for display only
Big Blue Interactive The Corner Forum  
Back to the Corner

Archived Thread

Two observations and suggestions..

Tark10 : 8/25/2014 8:09 am
I watched every Giant game last year and the first 4 games this year and have reached 2 conclusions. JPP is either a has-been or just isn't putting forth the effort. He received a pass last year because he was recovering from an injury. This year looks like last year. He doesn't have a bull-rush or spin move and gets zero penetration off the line of scrimmage. The left tackle seems to handle him with ease. My suggestion is to move him to left end and start Moore at right end. Moore has the speed and enthusiasm and needs the experience to develop this year in to a prime defensive end.
My 2nd proposal is far more difficult to state. Eli Manning attempting to run the new offense is like watching Chris Christie perform ballet. It just doesn't work. Eli looks totally uncomfortable in this new offense. If we disregard the final 1:37 of the 2nd quarter of the Jet game, he has accomplished next to nothing in the preseason. This is my proposal. Sam Bradford suffered a season ending ACL injury. Would the Giants consider trading Eli to the Rams for next years 1st round pick? Just the thought of this makes me sick, but considering the way things are progressing it may not be such a bad idea. Elevate Nassib to be the starter and keep Painter as the experienced back-up and let Nassib develop. I could see Beckham, Cruz, and Washington as the eventual starters. I know this is a major move with Eli. I've been a die-hard fan since 1971. Curious how this scenario would be received by other posters.
Pages: 1 2 <<Prev | Show All |
I think those who think Eli and JPP and done  
BillT : 8/25/2014 9:32 am : link
Are going to be shown just how little they know about football.
If you think Eli might be done, what the hell would make you think  
Riggies : 8/25/2014 9:40 am : link
a team will trade a first round pick (which isn't penciled in for number one overall or top even top ten, BTW) and that both teams would be able/willing to make it happen cap wise? I'm not even touching the Nassib insanity specifically.

This board is horrible right now. It really is.
Riggies  
dep026 : 8/25/2014 9:53 am : link
Truer words could not be spoken.
RE: I think those who think Eli and JPP and done  
SGMen : 8/25/2014 10:03 am : link
In comment 11824036 BillT said:
Quote:
Are going to be shown just how little they know about football.
BillT, I agree, and both players will have bounce-back years. I can see Eli having an "efficient" year in the sense that he'll take what the defense gives him in this WCO and he won't turn it over nearly as much as last year. That will help.

JPP himself has said he is finally feeling healthy. He was dinged this past pre-season game but I believe he practiced yesterday. I'll wait until the first real game is completed before I begin to worry. I think he plays well this year. Maybe not 16.5 sacks but double digits. I also think Moore will work his way in more and more as the season goes. Rotating DL's is key to any good team.
Please. Go root for the Jets.  
x meadowlander : 8/25/2014 10:12 am : link
There is no indication that Eli's mechanics are fading. Can still fire the accurate long ball. Did fine in the first preseason game, was decent in the last - the rest of the preseason struggles are FULLY EXPECTED with a COMPLETELY REVAMPED OFFENSIVE LINE, NEW OFFENSIVE SCHEME and major personnel changes at HB, WR and TE.

Yeah. Trade him to the Rams.

Trade YOU to the Rams. :)

Agree Riggies  
HomerJones45 : 8/25/2014 10:15 am : link
and depshit is still a jackass.
The Eli is finished crowd  
deadkurtrulz : 8/25/2014 10:28 am : link
should hand in their Giant jerseys right now and become bandwagon jumping Jet fans. Do I like Eli rolling out? No. Do I still think Eli can make bigtime throws downfield that most NFL QB's cannot ? Yes.

Trading Eli for another number one draft pick that may or may not survive a single practice like all-world Beckham? I think not. Give Eli some time and he will make nobodies like Kevin Boss and Steve Smith look like all pros.

Not sure if JPP has lost his desire or his explosive speed but we will sure know quickly once the season starts. If he does not generate pressure Moore has to play.

Giants have many issues but so do most teams in parity NFL. Let the games begin!
eli  
hankb1126 : 8/25/2014 10:30 am : link
if you trade eli to the rams for a # 1 it will probably be a mid to late first and he is worth alot more than that

how would his contract fit on rams salary cap ??
and what hit woult that have on giants i know he has renegotiated contract several times

with all that i still think trade would be stupid unless they are overwhelmed in any trade offer
While I agree that I am really concerned about JPP  
Gman11 : 8/25/2014 10:46 am : link
because he has shown nothing during the preseason, you blew it with a thought of trading Eli.

For one thing, even if you think Eli is done or next to done he's still miles better than Nassib. Nassib is not starter potential right now. We're not talking about a Heisman Trophy winner who was the #1 pick in the draft. We're talking about a 4th round draft pick who two weeks ago looked like he was going to be cut.

I am not one of those that thinks Eli is beyond criticism just because he won 2 Super Bowls, but this isn't a Joe Montana vs. Steve Young you're proposing here. This is Eli Manning vs. a nobody.

Despite what some people think, management of all teams do not tank a season on purpose. Trading Eli and starting Nassib would be tantamount to tanking the season.
So if I follow this correctly...  
Mike from Ohio : 8/25/2014 10:47 am : link
Eli is done as a quality starting QB in the NFL. However, the Rams - who have their franchise QB on a huge contract - would likely be willing to trade their first round draft pick next year for this 33 year old QB is largely done? Because they likely believe they are in "win now" mode?

It would be nice if people would ask themselves "why would the other team make this trade?" before posting trade scenarios. Just because you don't think we need someone on our team does not mean they have 1st round value around the league.

Oh, and it is waaaaaay to early to give up on Eli and turn this team over the Nassib. That thought does not even occur until this offseason based on how things play out for the full year.
THERE ARE STUPID POSTS AND THERE ARE STUPID POSTS  
vince : 8/25/2014 10:48 am : link
BUT THIS ONE IS BEYOND DESCRIPTION. ARE YOU FANTASY PLAYERS OR FANS?
FANTASY PLAYERS PLEASE GO TO NEVERLAND WITH PETER AND TINKERBELL.

IF YOU'RE NOT FANTASY PLAYERS THEN JUST........OH WELL YOU'RE FANS

GADZOOKS WHY DID I LET THIS TRASH GET TO ME.

IF WE'RE GOING ON SHOULD AND MAYBE'S THEN MARA SHOULD TRY TRADING SOME OF THESE FANS FOR CUSHION SEATS


Just to deal with the cap aspect...  
Big Blue Blogger : 8/25/2014 10:56 am : link
...the Giants would save about $15MM of his ~$20MM cap number in 2014 and $17MM of his ~$20MM cap number in 2015 by trading Eli Manning today. There wouldn't be any acceleration, because 2015 is the last year of his deal anyway.

Any team acquiring him would probably have to restructure his deal to fit his salary into this year's cap at such a late date. I guess the Rams could just cut their whole offensive line to make room for Eli.

Clearly, this is a silly scenario; but that's how the cap numbers would stack up. As for the price, didn't the Raiders cough up a 1 and a 2 for Carson Palmer when many saw a fork handle protruding between his shoulder blades? He wasn't exactly a cap bargain, either.

As for the idea of starting Nassib, you really have to believe Eli is completely shot for it to make sense. Eli probably forgets more about reading NFL defenses over breakfast each morning than Nassib has learned in his fifteen months as a pro. Manning makes some boneheaded decisions, but at least he knows what he's looking at.
Watch the game  
UberAlias : 8/25/2014 10:57 am : link
The problem with Eli was lack of protection, not the offensive scheme.
Why didn't the Giants already sign Eli  
xman : 8/25/2014 11:02 am : link
to a new contract and ease the present cap hit??
Eli's game...  
rptl530 : 8/25/2014 11:04 am : link
the other night might have looked a lot better if Jernigan doesn't drop an easy 3rd down pass for a 1st down on the first drive.

How he dropped that ball I'll never know.
I take by his handle Tark10  
OldPolack : 8/25/2014 11:17 am : link
is an older fan like me.
In a way it's not a crazy idea.
Look at the Colts accomplished by letting Payton go.

I was 26 when YA was bleeding on his knees at Yankee Stadium, he played one year to long.

Eli is a GREAT GIANT, and PERSON, but as the Godfather said "this is business".


The 1st suggestion  
Marty866b : 8/25/2014 11:20 am : link
Off what we've seen the last year and a half,JPP is not the same player as he was in 2011 and probably will never be. Moore is the more dynamic pass rusher and it would be a good idea to move him in on the blind side and move JPP to the other side. KIWI is a JAG and JPP there would be an upgrade.
The Eli trade thing isn't happening though every Giant fan has to be VERY concerned by Eli's play the last few years. Ignoring the exhibition games, let's not forget he has led the entire league in int's the last two out of three years. Not good.
RE: I take by his handle Tark10  
Gman11 : 8/25/2014 11:21 am : link
In comment 11824248 OldPolack said:
Quote:
is an older fan like me.
In a way it's not a crazy idea.
Look at the Colts accomplished by letting Payton go.


The Colts had Andrew Luck to replace Peyton.
RE: Why didn't the Giants already sign Eli  
MOOPS : 8/25/2014 11:22 am : link
In comment 11824215 xman said:
Quote:
to a new contract and ease the present cap hit??


Eli is in a put up or shut up season.
He's the QB this year, but next year his dead money number is negligible. From a strictly business decision, he's got to earn his next contract this year. After last year, he's got to show he still has it. Doesn't make sense to sign him this year to an exorbitant number or restructure him in a way that hurts the team down the road. I'm pretty sure he gets that too.
Yes its put up or shut up for ELI from the front office so  
xman : 8/25/2014 12:07 pm : link
Giant fans that resent any mention of decline in Eli's play need to recognize that management is leary at this stage of signing Eli long term.

Eli is a turnover machine. Either its a fumble when he scrambles or a poor decision in throwing the ball. You don't win giving the ball away. Eli has develop some bad habits trying to be what he once was. He looks old
RE: Eli will not be traded  
ct.fatboy1080 : 8/25/2014 12:46 pm : link
In comment [mode=2&thread=500035&show_all=1#11824015]11824015[/url] djstat said:
Quote:
Due to the cap hit. End of Story. He is playing behind an awful O-Line and has garbage at WR (Aside from Cruz) and no TE. Randel is unproven and appears dumb. JJ is a waste. OBJ has yet to sniff the field. Maybe Eli looks uncomfortable because no one is open. evern thought of that?

JPP has had one good year in four years. He is nothing until he provess otherwise. His best highlight since 2011 was throwing Prince into the hottub. Since then Pricne has proven to be a better football player.
well said!!
Management had and has zero reason to extend Eli right now, regardless  
Riggies : 8/25/2014 12:52 pm : link
of what they think of his play. Despite what some had thought last year, even if he had been coming off a great season, extending him this offseason would have been stupid as it turned out that they didn't need the money in the short term and you should never push money (like it would have) forward if you don't absolutely have to. The more flexibility, even if you don't intend to use it, the better.

People can be down or up or whatever they want to be on Eli -- so long as it's about his play and not stupid shit about seeing his lack of leadership from your couch or whining about the way his shoulders slump or his face looks after some play, I don't care. I'm not exactly entirely bear-ish on him right now myself. What I resent is the sheer fucking stupidity that has overtaken this place, from thinking a team is going to give up a first rounder+ and blow out their cap situation for a QB that's been decided to be totally forked to declaring Nassib the next Drew Brees... two weeks after the team demoted him behind the blight that is Curtis Painter and not a single in-season pass thrown. I don't visit or post at Giants.com for a reason, though I might as well these days.
.  
JOMO25 : 8/25/2014 1:06 pm : link
I agree that we cannot dismiss the two SBs and his mammoth contract for decisions about playing time this year. He certainly can't be traded. We're probably a year from turning the page if this poor play continues.

It would be interesting to know if he has outplayed Nassib in training camp though -- even with a red jersey on. That question is more about what we have in Nassib and the future as opposed to what Eli has left.
The reason Eli won't be traded has very little to do with the cap hit.  
Big Blue Blogger : 8/25/2014 1:16 pm : link
The Giants would SAVE a massive number of cap dollars by trading him. The reason they won't trade him is that they don't want to trade him.
RE: Management had and has zero reason to extend Eli right now, regardless  
Big Blue '56 : 8/25/2014 1:21 pm : link
In comment 11824423 Riggies said:
Quote:
of what they think of his play. Despite what some had thought last year, even if he had been coming off a great season, extending him this offseason would have been stupid as it turned out that they didn't need the money in the short term and you should never push money (like it would have) forward if you don't absolutely have to. The more flexibility, even if you don't intend to use it, the better.

People can be down or up or whatever they want to be on Eli -- so long as it's about his play and not stupid shit about seeing his lack of leadership from your couch or whining about the way his shoulders slump or his face looks after some play, I don't care. I'm not exactly entirely bear-ish on him right now myself. What I resent is the sheer fucking stupidity that has overtaken this place, from thinking a team is going to give up a first rounder+ and blow out their cap situation for a QB that's been decided to be totally forked to declaring Nassib the next Drew Brees... two weeks after the team demoted him behind the blight that is Curtis Painter and not a single in-season pass thrown. I don't visit or post at Giants.com for a reason, though I might as well these days.


Rigs, I hayte when you're being reasonable.
RE: Management had and has zero reason to extend Eli right now, regardless  
BrettNYG10 : 8/25/2014 1:24 pm : link
In comment 11824423 Riggies said:
Quote:
of what they think of his play. Despite what some had thought last year, even if he had been coming off a great season, extending him this offseason would have been stupid as it turned out that they didn't need the money in the short term and you should never push money (like it would have) forward if you don't absolutely have to. The more flexibility, even if you don't intend to use it, the better.

People can be down or up or whatever they want to be on Eli -- so long as it's about his play and not stupid shit about seeing his lack of leadership from your couch or whining about the way his shoulders slump or his face looks after some play, I don't care. I'm not exactly entirely bear-ish on him right now myself. What I resent is the sheer fucking stupidity that has overtaken this place, from thinking a team is going to give up a first rounder+ and blow out their cap situation for a QB that's been decided to be totally forked to declaring Nassib the next Drew Brees... two weeks after the team demoted him behind the blight that is Curtis Painter and not a single in-season pass thrown. I don't visit or post at Giants.com for a reason, though I might as well these days.


Quality post as usual, Riggies.
Eli is done because the line sucks  
crick78 : 8/25/2014 1:28 pm : link
sounds like solid analysis.
the reason they have  
pjcas18 : 8/25/2014 1:30 pm : link
or HAD to extend Eli would have been to reduce his league high (or near it) cap number to allow for improvement in other areas like I don't know O-line or TE.

The Giants sat back and watched Brendan Albert, Eugene Monroe, Zane Beadles, etc. were signed.

If the Giants are convinced Eli is not done and has another championship run in him why not extend him, lower his cap number and get some premium OL talent to help the situation.

At his age, Eli is not prepared (IMO) for a 2004-like rebuilding.

At this point, even if the homers don't like it, trading Eli for the Rams 1st round pick (and maybe injured OL Roger Saffold) isn't an awful idea. It's not easy to go from Favre to Rodgers or Manning to Luck. This is one way to do it.

I expect a 4 - 12 season though, unlike some of you who think this team is going 10 - 6.
This is out of control  
PatersonPlank : 8/25/2014 1:35 pm : link
Let's let Eli play behind an NFL caliber line, and give him one preseason to learn a new offense, before passing judgement. If our OL is functional (not great) and our WR's are average, then IMO Eli will have another very good year.

No QB could have succeeded last year. No time to throw, no running game to take the heat off, and no WR's.
The Giants were never going to hand an OT the money Albert  
Riggies : 8/25/2014 1:44 pm : link
got, whether they had it or not to spend. For better or worse, they're locked into a contract with Beatty at LT and Pugh was coming off a very good rookie year at RT. Schwartz was actually one of the best G options available this year and they signed him (then stuck him on the wrong side, but whatever).

This was an awful FA TE class too. The Giants handing big money or a locked in contract out to any of the "top" options would have been a terrible move. As their cap situation was, they still could have been players for some of the middle of the pack guys if they had chosen to, but they didn't make that choice; it hasn't looked good since, but they wanted to go with their younger guys.

And, again, the Rams are not trading a first rounder+ for a QB that would, in this scenario be on the trade block because he's almost certainly done, especially not when they'd have to fuck up their own cap situation badly to do it. Only the Raiders would be that stupid and they just took on Schaub, so even they've had their fill.
So then it's a self-fulfilling  
pjcas18 : 8/25/2014 1:52 pm : link
prophecy. You know your o-line is weak, yet you do little to bolster it. and then you wonder why Eli is running for his life.

Eli will not survive this season. and I believe he runs the risk of becoming David-Carr-ized.

they signed a RG to play LG, a center who hasn't played in 2 years, the worst LT available, and restructured their 34 year old RG and handed him the job.

the draft had TE's Jace Amaro looked pretty good against the Giants.

It's not like the OL issues snuck up on anyone.
How do you know they did little to bolster the OL?  
Big Blue '56 : 8/25/2014 1:59 pm : link
Schwartz was on most BBIers short list..Ok, he's hurt. When and if he returns this year, tbd..

Richburg was, by most reports, a solid pick...

No reason to expect a healthy Beatty not to at the very least perform adequately..

JD Walton just needs time to shake the rust imv. Certainly not a bad pick-up imo..

Depth has been addressed and will continue to be addressed...OLs around the league do not appear to be an area of strength with most teams..

This line needs time to gel, something many on this board will not be patient with even though they've given lip service to it..
BB '56  
pjcas18 : 8/25/2014 2:04 pm : link
maybe wait until they're 0 - 6? so they can gel?

they half-assed the O-line, no two-ways about it.

Zack Martin, Zane Beadles or a LG, Richburg, and Schwartz that's addressing the line - for the future, not on a wing and a prayer like now.

I have major issues with Reese & Co's ability to evaluate talent  
Riggies : 8/25/2014 2:05 pm : link
these days, particularly along the OL.

Relying on Snee, choosing to give Walton a starter's contract, putting Schwartz on the wrong side, signing depth in the form of terrible players like Jerry and Brown instead of anyone else with a pulse... I wasn't a fan of any of it, but pretty much none of the major issues there were because of Eli taking up too much cap space.

I'm not happy about relying on Beatty to bounce back, but you can't just make his contract disappear either. They already had to do some nifty book keeping to get out from Baas this offseason. Throwing, say, Branden Albert's contract on as a bandaid, on top of Beatty's existing deal and with Pugh assumed to be locking down RT for awhile, is a formula for cap disaster.

The OL has been a major problem for this team since 2011 and, during that time frame, a ton of money has been paid out to guys on the OL. They have spent draft picks, from all different rounds, on the OL dating back to 2009. The investment, contrary to popular belief, has been there. The problem is that they're not good at investing.
Riggies,  
BrettNYG10 : 8/25/2014 2:07 pm : link
I'd argue that the OL needed major investment starting in 2010.

And I'd add that we attempted to address that with Baas but failed.

I think the investment has been there in terms of signings and draft picks, but the execution has been quite poor.

Hopefully it changes this season.
I didn't read your last paragraph  
BrettNYG10 : 8/25/2014 2:09 pm : link
(I got distracted).

Apologies - you said the same thing I did.
My point is  
pjcas18 : 8/25/2014 2:09 pm : link
we've all watched Eli, I'll assume, nearly every throw he's made.

he's the epitome of a rhythm quarterback. When he's in synch and the offensive timing is down he's as good as there is.

he's not great when things break down (consistently).

This team will live and die with the OL, I was concerned about it last year (and that's when I thought Beatty was good), I'm concerned about it this year when I don't know what to think of Beatty.

In fact, that's the problem. I don't know what to think of Schwartz at LG (where he has not been adquate) and is now injured, no clue what to think of Walton, no idea what to think of Richburg and hope Pugh is just rusty.

A lot of questions on the one unit that can make or break the season.
The Giants  
chris r : 8/25/2014 2:12 pm : link
couldn't pour enough resources into the OL this offseason to make the OL 100% guaranteed to be very good and still e able to improve other areas of the team.

If they are going to win this year some things are going to have to break right on the OL inlcuding Beatty and Walton bouncing back, Richburg/Mosley developing quickly. If not they're, not going to e that good. But they have a better chance to win hoping a few things break right on the OL and its solid AND having a big time deep threat at WR, a top CB and a solid running back rather than getting the sure fire good OL and not having those other weapons.

So I endorse Reese's strategy in principle at least.
RE: .  
Matt M. : 8/25/2014 2:17 pm : link
In comment 11823945 JOMO25 said:
Quote:
1. I'd guess JPP is playing it safe and not going balls out here in pre-season.

2. I hope its not the case, but I think Eli is done. I think the days of bad athletes at the QB position are over (unless you are a precision passer and have tremendous command of an offense - neither of which are Eli's traits).


How can you say Eli doesn't have total command of an offense? If nothing else, that is one of his greatest strengths. He has known the Giants offense inside and out almost from day one. This may be a new offense, but the same work ethic and football IQ exist.
One thing  
Jerry in DC : 8/25/2014 2:21 pm : link
that we'll never have the answer to, but deserves consideration among Giants decision-makers is the "drafting vs. development" idea, especially on the OL.

We've spent a fair number of mid-round picks on the OL over the years and few, if any, have developed into good NFL players or even average starters. Coaches, both positional and head, get credited with that type of development when it happens (i.e. Seattle with DBs, previous iterations of the Giants on the OL, many QB coaches, etc).

The flip-side would be that coaches would get deducted credit for the failure of players to develop. This doesn't really happen, understandably so, because there's a knowledge vacuum. We just don't know if those players really didn't have the material or if the material wasn't maximized.

I'm not saying that this is the case. I couldn't possibly have the information necessary to claim it. Really, nobody could have that information, although people on the inside would be closer to having it. But it is something to consider.
RE: Riggies,  
Riggies : 8/25/2014 2:22 pm : link
In comment 11824556 BrettNYG10 said:
Quote:
I'd argue that the OL needed major investment starting in 2010.

And I'd add that we attempted to address that with Baas but failed.

I think the investment has been there in terms of signings and draft picks, but the execution has been quite poor.

Hopefully it changes this season.


Honestly, you can even date back to them signing say Shawn Andrews after 2009, as them trying to rebuild/invest and it not ending up working out for them.

(Though that's one deal that I don't blame them for not working. It was a little risk/great reward that unfortunately they only got rewarded with one season out of. If his back had somehow held up, that would have been a huge boon to this team the last few years, as he was a proven quality player and not just a one-year wonder like a Baas, for example.)
RE: My point is  
Big Blue '56 : 8/25/2014 2:22 pm : link
In comment 11824566 pjcas18 said:
Quote:
we've all watched Eli, I'll assume, nearly every throw he's made.

he's the epitome of a rhythm quarterback. When he's in synch and the offensive timing is down he's as good as there is.

he's not great when things break down (consistently).

This team will live and die with the OL, I was concerned about it last year (and that's when I thought Beatty was good), I'm concerned about it this year when I don't know what to think of Beatty.

In fact, that's the problem. I don't know what to think of Schwartz at LG (where he has not been adquate) and is now injured, no clue what to think of Walton, no idea what to think of Richburg and hope Pugh is just rusty.

A lot of questions on the one unit that can make or break the season.


I easily can be proven incorrect as the season draws to a close, but I have to believe an interior of Walton, Richburg and whomever (for now) mans the other OG spot will allow Eli to step up into the pocket(his strength) better, perhaps much better than Baas, Snee and Boothe did..

that  
JOMO25 : 8/25/2014 2:25 pm : link
is a fair projection '56
RE: My point is  
Jacob's Ladder : 8/25/2014 2:30 pm : link
In comment 11824566 pjcas18 said:
Quote:
we've all watched Eli, I'll assume, nearly every throw he's made.

he's the epitome of a rhythm quarterback. When he's in synch and the offensive timing is down he's as good as there is.

he's not great when things break down (consistently).

This team will live and die with the OL, I was concerned about it last year (and that's when I thought Beatty was good), I'm concerned about it this year when I don't know what to think of Beatty.

In fact, that's the problem. I don't know what to think of Schwartz at LG (where he has not been adquate) and is now injured, no clue what to think of Walton, no idea what to think of Richburg and hope Pugh is just rusty.

A lot of questions on the one unit that can make or break the season.


Mostly agree aside from his 2011 year. He was in a zone that year and his pocket awareness was so amazing that he would always seem to slide step the rush and find a spot to make a strong and accurate throw from.
RE: RE: Riggies,  
BrettNYG10 : 8/25/2014 2:31 pm : link
In comment 11824585 Riggies said:
Quote:
In comment 11824556 BrettNYG10 said:


Quote:


I'd argue that the OL needed major investment starting in 2010.

And I'd add that we attempted to address that with Baas but failed.

I think the investment has been there in terms of signings and draft picks, but the execution has been quite poor.

Hopefully it changes this season.



Honestly, you can even date back to them signing say Shawn Andrews after 2009, as them trying to rebuild/invest and it not ending up working out for them.

(Though that's one deal that I don't blame them for not working. It was a little risk/great reward that unfortunately they only got rewarded with one season out of. If his back had somehow held up, that would have been a huge boon to this team the last few years, as he was a proven quality player and not just a one-year wonder like a Baas, for example.)


I forgot about him, great point. He was really good when he was healthy. That was an excellent signing, despite his issues.
Eli's Future  
Jeffrey : 8/25/2014 4:11 pm : link
Once people accept that the Giants are in a rebuilding mode (and many do not) the posters who suggest trading Eli do not seem so ludicrous. The justification for trading Eli is not that he is suddenly a bad QB, but just the opposite. He still offers quality play in the right situation.

The question should be how far away are the Giants from contending. If they are not close then Eli is a wasted asset. Eli is special as a player and a perfect fit for NY with his even demeanor. Yet, that did not save him last year when the rest of the offense disintegrated.

Those who really like him as a player might consider whether he would benefit from moving to a team that can actually protect him, offer a quality TE and at least a couple of receivers who might stretch the field. Unless things come together soon for this offense, Eli will be running for his life all year and getting blamed for every loss.

Ask Eli's dad how it felt to play with a rebuilding-average team for an entire career.
Definiitely  
bignygfan : 8/25/2014 5:00 pm : link
dumbest thread of the week so far.
.  
JOMO25 : 8/25/2014 5:29 pm : link
RE: .
Matt M. : 2:17 pm : link : reply

In comment 11823945 JOMO25 said:

Quote:
1. I'd guess JPP is playing it safe and not going balls out here in pre-season.

2. I hope its not the case, but I think Eli is done. I think the days of bad athletes at the QB position are over (unless you are a precision passer and have tremendous command of an offense - neither of which are Eli's traits).


How can you say Eli doesn't have total command of an offense? If nothing else, that is one of his greatest strengths. He has known the Giants offense inside and out almost from day one. This may be a new offense, but the same work ethic and football IQ exist. --> He is a smart guy, no doubt but he doesn't seem to have the same command as his brother, Brady even Rivers (the other bad athletes that are NFL QBs).
Has McAdoo  
Doomster : 8/25/2014 8:36 pm : link
or Flaherty ever given an explanation why Schwartz was used at LG rather than RG?

But what does it mean, if a rookie outplays a vet we shelled out big bucks for? Baas? Beatty? Bueller?
RE: Has McAdoo  
Bill in UT : 8/25/2014 8:37 pm : link
In comment 11825075 Doomster said:
Quote:
or Flaherty ever given an explanation why Schwartz was used at LG rather than RG?

But what does it mean, if a rookie outplays a vet we shelled out big bucks for? Baas? Beatty? Bueller?


It means we either got a great rookie or overpaid for a JAG vet
Pages: 1 2 <<Prev | Show All |
Back to the Corner