for display only
Big Blue Interactive The Corner Forum  
Back to the Corner

Archived Thread

NFT: Yankees at a crossroads (including the Mets)

Matt M. : 7/17/2014 1:50 pm
I can see the current iteration of the Yankees over the next few years either becoming the Yankees of the early to mid 80s or the 1995-1996 Yankees.

They can continue to employ aging and/or mediocre veterans to plug holes and continue to slide. At the same time, the Mets could be on the ascent with their plethora of pitching, seeing the tide of fandom on NY shifting back to the Mets. This would be the scenario similar to the early/mid 80s.

On the other hand, they can commit to calling up more youngsters (Refsnyder, Pirela, etc.) to go along with the pitchers they've already called up to fill injury slots. This could mirror the 1995 Yankees calling up a number of AAA players to fill injury spots. A lot of people had written them off, but the youngsters performed well enough to keep them afloat and they rallied around Mattingly. In this case they could rally around Jeter.

Which team will the end up resembling?
I'd be really surprised...  
Dunedin81 : 7/17/2014 2:10 pm : link
if the "tide" shifted back to the Mets. It's a different landscape than in the 1980's. You still had people (parents) with memories of other NY teams. It's about more than success. And while the Mets are well-poised for success, they'd be more believable if the Wilpons would sell to [insert generic owner here].
If the Mets want to be "the team"  
sinctybldh : 7/17/2014 2:13 pm : link
they either need every prospect to hit or they need to show a willingness to go out and fill holes. It will be interesting to see what they do when the time comes to show that they can be contenders with their young pitching staff.
Dunedin  
Matt M. : 7/17/2014 2:17 pm : link
It would be a progression over 2-3 years. I'm not saying it will happen. But, I think it's possible.

Think about it this way. In the mid 90s to just a couple of years ago, the Yankees had a number of All star caliber players and/or household names on their roster. Simply, they had star appeal. Right now, Jeter is the only guy that fits the bill and Tanaka has potential. They have no other stars. On the flipside, the Mets still have Wright and Harvey was on his way to exploding to that status. With the right couple of moves the Mets could be the team of more interest to fringe fans.

Now, the real x factor is that Mets ownership is terrible and very likely to screw things up. But, the Yankees could end up on the downward path regardless.
Or, the third option is one that NY hasn't experienced in a while  
Matt M. : 7/17/2014 2:22 pm : link
The Yankees and Mets could both just flat out suck. when was the last time both teams were no better than .500 in the same season?
Im a Mets fan and I dont see a long term threat to the Yanks brand  
Deej : 7/17/2014 2:23 pm : link
This is like when the Jets are winning more, or the White Sox etc. It doesnt matter. There may be a few years blip where the Mets rule the back cover of the Post and Daily News, but the long term trend will remain that this is a Yankees town. Doesnt really matter much though -- there is more than enough revenue opportunity for the Mets to be a top 5 spending team. I just want them to win.
Mets  
speedywheels : 7/17/2014 2:24 pm : link
don't need "every" prospect to make it, but they sure as shit need a power LF bat!

And yeah, having the Wilpon sell wouldn't hurt...
speedy  
Deej : 7/17/2014 2:42 pm : link
if the Harvey, Wheeler, and Syndergaard all reach their potential and are healthy, Mets need very little else more than what they already have. Each can be a 5+ WAR pitcher, and if the Mets didnt have rotten luck in 1 run games, they'd be 5 games over .500 instead of 5 under -- and that's with only one regular hitter over .800 OPS.
It does come down to the Wilpons  
Jim in Fairfax : 7/17/2014 2:45 pm : link
They were willing to spend pre-Madoff implosion; they were a top 5 payroll team. Obviously Madoff ended that. The question is what happens now?

Hopes that they will sell will probably go unfulfilled. There were high hopes that balloon payments on their stadium loans would do them in, starting with a $250M payment that was due this summer. But they were able to refinance the loans, and so there is nothing impelling them to sell anymore.

The question now is: is spending still low because they can't afford it, or is Sandy advising them to keep their powder dry until the team is ready to make a serious move to contention? Or maybe somewhere in the middle, where they're not on desperate footing anymore, but funds are tight enough that they need to start winning enough to see attendance grown before they infuse more money.

Time will tell. The fact that the banks were willing to refinance rather than forcing a sale gives us at least some hope.
Well  
Jay in Toronto : 7/17/2014 2:50 pm : link
"On the other hand, they can commit to calling up more youngsters (Refsnyder, Pirela, etc.)"

That would be awesome if we are talking about anything like Jeter, Posada, Rivera and Petite. As long as you are making comparisons.
RE: Well  
Dunedin81 : 7/17/2014 2:54 pm : link
In comment 11771166 Jay in Toronto said:
Quote:
"On the other hand, they can commit to calling up more youngsters (Refsnyder, Pirela, etc.)"

That would be awesome if we are talking about anything like Jeter, Posada, Rivera and Petite. As long as you are making comparisons.


No, Refsnyder is not likely to be one of those guys. But he could be a longtime average to above average starter at the position, think maybe Brian Roberts in his prime but with 25 steal potential instead of 50. That's a good building block, particularly because the money you don't pay for an established starter there is one you can use on an established starter somewhere else (SS, for instance).
I agree with Dunedin  
Matt M. : 7/17/2014 2:56 pm : link
And i was not saying they had to be the same level of players as Jeter, Rivera, etc. But, if they commit to a handful of young players between now and the Spring and a couple of them pan out, it is a really great start.
RE: Im a Mets fan and I dont see a long term threat to the Yanks brand  
81_Great_Dane : 7/17/2014 2:57 pm : link
In comment 11771104 Deej said:
Quote:
This is like when the Jets are winning more, or the White Sox etc. It doesnt matter. There may be a few years blip where the Mets rule the back cover of the Post and Daily News, but the long term trend will remain that this is a Yankees town. Doesnt really matter much though -- there is more than enough revenue opportunity for the Mets to be a top 5 spending team. I just want them to win.
The Yankees own the town because they win. And win and win and win. If the Mets win like that, and the Yankees don't, they could flip the town.

There just doesn't seem to be any indication the Mets are going to get that good anytime soon, or get a marquee player as beloved as Jeter or Rivera, or that they'd be able to sustain success if they got there, or that the Yankees are going to suck for an extended period of time.
The Devils won...  
Dunedin81 : 7/17/2014 3:00 pm : link
and didn't even flip New Jersey. Inroads, sure, but nobody doubts that the NYC metro area is still an Rangers town. The Yanks could lose the audience, but the brand is iconic both inside and outside the metro area, it would take a sustained period of abject failure by the Yanks for the Mets to do more than dominate the back pages.
Dunedin  
Matt M. : 7/17/2014 3:07 pm : link
The early to mid 80s built up to NYC being a Mets town for about half a decade. It involved the Yankees losing most of their biggest names either to FA or injury and overpaying for aging and/or mediocre veterans. At the same time, the Mets were calling up a ton of young players, not all stars, and adding a few key veterans culminating in a WS win.

The Yankees followed that with perhaps the worst period of their history, or at least one of the worst. But, they were building their farm system and by about 1993 were on the rise again and re-taking NYC. They have had a stranglehold for 2 decades. But, it did get close in late 90s to 2000, though.
Dunedin  
Matt M. : 7/17/2014 3:09 pm : link
Comparing the Devils and Rangers to the Mets and Yankees is not really apples to apples.

I will add, depending on what they do this offseason, this could be the first time an entire generation of Yankee fans has a team without a legitimate star on it.
I was local at the time...  
Dunedin81 : 7/17/2014 3:28 pm : link
it wasn't close. The Mets had a big fanbase - a good fanbase - and they stole the headlines but it was still a considerably smaller fanbase than the Yankees. I grew up in North Jersey and there were as many Jets fans as Mets fans in my hometown.

And remember in the 80's you had people who grew up with the Dodgers and Giants, the Mets were an easy transition for them and their kids. Most of them have passed on at this point, and generally speaking Mets fans are not as anti-Yankees as the prior generation (recovering Dodger and Giant fans) were because they rarely play meaningful baseball against each other. More likely than a switch for any but the casual fans is just that lukewarm Mets fans would care more and lukewarm Yankee Fans would care less.
Dunedin  
Matt M. : 7/17/2014 3:33 pm : link
In the 80s the Yankees fanbase was shrinking and the Mets was growing. The Mets had better attendance for a number of years. Hell, I almost got beat up for wearing a Don Mattingly t shirt to school the day after the Mets won the World Series.
when I was a kid, there was an awful lot of Mets fans around  
Greg from LI : 7/17/2014 3:39 pm : link
But then Long Island always tends to have more Mets fans.
RE: Dunedin  
Dunedin81 : 7/17/2014 3:40 pm : link
In comment 11771263 Matt M. said:
Quote:
In the 80s the Yankees fanbase was shrinking and the Mets was growing. The Mets had better attendance for a number of years. Hell, I almost got beat up for wearing a Don Mattingly t shirt to school the day after the Mets won the World Series.


Attendance isn't necessarily the end-all be-all, especially when the experience at YS was pretty mediocre (not that new YS is much better). I get that one was trending up and the other down, but if the Mets had fallen off and the Yankees had come on the attendance figures would have flip-flopped.
NY has always had a strong NL fan base  
steve in ky : 7/17/2014 3:48 pm : link
When the Mets win and play great ball they usually start to attract those fans, if it coincides with the Yankees playing bad ball then the Mets usually capture the town like they did with the early miracle Mets and then again in the late 80's. It is just rare and doesn't happen too often.
Here's how I believe these things work....  
kmed : 7/17/2014 3:48 pm : link
The Mets could win the next 3 WS and the Yankees could be the Mets of the last 3 years and it still wouldn't change anything. There are Yankee fans(a lot more of them because of the brand and last 100 years) and there are Mets fans. If the Mets were to win, you'd see some of the casual fans become loud fans and you'd see all the Mets fans wearing their mets gear, but nothing would change. Maybe some young fans that are just starting to like baseball will choose the Mets because of their success, but it's not like the dynamic of the fan base would change in NY.

So it would seem like things are changing because the team with the recent success would have fans that come out of the woodwork, but perception isn't always reality.
It's interesting to read some of the opinions here  
Matt M. : 7/17/2014 3:53 pm : link
I recall hearing for more than 30 years in the media and from fans that NY has always been a National League town. Growing up in the 80s, it certainly seemed like I was in the minority as a Yankees fan. Now, I'm not talking about a huge disparity. But, it certainly did seem like a shift from Yankees to Mets.
You mean when the Mets were winning?  
kmed : 7/17/2014 3:54 pm : link
That's how NY is. When one team wins, it seems like their town, but it's only because there are so many casual fans that come out of the woodwork.
There are a lot of Yankee fans.  
Ten Ton Hammer : 7/17/2014 3:57 pm : link
But I doubt all 100% of them would continue wearing their hats if the team was winning 78 games a year for 3 years. I think we underestimate how many yankee fans are fans of convenience because they never had to experience a bad year, much less three of them in a row.

RE: There are a lot of Yankee fans.  
Greg from LI : 7/17/2014 4:00 pm : link
In comment 11771320 Ten Ton Hammer said:
Quote:
But I doubt all 100% of them would continue wearing their hats if the team was winning 78 games a year for 3 years. I think we underestimate how many yankee fans are fans of convenience because they never had to experience a bad year, much less three of them in a row.


Yup. I'm actually looking forward to cleaning that element out of the fan base. The hell with them.
TTH,  
kmed : 7/17/2014 4:00 pm : link
it works both ways. The casual Mets fans would start wearing the gear and be seen everywhere in NY and the casual Yankee fans would stop wearing the gear. Things would seem like a shift in fanbases, but it's not. As I said earlier, maybe you start to see the results 10 years down the road when the 7 year olds that are just starting to find a team get older.
There are a lot of people who wear caps  
steve in ky : 7/17/2014 4:04 pm : link
for no other reason than trend and style. Right now almost all those people wear Yankee caps if they live in NY and simply want to go out with a bb cap on. If the Mets start winning big and the Yankees lose those would be the first people to switch.
Greg I know what you mean  
steve in ky : 7/17/2014 4:10 pm : link
There is a certain amount of annoyance that comes along for the genuine fan when your team starts to really win big and all the fair weather fans jump on board.

As fun and great as 85 & 86 were as a Mets fan there was something a little extra special and in a ways even more enjoyable for me in 84. I was at Shea for so many games from 82 though 84 and watching it all unfold and feeling like really being part of it as a fan made 84 almost our little secret. Then by 85 everyone was getting on board and were "die hard fans".
Look at Seinfeld  
Greg from LI : 7/17/2014 4:14 pm : link
The first few seasons (1989-92) incorporated the Mets into several episodes (Keith Hernandez, Kramer inadvertantly telling Jerry the score of a Met game he taped to watch later, the '86 World Series story George uses to try to butter up the woman from the unemployment office).

The Mets fall apart, the Yankees start winning, so what happens? During the 1994 season, George gets a job with the Yankees and the Yankees become a major part of the series - cameos by Showalter, Tartabull, O'Neill, Jeter and Bernie, the recurring Steinbrenner character, etc.
steve  
Greg from LI : 7/17/2014 4:15 pm : link
Exactly. Suffering through the bad times is what bonds fans of particular teams together. I didn't understand that with the Giants until they hit the skids in the '90s.
kmed  
Matt M. : 7/17/2014 4:24 pm : link
It is, of course, the casual fans, that sway the overall perception. I think among "real" fans, NYC is probably very evenly divided. But, I always recall hearing it described as an NL town.
Right.  
kmed : 7/17/2014 4:25 pm : link
Perception is that there are more fans of the winning teams in that area during any short time period, but reality is that there are more Yankee fans because when kids are young and just getting into the sport, the Yankees were most likely a good, popular team.
kmed  
Matt M. : 7/17/2014 4:31 pm : link
That is my point. Right now, the teen to 20 somethings are probably predominantly Yankee fans. But, over the next 5 years or so, we can see a shift among the next wave of fans. Jeter will be gone and the Yankees could be in a WS drought. On the other side, the Mets have a bevy of young pitching. If they contend by going out and getting a couple of star hitters, they could be the team of choice by a lot of new fans in a couple of years.
You guys can own the town  
Headhunter : 7/17/2014 5:00 pm : link
I don't give a rat's patooey. I just want to win. Sick of losing. The last I think about who is going to own the town. You can have permanent ownership. I want to win
RE: Right.  
Deej : 7/17/2014 5:01 pm : link
In comment 11771391 kmed said:
Quote:
Perception is that there are more fans of the winning teams in that area during any short time period, but reality is that there are more Yankee fans because when kids are young and just getting into the sport, the Yankees were most likely a good, popular team.


To some degree this is true. I was born in 1979 and grew up in Manhattan. Among my friends, fandom is really split 50-50. Except the Mets were very successful in the mid/late 80s while the Yankees didnt make the playoffs from 82-94 (though they had some very good 80s teams). You'd think with the 86 series and 88 playoffs as part of 5 straight 90+ win seasons that the split would have been more than 50-50 between Mets and Yankee fans. My friends who had dads that rooted for the Yankees almost all became Yankees fans (I was an exception, but I didnt know my dad was a Yankees fan until the late 90s when he started working less and eventually retired).
Yanks fans will be Yanks fans and Met fans will be Met fans  
Phil in LA : 7/17/2014 5:19 pm : link
the reason you hear more about the winning teams is because New Yorkers know enough not to talk shit when they're down.
I don't remember ever thinking watching a game  
Headhunter : 7/17/2014 5:22 pm : link
thinking you know if we win this game a few casual fans might become Met fans.
I would also speculate  
PaulBlakeTSU : 7/17/2014 5:56 pm : link
that the boom in Mets fandom in the 80s is also due to that time being when the last generation of natural Brooklyn Dodger and NY Giant fans were at the age where they were having kids; as they raised them to be baseball fans, I can't imagine they were teaching them to be Yankees fans, so they turned to the National League team as a Dodgers/Giants replacement.
I think there are more Met fans than people realize.  
arcarsenal : 7/17/2014 6:44 pm : link
6 years of garbage kills the interest of a lot of fans who aren't completely invested in the team. Fans like a bunch of the fans here aren't the majority by a long shot. When a team loses for a sustained period of time, attendance dips. It doesn't matter who the team is. If the Yankees had the same 6 years the Mets just have, YS2 would look much like Citi Field typically does now.

If the Mets start winning again, there won't be many empty seats at Citi. It's just a winning/losing thing. I'm sure there are more Yankee fans than Met fans but I don't think the split is quite as drastic as Knicks/Nets fans or Rangers/Islanders.

In 2006 and 2007.. even 2008, I had partial seasons and went to a ton of games and a lot of those times, Shea was packed. There is no shortage of Met fans. Just a lot of people who got tired of watching a shitty team but will come back if they start winning again.
Arcar  
Matt M. : 7/17/2014 7:02 pm : link
That's kind of my point. Some people here are acting like there is a big gap.
Yeah, there's not.  
arcarsenal : 7/17/2014 7:09 pm : link
There are definitely more Yankee fans. 100%. Would never say there weren't. But this notion that the Mets would still be some sort of irrelevant if they won a couple of WS titles just isn't true.

When it comes to the NY baseball teams, fans will be there when they're winning and will stop showing up during extended down periods. That's just how it is.
Yankees dominating the fan base is a recent phenom  
oipolloi : 7/17/2014 7:24 pm : link
NY had two NL teams until 1959, and those two fan bases combined were larger than the Yankees fan base. And Dodgers and Giants fans hated the Yankees because of their success and perceived high hat mentality.

That NL bias was still in NY until the mid-1990s. Manhattan, Northern Jersey, and Westchester were always dominated by the Yanks.But in Brooklyn, there were very few Yankee fans.

I think the major thing that has changed is that you have had an influx of immigrants into NY over the last 30 years--Dominicans, Koreans, Russians etc --who did not inherit the Dodgers/Mets/Giants vs Yankees mentality. And most of them became Yankee fans because of their great success over the last two decades.

Families who go back for four or more generations in the NY metro area probably still have a good percentage of Met fans. But among more recent immigrants. I would bet that it is overwhelmingly Yankee fans, and they will pass that rooting interest onto their kids.

From 1966 until the sale to George Steinbrenner  
Ron from Ninerland : 7/17/2014 10:21 pm : link
The Yankees were even more irrelevant in NY than the Mets are now. NY was a National league town since the 50's. Once the Yankees stopped winning in '65, nobody cared about them any more. The Mets were lovable loses, who in 1969 became miracle winners. The Mets played in ( then ) a shiny new stadium. The Yankees played in a dump in a horrible neighborhood. The Mets were on TV every day. The Yankees were on maybe twice a week. The Mets had Tom Seaver. The Yankees had Horace Clarke. The Mets won the '69 series and got to game 7 in '73. The Yankees Fritz Peterson and Mike Kekich swapped wives.
NYC was Mets territory in the mid 80s to early 90s.  
Optimus-NY : 7/17/2014 11:55 pm : link
Denying that is wishful thinking.
Thank you for the last few posts  
Matt M. : 7/18/2014 12:53 am : link
That is my take and what I have heard for 37 years as a fan.
I have been a Yankee fan  
PaulN : 7/18/2014 10:17 am : link
For 53 years. So i think i have a feel for this. The Met fans will come out when thier team becomes a winner, it has always happened that way. The Yankee fans will hide also if the Yanks have a really bad stretch, that is also the way it works, its not different, it is never different, only people that think it is are the ones that have not lived long enough to understand and have seen it happen, MORE THEN ONCE.

I think the Yanks could be heading into oblivion if they do not get their heads out of thier asses and fix the minor league system. That is broke. Plus they need that to be the priority, because if it isn't, you are no longer going to be able to be good consistently. i still do not know if cashman understands this, he certainly makes you wonder.

The mets are in great shape with thier pitching, i think they will hit big on some, and i do think they will spend when they really feel they can make enough noise, and that is coming, very soon.
PaulN  
Matt M. : 7/18/2014 11:12 am : link
That was essentially my point. The Yankees are at a crossroads of putting in the building blocks of the next winner or fading fast. As it is, the new stadium is rarely full, regardless of the official attendance numbers, thanks to obscen prices for the lower bowl especially.
Its even worse than that  
Ron from Ninerland : 7/18/2014 11:34 am : link
Once a team goes in a long losing stretch its hard to draw fans back. The Yankees actually had decent seasons in 1968 and 1970. By 1970 they even had Thurman Munson. It didn't matter, they still didn't draw dick. This year the Mets have a solid pitching staff with Harvey coming back next year. If they get a couple of bats they could get real good real fast just as Atlanta did in 1991. Again it doesn't matter. Nobody is going to believe it until they prove they can win consistently.

My point is that once Jeter packs it in at the end of this year, there's really no reason to watch this team. They need to bring up young players with potential and they need to do it fast. I'm not sure this management knows how to draft and develop young players.
Back to the Corner