"Sources told FOX 26 Sports Minnesota Vikings running back Adrian Peterson has been indicted in Montgomery County for reckless or negligent injury to a child."
http://www.myfoxhouston.com/story/26520182/vikings-star-rb-adrian-peterson-indicted-in-child-injury-case#.VBNYGbapZQ0.twitter - (
New Window )
Quote:
My initial impression was he pretty obviously was, because thats how it is in most of these cases. Then I later saw the lawyers statement where he does in fact mention that. This is learned behavior, most often passed down. And as much as we increasingly and rightfully look to evolve, this behavior can actually stem from good intentions, even though misguided
Oh, his lawyer said. Did his lawyer say he went through this ...
According to police reports, the child, however, had a slightly different story, [B]telling authorities that "Daddy Peterson hit me on my face." The child also expressed worry that Peterson would punch him in the face if the child reported the incident to authorities. He also said that he had been hit by a belt and that "there are a lot of belts in Daddy's closet." He added that Peterson put leaves in his mouth when he was being hit with the switch while his pants were down. The child told his mother that Peterson "likes belts and switches" and "has a whooping room."[B] Link - ( New Window )
Meh, no biggie. I'm sure Adrian has nothing but the best of intentions, whooping room, shoving leaves down his son's throat, and all.
THAT'S WHAT 4 YEAR OLDS DO. THEY PUSH AWAY ANOTHER KID BECAUSE THEY ARE IMPATIENT. THAT DOESN'T REQUIRE DISCIPLINE, IT REQUIRES VERBAL COMMUNICATION.
Maybe AP grew up in the former era, and he sure as shit had his kids in the latter. He might not be some kind of monster, but the detail in that report and the systematic way his discipline was handed out was/is pretty fuckin far from OK.
The legal issue needs to run its course, then the NFL should act accordingly, but since I'm only a juror in the court of public opinion, I'm pretty disgusted by the guy and he would not be playing on my team.
I doubt he absorbed or retained an ounce of anything that was taught to him.
Sense allows, however, for a distinction between shitty parent and sociopath. Peterson, based on the visual evidence (if that is indeed substantiated) is tending toward the latter. It takes a lot to truly be elevated as such, but once blood is drawn, and repeatedly so, we've moved decidedly beyond "spanking" bad parent territory and into "time to protect the kid from an objectively pernicious influence."
Too bad it's such a great player. I guess? The NFL is on a big time cold streak. Goodell, time for a spanking.
I liked when the "bad" NFL players just did a shitload of cocaine.
he is probably done for this season at a minimum. This is a brutal week for the nfl
But there is a huge difference between a smack on the butt and whats on display in those pictures. Thats abuse. Thats violence. Considering his statements since and its clear that you have a guy who really doesnt know where the line between discipline and abuse is. I dont even know what kind of man is capable of doing that to his children. I find it pretty pathetic though. He should face the same legal ramifications that any other POS who puts his hands on his kids like that faces. I dont know what kind of penalties he's facing but people go to prison for less every day. Some time in a box with nothing to do but think about whether he wants his children to love him or fear him might not be a bad idea.
Greg Hardy sounds worse than McDonald (and Rice) and has been found guilty, pending appeal. How that guy is allowed to play but AP isn't is hypocritical, but i guess that's a Vikings decision and not a league decision.
Link - ( New Window )
Quote:
is not a Sicilian immigrant. I don't give a fuck if he was beaten daily by his piece of shut father. He's a fucking criminal. This is not discipline in any civilized society.
Exactly...I don't get this "Well I got beat 35 years ago by my dad so it's okaay this kid got hit with a switch"..
I was thinking about this last night. The net is rife with this very sentiment. A cpl yrs ago there was a thread on here about a dad beating a boy with a belt and a # of posters said the same thing. I think we all want to believe our parents loved us and had our best intentions in mind at all times. The latter however, may not necessarily be true. There is a point where "For his own good" becomes an act of self serving animalistic rage. It satisfies a primal urge in the attacker and only serves to confuse the child who often still doesnt really know why what he/she did was wrong. No true lesson is learned, just more fear instilled. No parent really want their child to fear them - do they?
You can break the cycle though. And with time to reflect and a generation of being in the american culture, my mom and aunts look back at that with regret, they would never think of laying a finger on one of their grandkids. Me and my cousins look back and laugh at the shared beatdowns. What peterson did was wrong, and its easy to just vilify him. Its simple to just paint him as some monster. But I think its more complex than that. I dont find what he did as appalling as ray rice. And I find it easier to believe that adrian petersons behavior is probably more open to rehabilitation. He was very likely on the other side growing up, and learned this behavior as a teaching tool (as misguided as it may be). I dont think its as simple as he just gets off beating on kids.
There is so much in this post that I agree with, but I do think one point is being understated. I agree that this is probably a result of how he was brought up and I agree that the generations before us were way more physical with their children then they are now. That being said, there is still something inside of these people that allows them to do serious physical damage to a defenseless child. I also agree that Peterson probably thinks that he's doing the right thing and he's well within his rights, but he's wrong.
This isn't a debate about whether spanking a child is good or bad for them. This isn't your run of the mill spanking to teach a 4 year old not to do something. This is child abuse. Adrian Peterson didn't spank his son for saying a curse word. He whipped him with a branch that left long lasting scars. What kind of person thinks that's ok? Parents were more physical in years past, but whipping a 4 year old is child abuse in any generation and takes a special kind of person to do that.
I'm in the camp of what AP did was sick, abusive and completely unacceptable. On the other hand I don't think he did this for enjoyment but rather this is what he knew and he probably thought this was the best parenting he could do. As someone said earlier, he needs education and rehabilitation. The public raking and suspension he's going to get is going to be punishment.
So if you're the NFL what do you do? This is of course complicated by the timing of the Ray Rice situation. Clearly you have to do something. Do you suspend him indefinitely too? Ban him for life? Wait for the legal system?
In this case I would gather all of the facts and if it seems that this truly is APs idea of best parenting, I would use the newly implemented abuse policy and state that there is no room for child abuse in our society and league and AP is going to suspended for 6 games. I would force AP to publicly apologize and say he didn't realize what he did was wrong but now he knows and he'll never do it again. Then donate the salary that he loses from the suspension to child abuse prevention.
Ultimately AP should be able to play again and this is an opportunity to use a terrible situation for some good. This is an opportunity for the NFL to do what's right and come down harsh on AP but use it as a lesson for everyone watching.
If Goodell screws this us he's gone.
Wow, he wasn't evasive and openly admitted to whipping his little boy with a fucking stick? Let's give him a medal for being a sociopath as well as an ignorant criminal!
Wow, he wasn't evasive and openly admitted to whipping his little boy with a fucking stick? Let's give him a medal for being a sociopath as well as an ignorant criminal!
Well said Chris.
Wow, he wasn't evasive and openly admitted to whipping his little boy with a fucking stick? Let's give him a medal for being a sociopath as well as an ignorant criminal!
That first paragraph is spot on. I think people can understand why he's fucked up, but it doesn't change the fact that he's fucked up....and he's absolutely fucked up for thinking what he's doing is ok.
I completely agree. The NFL's poor handling of the entire Ray Rice situation is going to come back and bite them in the ass repeatedly.
The fact that Peterson is most likely abusing his child and thinks he's doing good, leads me to believe that he can be taught that it's not ok. A parent that has major anger issues and abuses their kids probably can't change and I'm hopeful AP is in the former category.
the point is that adrian petersons mindset is very likely more layered and complex than strictly being some deviant monster. thats a simple explanation for simple minds. and of course ap was wrong either way.
4 year olds are quite capable of being little shits
4 year olds are quite capable of being little shits
Four year olds can be little turds, to be sure, but they also don't understand punishment, physical or otherwise, particularly well, so as useless as is brutalizing anyone it is even less likely to effect the desired outcome on a child of that age.
4 year olds are quite capable of being little shits
Yea, so are 3 hour old "kids". Gimme a fucking break. What is the point of your comment? That you relate to the desire to beat the shit out of a 4 year old? If not, then what?
Goodell fucked all of this up sideways. Suspending a guy 2 games for KOing his fiancé, then establishing 6 games as the policy, then indefinite when evidence of a crime you already knew about comes to light? How does he rationalize anything short of that for Peterson now?
A whooping room? If true, this goes a lot deeper than this one incident.
Four year olds can barely appreciate the connection between the behavior and the punishment. Yes you can punish them, but you can't punish them the way you can a six or a seven year old. You take away a seven year old's favorite toy as punishment, they scheme to get the thing back. You take away a three or a four year old's, they forget about it and find something else to fixate on.
Four year olds can barely appreciate the connection between the behavior and the punishment. Yes you can punish them, but you can't punish them the way you can a six or a seven year old. You take away a seven year old's favorite toy as punishment, they scheme to get the thing back. You take away a three or a four year old's, they forget about it and find something else to fixate on.
I appreciate your observation and it is undoubtedly correct in a theoretical sense. But I don't understand why this is even an issue for discussion. All I can visualize is the picture of that little boy - with a caption underneath talking about whether a four year old can benefit from discipline.
There are some pretty scary comments in this thread.