for display only
Big Blue Interactive The Corner Forum  
Back to the Corner

Archived Thread

Two observations and suggestions..

Tark10 : 8/25/2014 8:09 am
I watched every Giant game last year and the first 4 games this year and have reached 2 conclusions. JPP is either a has-been or just isn't putting forth the effort. He received a pass last year because he was recovering from an injury. This year looks like last year. He doesn't have a bull-rush or spin move and gets zero penetration off the line of scrimmage. The left tackle seems to handle him with ease. My suggestion is to move him to left end and start Moore at right end. Moore has the speed and enthusiasm and needs the experience to develop this year in to a prime defensive end.
My 2nd proposal is far more difficult to state. Eli Manning attempting to run the new offense is like watching Chris Christie perform ballet. It just doesn't work. Eli looks totally uncomfortable in this new offense. If we disregard the final 1:37 of the 2nd quarter of the Jet game, he has accomplished next to nothing in the preseason. This is my proposal. Sam Bradford suffered a season ending ACL injury. Would the Giants consider trading Eli to the Rams for next years 1st round pick? Just the thought of this makes me sick, but considering the way things are progressing it may not be such a bad idea. Elevate Nassib to be the starter and keep Painter as the experienced back-up and let Nassib develop. I could see Beckham, Cruz, and Washington as the eventual starters. I know this is a major move with Eli. I've been a die-hard fan since 1971. Curious how this scenario would be received by other posters.
Pages: 1 2 <<Prev | Show All |
The Giants  
chris r : 8/25/2014 2:12 pm : link
couldn't pour enough resources into the OL this offseason to make the OL 100% guaranteed to be very good and still e able to improve other areas of the team.

If they are going to win this year some things are going to have to break right on the OL inlcuding Beatty and Walton bouncing back, Richburg/Mosley developing quickly. If not they're, not going to e that good. But they have a better chance to win hoping a few things break right on the OL and its solid AND having a big time deep threat at WR, a top CB and a solid running back rather than getting the sure fire good OL and not having those other weapons.

So I endorse Reese's strategy in principle at least.
RE: .  
Matt M. : 8/25/2014 2:17 pm : link
In comment 11823945 JOMO25 said:
Quote:
1. I'd guess JPP is playing it safe and not going balls out here in pre-season.

2. I hope its not the case, but I think Eli is done. I think the days of bad athletes at the QB position are over (unless you are a precision passer and have tremendous command of an offense - neither of which are Eli's traits).


How can you say Eli doesn't have total command of an offense? If nothing else, that is one of his greatest strengths. He has known the Giants offense inside and out almost from day one. This may be a new offense, but the same work ethic and football IQ exist.
One thing  
Jerry in DC : 8/25/2014 2:21 pm : link
that we'll never have the answer to, but deserves consideration among Giants decision-makers is the "drafting vs. development" idea, especially on the OL.

We've spent a fair number of mid-round picks on the OL over the years and few, if any, have developed into good NFL players or even average starters. Coaches, both positional and head, get credited with that type of development when it happens (i.e. Seattle with DBs, previous iterations of the Giants on the OL, many QB coaches, etc).

The flip-side would be that coaches would get deducted credit for the failure of players to develop. This doesn't really happen, understandably so, because there's a knowledge vacuum. We just don't know if those players really didn't have the material or if the material wasn't maximized.

I'm not saying that this is the case. I couldn't possibly have the information necessary to claim it. Really, nobody could have that information, although people on the inside would be closer to having it. But it is something to consider.
RE: Riggies,  
Riggies : 8/25/2014 2:22 pm : link
In comment 11824556 BrettNYG10 said:
Quote:
I'd argue that the OL needed major investment starting in 2010.

And I'd add that we attempted to address that with Baas but failed.

I think the investment has been there in terms of signings and draft picks, but the execution has been quite poor.

Hopefully it changes this season.


Honestly, you can even date back to them signing say Shawn Andrews after 2009, as them trying to rebuild/invest and it not ending up working out for them.

(Though that's one deal that I don't blame them for not working. It was a little risk/great reward that unfortunately they only got rewarded with one season out of. If his back had somehow held up, that would have been a huge boon to this team the last few years, as he was a proven quality player and not just a one-year wonder like a Baas, for example.)
RE: My point is  
Big Blue '56 : 8/25/2014 2:22 pm : link
In comment 11824566 pjcas18 said:
Quote:
we've all watched Eli, I'll assume, nearly every throw he's made.

he's the epitome of a rhythm quarterback. When he's in synch and the offensive timing is down he's as good as there is.

he's not great when things break down (consistently).

This team will live and die with the OL, I was concerned about it last year (and that's when I thought Beatty was good), I'm concerned about it this year when I don't know what to think of Beatty.

In fact, that's the problem. I don't know what to think of Schwartz at LG (where he has not been adquate) and is now injured, no clue what to think of Walton, no idea what to think of Richburg and hope Pugh is just rusty.

A lot of questions on the one unit that can make or break the season.


I easily can be proven incorrect as the season draws to a close, but I have to believe an interior of Walton, Richburg and whomever (for now) mans the other OG spot will allow Eli to step up into the pocket(his strength) better, perhaps much better than Baas, Snee and Boothe did..

that  
JOMO25 : 8/25/2014 2:25 pm : link
is a fair projection '56
RE: My point is  
Jacob's Ladder : 8/25/2014 2:30 pm : link
In comment 11824566 pjcas18 said:
Quote:
we've all watched Eli, I'll assume, nearly every throw he's made.

he's the epitome of a rhythm quarterback. When he's in synch and the offensive timing is down he's as good as there is.

he's not great when things break down (consistently).

This team will live and die with the OL, I was concerned about it last year (and that's when I thought Beatty was good), I'm concerned about it this year when I don't know what to think of Beatty.

In fact, that's the problem. I don't know what to think of Schwartz at LG (where he has not been adquate) and is now injured, no clue what to think of Walton, no idea what to think of Richburg and hope Pugh is just rusty.

A lot of questions on the one unit that can make or break the season.


Mostly agree aside from his 2011 year. He was in a zone that year and his pocket awareness was so amazing that he would always seem to slide step the rush and find a spot to make a strong and accurate throw from.
RE: RE: Riggies,  
BrettNYG10 : 8/25/2014 2:31 pm : link
In comment 11824585 Riggies said:
Quote:
In comment 11824556 BrettNYG10 said:


Quote:


I'd argue that the OL needed major investment starting in 2010.

And I'd add that we attempted to address that with Baas but failed.

I think the investment has been there in terms of signings and draft picks, but the execution has been quite poor.

Hopefully it changes this season.



Honestly, you can even date back to them signing say Shawn Andrews after 2009, as them trying to rebuild/invest and it not ending up working out for them.

(Though that's one deal that I don't blame them for not working. It was a little risk/great reward that unfortunately they only got rewarded with one season out of. If his back had somehow held up, that would have been a huge boon to this team the last few years, as he was a proven quality player and not just a one-year wonder like a Baas, for example.)


I forgot about him, great point. He was really good when he was healthy. That was an excellent signing, despite his issues.
Eli's Future  
Jeffrey : 8/25/2014 4:11 pm : link
Once people accept that the Giants are in a rebuilding mode (and many do not) the posters who suggest trading Eli do not seem so ludicrous. The justification for trading Eli is not that he is suddenly a bad QB, but just the opposite. He still offers quality play in the right situation.

The question should be how far away are the Giants from contending. If they are not close then Eli is a wasted asset. Eli is special as a player and a perfect fit for NY with his even demeanor. Yet, that did not save him last year when the rest of the offense disintegrated.

Those who really like him as a player might consider whether he would benefit from moving to a team that can actually protect him, offer a quality TE and at least a couple of receivers who might stretch the field. Unless things come together soon for this offense, Eli will be running for his life all year and getting blamed for every loss.

Ask Eli's dad how it felt to play with a rebuilding-average team for an entire career.
Definiitely  
bignygfan : 8/25/2014 5:00 pm : link
dumbest thread of the week so far.
.  
JOMO25 : 8/25/2014 5:29 pm : link
RE: .
Matt M. : 2:17 pm : link : reply

In comment 11823945 JOMO25 said:

Quote:
1. I'd guess JPP is playing it safe and not going balls out here in pre-season.

2. I hope its not the case, but I think Eli is done. I think the days of bad athletes at the QB position are over (unless you are a precision passer and have tremendous command of an offense - neither of which are Eli's traits).


How can you say Eli doesn't have total command of an offense? If nothing else, that is one of his greatest strengths. He has known the Giants offense inside and out almost from day one. This may be a new offense, but the same work ethic and football IQ exist. --> He is a smart guy, no doubt but he doesn't seem to have the same command as his brother, Brady even Rivers (the other bad athletes that are NFL QBs).
Has McAdoo  
Doomster : 8/25/2014 8:36 pm : link
or Flaherty ever given an explanation why Schwartz was used at LG rather than RG?

But what does it mean, if a rookie outplays a vet we shelled out big bucks for? Baas? Beatty? Bueller?
RE: Has McAdoo  
Bill in UT : 8/25/2014 8:37 pm : link
In comment 11825075 Doomster said:
Quote:
or Flaherty ever given an explanation why Schwartz was used at LG rather than RG?

But what does it mean, if a rookie outplays a vet we shelled out big bucks for? Baas? Beatty? Bueller?


It means we either got a great rookie or overpaid for a JAG vet
Pages: 1 2 <<Prev | Show All |
Back to the Corner