in the cell phone camera age. I really want to believe in a creature like that. But a thing that big on land in today's world would need to be a ninja to go unseen. Just don't see it as possible.
But who knows what's under the oceans of the world. I know Loch Ness isn't an ocean which is why Nessie has always felt less likely to be real. But an undiscovered giant sea creature just seems far more likely than an undiscovered giant land creature at this point.
"For six months the image has been studied by experts at the Official Loch Ness Monster Fan Club, where excitement is mounting after various explanations for it were ruled out... leaving them to conclude it is ‘likely’ to be the elusive beast."
last week, Japanese scientists explaced... placed explosive detonators at the bottom of Lake Loch Ness to blow Nessie out of the water. Sir Cort Godfrey of the Nessie Alliance summoned the help of Scotland's local wizards to cast a protective spell over the lake and its local residents and all those who seek for the peaceful existence of our underwater ally.
doesn't need to be any more scientific than that. Is this probably a big fish on zoom? Sure. That's how the one great hoax picture was perpetrated, scaled "monster" when the waves were relatively calm. But it keeps people going to a part of the UK that could doesn't have much going for it save tourism, and the people up there are great regardless.
The explanation (likely BS of course) for why Loch Ness is that it is very deep and could be linked to the sea by underwater caves. The water is too murky for any sort of comprehensive exploration of the bottom.
doesn't need to be any more scientific than that. Is this probably a big fish on zoom? Sure. That's how the one great hoax picture was perpetrated, scaled "monster" when the waves were relatively calm. But it keeps people going to a part of the UK that could doesn't have much going for it save tourism, and the people up there are great regardless.
The explanation (likely BS of course) for why Loch Ness is that it is very deep and could be linked to the sea by underwater caves. The water is too murky for any sort of comprehensive exploration of the bottom.
It's linked directly to the sea by the River Ness.
Yes but the River Ness is not especially deep.... Â
and even a giant fish swimming through Inverness would not escape notice. It would seem more "plausible" that something would swim up the Great Glen through one of these magical subterranean channels.
if it were 'spotted' in the ocean. Thing is, Loch Ness is fresh water. It's fake. Always has been, always will be.
I'm not sure what fresh water or the ocean has to do with anything. Bull Sharks can adapt to fresh water. There are species of crocodiles that can survive in both environments as well.
But who knows what's under the oceans of the world. I know Loch Ness isn't an ocean which is why Nessie has always felt less likely to be real. But an undiscovered giant sea creature just seems far more likely than an undiscovered giant land creature at this point.
The explanation (likely BS of course) for why Loch Ness is that it is very deep and could be linked to the sea by underwater caves. The water is too murky for any sort of comprehensive exploration of the bottom.
The explanation (likely BS of course) for why Loch Ness is that it is very deep and could be linked to the sea by underwater caves. The water is too murky for any sort of comprehensive exploration of the bottom.
It's linked directly to the sea by the River Ness.
Maybe Nessie is a giant frog created by a radioactive cloud from Fukushima?
dog
ratdog
I'm not sure what fresh water or the ocean has to do with anything. Bull Sharks can adapt to fresh water. There are species of crocodiles that can survive in both environments as well.
That being said I believe that is a boat.