for display only
Big Blue Interactive The Corner Forum  
Back to the Corner

Archived Thread

How do you score 0 points?

eclipz928 : 10/14/2014 4:16 pm
This just continues to bother me. Over the last three seasons, going back to 2012, the Giants have managed to be held without a score in a game on 4 different occasions. 4 games is not a huge sample size over that period but I just can't wrap my mind around how an offense, with a legitimate QB, that can look unstoppable at times can accomplish this.

I didn't have the time to look at every team in the NFL to see how that number of shut-outs matches up to other franchises, but I did take a look at the Jaguars, Raiders and Bucs. Right now those three teams are awful (and have been awful for a while) and have a combined record of 1-16 . . . yet between all three of them they have been shut-out a total of just one time over the last three seasons. Just once combined compared to 4 times for the Giants alone.

For me, this used to be one of my biggest knocks on Kevin Gilbride. I didn't believe that a team with any kind of above average QB could ever be held scoreless in today's NFL where the emphasis is completely on offense and running up the scoreboard. So I blamed the OC whenever the Giants got blown out because I never thought that the talent level on this offense ever came close to approaching the mediocrity of teams like the Bucs, Jets or Jaguars.

But now with a new OC I'm starting to wonder if maybe there is something else going on. Coughlin and Eli are the only static variables left, and I can't help but think that the inconsistency that we've been seeing with the offense over the last few years may be more linked to Coughlin than previously thought.

I'm really trying my best not to overreact to this shut-out. I understand that it was against the Eagles, and its going to sting a lot more than usual and that we're all searching for answers around here. But man . . . the Giants have had some really brutal, embarrasing losses in recent years. I think it's fair to stop and ask what has the head coach's role been in all of them.
Pages: 1 2 <<Prev | Show All |
since 2012  
MarshallOnMontana : 10/14/2014 5:46 pm : link
There have been 11 shutouts in the whole league, and we are personally responsible for 4 of them. In other words, 1/32nd of the league is responsible for over 1/3 of its shutouts.

4 times in less than 2 1/2 years is insane. For many teams in the league, you have to go back over 20 years to find 4 shutouts.
I was stunned  
Route 9 in LEH : 10/14/2014 5:50 pm : link
By the Atlanta shut out in December 2012

The Carolina one I was more annoyed and was kind of similar to this Philly game in terms of matchups ("The Carolina secondary is so banged up, Eli is gonna have a field day!") Just like the banged up Online of Philly was gonna get manhandeldd by our D line and vice versa going into this week...

After Seattle in December of 2013 and Philly in October 2014, it's become quite the norm. Pathetic.
The one in ATL in 2012 destroyed our playoff hopes that season  
Giants4246 : 10/14/2014 5:58 pm : link
Im sure atlanta had that game circled on their schedule after we trashed them in the playoffs in 2011. We were doomed right from the start when wilson took the opening kickoff out from like 8 yards in the endzone and i dont even think he got to the 10 yard line. I remember my brother turning to me and saying "why the fuck did he bring that out for". It was sickening watching all those falcon fans carry on like they just won the super bowl.
RE: RE: RE: Duffy Eagles.com: Anatomy of a shutout  
chuckydee9 : 10/14/2014 5:59 pm : link
In comment 11920266 Patrick77 said:
Quote:
In comment 11920247 chuckydee9 said:


Quote:


In comment 11920136 Defenderdawg said:

Quote:
Film breakdown of what happened: Link - ( New Window )


Both the line and the WRs look horrible...



Even when Eli got blocking (rarely) the receivers weren't getting open. Some of the sacks, bad running plays, and pressures are just horrible communication by the offensive line, quite a few are just Jerry, Walton, Pugh, and Donnell failing to sustain any type of block.

It also looks like the Eagles knew what was coming on multiple plays and were recognizing routes and plays. 3 step drops work great if the first read gets open. I think part of them not getting open was the Eagles had a pretty good idea of what they intended to do on most plays and the receivers weren't beating man coverage or double coverage.

The most concerning part to me is Giants offense was predictable and easy to figure out for the Eagles. No adjustments were made at all to combat that the Eagles new what was coming. The offensive line can improve, the receivers can beat their man often times, but if the offense is predictable after 6 games that is pretty concerning.




I don't know if it was predictability of the offense or just a lack of execution or worse yet the inability to execute.. After looking at that in-depth article of those plays.. I am actually scared for the remainder of the year... Predictability can be solved, the inability to execute needs a long time to fix...
You don't.  
shepherdsam : 10/14/2014 6:11 pm : link
How is this a question?
He's right. You can't score 0 points.  
Jimmy Googs : 10/14/2014 6:14 pm : link
They give you zero at the beginning of the game.

its kind of like...free.
RE: RE: RE: RE: Duffy Eagles.com: Anatomy of a shutout  
Patrick77 : 10/14/2014 6:21 pm : link
In comment 11920302 chuckydee9 said:
Quote:

I don't know if it was predictability of the offense or just a lack of execution or worse yet the inability to execute.. After looking at that in-depth article of those plays.. I am actually scared for the remainder of the year... Predictability can be solved, the inability to execute needs a long time to fix...


See I take the different view. They have proven they can beat scrub defenses like the Redskins or Falcons so they can clearly execute vs inferior competition. They always talk about the great week of practice as well. They may get outplayed and not be more talented than good teams, who knows. I was just surprised that the Giants had no answers to teams playing press man, doubling Donnel and Cruz, and loading the box. They tried and failed at the 1 RB screen pass, never tried any WR screens. The Giants never even tried firing a bullet pass to Beckham/Cruz/Randle at the snap when there was off coverage and hoping one of them could get a few yards one on one. The offense got nothing going in the flats, or running outside either.

There has to be ways to attack an over aggressive defense that has 8 guys in the box every snap, and I didn't think running outside with two tight end sets or trying intermediate throws when they can't block were the answer.

No gameplan was going to win that game based on the effort and talent the Giants put on the field but surely they could have done better.
Why worry about a shut out?  
Daniel in MI : 10/14/2014 6:30 pm : link
I respect TC for not taking the "cheap" points of a FG on 4th down. We'd have avoided the shut out, and no one could go on about that, but we would not have really gotten back in it. The point is to win, and he kept trying to do that until it was too late and pulled Eli. If not for a fluke injury to Cruz we score there and are - if not back in it - closer with some hope remaining.
Lol the best BBI 53  
Route 9 in LEH : 10/14/2014 6:39 pm : link
Can score 0 points
A little overstated..  
Sean : 10/14/2014 6:47 pm : link
considering the Giants bypassed chip shot FG's in both the ATL and Philly shutouts. This should be looked into further to bring up only scoring 3 or 6 points as well.
sean  
MarshallOnMontana : 10/14/2014 6:57 pm : link
That is a common theme in most shutouts. Not something unique to the giants. And if im not mistaken (and I might be because that mess of a game is already a blur) the fg we passed up on sunday was not something the offense would have earned anyway, because they were gifted starting field position in fg range off a turnover
no its a valid question...  
prdave73 : 10/14/2014 7:06 pm : link
How do you score Zero points?? Especially against one of the worst defenses in the league??! I'm really still trying to figure that one out.. You can blame it on the Oline, but really zero points?? You have WR's! You have a 1st round draft choice in Beckham that you picked up instead of an offensive linemen?? Beckham only looked like the real deal in the previous game against Atlanta?? Why wasn't he utilized more?? He was suppose to be a weapon that could help the offense right?? This is a team that had the offense rolling before they played the Eagles.

My theory, just plain out coached in every phase.. You did not prepare at all. Made for a good reason why in the end of this season I wouldn't mind if the Giants let the entire coaching staff go, including Coughlin.. They needed to get these players to perform in these types of situations. That was a division game, no excuses for what happened. Zero points should not have happened period..
I remember  
Route 9 in LEH : 10/14/2014 7:12 pm : link
Back in the Atlanta and Carolina games Tynes and Brown both missed field goals. I think Wilson had a TD called back on a hold. Just sad to know that missed "opportunities" such as missed field goals and called back TDs are the closest thing to scoring you'll see all day.
It is truly incredible  
bceagle05 : 10/14/2014 7:17 pm : link
how many no-shows we've had. Even the shittiest of shitty teams show up and compete.
the real question is...  
Frank from CA : 10/14/2014 7:26 pm : link
Why would you not sufficiently prepare for a divisional game? All 6 divisional games should be high energy and commitment. The divisional games are the most important in the season if the goal is to win the division. It is extremely disappointing when the Giants do not approach the divisional game with the utmost intensity and preparation that a regular season time frame allows. Statistically it is much better to defeat a divisional rival than other opponents, especially in the AFC. What a waste of an opportunity to remain relevant in the division race. Now the Giants have to hope other teams do the work that they should have. This is where I don't get the head coach.
Frank,  
prdave73 : 10/14/2014 7:37 pm : link
"Why would you not sufficiently prepare for a divisional game? All 6 divisional games should be high energy and commitment"

Exactly.. It goes back to what I said, they were out coached! You have a inept DC in Perry Fewell, you have a rookie OC in McAdoo, and then you have a HC that is on his last days. I'm thinking not much could have been said that they haven't heard already. McAdoo was lost, Fewell had no answers with his shitty soft zones, and TC is losing it. Add those things up with Reese's Oline of scrubs and there is your answer on why zero points happened.
RE: since 2012  
eclipz928 : 10/14/2014 8:53 pm : link
In comment 11920284 MarshallOnMontana said:
Quote:
There have been 11 shutouts in the whole league, and we are personally responsible for 4 of them. In other words, 1/32nd of the league is responsible for over 1/3 of its shutouts.

4 times in less than 2 1/2 years is insane. For many teams in the league, you have to go back over 20 years to find 4 shutouts.


Marshall, thanks for looking this up. It definitely accents my main point, which is that complete shut-outs have not been a common occurrence in recent years in the NFL, except for in the case of the Giants.

Of course we can go minute by minute through a game and find all of the missed opportunities and access the circumstances that lead to the final score. But the fact remains that what the Giants did (or failed to do) on Sunday night is very rare in the NFL - and they've managed to do it on 4 separate occasions since 2012.

I guess the real question isn't so much about how does one specific game transpire to lead to 0 points on the scoreboard, but more about how does one team (with a seemingly proficient offense) manage to do something so uncommon multiple times over the span of just a couple dozen games. It's something that I find a bit tough to just disregard entirely.
How do you score zero points?  
Doomster : 10/14/2014 8:56 pm : link
Simple......the #1 offense just crosses mid field just once in the game, and next thing you know, it's 4th and 30....

Your receiver blows out his knee on a 4th down pass...

with less than 2 minutes left in the game, the Giants finally cross midfield again.....4th and 4, your qb gets sacked with a 3 man rush, made up of scrubs....

Best to forget about it  
Rocky Thompson : 10/14/2014 8:59 pm : link

If it happens against Dallas we can all move on to prime time TV and Halloween decorations...
Rocky,  
prdave73 : 10/14/2014 9:05 pm : link
lol. u do have a point there. it's just hard to erase from your mind.. it was a nightmare. It's going to take awhile to shake that loss.
Ha ha - the same people who bitched about GIlbride being predictable  
PatersonPlank : 10/14/2014 9:06 pm : link
are now bitching about McAdoo being predictable. Maybe, just maybe, it has nothing to do with being predictable but everything to do with lack of execution by the WR's and OL?
Coughlin  
Giant Mike : 10/15/2014 3:46 pm : link
will also pass up meaningless FG's in games like this, where other coaches I have seen will take a FG down 20-0 just to put SOMETHING on the board. I don't fault him for that.
RE: Coughlin  
Britt in VA : 10/15/2014 3:50 pm : link
In comment 11922039 Giant Mike said:
Quote:
will also pass up meaningless FG's in games like this, where other coaches I have seen will take a FG down 20-0 just to put SOMETHING on the board. I don't fault him for that.


This is a really good point, and one of the reasons the shut out doesn't bother me.

The ass whipping bothers me, but the shut out doesn't so much.
Who cares..  
Big Blue '56 : 10/15/2014 3:52 pm : link
when you get a beatdown like that from time to time, it matters little, or is small consolation if you happened to score a TD or a little more..

I'll take a beatdown like this, where you have very little choice but to learn and move on from it, rather than lose a higher scoring nail-biter in the waning moments
watch most shutouts  
MarshallOnMontana : 10/15/2014 4:00 pm : link
And teams passing up 2nd half fgs because of a big disparity is a common theme in many if not most. Not something unique to the giants. And as if passing up on a fg against the eagles would have been earned points by the offense anyway, the drive started in fg range
.  
arcarsenal : 10/15/2014 4:02 pm : link
I actually agree with the Parcells way of thinking more. I think you kick the FG there and get the 0 off the board as soon as you can. The longer it stays there, the better chance that it's never going to go away. The more the opposing team starts to smell blood and think they can shut you out and the more it starts to loom and feel like a 12th defender.

Even as a fan you can feel it. When that 0 is still there into the 2nd half, it feels increasingly harder to get rid of. If it's into the 4th, you have to go for a TD.. but at the point in the game we were at, I think you kick the FG and just put something on the board to get the goose egg off your shoulders.

It seems meaningless but there's absolutely a psychological factor there that I think people are understating.
literlly every single shutout our defense has been a part of  
MarshallOnMontana : 10/15/2014 4:13 pm : link
This century involved the opposition passing up 2nd half fgs to go for it on 4th down because of a big disparity. From 09 vs tampa, to 05 vs washington, even throw in the 11 playoff game vs atlanta where we allowed 0 offensive points (2 total). This happens in shutouts. The notion that its a misleading shutout because we passed on a fg that the offense didnt earn anyway is quite silly
RE: Who cares..  
bob in tx : 10/15/2014 4:17 pm : link
In comment 11922047 Big Blue '56 said:
Quote:
when you get a beatdown like that from time to time, it matters little, or is small consolation if you happened to score a TD or a little more..

I'll take a beatdown like this, where you have very little choice but to learn and move on from it, rather than lose a higher scoring nail-biter in the waning moments


So, you would rather lose 27-0 than 27-26? Not me, I prefer the Giants being competitive against an NFC East rival, or any team, rather than casually dismissing the loss as an "oh well, this shit happens". A loss is a loss is a loss, but I much prefer seeing something that says " we can beat these guys".
My point is, and I think Giant Mike's was....  
Britt in VA : 10/15/2014 4:18 pm : link
an ass whipping is an ass whipping is an ass whipping.

I don't care if it's 50-14, 50-7, 50-3, 50-0... The "shut out" aspect itself means little to me.
.  
arcarsenal : 10/15/2014 4:18 pm : link
Not sure who is calling it misleading or hinting at it but it certainly wasn't my point at all.
Right...  
Giant Mike : 10/15/2014 4:22 pm : link
Would 27-3 (which almost certainly would have been the outcome) been any better than 27-0? Same exact ass kicking.

And hey... maybe we still have Cruz if we just kick it... LOL.
arc  
MarshallOnMontana : 10/15/2014 4:24 pm : link
I wasnt refering to you. But the notion has come up a few times on this thread and more broadly on the board in the last few days to explain us lapping the league in this area in recent times. Like passing up on a fg trailing big in the 2nd half is somehow unique to tom coughlin. It just reads like an attempt to cushion something that is absolutely embarrassing. Being blanked 4 times in less than 2 1/2 years is unbelievable, uncommon, historic, you name it. Especially in todays game
I believe  
Route 9 in LEH : 10/15/2014 4:25 pm : link
Minnesota kicked a late field goal at the end of their game to prevent a shutout. There was under 3 or maybe even less than 2 minutes left in the game.

I guess to them losing 17-3 is better than 17-0?? Just nothing but box score politics, I say!!
kicking in that spot makes a 3 score game a 2 score game  
MarshallOnMontana : 10/15/2014 4:31 pm : link
There is more value to the fg there, to infer minny would have kicked that solely to avoid a shutout is a stretch. And if they did do that, its not common

never mind mentioning the fg we passed up on would have been gifted to us by our defense anyway, the offense absolutely didnt earn 3 points there starting a drive where they did
.  
arcarsenal : 10/15/2014 4:33 pm : link
I definitely agree, I don't think it's excusable and it shouldn't happen nearly as often as it has these last couple of years.

It's actually hard to get completely shut out in this league and yet, we've done it 4 times in less than 2 full seasons worth of games.

In a 60 minute football game, you should not be unable to drive the football down the field and score at least ONE time. Not in today's NFL. And not when your same offense was putting 30's and a 40+ on the board the 3 weeks prior.

I don't know what it is, I don't know why it happens but it happens far too often to this football team in this regime. It's concerning.
RE: arc  
David in LA : 10/15/2014 4:35 pm : link
In comment 11922091 MarshallOnMontana said:
Quote:
It just reads like an attempt to cushion something that is absolutely embarrassing.


Joe, it shouldn't be a surprise that it's the same crowd that gets extra butt hurt when you criticize Eli, but won't hesitate to insinuate that our miscues are 10 times out of 10 on the WR's.
im not making this an eli thing at all  
MarshallOnMontana : 10/15/2014 4:41 pm : link
Im just saying lets not try to cushion this. Being blanked 4 times in less than 2 1/2 years is just incredible. If the defense is "hey, thats misleading because we passed on a 2nd half fg our offense didnt earn anyway", its a weak defense. This is simply unfathomable
There have been 38 regular season games since the start of 2012  
YAJ2112 : 10/15/2014 4:44 pm : link
where a team has scored 0 offensive TDs and no more than 1 FG. Not sure why its more meaningful that we've been shutout 4 times in that span. That we are among the leaders in games like this is certainly troubling, but the fact that they were complete shutouts vs just kicking a FG seems arbitrary to focus on.

Teams with multiple games of 0 Off TDs and 1 or less FG since 2012:
Jets 5
Giants 4
Jags 4
Miami 4
Arizona 3
Philly 3
KC 3
SF 2
Hou 2
Min 2
TB 2
Throw in the bad luck  
GiantInMaine : 10/15/2014 4:47 pm : link
of a receiver blowing his knee out while trying to make a td catch.
It's actually impossible  
bc4life : 10/15/2014 4:51 pm : link
to score 0 points - if there is a 0 on the score board - you did not score.
never mind  
Route 9 in LEH : 10/15/2014 4:52 pm : link
There was 5 minutes left. I thought it was less than that. That's why I said "I believe"... Wasn't 100% positive. That game was irrelevant anyway.
yaj  
MarshallOnMontana : 10/15/2014 4:56 pm : link
I dont disagree, good list.

Not good company
in 2009  
Route 9 in LEH : 10/15/2014 4:57 pm : link
When the Giants were beating the Buccaneers 24-0. Tampa had 1st and 5 at the Giants 5, 4 straight incompletes. They could've easily avoided the shutout by kicking a field goal. Shutouts are pathetic but it's not like they count more than one loss. the Giants could have lost 10-9 and it would've been the same blow to the record.
RE: There have been 38 regular season games since the start of 2012  
arcarsenal : 10/15/2014 4:58 pm : link
In comment 11922132 YAJ2112 said:
Quote:
where a team has scored 0 offensive TDs and no more than 1 FG. Not sure why its more meaningful that we've been shutout 4 times in that span. That we are among the leaders in games like this is certainly troubling, but the fact that they were complete shutouts vs just kicking a FG seems arbitrary to focus on.

Teams with multiple games of 0 Off TDs and 1 or less FG since 2012:
Jets 5
Giants 4
Jags 4
Miami 4
Arizona 3
Philly 3
KC 3
SF 2
Hou 2
Min 2
TB 2


The thing that stands out to me right away is how many shitty football teams are on this list.

It's really not one I feel good about the Giants being on. Especially not right near the top of it.
RE: It's actually impossible  
Route 9 in LEH : 10/15/2014 4:58 pm : link
In comment 11922141 bc4life said:
Quote:
to score 0 points - if there is a 0 on the score board - you did not score.


We get it
they just get their asses handed to them by good teams  
Route 9 in LEH : 10/15/2014 5:08 pm : link
Aside from playing the Eagles and Packers in 2013 with the hotdog vendor playing QB, Was the Packers in 2012 the last playoff team (for that year that respective year) that the Giants beat?

2013 Games vs playoff teams:

Denver:41-23 L
Carolina: 38-0 L
Kansas city: 31-7 L
Philadelphia: 36-21 L
Philadelphia: 15-7 W
Green bay: 27-13 W
San Diego: 37-14 L
Seattle: 23-0

2012 games vs playoff teams:
San Francisco: 26-3 W
Washington: 27-23 W
Cincinnati: 31-13 L
Green Bay: 31-10 W
Washington: 17-16 L
Atlanta: 34-0 L
Baltimore: 33-14
RE: There have been 38 regular season games since the start of 2012  
eclipz928 : 10/15/2014 9:18 pm : link
In comment 11922132 YAJ2112 said:
Quote:
where a team has scored 0 offensive TDs and no more than 1 FG. Not sure why its more meaningful that we've been shutout 4 times in that span. That we are among the leaders in games like this is certainly troubling, but the fact that they were complete shutouts vs just kicking a FG seems arbitrary to focus on.

Teams with multiple games of 0 Off TDs and 1 or less FG since 2012:
Jets 5
Giants 4
Jags 4
Miami 4
Arizona 3
Philly 3
KC 3
SF 2
Hou 2
Min 2
TB 2


That's definitely an interesting list, but the first thing that I would point out is that the concern isn't specifically about the offense not scoring points, but the entire team. As it was mentioned in the OP, there should be a question of what head coach's role has been in some of these games - not just the OC or the offensive players because clearly adequate opportunities were not created by defense or special teams either.

The second thing I would be curious about is exactly WHEN did those made field goals occur in those games when a single TD wasn't scored. As Marshall pointed out already, it's pretty common practice for any team on the verge of shut out to not kick a field goal in garbage time or when it would not have a significant impact on the game.

My hunch is that the majority of those teams that were only held to a field goal scored those points at a time when the game was still very competitive, which would be a much different circumstance than if the Giants had settled for the FG on 4th down (as opposed to passing it to Cruz in the end zone) at that point in the game against the Eagles. Essentially, the Giants (offense, defense, special teams) were just incapable of scoring a single point during a time when meaningful football was being played - and that's where the issue is.
Zero points is like 200 on the SATs  
Some Fan : 10/15/2014 9:24 pm : link
just for signing in. It is fairly easy to score zero.
Always Take the points.  
blakjedi : 10/16/2014 6:14 am : link
Strength of win also counts in calculations... PF/PA


i dont see other teams leaving points on the field when they are there... Dallas was Down 10- then got a FG... then a TD...

sometimes once you score... you score again rapidly... Footbal is as much about psyche as it is physical and mental gameplanning.
If not for Dixon's ST TD in Super Bowl 35  
Route 9 in LEH : 10/16/2014 9:32 am : link
We lose 34-7 instead of 34-0
Pages: 1 2 <<Prev | Show All |
Back to the Corner