Â
|
|
Quote: |
“I realized how many times he saved our butts and how many times he came up big,” Amukamara said of Hill, the former Giants safety who was waived on Monday after being handed a third drug-related suspension in three seasons by the NFL. “It’s going to be a tough loss. Hopefully if he goes to a team, it’s not someone in the NFC East. He’s a guy you don’t want to face.” ... “I just saw him with the trash bag right before we were going out to practice, so it shocked us,” Amukamara said. “He told us that he was gone, so it was tough.” ... “I know the Giants are very huge on reputation and representing the organization well,” Amukamara said. “It was tough. I figured that was an option, to cut him from the team, but I didn’t think they would. I don’t think he missed a day in meetings or showing up to OTAs or practice. I didn’t see it coming, but I definitely saw it as a possibility.” ... “It’s going to be tough to fill his shoes because he brought so much energy on special teams and on defense,” Amukamara said. “He’ll be a hard guy to replace.” |
And spare me on how much he "saved" the Giants secondary last year. Last I checked, they were 7-9. That does not sound like a "saved" team to me.
Then he did. Some guys always do. Just a matter of time.
Terrible loss but what else could the Giants do?
Anyone who has run an organization or managed people knows that there have to be rules and consequences for breaking the rules.
When an employee violates one of the rules you sit them down, explain the violation and tell them the consequences if they break the rule again.
The Giants likely did the same thing with Hill, letting him know at "strike two" that if he violated the substance abuse policy again he would be gone. They probably even asked him if he understood the consequences for another violation.
So what else could they do when Hill broke the rules for a third time?
Should they have said that they were only kidding when they told him he would be cut after strike three?
Should they have said that they'd let him slide one more time, but if he did it again they would actually follow through on their promise to cut him?
What message would that have sent to Will Hill and to his teammates?
You can't run a team like that.
Will Hill knew the rules and the repercussions for breaking the substance abuse policy a third time.
The Giants didn't cut him. Will Hill cut himself.
"...Another slip-up and that's that..."
'Nuff said..
It's the equivalent of a guy who is very productive but constantly injured. At some point the team has to go with somebody who has a better chance of giving you 16 full games.
Even if the league excepted weed from the drug policy, with someone like WH who apparently has -0- self control,and supposing he tokes up or gets a ride from some buddies and gets a contact/2nd hand smoke high;-),game day,and has that 'glow', narrow-eyed look, you think he's helpful even 4 hours later?
TC(not naive) likely makes him an inactive for punishment.
Same for an alcohol stupor for those that like to equivocate the substances.
He really needs to check into a long term rehab place or we read about him 10 years from now in a Mark Ingram I kind of story. In'15 I think he'll be 26 w/o the wear and tear and can get back someplace, maybe even NYFG if he really can prove his rehabilitation.
i.e. he know how to cover up his crimes
kidding....
Tuck (for good reason), Linval Joseph and Hill are gone. Those were three of the five most determined players on defense last year. Who is going to replace them? Rookie DT Jay Bromley? PUHLEESSSEEEE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
This likely bites in the ass big time.
"Wow", smoking weed gets you suspended and then cut by your team in the NFL. But killing a person while driving drunk only gets you a month in prison and then a FA contract the following year (re: Dante Stallworth)? Something smells rotten with the NFL!
In comment 11708546 Crispino said:
I remember reading that he remained clean until the day he retired when he promptly went out on a bender
In comment 11708548 mfsd said:
Quote:
on Parcells' Giants teams.
That's not a fair statement. Parcells spent his first couple years getting rid of the coke heads on the team. Sure, LT is a separate story and you can debate the double standard for LT vs everyone else, but it's not accurate to imply Parcells overlooked things like this
"Wow", smoking weed gets you suspended and then cut by your team in the NFL. But killing a person while driving drunk only gets you a month in prison and then a FA contract the following year (re: Dante Stallworth)? Something smells rotten with the NFL!
In comment 11708546 Crispino said:
Quote:
to play for so he can "get back "at the Giants for cutting him. He's that kind of moron.
We have a "new" troll.
Hill is not a knucklehead. He "Will" be missed considerably. And the Giants just stuck their proverbial foot in their mouth (because he is not replaceable)!
In comment 11708540 bceagle05 said:
In comment 11708633 Reese's Pieces said:
I wonder who made the final call. The owners, or did they defer to the coach. I hope not. The old man probably still ranks marijuana with coke.
What exactly did he do? He took some Ritalin and smoked some reefer (on his own time). Yes, he knew the rules. But now that 30+ states have medical marijuana and the Feds voted the other day not to interfere with any state that has a medical marijuana statute, I find this alarming. The NFL did not even attempt to give Hill due process. What is even more
contemptuous regarding the NFL, the Giants and Hill (in this instance)is that there will probably be a negotiation between the NFL and NFLPA to change their agreement on suspending players for recreational marijuana use within the next two years. They are already in talks regarding this issue given that penalizing players is not gravitating towards the present zeitgeist regarding marijuana use in this country.
In comment 11708681 SanFranGiantsFan said:
In comment 11708662 Reese's Pieces said:
Quote:
its not a question if its a crime.. Its against the league policy.. he knew the rules.. he chose not to abide by them.. if I am required to wear a suit at my job.. no matter how talented I am.. if I continue to break the rules.. I would be fired..
Will Hil couldnt adhere to the rules of his workplace environment.. period.. dont blame the Giants.. or the NFL.. the blame is squarely on him..
Sorry, but I think that you are being naïve. As long as there have been leagues there have been league rules that have been broken. You can start with Mickey Mantle and Babe Ruth, two of the biggest drunkards and womanizers in the history of sports in this country. They were not kicked off the team or ostracized from the league for their repeated violation of team and league rules. No, they are in the Hall of Fame and have monuments in Yankee Stadium.
And Lawrence Taylor. Do I detect a big groundswell of support from all of you out there for evicting him from the Hall of Fame? I didn't think so.
Will Hill's problem was not smoking marijuana. It was for being stupid enough to be caught.
Hill is not a knucklehead. He "Will" be missed considerably. And the Giants just stuck their proverbial foot in their mouth (because he is not replaceable)!
In comment 11708540 bceagle05 said:
Quote:
Just a knucklehead off the field. The Eagles released Cris Carter and it wound up changing his career and life. Hope this has a similar effect on Hill.
Yeah, Hill is no addict. He just can't help using weed to deal with his problems, back child support, arrest warrants and livelihood. Oh wait...
Explain to me how this franchise can have a mediocre racist alcoholic QB and a mediocre accused rapist defensive tackle play for it but not a potential all pro pot smoker.
Give Amukamora credit for saying the truth about Hill's value last year.
I especially like the part where the NY media (and BBI) created an environment of disgust for Will Hill that Mara/Reese just had to cut him.
That's just classic...
Explain to me how this franchise can have a mediocre racist alcoholic QB and a mediocre accused rapist defensive tackle play for it but not a potential all pro pot smoker.
Give Amukamora credit for saying the truth about Hill's value last year.
So this is how you fit 10 pounds of stupid into a 5 pound bag. Congrats?
Explain to me how this franchise can have a mediocre racist alcoholic QB and a mediocre accused rapist defensive tackle play for it but not a potential all pro pot smoker.
Give Amukamora credit for saying the truth about Hill's value last year.
When I was reading that all I could think of was that Mad Libs game that we played as kids.
Wait...are you trying to say the Giants should be more like the Cowboys? As in the franchise that hasn't had success since the Clinton administration?
Explain to me how this franchise can have a mediocre racist alcoholic QB and a mediocre accused rapist defensive tackle play for it but not a potential all pro pot smoker.
Give Amukamora credit for saying the truth about Hill's value last year.
Bahah.. yeah, Connor Hughes and Eric are calling the shots for the Giants now. This is all their fault.
At least AMUKAMORA told us the truth.
This guy is no more valuable than Tiki was and arguably Shockey. We did quite alright w/o either of them.
The important part is the remaining rotation. We have a few high upside guys and the starters, Rolle and Stevie Brown (if healthy) are very good.
Somebody just above me noted that the Giants did surprisingly well right after losing impact players tiki and shockey. Let's just all wish Will Hill luck and hope for similar magic.
As for Eric's hand-picked hatchet man, Connor Hughes, he probably had that editorial written weeks ago, salivating at the thought of having it published on BBI, pouring salt onto a grievously wounded Will Hill.
Keep fighting the good fight, Willie.
Tuck (for good reason), Linval Joseph and Hill are gone. Those were three of the five most determined players on defense last year. Who is going to replace them? Rookie DT Jay Bromley? PUHLEESSSEEEE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
"Yeah, they should have given him one more chance given the circumstances"
They DID give him one more chance - last year. At some point, you have to stop giving a guy "one more chance" or he'll never change, nor will any of the other players believe you. In "Earn the Right to Win," Tom Coughlin points out the necessity of instilling discipline, setting out rule and expectation, and treating all players by those same rules. It doesn't matter whether it was Will Hill, Julian Talley, or JPP. When a player continuously shows a disregard for team rules and puts himself above the team, then he must be removed. I loved the talent Hill showed, but he was given enough chances.
this
made
my
day
2. Hill is not bigger than the rules or the team; he was given one last chance to shape up and stay out of trouble and he didn't comply. out of principle, you have to treat everyone equally otherwise no one has respect for the rules and chaos can ensue. if he slipped up again, which given his history and lack of respect for the policies is likely, it could be a year long type of suspension and serve as even a bigger risk and disruption than it already has been,
3. Hill's infractions of the rules seem relatively minor and benign in the big picture and relative to some bad things other people have done
Cumulatively point #2 wins out over #1 and #3 as painful as that is.
That doesn't make sense. I don't see how the lesson is impaired. The lesson is you can't keep screwing up and making excuses and play here. He's no longer here. They have decided that they don't want his talent. Of course you as a fan may not agree.
As Prince states in his comments, Hill will be on another team... he's too talented not to be. There's a decent chance he'll end up with a better contract than the one he just had. It's not as if Will Hill's options are the Giants or a park bench. That's where the lesson loses whatever perceived power comes from it. The fact that he "won't be here" isn't going to hurt Will Hill. It's just going to hurt the Giants.
Hill wasn't great. Tiki Barber was a "great great" player.
He'll look for any team that will have him. It's not likely that his whole agenda is going to be "getting back at the Giants". Are you saying you wouldn't take a paycheck from a competitor after your company fired you (for cause)? Someone sounds like they are full of sh*t.
its a damn shame cause there are a million guys with less talent that would take this wasted talent and use it to have a career
If you have no teeth to following through with consequences to the rules you have stated, then you remove the incentive to follow the rules.
If you have no teeth to following through with consequences to the rules you have stated, then you remove the incentive to follow the rules.
It's this, and the fact that if you bend the rules for one guy, no matter how talented, the rest will start to expect the same.
It sucks that Hill is gone, but the Giants really had no other choice.
I think this post might be a suspensable airor.