for display only
Big Blue Interactive The Corner Forum  
Back to the Corner

Archived Thread

Brady/Welker Incompletion Re-Visited

tnick2014 : 9/18/2014 10:40 pm
I know this forum discussed this play ad nauseam more than 2 years ago, but I wanted to hear your thoughts (I'm actually a Patriots fan).



Here are my thoughts:

First of all, I still don't see how Welker would've scored a touchdown on that particular play. Second of all, Brady's CLEARLY back-shouldering the pass to keep it away from Kenny Phillips (the Giants' safety) so that he couldn't break up or intercept the pass (he was 5-6 yards away from where the ball would normally be thrown, and it was a pass that travelled 26-27 yards through the air). Bill O'Brien (the then-offensive coach), Eric Mangini, Steve Mariucci, and SEVERAL other players and coaches have repeatedly said this. The reason why the pass LOOKED crappy was because Welker struggled adjusting to the pass (because Welker was expecting it to be thrown inside, not outside). Tough play overall (and not a drop), but Welker probably should've come down with it (Welker even said so himself). Honestly, the pass wasn't crappy. On a scale of 1 to 10, I'd give it a 5. Anyway, it DEFINITELY wouldn't have been ballgame, as there were STILL 4 minutes left in the game, and the Giants had 1 remaining timeout and the two minute warning. Still enough time for Eli to do his magic (as I've learned all too well).

The link in this thread provides great evidence of everything I just said.
Brady/Welker Incompletion - ( New Window )
Pages: 1 2 <<Prev | Show All |
People are saying let it go  
Randy in CT : 9/19/2014 6:56 am : link
(aside from it being their favorite song) because as you outlined, who knows what would have happened afterwards if he HAD caught the ball. Brady might have thrown a pick 6. Who knows?

My thought was that while it was catchable, it was far from a gimme that some make it out to be.

Oh, and that "almost INT" on the sideline? That had a 10% chance of being caught inbounds.

Giants > Pats. Great game though. Games.
Spock,  
Randy in CT : 9/19/2014 6:58 am : link
Then Should Manningham have dropped that pass vs San Fran? Should Eli have not made that perfect throw?

This should have would have crap is horseshit. The game unfolded as it did with plays made and plays left on the field.
85% welker  
kmed : 9/19/2014 7:06 am : link
15% Brady.
Just another example  
JoefromPa : 9/19/2014 7:51 am : link
that season of a Perry Fewell defense had to be bailed out by a lack of execution by the opponent's offense to get off the field in a season changing play.

Cowboys and Tony Romo had a similar play a few weeks prior to the Super Bowl that would have ended the Giants seasons.

Even 4th and 18 Fewell's defense could not get a stop to win the Super Bowl. Instead Giants had to survive a Hail Mary pass that came too close for comfort.
85% Brady  
Doomster : 9/19/2014 7:54 am : link
15% Welker.....

Watching that play, there was no pressure on Brady, he had a good pocket, Phillips was not going to the ball.....he throws it right at him, and the Pats, worse case scenario, get a fg and take time off the clock(they score a td, and it's over)....and sets the stage for Eli to do it again.....
that was not a very catchable ball to me  
mattlawson : 9/19/2014 8:20 am : link
hard to say it was a 5. 3 at best. even if "that ball had to be caught" it was still nowhere near a gimmie like cruz had last sunday. cruz dropped a 9 out of 10 with the game on the line... huge difference.

plus that phantom holding call when jacobs took it into scoring position would have put the game away before this even happened
RE: Just another example  
mattlawson : 9/19/2014 8:26 am : link
In comment 11870689 JoefromPa said:
Quote:
that season of a Perry Fewell defense had to be bailed out by a lack of execution by the opponent's offense to get off the field in a season changing play.

Cowboys and Tony Romo had a similar play a few weeks prior to the Super Bowl that would have ended the Giants seasons.

Even 4th and 18 Fewell's defense could not get a stop to win the Super Bowl. Instead Giants had to survive a Hail Mary pass that came too close for comfort.


That was on Aaron Ross, not Fewell, watch the play. Ross SUCKS and almost cost us the season.
That gif is the first time I saw it in awhile  
JOrthman : 9/19/2014 8:29 am : link
and just based on what I see there, Brady didn't need to throw it where he did. None of the Giant Defenders were going to get to the ball based on where they were. They were all running trying to keep up with Welker, therefore no one had the ability to adjust where they would need to to pick it off.
And just be cause Welker took the blame  
JOrthman : 9/19/2014 8:31 am : link
does not mean he was right to. He knows he's an NFL reciever and it is his job to catch anything he can get his hands on. Its a lesson I think most Giants WR's and fans need to learn.
on a scale of 1-10  
Les in TO : 9/19/2014 8:34 am : link
that attempted catch was about an 8 in terms of difficulty given how he had to twist at full speed.
It doesn't mater where the throw was. A QB isn't going to be  
kmed : 9/19/2014 8:41 am : link
perfect everytime. The ball hit welker in both hands. Not fingertips either, it hit him in both palms. That's on Welker.
Mattlawson: Like many Giant fans, you might be overstating...  
Big Blue Blogger : 9/19/2014 8:42 am : link
...the significance of the holding call on Boothe:
Quote:
Plus that phantom holding call when jacobs took it into scoring position would have put the game away before this even happened.

Was the holding call an important, momentum-changing play? Certainly. But let's be real. If the Jacobs run stands, the Giants have 1st and 10 at the NE 36 with a 9-3 lead and about 4:30 left in the half. Instead, they face 3rd and 10 at their own 45. Eli throws an incompletion and the Giants have to punt. What's often forgotten is that Weatherford pinned the Patriots at their own four on the ensuing punt, and Brady drove 96 yards to put the Pats ahead at halftime.

There's no way to know what would have happened in those last few minutes if the flag had been picked up. Maybe the Giants would have drained the clock, scored a TD and gone to the locker room up 16-3. Or maybe they would have stalled and punted anyway, or missed a field goal, or thrown a pick, giving the Pats better field position for their go-ahead drive. Even at 16-3, the game would have been far from over. Remember, the Pats sliced through the Giants again at the start of the third quarter, to make it 17-9. To say Jacobs's first down would have given the Giants a decisive edge, you have to put a lot of emphasis on momentum, and disregard what happened on New England's next two possessions.
If you think that's an 8 out of 10 in terms of difficulty,  
kmed : 9/19/2014 8:42 am : link
I question whether you've ever touched a football in your life.
My response has never changed  
USAF NYG Fan : 9/19/2014 8:44 am : link
It's Welker's fault he didn't catch it. He had both hands on the ball. No other way to see it. That would not have been game over though. The Giants still could have held them to a FG with enough time for Eli to work his magic. Remember we left too much time on the clock (IMHO) after we scored the final touchdown.

It's Brady's fault it didn't go for a touchdown. If Brady threw a better ball (maybe hit him in stride), and if Welker catches it, it goes for a touchdown and the game is very likely over at that point. I don't think Phillips was in position to stop it. That would have been 2 scores down with 4:00 left to go.
From what I remember  
mrvax : 9/19/2014 9:04 am : link
it was a tough ball to catch and even if Welker came down with it, he was very likely to be off balance and fall.
The game would have been pretty  
pjcas18 : 9/19/2014 9:27 am : link
much over, the Pats would have been at the Giants 20 yard line with a first down and under 4 min left.

a FG would have forced the Giants to score a TD to win.

it wouldn't have been 100% dead over, but pretty much over.
But I know one thing.....  
Doomster : 9/19/2014 10:05 am : link
Giselle would have caught it!



"I got it! I got it!"
I think the throw was where it was because  
Bino5 : 9/19/2014 10:12 am : link
Brady was throwing it away from Rolle. Rolle was very close to Welker's inside as Brady was about to throw the ball. Inexplicably Rolle takes off away from Welker(I have to think he guessed Welker was running a post) so he did not end up being that close when the ball arrived.

That is a catch you would like an NFL WR to make, but that is a difficult catch after the adjustment he has to make.
I don't know how you  
Bob from Massachusetts : 9/19/2014 10:28 am : link
"blame" anybody on that. Brady threw it about 40 yards downfield to within about 2 feet of what would have been a perfect pass. That's a pretty good throw. And Welker had to reach back across his body to make the catch. He made a good effort, and he almost caught it. But it wasn't like the ball hit him in the numbers. It's just a tough play that didn't exactly work out. Like happens all the time.

But if they get that first down, they go right to burning the clock and kicking the field goal. Could the Giants have then mounted a long drive for a touchdown? Maybe, but miracles usually don't happen more than once every 10 years....
Shouldn't be playing the what if game but ...  
USAF NYG Fan : 9/19/2014 10:42 am : link
I think the Giants had a timeout left and there was about 4:00 minutes to go. Correct me if I'm wrong because I can't verify from work. IF, the giants stopped them there, holding them to a FG, they would have had time for Eli to march down the field and a touchdown still wins it (21-20 instead of 21-17).

Eli did march down the field and score a touchdown. In fact he did it too quickly thus evidenced by the sitdown touchdown by Bradshaw.

However, this is the what if game and based on assumptions so ...
all i know  
giantfanboy : 9/19/2014 10:53 am : link
whatever happen to welker on that play
the same thing happen to Cruz this past week on 3rd and 6
RE: Rolle probably blew the coverage. Phillips had no shot.  
tnick2014 : 9/19/2014 10:57 am : link
In comment 11870654 Big Blue Blogger said:
Quote:
KP wasn't even playing the ball. He was breaking deep to make the tackle after the catch. That might have been partly an adjustment to the ball in the air, but it would have taken a move worthy of the Chinese Acrobats for him to get to Welker, even if the ball had been lower and slightly farther inside.

Brady did adjust the throw to the outside, and it was the correct adjustment, since the only deep coverage (Phillips) was near the hash mark. Brady put the ball where no Giant could make a play. But he didn't need to throw it quite that far outside to take Phillips out of the play, and he didn't need to throw it quite that high, since neither of the two underneath defenders - Rolle/Webster - was anywhere near Welker. There was a huge hole amid the three Giants; Brady could have just dropped the ball into Welker's belly at the 24 rather than extending him fully at the 22. No chance for YAC if Welker has to slow down, but he gets the first down and the game is pretty much over.

Instead, Brady did what all QBs are trained to do: he put the ball where his guy - and only his guy - could get near it. Great read, and a decent throw, but not the best play in that particular situation, where a first down - even an ugly one - probably equals a championship. Freeze at :27, and look where Phillips is going. - ( New Window )


You can't assume that he would've done the EXACT same thing if the pass was thrown inside. He's favoring the left hash mark, so Phillips could've definitely reacted differently if the pass was thrown inside. He definitely had a shot.
RE: that was not a very catchable ball to me  
tnick2014 : 9/19/2014 11:01 am : link
In comment 11870703 mattlawson said:
Quote:
hard to say it was a 5. 3 at best. even if "that ball had to be caught" it was still nowhere near a gimmie like cruz had last sunday. cruz dropped a 9 out of 10 with the game on the line... huge difference.

plus that phantom holding call when jacobs took it into scoring position would have put the game away before this even happened


Judging by the coverage and what Brady was trying to do on that play, a 5 seems about right. I'd give the throw a 3 if Brady had intended to throw it inside but it had gone outside instead.
tnick  
mrvax : 9/19/2014 11:06 am : link
In the end, both Brady and Welker deserve a bit of fault on the play. Don't beat yourself up over it. Chit happens.
And both of those 2 are exceptional players.
I could revist  
pjcas18 : 9/19/2014 11:20 am : link
this play, the Manningham catch, the Tyree catch, the alford sack, etc. every day.

it's fun.
Throw was to the wrong shoulder  
JonC : 9/19/2014 11:25 am : link
Welker didn't adjust quickly enough and it threw off his hand/eye coordination and timing as he tried to body control into better position. Not a gimme but you'll see more difficult catches made.
Even if Brady was throwing back-shoulder,  
Section331 : 9/19/2014 11:25 am : link
it was not a well-thrown ball. Yes,with KP coming over the top, Welker should have anticipated back shoulder, so he shares some of the blame, but I have always thought that it simply wasn't a well-thrown ball.
It doesn't matter  
pjcas18 : 9/19/2014 11:28 am : link
too much to me if it was a great pass or not, when this ball hits you in the hands you catch it.



the rest (back shoulder, front shoulder, KP, Rolle, Ross, etc) is noise.
Can't believe we are discussing an incompletion from 2011  
PatersonPlank : 9/19/2014 11:32 am : link
Pats fans need to give it a rest, and Giants fans have a lot more to worry about now. One play does not mean the game. Lots of things happened that could have turned a close game one way or another.
RE: Even if Brady was throwing back-shoulder,  
tnick2014 : 9/19/2014 11:38 am : link
In comment 11870970 Section331 said:
Quote:
it was not a well-thrown ball. Yes,with KP coming over the top, Welker should have anticipated back shoulder, so he shares some of the blame, but I have always thought that it simply wasn't a well-thrown ball.


I'm not saying that it was well-thrown ball. I'm just saying that it wasn't a poorly-thrown ball. Hence why I gave the throw a 5 on a scale of 1 to 10.
If I'm Welker  
JonC : 9/19/2014 11:39 am : link
I'd tell you I should've completed the catch, and wager Welker has said the same.
the idea  
PaulBlakeTSU : 9/19/2014 11:40 am : link
that because the ball hit Welker in the hands that he should have caught it is nonsense. It is an error in perception and the same faulty judgment that certain baseball fans use when they watch infielders try to make plays on ground balls and assign errors to great fielders who at least get a glove on a ball that poorer fielders would not have even gotten to.

Brady tried to mitigate his risk by throwing a back shoulder pass but unfortunately he threw it high to a short receiver with short arms. Plus, Welker should not have anticipated the back shoulder fade because as I pointed out in the article, he rarely gets those kinds of throws. It isn't his game, and it isn't in his skillset.

That Welker was able to twist his body at full speed and reach back to even get his hannds on it should be used to praise Welker's ability to adjust so quickly, rather than criticize him for not actually catching it.
Watching the play  
Spyder : 9/19/2014 11:58 am : link
again, it reminds me how I felt watching Brady, with all that time. Where was the pressure? It seemed like he had all day, especially when he made that little crow hop for a little extra.

That said, it would have taken a perfect throw to hit Welker right where the ball needed to be in that defense. Just the way he twisted his body to even get two hands on the ball made the catch very, very tough.

It would have taken a perfect throw. Nearly impossible to pull off.

Except the other QB did make a perfect throw, on the very next possession, a throw also nearly impossible to pull off. Still awesome to think of that nearly impossible and perfect throw to this day...

RE: the idea  
pjcas18 : 9/19/2014 12:06 pm : link
In comment 11870999 PaulBlakeTSU said:
Quote:
that because the ball hit Welker in the hands that he should have caught it is nonsense. It is an error in perception and the same faulty judgment that certain baseball fans use when they watch infielders try to make plays on ground balls and assign errors to great fielders who at least get a glove on a ball that poorer fielders would not have even gotten to.

Brady tried to mitigate his risk by throwing a back shoulder pass but unfortunately he threw it high to a short receiver with short arms. Plus, Welker should not have anticipated the back shoulder fade because as I pointed out in the article, he rarely gets those kinds of throws. It isn't his game, and it isn't in his skillset.

That Welker was able to twist his body at full speed and reach back to even get his hannds on it should be used to praise Welker's ability to adjust so quickly, rather than criticize him for not actually catching it.


that's a lot of words. there isn't a football wide receiver on the planet who would agree with you.
RE: RE: the idea  
mrvax : 9/19/2014 12:30 pm : link
In comment 11871064 pjcas18 said:
Quote:
In comment 11870999 PaulBlakeTSU said:


Quote:


that because the ball hit Welker in the hands that he should have caught it is nonsense. It is an error in perception and the same faulty judgment that certain baseball fans use when they watch infielders try to make plays on ground balls and assign errors to great fielders who at least get a glove on a ball that poorer fielders would not have even gotten to.

Brady tried to mitigate his risk by throwing a back shoulder pass but unfortunately he threw it high to a short receiver with short arms. Plus, Welker should not have anticipated the back shoulder fade because as I pointed out in the article, he rarely gets those kinds of throws. It isn't his game, and it isn't in his skillset.

That Welker was able to twist his body at full speed and reach back to even get his hannds on it should be used to praise Welker's ability to adjust so quickly, rather than criticize him for not actually catching it.



that's a lot of words. there isn't a football wide receiver on the planet who would agree with you.


No way to prove/disprove that pjcas. I agree with PaulBlake say only a superior WR could have even got hands on that throw. I'd expect that Megatron makes that catch, few others.
Was Welker wearing the wrong gloves? Crazy thought, but....  
xxixxv : 9/19/2014 12:36 pm : link
http://www.nfl.com/news/story/09000d5d8266a9c1/article/who-needs-stickum-when-youve-got-sticky-gloves
If that was not a catchable ball or a well thrown ball  
mamamia : 9/19/2014 12:38 pm : link
what are some of the catches that Donnell made last week? Was the Cruz drop a well thrown ball or a catchable ball?
I know my post probably seemed odd, but after watching the gif's, it  
xxixxv : 9/19/2014 12:51 pm : link
Seems like so many players today are making impossible and sometimes one-handed catches. It made me wonder if there were new gloves instituted recently to again, give the offense an advantage. Sure enough, a little search yielded that article. I am old enough to remember when they outlawed "Stick-um". Now it seems that the league condones that advantage.

It seemed to me that Welker may have been resistant to the new technology and was using the old "battling glove" style that the QBs use.

Don't really care......Giants won their 4th!!!! But thought I'd share that very random observation.
PJ  
PaulBlakeTSU : 9/19/2014 1:44 pm : link
of course wide receivers wouldn't agree with me. They all have egos / extreme confidence in their abilities (and rightfully so given they are the top sliver of a percent of people who grew up playing football). They always think they can make any catch.
whoever is bringing that play up  
djm : 9/19/2014 1:52 pm : link
is doing so to tweek giants fans. That's all they have is to bitch about that play..

Who cares. It could have been caught. It wasn't. Giants put themselves in position to win the super bowl and they did win the super bowl. THat's all that matters.
RE: whoever is bringing that play up  
mrvax : 9/19/2014 1:57 pm : link
In comment 11871236 djm said:
Quote:
is doing so to tweek giants fans. That's all they have is to bitch about that play..

Who cares. It could have been caught. It wasn't. Giants put themselves in position to win the super bowl and they did win the super bowl. THat's all that matters.


Disagree. Giant fans don't give 2 shits about that play but I imagine Pat fans would be like "what if"...
On that penalty that we KNOW  
NoPeanutz : 9/19/2014 2:04 pm : link
100% without a doubt was bogus (because it's on tape), NE converted a free 3rd and long when they were deep in the hole.

If they couldnt convert 3rd and long in the first half, why should we expect them to get it together with the the Supe on the line...
No sympathy from me. No Giants fan should feel guilty about this play, just because a couple Brady and WW finally ran out of luck with 5 to play in the season.
RE: RE: whoever is bringing that play up  
pjcas18 : 9/19/2014 2:04 pm : link
In comment 11871247 mrvax said:
Quote:
In comment 11871236 djm said:


Quote:


is doing so to tweek giants fans. That's all they have is to bitch about that play..

Who cares. It could have been caught. It wasn't. Giants put themselves in position to win the super bowl and they did win the super bowl. THat's all that matters.



Disagree. Giant fans don't give 2 shits about that play but I imagine Pat fans would be like "what if"...


yep, I don't care about the play and if anything it should make it sting even more for Pats fans. Many of my friends haven't watched a second of the highlights of XLII or XLVI and claim they never will.

Me, I can watch them all day and the smile will never leave my face, even the bad plays.
RE: the idea  
tnick2014 : 9/19/2014 2:29 pm : link
In comment 11870999 PaulBlakeTSU said:
Quote:
that because the ball hit Welker in the hands that he should have caught it is nonsense. It is an error in perception and the same faulty judgment that certain baseball fans use when they watch infielders try to make plays on ground balls and assign errors to great fielders who at least get a glove on a ball that poorer fielders would not have even gotten to.

Brady tried to mitigate his risk by throwing a back shoulder pass but unfortunately he threw it high to a short receiver with short arms. Plus, Welker should not have anticipated the back shoulder fade because as I pointed out in the article, he rarely gets those kinds of throws. It isn't his game, and it isn't in his skillset.

That Welker was able to twist his body at full speed and reach back to even get his hannds on it should be used to praise Welker's ability to adjust so quickly, rather than criticize him for not actually catching it.


I'll rephrase my statement and say that Welker definitely COULD have caught it--probably had a 65-75% shot of making it--but it definitely wasn't a given. What's also noteworthy is what Bill O'Brien said regarding that play, and it's pretty valid: "He's trying to paint Wes' outside shoulder to keep it away from Phillips." Fewell does mention that he didn't think Phillips had a shot even if the ball was thrown inside, but that's problematic because he's extrapolating (just because Phillips took one particular angle when the ball was thrown outside doesn't mean that he'd take that exact same angle if the ball was thrown inside, especially when he's 5-6 yards away from where the ball would normally be thrown. Also, Welker even said that Brady was "worried about the safety" on that play.
Kind of agree with tnicks here...  
Sonic Youth : 9/19/2014 2:36 pm : link
...tough throw and tough catch. You'd expect great players like Welker and Brady to hold up their end of the bargain, but when you consider they both had tough moves to make, it's no surprise it fell incomplete.

Yes, Welker getting his hands on it is a testament to his ability, but once he gets to that point and it hits him in the hands, he should come down with it.

Having said that, as mentioned earlier, Eli hit Manningham on an insane throw and catch (one that Manningham always struggled with - everyone would rip him for not getting that Toomer toe-tap down)... so WHO GIVES A SHIT! WE PULLED IT THROUGH! LET'S GO GIANTS SB XVLII CHAMPS!
RE: That gif is the first time I saw it in awhile  
tnick2014 : 9/19/2014 2:38 pm : link
In comment 11870718 JOrthman said:
Quote:
and just based on what I see there, Brady didn't need to throw it where he did. None of the Giant Defenders were going to get to the ball based on where they were. They were all running trying to keep up with Welker, therefore no one had the ability to adjust where they would need to to pick it off.


Phillips doesn't start running until Brady throws the pass. It's not like he was already taking that particular angle before Brady threw it. Again, he's favoring the left hash mark, and he could certainly move towards the direction of the ball if it was thrown inside (you can't assume that he'd take the EXACT same angle as he did when he threw it outside).

Practically every player-and many coaches-have repeatedly said this (particularly the good analysts, like Trent Dilfer, Eric Mangini, and Steve Mariucci). Why do so many of the non-players/non-coaches disagree with their statements?
Sonic Youth: XVLII?  
Big Blue Blogger : 9/19/2014 2:40 pm : link
What's Latin for dyslexia?
RE: Kind of agree with tnicks here...  
tnick2014 : 9/19/2014 2:43 pm : link
In comment 11871315 Sonic Youth said:
Quote:
...tough throw and tough catch. You'd expect great players like Welker and Brady to hold up their end of the bargain, but when you consider they both had tough moves to make, it's no surprise it fell incomplete.

Yes, Welker getting his hands on it is a testament to his ability, but once he gets to that point and it hits him in the hands, he should come down with it.

Having said that, as mentioned earlier, Eli hit Manningham on an insane throw and catch (one that Manningham always struggled with - everyone would rip him for not getting that Toomer toe-tap down)... so WHO GIVES A SHIT! WE PULLED IT THROUGH! LET'S GO GIANTS SB XVLII CHAMPS!


Finally, someone is on my side with this. Thanks for backing me up. Also, it should be worth noting that Brady and Welker never really connected on that type of pass at all while they were both on the Patriots. So, as you said, it's not that surprising that the play resulted in an incompletion.
I'm glad you moved on with your life  
David in LA : 9/19/2014 2:46 pm : link
.
The OP really needed more parenthesis  
Mike in Long Beach : 9/19/2014 4:31 pm : link
.
Pages: 1 2 <<Prev | Show All |
Back to the Corner