for display only
Big Blue Interactive The Corner Forum  
Back to the Corner

Archived Thread

Banks on the fan

blueblood'11 : 9/15/2014 12:16 pm
It was interesting in the beginning of the Carl Banks report how Beningo fixated on, and rightfully so, the events that took place in the fourth quarter after Cruz dropped a six yard pass that led to the punt to Ginn and everything that transpired afterwards.

Well, without hesitation Banks blew past all of that and zeroed in on the defense. After listening to his assessment it was pretty easy to read between the lines and without mentioning his name and very tactfully I would say threw Perry Fewell and his handling of the defense under the bus.

For that matter as he went along he threw the whole coaching staff under the bus for the teams lack of preparedness.
.
Pages: 1 2 | Show All |  Next>>
Would have love to hear that because it is an about face from  
Mason : 9/15/2014 12:19 pm : link
yesterday.
Well  
FranknWeezer : 9/15/2014 12:19 pm : link
cruz  
Loluchka80 : 9/15/2014 12:35 pm : link
this loss was on cruz. such crucial drops after he called for the ball in the media.

he should be benched for the first half next week.
I'm sure it must kill Banks to see the giants play this style of D  
Ten Ton Hammer : 9/15/2014 12:36 pm : link
where completions are practically encouraged
the players  
MookGiants : 9/15/2014 12:36 pm : link
on defense are average. Fewell is average as well but the talent on defense is going to lead to having at best an average defense. D-line is OK, linebackers stink, safeties are OK, corners are good. Decent defense, nothing more
Defense  
cm512 : 9/15/2014 12:41 pm : link
In terms of points allowed the defense was fine. No one would be talking about the defense if the Offense and Special Teams had taken care of business.
.  
arcarsenal : 9/15/2014 12:43 pm : link
The defense wasn't perfect but the brutal ST's, turnovers and drops had way more to do with our loss than they did.

We had given up 13 points total when Cruz dropped his pass, we allowed a PR TD and then fumbled the ensuing KO.

Seems silly to blame the D for blowing the game. It's not like they gave up some long game deciding drive with the game hanging in the balance.
What did he say about the defense?  
Reale01 : 9/15/2014 12:47 pm : link
Didn't hear it
They are what they are  
micky : 9/15/2014 12:48 pm : link
Heard the interview with banks, and don't think he was "throwing" anyone under the bus.
RE: .  
chris r : 9/15/2014 12:54 pm : link
In comment 11864078 arcarsenal said:
Quote:
The defense wasn't perfect but the brutal ST's, turnovers and drops had way more to do with our loss than they did.

We had given up 13 points total when Cruz dropped his pass, we allowed a PR TD and then fumbled the ensuing KO.

Seems silly to blame the D for blowing the game. It's not like they gave up some long game deciding drive with the game hanging in the balance.


As always there's plenty of blame to pass around. It's not necessary to only discuss what you think is the primary cause of the loss.
When TC hired Spags he said  
Bubba : 9/15/2014 12:56 pm : link
the principal reason was he wanted an attacking style of defense. What changed? He no longer wants that style? I can't figure it out.
RE: the players  
Shockeyisthebest80 : 9/15/2014 1:06 pm : link
In comment 11864058 MookGiants said:
Quote:
on defense are average. Fewell is average as well but the talent on defense is going to lead to having at best an average defense. D-line is OK, linebackers stink, safeties are OK, corners are good. Decent defense, nothing more


You can have average talent and still not have people running wide the fuck open because people are confused about what should be done. Physical fuck-ups I can accept due to lack of talent. The mental fuck-ups are on the coach since they seem to happen even when the roster turns over. It's not ALL his fault because he's never really been given the players to fit the scheme he's most comfortable with. However, there's no excuse for the guys running wide open and single coverage of opposing team's best players.
RE: RE: .  
arcarsenal : 9/15/2014 1:08 pm : link
In comment 11864133 chris r said:
Quote:
In comment 11864078 arcarsenal said:


Quote:


The defense wasn't perfect but the brutal ST's, turnovers and drops had way more to do with our loss than they did.

We had given up 13 points total when Cruz dropped his pass, we allowed a PR TD and then fumbled the ensuing KO.

Seems silly to blame the D for blowing the game. It's not like they gave up some long game deciding drive with the game hanging in the balance.



As always there's plenty of blame to pass around. It's not necessary to only discuss what you think is the primary cause of the loss.


Thanks for the clarification, chief.

My point was that if you're going to "fixate" on one phase of the game to point blame as intimated by Banks according to the OP, the defense probably isn't the correct place to be doing it.

I had my own gripes with the defense yesterday but I can hardly blame that unit for the loss when the most egregious errors came on ST's and offense.
I liked the Herzlich Ellington matchup w no help  
Reale01 : 9/15/2014 1:09 pm : link
The holding penalty on Herz saved us 25 yards.
RE: When TC hired Spags he said  
arcarsenal : 9/15/2014 1:11 pm : link
In comment 11864141 Bubba said:
Quote:
the principal reason was he wanted an attacking style of defense. What changed? He no longer wants that style? I can't figure it out.


We sacked Stanton 4 times and blitzed often yesterday.
I'm glad someone is finally on Fewell.  
Matt M. : 9/15/2014 1:12 pm : link
In my opinion, he should have been fired 2 seasons ago. Nothing he has done since has changed that opinion. The DBs still talk about miscommunication on a weekly basis. They still continue to routinely give up crucial plays on 3rd and long to wide open receivers. Even if your style of zone encourages allowing short receptions, there is no excuse for the holes in this defense that receivers regularly find.

They still show a lack of discipline against the run, especially on the backside and on the edge. They still, have trouble generating a consistent pass rush without blitzing. And, Hell, even yesterday was the first time in years I recall blitzing consistently resulting in anything other than the DB/LB getting blown up by an OL expecting it.

There is simply nothing special about this D and I think it is mostly on Fewell.
there  
Les in TO : 9/15/2014 1:15 pm : link
were gaps in all three phases. a d that let a journeyman qb march down the field repeatdedly in bend but don't break nonsense; an offense that made repeated drops and turnovers; two major special teams gaffes. blame goes all round but buck stops with coughlin.
How do you kill the D  
BillT : 9/15/2014 1:19 pm : link
When the ST gave up the go ahead TD an offensive TOs gave them their last 6 points.
Fewell is a read and react DC like Rod  
MikeN in Ottawa : 9/15/2014 1:28 pm : link
Rust was after BB left in '91. The guys on that D...Banks, Taylor etc. hated that style of D and have hated it every since. In fact, I hate it also. It is a defensive way to play defense if that makes sense.

Not surprised Carl ripped the D.
Bill  
Matt M. : 9/15/2014 1:28 pm : link
Because the offense has been getting killed and blamed for this team's state of affairs for now a second season, while the D (and the ST), in my estimation, were more broken. I'm not saying the D was responsible for the loss yesterday. I place that more squarely on Bowman, Demps, ST in general, Jennings. Then there is the consistent failing of this D, spanning multiple seasons.
RE: Bill  
arcarsenal : 9/15/2014 1:31 pm : link
In comment 11864223 Matt M. said:
Quote:
Because the offense has been getting killed and blamed for this team's state of affairs for now a second season, while the D (and the ST), in my estimation, were more broken. I'm not saying the D was responsible for the loss yesterday. I place that more squarely on Bowman, Demps, ST in general, Jennings. Then there is the consistent failing of this D, spanning multiple seasons.


The defense was more broken than the offense last year?

I disagree like.. one thousand percent. Not even close to true. The offense was one of the absolute worst in football last year. The defense was decent.
All last season  
JoefromPa : 9/15/2014 1:36 pm : link
with the focus on Gilbride I was one of the few that wanted to keep Gilbride and get rid of Fewell.

To me Gilbride had proven himself, and given the talent would have a good offense again. Fewell's defense has never been any good, and that includes the Super Bowl win.

One of the good things from this season is the fact that more people seem to be coming to the conclusion that Fewell needs to go.
arcar  
Matt M. : 9/15/2014 1:37 pm : link
I didn't say that. I said the defense seems to be getting a pass when it has been consistently bad for several years. The offense was terrible last year. There is no way around that. But, this defense has done nothing to help us stay in games on a consistent basis. This defense is routinely guilty of allowing the crucial conversions, the gamebreaking drive, etc.
it has to be demoralizing to a defense  
GiantNatty : 9/15/2014 1:38 pm : link
to see your offense so friggin inept. it also can't be the kinf of competition in practice that makes you better.
the defense gets a pass from me. they even got the ball back one more time at the end of the game.
the offense is still broken and is the reason why the giants are 0-2.
RE: arcar  
arcarsenal : 9/15/2014 1:42 pm : link
In comment 11864248 Matt M. said:
Quote:
I didn't say that. I said the defense seems to be getting a pass when it has been consistently bad for several years. The offense was terrible last year. There is no way around that. But, this defense has done nothing to help us stay in games on a consistent basis. This defense is routinely guilty of allowing the crucial conversions, the gamebreaking drive, etc.


And which crucial conversion or gamebreaking drive did they allow yesterday?

We had a lead at 14-13 and without the defense even setting foot on the field, we lost that lead. Immediately afterward, Demps fumbled the KR inside our own 25 yard line and the D held the Cards to a FG (which is all they could have done considering the Cards were already in FG range the second they took the ball)

Then, when the offense was down 8 and driving, Jennings fumbled away our last chance.

The defense was not "bad" last year. If you want to cite the competition, alright. But they were at least average if not pretty good. Certainly not on the level of the Seattles and Carolinas.. but the defense last year was good enough for this team to have been in the mix for the NFCE if the offense had been even average. The offense was SO bad last year that we just never had a chance.
According to Carl  
blueblood'11 : 9/15/2014 1:43 pm : link
This is an average defense that has above average talent and they are not playing up to that standard. You can say the talent is average and I think Carl would disagree. And yes, you can tell by the tone in his voice to see the defense play soft in big situations is killing him.
.  
arcarsenal : 9/15/2014 1:44 pm : link
My point is; I think a lot of people who have gripes with guys getting open or busted coverages don't watch a lot of other NFL games. Because a lot of the complaints are not unique to the Giants. Most teams blow a couple of coverages and leave a guy open through the course of a football game.

It's not like 31 other teams have air tight coverage on every play but the Giants just keep leaving guys running free.
arcarsenal  
blueblood'11 : 9/15/2014 1:46 pm : link
Carl wasn't placing the entire loss on the defense. I think it was one aspect that all of us have an issue with and when more of the same occurred yesterday Banks went out of his way to let his feelings and displeasure he known.
Losing our slot cover with Thurmond  
Canton : 9/15/2014 1:55 pm : link
And Beason most likely being next...

Our defense will never be more than average.
If Revis and Sherman were on this team  
Mason : 9/15/2014 2:15 pm : link
I think some people would try to use talent as excuse for bad play to avoid the obvious truth. Coaching and game planning matters in this league.
arcarsenal  
bignygfan : 9/15/2014 2:16 pm : link
Keep fighting the good fight.

But these guys will never understand what you are trying to say.
RE: If Revis and Sherman were on this team  
arcarsenal : 9/15/2014 2:25 pm : link
In comment 11864336 Mason said:
Quote:
I think some people would try to use talent as excuse for bad play to avoid the obvious truth. Coaching and game planning matters in this league.


Well, Phil Rivers shredded the Seahawk defense yesterday and dumped 30 on them.. so, what happened there? How were guys getting open?

People have a lot of ideas about things they think happen to the Giants defense but don't happen to other "good" defenses.
I watched that game... guys were weren't running wide open.  
Shockeyisthebest80 : 9/15/2014 2:30 pm : link
For example, each Antonio Gates TD was a contested catch and an extremely well thrown pass.

The Golden Tate catch up the sideline from week 1... I don't see plays like that on a regular basis around the league. No one on the Giants seems to be running wide open in the secondary.
arcarsenal  
blueblood'11 : 9/15/2014 2:30 pm : link
Very true. But the problem is that it has become a common theme with this defense under Fewell. Good defenses get burned I agree but not week in and week out.
.  
arcarsenal : 9/15/2014 2:31 pm : link
We got burned yesterday?

Drew Stanton threw for 167 yards and 0 TD's.
The performance trend under PF seems clear  
JonC : 9/15/2014 2:33 pm : link
and it was on display again yesterday. We've seen the soft zones, big cushions, miscommunication among DBs, playing zone in spots where it appears to be a very conservative call especially when your pass rush isn't getting home, LBs guessing and choosing the wrong hole to fill, DEs and OLBs blowing contain and/or failing to set the edge, Stevie's gambling, etc.

If you charted out the defense under PF's tenure, I'd be shocked if a professional head coach couldn't discern a trend similar to my observations. It's a bad re-run.

The defense picked it up yesterday when PF started calling more man and got some extra bodies dialed up on blitzes. As soon as the injuries went down, PF went back to his soft shell. It could be a logical common sense decision, but he almost always reverts to his soft shell.
arcarsenal  
Fish : 9/15/2014 2:33 pm : link
keep fighting the good fight and suck it you fucking fuck
.  
arcarsenal : 9/15/2014 2:34 pm : link
And Cruz was pretty open on that pass he dropped late in the game on 3rd down yesterday. The Cardinals were playing... *GASP* zone coverage.. either that or whoever was supposed to be covering him lost him pretty good because the defensive player Eli lofted the ball over was about 5 yards away from him.
True  
blueblood'11 : 9/15/2014 2:37 pm : link
But the Giants let teams off the hook in third and long situations too often. It leads to points. Field goals are points too. Fewell goes soft in third and long too often. Then when he dials up a blitz he leaves areas of the field wide open because of the system he runs. On Monday night Gruden alluded to the Tampa two in blitz situations because it leaves areas of the middle of the field wide open which is what Fewell apparently employs.
.  
arcarsenal : 9/15/2014 2:42 pm : link
Of course FG's are points too but it's kind of difficult to prevent them when their offense is starting a drive in FG range to begin. Holding them to 3 in those situations is the best the defense can do. We also don't run a strict Tampa 2. He does use those looks on occasion but we're not aligned like that on every down.

And lastly, we gave up about 290 yards of total offense yesterday so I guess I am just not understanding the outrage.
I look forward to the defensive team meeting that precedes  
BeerFridge : 9/15/2014 2:42 pm : link
Fewell "simplifying the scheme" and "doing what we do best".

I think Fewell sucks.
I like a team that goes down swinging  
montanagiant : 9/15/2014 2:43 pm : link
Not a big fan of soft coverage, playing not to lose football
.  
arcarsenal : 9/15/2014 2:45 pm : link
Everyone loves man coverage until a guy like Herzlich is forced to play and starts getting completely exploited.

How did Jordy Nelson keep finding open spaces yesterday against the Jets. Doesn't Rex Ryan know what he's doing?
Arcarsenal  
Watson : 9/15/2014 3:10 pm : link
We will have no logical discussion here.
Rex is starting a safety at corner and a rookie at safety.  
Shockeyisthebest80 : 9/15/2014 3:15 pm : link
That rookie bit on an already well-covered crossing pattern on Nelson's 80 yard TD catch. He should've given the corner help. Rookies make mistakes.

On Golden Tate's 44 yard catch in week 1 on 3rd & 11, there are no rookies in the secondary for the Giants. There are just experienced players who appear to have no idea what they're doing.
Eh  
JonC : 9/15/2014 3:24 pm : link
Some fans will conflate issues ... on the whole yesterday the defense did a decent job. Played well in a few spots, poorly in others, especially after the injuries and fatigue crept in. The punt return TD and turnovers certainly played a more distinct and decisive role in the loss formula. But, a lot of PF's calls and decisions being questioned are reasonable at the same time, imv.
arc  
JonC : 9/15/2014 3:24 pm : link
I'm sure you recognize I understand your position here.
I don't see what the issue was with the defense yesterday  
PatersonPlank : 9/15/2014 3:32 pm : link
As stated we were leading 14-13 in the 4th, and 7 of the 13 pts was a gift from the refs (we had like 20 penalties). Then the punt return for TD, then the Demps fumble (which the defense did its job and held to a FG). Now the score is 22-14, but the defense still only gave up6-13 pts in my book.
.  
arcarsenal : 9/15/2014 3:43 pm : link
Jon.. I have no issue with your stance on this issue even if we disagree in some aspects because you actually attempt to back your posts up with logical evidence or thought.

I am just tired of "Fewell sucks.. everything is zone coverage.. too complex... no one knows what they're doing"

They're all lazy arguments that piggyback and echo things that other people say. A lot of these things have no context and have become accepted as "fact" in this forum and it just annoys me. I just get the impression that a lot of these people would notice a lot of the same things they complain about around the league if they paid a this much attention to the other 31 teams. The pass is so damn difficult to shut down now when you get flagged for tapping a guy while he's running a route.

As far as the Tate play goes, DRC passed him off sooner than he should have. It was a fundamental error and a fuck up on his behalf. It's ok to say that DRC messed up. It doesn't mean Fewell called a coverage that was designed to have no one within 15 yards of a WR down the sideline.

Fewell for my money is an average DC. I don't think he's able to run the types of looks he really wants to consistently because he keeps losing the guys he trusts. We all know that he likes to deploy 3 safeties but when Quintin Demps is your 3rd safety, it gets a bit hard to do. You lose your main guy in the middle in Beason yesterday, you lose the promising young Kennard in week 1.

I realize adjustments need to be made but I also understand the apprehension on his behalf when it comes to isolating subpar players.

And finally, while I share the frustration of everyone about the 3rd down defense, the backup we lost to yesterday threw for 167 yards and didn't throw a TD pass. So this whole "guys are wide open all over the field left and right" just doesn't do much for me in regards to the game yesterday.
arc  
JonC : 9/15/2014 3:50 pm : link
Understood, no argument on that front from me.
Pages: 1 2 | Show All |  Next>>
Back to the Corner