should know that posting a SFW link that has a link that leads to NSFW material would be clicked on by someone who apparently doesn't know when they're reading an article about a vag would lead to a picture of a vag.. then email Eric about it..
What's really fucked up is that there are only 3 degrees of separation from any one link on the interwebz to pr0n.
So really, any link posted here is grounds for a banning.
Beez and Filthy were the same person. It was all an elaborate hoax. I'm actually surprised it lasted so long. Then again, from what I understand he went to incredible lengths to make it seem like they were two people; up to and including hiring a guy to attend camp as 'Beez'.
It was actually pretty damned obvious in hindsight.
i saw NSFW on it. maybe the word possibly. i dont really know. Either way, this site has linked directly to porn via ads. And that story was all over the gd interwebz. Banning filthy is just plain stupid. Hypocritical buncha sumonabeeches.
Nobody complains about those big titty Snorg Tees ads
i saw NSFW on it. maybe the word possibly. i dont really know. Either way, this site has linked directly to porn via ads. And that story was all over the gd interwebz. Banning filthy is just plain stupid. Hypocritical buncha sumonabeeches.
He actually said something along the lines of "extremely NSFW". Said the link was SFW, but led to NSFW if the people chose to go out of their way and wanted to see the NSFW picture.
He should know that posting a SFW link that has a link that leads to NSFW material would be clicked on by someone who apparently doesn't know when they're reading an article about a vag would lead to a picture of a vag.. then email Eric about it..
Like most vags it took some steps and extra effort to get to it and once you get there, it wasn't all that good to look at.
Go figure.
It wasn't even a good looking plane.
Don't usually participate in these type of threads
But how do you get banned for linking to a perfectly safe page? The picture wasn't even directly on the page linked to.
In order to see the picture you had to intentionally disregard the warnings, both here and on the link stating the picture was NSFW.
That's like me running into the Interstate at rush hour, and then suing the poor soul who hit me with his car.... Who's fault is it really? Free the filth!
and while stupid, the only people who should have been banned were the dumbasses who actually clicked on the link. To his credit, Filthy made it perfectly clear what they would find and that it was NSFW.
This offense doesn't deserve a time out - give a time out to the idiots who clicked on the link.
then what was the reason for posting in the first place? You wanted to read about a woman who had a back and forth with customer service of an airline?
I mean, I was surprised because the picture was posted on the thread but, not really offended. Pretty fuckin weak that someone complained and now he's been banned.
Is it a full on ban with no coming back. Or can he pull a Nelson Mandela here?
But didn't really understand what had gotten him banned. But come to think of it, I do remember the post in question, and if I'm right, then it's ridiculous that he got banned for the post I have in mind.
It was something going on in the news, and he posted the Safe-For-Work version and noted that clicking the Safe-For-Work version contained a link for the NFSW version in case anyone wanted to see.
All the information was there for the posted to make an informed decision. And this wasn't some nonsense link. This is a pretty big deal in the news.
Terrible job by BBI in this case... especially for a long-timer who's always been a good contributor.
As I said earlier, I am a Filthy supporter but when I clicked the thread I immediately saw the picture of a downed Boeing 777 in a huge gash. It wasn't anywhere near a safe for work version. I mean, it was right there, staring at me.
As I said earlier, I am a Filthy supporter but when I clicked the thread I immediately saw the picture of a downed Boeing 777 in a huge gash. It wasn't anywhere near a safe for work version. I mean, it was right there, staring at me.
If I'm thinking of the right post, all I saw was a heavily pixelated blob of nothingness. I was able to deduct what was going on based on the headline, but there was no visual to be seen.
As I said earlier, I am a Filthy supporter but when I clicked the thread I immediately saw the picture of a downed Boeing 777 in a huge gash. It wasn't anywhere near a safe for work version. I mean, it was right there, staring at me.
No, the link was to an article.
You had to click a link in the article to get to the picture.
And, there were several warnings in the article stating that the picture was NSFW.
I'm pretty sure the only thing he MAY have posted was the pixelated photo which you can not see a thing in, but my memory is faulty on this one and that might have even just been in the link he linked (which THEN linked to the dirty photos).
Either way, he definitely did not post the photo directly in the thread.
It was a separate link within the page Filthy posted. Filthy gave plenty of warning in his OP, anyone who saw the NSFW pic has nobody to blame but themselves. To complain to Eric about it makes them a bigger gash than, well... you know.
I'm pretty sure the only thing he MAY have posted was the pixelated photo which you can not see a thing in, but my memory is faulty on this one and that might have even just been in the link he linked (which THEN linked to the dirty photos).
Either way, he definitely did not post the photo directly in the thread.
When I clicked the thread, the picture was in the OP. I didnt have to click any link.
The way Eric worded it in the first Free Filthy thread made it seem like it was triggering web filters. He used the word blockers, perhaps as in "website blockers"?
Businesses can install software that keys in on certain phrases or websites to block users on their network from accessing certain websites. Porn, for example.
It's possible that even though the link Filthy supplied was free of the image, it could have triggered one of these filters and blocked a BBI user on a protected network.
in the BBI thread was pixelated. The pic on the article linked was pixelated. You had to actually click on a link called something like "If you really want to see it, click here". That took you to the offending picture.
But it would be difficult for any of us supplying a link
IMO that would be a weak reason for banning someone. How could he know that would happen? If that were the case just delete the thread and move on. However if he did link to porn Eric had little choice in banning him.
I still wonder if the site didn't change from a pixilated image to a clear one later in the day. Too many people insisting they saw different things.
then you must be a fucking riot when you take Rorschak tests. That image was pixelated beyond recognition.
jcn, it was clear as day on my browser. I didnt really care or think anything of it because I'm an adult and, the threads title clearly said NSFW.
Honestly, I don't care but this is exactly what I saw. Unless Filthy saved and stored and then uploaded the picture in the thread, there is a chance that the pixelated picture was replaced by the NSFW version. I know what I saw, damnit. Anyway, is he back yet?
nets
Ny loves teams that end in "ets".
Or just throw the pants away.
Er, uh - YEAH, nobody wanted that porn damnit!
Or just throw the pants away.
Good point, I told the pants store owner this and he said since the guy wearing the pants has been wearing pants for quite some time, he should have known not to stain the pants to begin with. Suffice to say, the owner is a bit of a blowjob. Nice store though.
Very Sneaky, sis!!!
That's for worse than a ban.
Quote:
maybe removing the offending stain and then letting the guy wearing the pants know not to stain them again would be appropriate.
Or just throw the pants away.
Good point, I told the pants store owner this and he said since the guy wearing the pants has been wearing pants for quite some time, he should have known not to stain the pants to begin with. Suffice to say, the owner is a bit of a blowjob. Nice store though.
Still a bit weird. It's not like even a guy that wears pants every day would know which stains would cause the most trouble, especially considering the amount of stains we see on pants around here daily.
Some stains evidently cause less trouble than others, even if they're the same variety. A wearer wouldn't know until after the stain had set , tho.
Oh well. Back to wearing shorts I guess.
Quote:
In comment 11622072 Cam in MO said:
Quote:
maybe removing the offending stain and then letting the guy wearing the pants know not to stain them again would be appropriate.
Or just throw the pants away.
Good point, I told the pants store owner this and he said since the guy wearing the pants has been wearing pants for quite some time, he should have known not to stain the pants to begin with. Suffice to say, the owner is a bit of a blowjob. Nice store though.
Still a bit weird. It's not like even a guy that wears pants every day would know which stains would cause the most trouble, especially considering the amount of stains we see on pants around here daily.
Some stains evidently cause less trouble than others, even if they're the same variety. A wearer wouldn't know until after the stain had set , tho.
Oh well. Back to wearing shorts I guess.
The guy who was wearing the pants didn't even wear them to work because he knew they wouldn't be safe there. He told me, and anyone else who was near him and his pants that these pants weren't safe for work. But I guess pants can still get dirty no matter how many precautions you exhaust.
I have dirty pants.
About Filthy or just in general?
As usual.
He's gonna go to put them on tomorrow morning and find out about the mess then.
Then what's he gonna do? It's not like he can just get a new pair of pants at that hour.
Link - ( New Window )
Yeah, hell, throw em out.
I sure wouldn't want that on my conscience...
He's gonna go to put them on tomorrow morning and find out about the mess then.
Then what's he gonna do? It's not like he can just get a new pair of pants at that hour.
He can always go to the thrift shop and find himself a new pair of pants altogether, but he's been through a lot with these particular pair of pants that he almost holds a sentimental value towards and that people have come to recognize him by. Without these pants, he's not himself.
But I never really liked his pants anyway, so no biggie. Thrift shop it is.
5 posts strong and not a fucking iota of advice on my pants dilemma. Focus, people.
It's not worth it. They'll just get thrown out again for something like a pulled thread, or a missing button, or frayed cuffs...
Do you ever offer anything positive on pants threads? You should kill yourself.
It's not worth it. They'll just get thrown out again for something like a pulled thread, or a missing button, or frayed cuffs...
I guess, but you always feel like these new pair of pants will be different from previous pants. Maybe seeing a tailor every so often and giving these new pants some TLC instead of just getting rid of them after a few nicks and stains can make a world of a difference into the quality of pants from here on out.
we're big pant people
jcn.. Yes I heard that - he did declare that it was over between him and the Braves and declared his everlasting allegiance to the Mets - but I think he was stuttering a little there that made Mets, Mets, Mets!!! Sound like Mets, Jets, Mets!!!
I'm sorry a picture of a vagina shocked you Brett.
It's the internet, none of us are wearing pants.
Well considering it mentioned the word vagina, I'm sure many posters creamed their pants.
I agree, very childish.
One clarification, Bold Ruler and I are not involved in the site development/programming.
Quote:
But Filthy gets banned?
One clarification, Bold Ruler and I are not involved in the site development/programming.
Gary, Shawn has your back, yo!
He's been married with a kid for a while and got a little to excited watching som pr0n.
Bad/bushy childhood memories I suppose.
I alway did my best to make his moms keep that shit clean shaven, but I didn't always have that extra pack of smokes to spare.
Somebody clicked on aforementioned link, got offended by the cooch and emailed Eric. Then somebody else did the same thing.
Eric banned Filthy. A few people blamed the mods and said that it was okay for the mods to make use of ads with cooch pictures, but poor filthy got banned for it.
Shawn set them straight and let them know that Gary is the one who sets up the cooch ads.
Cam accused Shawn of throwing Gary under the bus.
Then you came on and asked what's happening and I told you.
Now you're up to date.
Go get me a beer.
Bad/bushy childhood memories I suppose.
I alway did my best to make his moms keep that shit clean shaven, but I didn't always have that extra pack of smokes to spare.
jesus, lmfao
Bad/bushy childhood memories I suppose.
I alway did my best to make his moms keep that shit clean shaven, but I didn't always have that extra pack of smokes to spare.
Thanks, Cam, that was very thoughtful of you.
Problem solved!
Somebody clicked on aforementioned link, got offended by the cooch and emailed Eric. Then somebody else did the same thing.
Eric banned Filthy. A few people blamed the mods and said that it was okay for the mods to make use of ads with cooch pictures, but poor filthy got banned for it.
Shawn set them straight and let them know that Gary is the one who sets up the cooch ads.
Cam accused Shawn of throwing Gary under the bus.
Then you came on and asked what's happening and I told you.
Now you're up to date.
Go get me a beer.
You think you're so fucking good. Where do my dirty pants play into all of this, Dor Vinci?
(God I hope Filthy's mom hasn't passed away)
Alright, I'm just running on fumes right now.
Problem solved!
Haha! I have a pair exactly like that.
For riding, not for 'riding'.
he was my favorite poster
He should know that posting a SFW link that has a link that leads to NSFW material would be clicked on by someone who apparently doesn't know when they're reading an article about a vag would lead to a picture of a vag.. then email Eric about it..
he was my favorite poster
He should know that posting a SFW link that has a link that leads to NSFW material would be clicked on by someone who apparently doesn't know when they're reading an article about a vag would lead to a picture of a vag.. then email Eric about it..
What's really fucked up is that there are only 3 degrees of separation from any one link on the interwebz to pr0n.
So really, any link posted here is grounds for a banning.
Unless it's an ad.
And wtf happened to beez.???
And wtf happened to beez.???
His last thread was broadly Pan'd
And wtf happened to beez.???
I swore that I would keep this a secret...
But since they're both gone...
Beez and Filthy were the same person. It was all an elaborate hoax. I'm actually surprised it lasted so long. Then again, from what I understand he went to incredible lengths to make it seem like they were two people; up to and including hiring a guy to attend camp as 'Beez'.
It was actually pretty damned obvious in hindsight.
I miss those.
One-degree of separation, clearly, is a bannable offense.
He actually said something along the lines of "extremely NSFW". Said the link was SFW, but led to NSFW if the people chose to go out of their way and wanted to see the NSFW picture.
Filthy posted a picture of a Cockpit and got banned for it.
He should know that posting a SFW link that has a link that leads to NSFW material would be clicked on by someone who apparently doesn't know when they're reading an article about a vag would lead to a picture of a vag.. then email Eric about it..
Like most vags it took some steps and extra effort to get to it and once you get there, it wasn't all that good to look at.
Go figure.
It wasn't even a good looking plane.
In order to see the picture you had to intentionally disregard the warnings, both here and on the link stating the picture was NSFW.
That's like me running into the Interstate at rush hour, and then suing the poor soul who hit me with his car.... Who's fault is it really? Free the filth!
This offense doesn't deserve a time out - give a time out to the idiots who clicked on the link.
There was nothing wrong with what was posted in the OP.
Major milf's?
wallnuts
beez
blame the sick fucks who put the fucking airline tragedies on on of the fucking telly all day every day
'do no click on any link if you are easily offended'
thus a legalistic loophole of sorts to any said 'policies' that may or may not be in place
id really like to see it clearly stated.
I'm still amazed at the stomach butt..
BAN 78!
Is it a full on ban with no coming back. Or can he pull a Nelson Mandela here?
It was something going on in the news, and he posted the Safe-For-Work version and noted that clicking the Safe-For-Work version contained a link for the NFSW version in case anyone wanted to see.
All the information was there for the posted to make an informed decision. And this wasn't some nonsense link. This is a pretty big deal in the news.
Terrible job by BBI in this case... especially for a long-timer who's always been a good contributor.
If I'm thinking of the right post, all I saw was a heavily pixelated blob of nothingness. I was able to deduct what was going on based on the headline, but there was no visual to be seen.
No, the link was to an article.
You had to click a link in the article to get to the picture.
And, there were several warnings in the article stating that the picture was NSFW.
You learn every day, you never stop learning.
I'm pretty sure the only thing he MAY have posted was the pixelated photo which you can not see a thing in, but my memory is faulty on this one and that might have even just been in the link he linked (which THEN linked to the dirty photos).
Either way, he definitely did not post the photo directly in the thread.
Quote:
directly in the thread or not?
I'm pretty sure the only thing he MAY have posted was the pixelated photo which you can not see a thing in, but my memory is faulty on this one and that might have even just been in the link he linked (which THEN linked to the dirty photos).
Either way, he definitely did not post the photo directly in the thread.
When I clicked the thread, the picture was in the OP. I didnt have to click any link.
Brought back terrible memories.
It was all clearly marked.
It was all clearly marked.
Quit defending your internet friend. This isn't Facebook. It's BBI.
Man the Fuck up and stop being a coward.
Pussy.
Quote:
It was inappropriate.
Pussy.
I'm sorry that I have ethical values and don't want that filth on this message board.
Quote:
In comment 11625182 BrettNYG10 said:
Quote:
It was inappropriate.
Pussy.
I'm sorry that I have ethical values and don't want that filth on this message board.
You don't have any values. You're just as morally repugnant as the rest of us and you love it.
I know it's trout season, but you don't have to bite at every thing in the water.
Well that's all you had to say! That I can understand.
jcn, it was clear as day on my browser. I didnt really care or think anything of it because I'm an adult and, the threads title clearly said NSFW.
It's possible that even though the link Filthy supplied was free of the image, it could have triggered one of these filters and blocked a BBI user on a protected network.
For example, a network nazi could install a filter that blocks any links to giants.com or even the NY Post, for example.
I still wonder if the site didn't change from a pixilated image to a clear one later in the day. Too many people insisting they saw different things.
That's why I use Bing.
don't type in hot pussy! NSFW! - ( New Window )
Quote:
then you must be a fucking riot when you take Rorschak tests. That image was pixelated beyond recognition.
jcn, it was clear as day on my browser. I didnt really care or think anything of it because I'm an adult and, the threads title clearly said NSFW.
Honestly, I don't care but this is exactly what I saw. Unless Filthy saved and stored and then uploaded the picture in the thread, there is a chance that the pixelated picture was replaced by the NSFW version. I know what I saw, damnit. Anyway, is he back yet?