He's got be having some buyers remorse.
Of course he would never say so, and would claim to be interested in the long term. However, in his mind he's got to be regretting the Cowboys getting Martin.
Pile on BBI...I'm in a good mood today no matter what.
What if next week Martin is rung up on a domestic abuse charge or blows out his knee?
What an exercise in futility.
Sadly, Reese could probably very easily say yes to the question and a bunch of BBI'ers would criticize him because no immediate returns have been seen. But that isn't how you should look at a draft pick.
A flawed premise almost always ends up with a flawed conclusion.
It still doesn't mean that the thought process that went into making the pick at the time was flawed or that the pick will end up being a bad one in the long term.
yah....it's early, coffee still kicking in
I don't necessarily consider it a bad pick. Obviously, we won't know that, but given the body of work at this point (basically nothing) would he elect a "do-over" if he could? My guess is that he would have a "do-over".
And while he is hurt now, it's not like he tore an ACL or suddenly has a career threatening injury. Hamstrings are a nag, but they're not a serious injury.
I would think we've been fans long enough to know this as well.
I think Beatty has been playing good enough so far this year. Between Beatty (2nd Round), Pugh (1st Round), and Richburg (2nd Round), thats 3 high draft choices on OL the past couple of years. I know everyone kills Reese for it, but its not like he has totally ignored the position during drafts. Its just that injuries and lack of development of late picks haven't panned out.
If they use another high draft pick on OL next year, you will have 4/5ths of a line that was spent on high draft picks.
#jryreach
#lol
And, while we can argue the OL has been neglected in the past, its hard to make the case that it was starved for resources this past offseason. I think the patchwork state is a testament to just how broken it was, and that it wasn't a one year fix.
Even Steve Smith was hurt part of his rookie year but contributed later in the season. Im not sure how you fix these things, buts guys get signed to this team and get hurt (i.e Canty, Thurmond, Beason, etc)
This is an absolute fiction being touted by those infants on here who can't reconcile us not taking Martin.
Check that, it's not a fiction, it's a fucking lie.
gmen9892 : 9:48 am : link : reply
In comment 11869143 MikeN in Ottawa said:
Quote:
failure to recognize the Offensive Line was aging and not to invest high draft picks to rebuild the line for another SB run or two. It appears right now, we may not be ready for at least another year or two. I like Pugh and Richburg but the decision to sign Beatty to that deal was another HUGE mistake.
I think Beatty has been playing good enough so far this year. Between Beatty (2nd Round), Pugh (1st Round), and Richburg (2nd Round), thats 3 high draft choices on OL the past couple of years. I know everyone kills Reese for it, but its not like he has totally ignored the position during drafts. Its just that injuries and lack of development of late picks haven't panned out.
You don't rebuild your OL all at once......Beatty is nothing to get excited about.....Pugh and Richburg have only a small sample to judge them on, thus far....Pugh looked better than he was last year, when compared to what was out there to the left of him.....this year, more is expected of him, and I have not seen him improve much, if at all from last year...
The line should have had a steady infusion of new talent....guys ready to step in...instead we have counted on fourth and 7th rounders to do the job....it's been neglected, pure and simple....with the track record we have had from the 3rd round up, I can't understand why we don't package one of those picks with a first rounder, to move up and get what we need....BBI seems to feel we need bodies, and hate to give up draft picks....but look at all the bodies that we have drafted that don't make the team, that sit on the bench and don't play, and when they do, don't perform....
That said, I don't question the pick. It's defensible. What I do question is not signing a vet WR like James Jones and instead relying on Jerningan as Beckham's backup. The Giants needed a reliable vet in case Beckham stuggled to get used to the NFL (which is common with rookie WRs).
Martin
CJ Mosley
Odb
In that order
Eli might not survive Sunday. Giants caught a break when Clowney got hurt.
At the moment, you could say the Giants would be better off with Zack Martin and Davante Adams (or Jordan Matthews, or Allen Robinson, or Jarvis Landry, or any other rookie receiver who's actually playing) than with Beckham and Richburg. I think that's extracting a lot from a tiny data sample.
What I wonder is if Lewan was not taken by the Titans would he ave been the pick instead?
But who knows? Beckham could wind up being just as good as - or better than -- any or all of them. Given a time machine and the ability to take the pick back would present Reese with a gamble just knowing what he knows now.
solidify the line. get a beast defender. get a playmaker. the needs were everywhere.
what we couldn't afford is exactly what's happened, so far.
Link - ( New Window )
solidify the line. get a beast defender. get a playmaker. the needs were everywhere.
what we couldn't afford is exactly what's happened, so far.
We're two, count 'em, two games into the season with a new system on O and a new OC. And you're ready to say that Beckham isn't a home run? That's fatuously rich.
Just because he hasn't had a chance to perform yet has zero to do with whether he's a home run, a whiff, or somewhere in between. I agree that it would have been much better if the hamstring problem never happened, but it did, and the Giants just have to deal with it (just like the team we're going to play next has to deal with the loss of Clowney).
This is why we can't have nice things.
What worries me is that nyg's have
Hammy issues with many players...
web..holsey..grimble...had for months..
is it our training. ..