I get there is a decent amount of fear mongering with Ebola but why are we still permitting flights from there while we try to get this contained? It's an incubation period of 21 days and the vaccination is still being tested. It seems just sane to limit direct flights until this situation is better understood.
Link - ( New Window )
I am guessing family visit?
I am guessing family visit?
You would be correct.
And no BS and conjecture and politically correct crap.
Why would there be no review of travel policy, why would there be no explanation either way of why travel would still be unrestricted from these areas connecting flights or no.
I can think of not one plausible reason why there would still be unrestricted or at least some review of any flights from these affected countries. If you are a US citizen and you travel there and want to come back that is your problem now. Why would someone's right to travel outweigh the public health risk to us all?
Also, how the hell did this hospital let this guy go? Is this the most incompetent hospital in the US? How does someone with a travel history from ground zero of this epidemic allowed to go home when they have symptoms of ANY kind?!?!
Also, the CDC goes on and on about the American healthcare system being so great. Well, they fucked up the case with this guy by letting him go when he came to the hospital on 9/24.
Also, how the hell did this hospital let this guy go? Is this the most incompetent hospital in the US? How does someone with a travel history from ground zero of this epidemic allowed to go home when they have symptoms of ANY kind?!?!
Also, the CDC goes on and on about the American healthcare system being so great. Well, they fucked up the case with this guy by letting him go when he came to the hospital on 9/24.
Because the guy didn't tell the hospital where he flew in from, and they didn't ask.
So how is this a fuck up?
Panic much?
Also, if they did not ask him then that is even more proof that they they are incompetent.
I also would like to hear a valid argument supporting unrestricted air travel from these regions. A valid argument may very well exist but I can not think of it and I have not heard or read one yet.
In late August and early September of 2012, eight new cases of Hantavirus were confirmed, including three deaths, in the Curry Village area of Yosemite National Park. On Long Island, David Hartstein, a chiropractor, died in June 2011, after contracting hantavirus. His story is featured in the HBO documentary Hard Times, Lost on Long Island.
Oh you do not feel well? We have no real diagnosis and you are exhibiting some symptoms. Here take some antibiotics and have a good day.
If Ebola does not get us, an antibiotic resistant superbug will cause problems someday with medical "care" like that.
Ridiculous, and it does not fly with the CDC's claim that the US medical system top of the line. Tell that to anyone who may have been infected by this guy in the 48 hours while he was symptomatic, which means he was contagious.
Who was the doctor who let this guy go? Where did this guy go to medical school?
Were these people practicing third world sanitary procedures?
Quote:
Also, how the hell did this hospital let this guy go? Is this the most incompetent hospital in the US? How does someone with a travel history from ground zero of this epidemic allowed to go home when they have symptoms of ANY kind?!?!
Also, the CDC goes on and on about the American healthcare system being so great. Well, they fucked up the case with this guy by letting him go when he came to the hospital on 9/24.
Because the guy didn't tell the hospital where he flew in from, and they didn't ask.
So how is this a fuck up?
Panic much?
That's incorrect. It's been reported that the gentleman did indeed tell the first nurse he had just come from Liberia. The hospital confirmed this and claims that that information wasn't properly conveyed down the line.
The issue at hand is why was he allowed those two extra days after the second visit.
Why would this not be done? Why would they just send this guy out with antibiotics which might as well be tic tacs if you have a viral infection of any kind.
Why would this not be done? Why would they just send this guy out with antibiotics which might as well be tic tacs if you have a viral infection of any kind.
Because they fucked up.
To me it seems like if there was any real pressure put on the emergency medical care system in a city like NY the system would snap like a twig and there would be a real problem on our hands.
Again I am no expert but the idea that it is of no real consequence or just some minor event that this germ has made its way to the US seems ridiculous to me.
To me it seems like if there was any real pressure put on the emergency medical care system in a city like NY the system would snap like a twig and there would be a real problem on our hands.
Again I am no expert but the idea that it is of no real consequence or just some minor event that this germ has made its way to the US seems ridiculous to me.
You ever think that it has already had made it here and our first world sanitary procedures have kept it at bay?
Quote:
...has anyone every been to an Emergency Room in NYC? It is like Grand Central Station, the whole neighborhood is there.
To me it seems like if there was any real pressure put on the emergency medical care system in a city like NY the system would snap like a twig and there would be a real problem on our hands.
Again I am no expert but the idea that it is of no real consequence or just some minor event that this germ has made its way to the US seems ridiculous to me.
You ever think that it has already had made it here and our first world sanitary procedures have kept it at bay?
First world sanitary procedures in a NYC hospital? Next thing youll try to sell me some bridge or ocean front property in Yuma...
To me this is very serious, and the fact that the system already messed up and let this guy loose does not fill me with confidence.
While I do not think it would get Africa bad here in the US, an Ebola outbreak in a major city in this country would be very serious and I do not think the current medical system could deal with the stress.
More drastic measures would have to be developed and I am STILL waiting to hear one good argument as to why any travel would be allowed from these areas into the US.
Weeks ago, a patient showed up to the ER of her hospital with flu like symptoms. As is the custom -- ALWAYS -- they took the patient's travel history. He responded that he had just flown in from Liberia days earlier. News of African Ebola outbreaks had been around for weeks. So, immediately, they contacted the CDC for further instructions because the potential for an Ebola case automatically comes within the scope of the CDC's authority. The CDC's directive? Treat the patient for flu and send him home. After explicit requests for authority to conduct a test for Ebola, the CDC rejected them, saying that the person was "low risk." No further explanation. Of course, the doctor and the rest of the staff documented the hell out of this case, and sent him on his way.
We have not heard much from the Texas hospital. I cannot fathom that they did not -- as is patently obvious to all of us armchair medical professions -- contact the CDC immediately upon seeing that an African visitor with flu-like symptoms just flew in from Liberia. Every ER professional is hyper aware of Ebola and the likelihood that a patient with it will show up on their doorstep. What the real story is here, I do not know, but something does not add up.
No.
EMTALA requires that any hospital that accepts federal money treat emergency patients regardless of their ability to pay.