I have these giant filthy stains on a nice pair of slacks I bought last week. Anybody have any tips on how to free these slacks of these giant filthy stains?
The way Eric worded it in the first Free Filthy thread made it seem like it was triggering web filters. He used the word blockers, perhaps as in "website blockers"?
Businesses can install software that keys in on certain phrases or websites to block users on their network from accessing certain websites. Porn, for example.
It's possible that even though the link Filthy supplied was free of the image, it could have triggered one of these filters and blocked a BBI user on a protected network.
in the BBI thread was pixelated. The pic on the article linked was pixelated. You had to actually click on a link called something like "If you really want to see it, click here". That took you to the offending picture.
But it would be difficult for any of us supplying a link
IMO that would be a weak reason for banning someone. How could he know that would happen? If that were the case just delete the thread and move on. However if he did link to porn Eric had little choice in banning him.
I still wonder if the site didn't change from a pixilated image to a clear one later in the day. Too many people insisting they saw different things.
then you must be a fucking riot when you take Rorschak tests. That image was pixelated beyond recognition.
jcn, it was clear as day on my browser. I didnt really care or think anything of it because I'm an adult and, the threads title clearly said NSFW.
Honestly, I don't care but this is exactly what I saw. Unless Filthy saved and stored and then uploaded the picture in the thread, there is a chance that the pixelated picture was replaced by the NSFW version. I know what I saw, damnit. Anyway, is he back yet?
Quote:
In comment 11625182 BrettNYG10 said:
Quote:
It was inappropriate.
Pussy.
I'm sorry that I have ethical values and don't want that filth on this message board.
You don't have any values. You're just as morally repugnant as the rest of us and you love it.
I know it's trout season, but you don't have to bite at every thing in the water.
Well that's all you had to say! That I can understand.
jcn, it was clear as day on my browser. I didnt really care or think anything of it because I'm an adult and, the threads title clearly said NSFW.
It's possible that even though the link Filthy supplied was free of the image, it could have triggered one of these filters and blocked a BBI user on a protected network.
For example, a network nazi could install a filter that blocks any links to giants.com or even the NY Post, for example.
I still wonder if the site didn't change from a pixilated image to a clear one later in the day. Too many people insisting they saw different things.
That's why I use Bing.
don't type in hot pussy! NSFW! - ( New Window )
Quote:
then you must be a fucking riot when you take Rorschak tests. That image was pixelated beyond recognition.
jcn, it was clear as day on my browser. I didnt really care or think anything of it because I'm an adult and, the threads title clearly said NSFW.
Honestly, I don't care but this is exactly what I saw. Unless Filthy saved and stored and then uploaded the picture in the thread, there is a chance that the pixelated picture was replaced by the NSFW version. I know what I saw, damnit. Anyway, is he back yet?