I've officially had enough of Tom Brady as my starter.
I gave him plenty of chances but I'm done.
I put out some feelers for trades, I have both Kelce and Cameron as tight ends so I'm hoping to package someone like Cameron and Wright for someones backup qb. (russell wilson, kaepernick)
I also signed drew stanton because I think he will put up good numbers this week.
I could also sign either Bridgewater or Bortles, or even Dalton.
anyone has to be better than brady at this point.
advice? think i should just hedge my bets on one of those rookies?
im lost at qb man haha.
Would you trade Colston for Witten (PPR). My other WRs are Allen, Hilton, R White. Lost N Paul and would have to scour the waivers for TE.
Brees
Calvin
Maclin
Cruz
Jennings
Vereen
Graham
TY Hilton
Or
Brees
Calvin
Maclin
Cruz
Bernard
Jennings
Olsen
Golden Tate
Would you trade Colston for Witten (PPR). My other WRs are Allen, Hilton, R White. Lost N Paul and would have to scour the waivers for TE.
I would make that trade. Witten's a safe TE that gets a good chunk of targets per game.
He hasn't shown good progress after he said he definitely play this week, they're supposed to make a decision this afternoon.
Bortles against Pitt ain't a bad play. Big Ben will likely go off on Jax and Bortles could throw 50 times.
Dalton might be better long term but I wouldn't cut Brady yet...
My rb's are
Peterson (just dropped)
Bell
Asiata
Blount
Moreno (hurt)
Ingram (hurt)
Searching for TE
Clay Harbor available?
For
Graham, Hilton, vereen
The way I see it, I invested a 2nd on brees, I still think he will pick it up and be worthy. I believe Graham will be the beneficiary. I'm also a big Ty Hilton fan and I'd be buying low in him. I obviously weeken my rbs a lot, but improve TE total pts and Flex total points. Plus, there will be other rbs available throughout the season. Thoughts.
Bernard
Olsen
Tate
vs
Vereen
Graham
Hilton
I like team 1 for two of the three, and the drop-off on the third doesn't seem like a ton.
Right now and he's already has his bye Gio has 25 points more than vereen
Right now, neither with a bye: Tate has 4 more points than Hilton
And Graham has 26 points more than Olsen.
In the end I go with Gio and Tate to improve, Vereen is not what I thought he was (through 4 games) and Hilton is buried in a bevy of options.
0.5 pts per 10 yards, 3 pt bonus at 100, 6 pts for TD, 0.5 pt per reception.
Colston had a game in which he wasn't even targeted, then had 10 targets last week (only caught 5, but one was a TD). Decker has the crappy QB, but he's their top WR (when his hammy isn't sore). Hopkins is putting up great numbers so far), and doesn't normally face the top CB.
Which would you drop?
Hilton>Tate(slightly)
Vereen>vernon(or Olsen who goes to my bench)
Peyton Manning
Russell Wilson
Michael Floyd
Jeremy Maclin
TY Hilton
Mike Evans
Jimmie Graham
Ladarius Green
Reggie Bush
Lamar Miller
Bishop Sankey
Darren McFadden (whom I dropped for Bobby Rainey...)
Just missed adding McKinnon on Waivers and in a 12 team league, its really fucking thin out there.
Anywho, just wanted to rant.
This is the same league I am potentially looking to deal Brees.. I offered the last place guy Brees for AJ straight up. He also has Demaryius and Newton is his QB so he's not getting a whole lot there right now.
I have to play two of the three following guys:
Patterson at GB
Royal vs. the Jets
Foster against Dallas
Patterson has been a bust, Royal is getting a lot of balls thrown his way but will he keep it up, Foster got 1 carry in the 2nd half last week and it looks like they are limiting him.
Thoughts?
Also, in my other league where I really need a RB I was offered Sproles and Talafarrio (sp?) for McKinnon and VJax. No, right? Another guy said he'd swap me Tate (Crowell is a FA so I can cuff him) for a WR.. I have VJax, Mike Floyed, Terrance Williams, Quick and Cooks so I can part with one of them since we only start 2 a week.
This is the league I drafted AP which is why I got fucked.
With Olsen and Graham yes of course it is an upgrade to Graham but Olsen is effectively their number 2 receiver and Newton will start to get into a groove and use Olsen more...
I just like Tate more than Hilton and with Megatron hobbled a little bit Tate was the guy they went to...he is a good number 2 receiver...i just trust Tate week to week more than Hilton...
In the end i just dont think it is a trade you need to make...
Cousins will be hit or miss all season but his next 2 are against Seattle and AZ, so i probably wouldn't have started him over Brady those weeks anyway.
Asiata @ GB
Lacy vs Minn
Ellington @ Den
With Olsen and Graham yes of course it is an upgrade to Graham but Olsen is effectively their number 2 receiver and Newton will start to get into a groove and use Olsen more...
I just like Tate more than Hilton and with Megatron hobbled a little bit Tate was the guy they went to...he is a good number 2 receiver...i just trust Tate week to week more than Hilton...
In the end i just dont think it is a trade you need to make...
Appreciate the feedback. You don't have to tell me about the Pats and their RB usage, I've been harping on that since the first fantasy threads. Again though, it's not RB's vs RB's and I think Vereen will be servicable as a starter and he would be compared to my TE which is still an upgrade.
I happen to think Olsen is very overrated. I think he's serviceable as a starter, but they don't pass a ton and they aren't a great passing offense. He will have a few duds week to week.
I like Hilton better than Tate personally. I think Tate is good, but I also have calvin which is annoying. I think Hilton is going to start finding the endzone and I also think Detroit has as many passing options as Indy. I think it's a lateral move in reality, but I like Hilton more moving forward.
Def not a trade I need to make, I'm not even actively shopping anyone because I like my team a lot, but this opportunity came to me and I'm always looking to improve. It's not like I'm messing with team chemistry.
I think there are reasons for both sides to be honest...it wouldnt be a bad trade if you did it...