OK maybe you're getting old, but at least you're still 10 years younger than Arc!
Like a shot of adrenaline to the heart, “Pulp Fiction” changed the movie landscape when it opened on Oct. 14, 1994. Quentin Tarantino’s ode to crime and pop-culture was a bold new cinematic vision in a decade that badly needed one. Before “Pulp Fiction,” prestige films like “Dances with Wolves” and “A Few Good Men” seemed content to play it safe, while blockbusters like “Jurassic Park” and “The Fugitive” focused squarely on the mainstream. Overnight, the term ‘Tarantinoesque’ became shorthand for audaciously stylized ultra-violence and genre-bending thrills. On its 20th anniversary, here’s why “Pulp Fiction” remains the coolest movie of the ’90s.
|
Link - (
New Window )
Usually films cycled in and out of that theater quickly, but Pulp Fiction played on one screen there forever. My buddies and I saw it at least ten times.
I happily own the DVD.
Zed's dead, baby. Zed's dead.
I was just sitting here eating my muffin when I had what alcoholics refer to as "a moment of clarity".
Jimmy responds... "DON'T FUCKING JIMMY ME, JULES!"
There were 10 people in the meeting and 8 got the reference. 1 of the 2 that didn't was Juliana, haha.
lmao, yes. I re-watched it recently and man... The Wolf provided some pretty basic information. Beyond having a connection with Monster Joe, he didn't really do anything.
ENGLISH, MOTHERFUCKER, DO YOU SPEAK IT?
-Yes!
So you know what I'm saying, then!
-Yes, yes!
Describe what Marcellus Wallace looks like!
-What??
Say "what" again. Say "what" again, I dare you, I double dare you, motherfucker! Say "what" one more goddamned time! Describe what Marcellus Wallace looks like!
-Heeeeee's black....
Go on!
-He's bald?
Does he look like a bitch?
-What???
*BAM*
Harvey Keitel just killed that role. As others posted, that's what made it so amusing - Winston Wolf didn't really do anything, and yet he made that whole part of the movie just hilarious
Tarantino peaked as a video clerk, then the Peter Principle. I was asked shortly afterwards to look at one of his scripts and I refused.
Glad I did.
But does anyone know why Samuel L. Jackson called Tim Roth "Ringo"?
Todd McCarthy--Hollywood Reporter - ( New Window )
Tarantino peaked as a video clerk, then the Peter Principle. I was asked shortly afterwards to look at one of his scripts and I refused.
Glad I did.
Oh, that's right, you prefer old man on old man porn... Proving that you don't even have taste in your mouth.
No it isn't.
Tarantino peaked as a video clerk, then the Peter Principle.
Another swing and a miss from Stan!
What ya got?
To Stan, it doesn't matter if:
--a vast proportion of critics really liked the movie,
--A vast proportion of viewers loved the movie. Didn't like it, loved it. Rotten Tomatoes: Critics 94% with an average rating of 9/10. Viewers 96%.
--It made massive amounts of money.
--It generated massive numbers of imitators.
None of that matters. If Stan doesn't approve of it, it's overrated.
I can't find it in the DSM-IV, but there is definitely a diagnosis associated with that level of megalomania.
Tarantino peaked as a video clerk, then the Peter Principle. I was asked shortly afterwards to look at one of his scripts and I refused.
Glad I did.
I'd be curious to know which scenes were stole from what movies?
At the time, it seemed epoch making. But it might not play as well to an audience of twenty year olds today. They definitely wouldn't see it ten times.