for display only
Big Blue Interactive The Corner Forum  
Back to the Corner

Archived Thread

I am tired of this

Vin_Cuccs : 10/19/2014 7:58 pm
I think that I am at least a moderately respected poster in these parts and most know that this type of opinion or overreaction is not my norm. I want to preface this by saying that I am not speaking out of emotion or frustration but more so disappointment.

This team has talent. There are talented players on the roster. The quarterback is a proven winner and extremely gifted. But yet, they flounder in mediocrity.

It’s the little things. The frequent, drive killing/drive extending penalties. The stubbornness/repetitiveness of play calling. What seems to be a lack of desire/motivation at times. What seems to be a lack of preparation. The mental errors and lack of in-game adjustments is maddening. The nagging injuries. They can’t win the close ones. They are making the critical mistakes to lose games. For a coach that emphasizes attention to detail, this is poorly coached team. They can’t make plays when plays need to be made on either side of the ball. The inconsistencies with this team are completely mind-boggling. Lately, this team has come up small in big spots.

My fear is that we are wasting away the prime years of the best QB this franchise has ever seen with poor coaching. There is too much talent on the roster to miss the playoffs 4 out of the last 5 seasons. Soon to be 5 out of the last 6 seasons.

For all intents and purposes, this season is over and it’s not even Halloween yet. For the second season in a row. I will always love Coughlin for what he has done for this franchise and I am forever grateful but the coaching staff from top to bottom has done a poor job. From preparation to in-game coaching to simple development of players.

It is time for a change. It was time for a change at the end of last season, but the proper changes were not made.

To be frank, I don’t really care if people disagree with this post and I don’t really care how this post is perceived. This team is too damn good to miss the playoffs so frequently.
Pages: 1 2 3 <<Prev | Show All |
I understand Pierre-Paul was hurt.  
Vin_Cuccs : 10/19/2014 10:01 pm : link
He is healthy now though, is he not?

How about this: why is an ineffective Kiwanuka still starting if Ayers has clearly outplayed him? COACHING!
Agreed - TIME FOR A CHANGE  
Jim Burt64 : 10/19/2014 10:03 pm : link
Dallas? Ginger is a puppet to Jerrah... they have hired like 3 capable head coaches & great DC's to their staff...Thats why they have improved significantly.
one more thing on the 07 giants  
MarshallOnMontana : 10/19/2014 10:03 pm : link
Even if by some weird revisionist logic we look at them as having been the best team or most talented team that season, (a notion way beyond reality, but just for the sake of convo) do you understand how tough and improbable it is to still cash in and see it through with a sb trophy?

History will look back at the giants of the coughlin era as the complete opposite of underachievers, at least those with proper perspective. This team winning multiple sb in this era is incredible
It's not revisionist to call the 2007 team  
Overseer : 10/19/2014 10:04 pm : link
a quality one by the end and not "flukish". This was blatantly obvious in week 17. Do you not remember that game? The Pats were going all out to try to seal 16-0. There were quality players, old and young, all over that Giants roster and not just "names".

The reason they were not a hot pick and why even we as fans weren't totally confident in them was very simple: Eli was still decidedly in "is this guy really an NFL QB?" mode. Once he took that next step in the post-season it was basically the icing on the cake and they absolutely deserved to compete against TB, Dal, GB, and the 18-0 Pats.

A fact, again, re-inforced when we saw their continuation in 2008. You're extrapolating too far the true point that 2011 was totally over-achieving and the result of a hot streak. 2007 was the result of solid drafting (I mean, just that year were Ross, Smith, Boss, Bradshaw...nevermind the years before it) and a team getting better over the course of the season. All they needed was Eli to click.
And what happens if a new coach is brought on?  
Vin_Cuccs : 10/19/2014 10:04 pm : link
Is that coach obligated to keep McAdoo since he has only had one year? What if a new coach has a different offensive philosophy?

Will Fewell, McAdoo or Guinta get first crack at a new job? Will the majority of the staff stay put?
RE: I understand Pierre-Paul was hurt.  
MookGiants : 10/19/2014 10:04 pm : link
In comment 11930535 Vin_Cuccs said:
Quote:
He is healthy now though, is he not?

How about this: why is an ineffective Kiwanuka still starting if Ayers has clearly outplayed him? COACHING!


He has clearly not regained the explosion that he had prior to his back injury, and at this point he probably never will. Guess that's the coaches fault.
Who cares  
bceagle05 : 10/19/2014 10:10 pm : link
about the probability or improbability of the championships? They were earned in between the white lines. Of all the annoying things about the Giants being shitty, the thing that annoys me most is the feeling that the mysterious "football gods" are settling the score for the gifts they gave us. Fuck that. And before we start blowing the Eagles and Cowboys, let's wait and see if they have the stones to do what the Giants did twice. The last two Super Bowls to come from the NFC East came courtesy of the Giants - it wouldn't shock me if the next one does, too.
overseer  
MarshallOnMontana : 10/19/2014 10:12 pm : link
They won the sb. So they obviously crossed the threshold of having enough capable talent to conceivably win a sb. That doesnt mean them winning still wasnt incredibly unlikely. A month earlier merely giving the pats a game at our place for 3 quarters was seen as a moral victory. This is a team that won the sb a month later
I dunno  
santacruzom : 10/19/2014 10:19 pm : link
I mean, the Giants have already shown they'll very likely exceed my expectations and will probably win seven, maybe eight games this season. And that's without their best WR and their starting RB missing two games so far.

The Giants have a recent history of devaluing important aspects of football teams: Linebackers, safeties, special teams namely. That *cant* last forever can it? And we have oodles of cap space next year.
Mook  
Vin_Cuccs : 10/19/2014 10:20 pm : link
If you contend that the coaching staff is not a problem, we will just have to agree to disagree.

In my opinion, the coaches are responsible for developing players and putting them in the best position to make plays.

Right now that is not happening. If Pierre-Paul is still hurt our not the same player, it's time to look for other options. If he is healthy, then the coaching staff is not doing a good enough job of putting him in positions to be a disruptor. Either way, the coaching is the issue.
and what the team did in 08  
MarshallOnMontana : 10/19/2014 10:20 pm : link
Building on their improbable 07 run is absolutely irrelevant with regards to the viewing of the 07 team. They were different teams. Just as irrelevant as it is in the other direction as to how the 14 seattle team should color how we feel about the 13 team, which will remain one of the more dominant champs in the cap era even if they follow it up with 8-8 this season
It was 'unlikely'  
Overseer : 10/19/2014 10:24 pm : link
until and then not at all after Eli Manning took the next step. By week 17, a deserving SB team was fully in place below him. They were playing well.
you take unlikely to mean not deserving  
MarshallOnMontana : 10/19/2014 10:28 pm : link
It doesnt

and they were incredibly unlikely. One of the handful of most unlikely sb champs ever, surpassed by very few, including a later incarnation of themselves 4 years forward. Which is why its crazy to talk about this era like the franchise did snything but grossly over achieve
RE: I guess  
SHO'NUFF : 10/19/2014 10:30 pm : link
In comment 11930422 MookGiants said:
Quote:
Flaherty forgot how to coach o-lineman? Some of the best lines the Giants have ever had came under his watch.


His O-line unit has been going downhill since 2010...I'm still not sure how we won it all in 2011. His player evaluation is suspect (playing O'Hara and Diehl on their last legs) and he definitely hasn't coached up anybody in recent memory...Richburg may be the first, but hard to say since he's a rookie. Hope he doesn't go the way of Justin Pugh, getting worse as he spends more time with Coach Flaherty. Beatty was good, then bad, then decent enough this year. I don't know, I like Flaherty, but I think he should be held accountable.
SHO'NUFF  
Matt M. : 10/19/2014 10:35 pm : link
I don't think the issues with the OL are technique.
RE: the thing that bothers me most about hte Giants  
mrvax : 10/19/2014 10:52 pm : link
In comment 11930382 chris r said:
Quote:
the past few years is we're just not very physical.

We get pushed around a lot on both lines.


I agree with this. The defense scares no one. I hope we can draft/sign some fierce players to get that D respectful again.
To ''over-achieve''  
Overseer : 10/19/2014 10:56 pm : link
is players that aren't great achieving greatness (a SB ring)

2011: absolutely. These were mostly mediocre or good not great (dare I say even Nicks is in this category) players who just played out of their minds beginning with right about here. Carried on Eli's back.

2007's roster was filled with much better players, especially on the O-line. Rookies clicking, vets like Toomer and Strahan still playing at a high level. They just needed a QB. Once they had one, the run was not at all surprising.
RE: SHO'NUFF  
SHO'NUFF : 10/20/2014 12:23 am : link
In comment 11930646 Matt M. said:
Quote:
I don't think the issues with the OL are technique.


maybe it's Strength and Conditioning? because they always seem to be weaker than the man lining up opposite them
RE: RE: I guess  
dpinzow : 10/20/2014 12:52 am : link
In comment 11930635 SHO'NUFF said:
Quote:
In comment 11930422 MookGiants said:


Quote:


Flaherty forgot how to coach o-lineman? Some of the best lines the Giants have ever had came under his watch.



His O-line unit has been going downhill since 2010...I'm still not sure how we won it all in 2011. His player evaluation is suspect (playing O'Hara and Diehl on their last legs) and he definitely hasn't coached up anybody in recent memory...Richburg may be the first, but hard to say since he's a rookie. Hope he doesn't go the way of Justin Pugh, getting worse as he spends more time with Coach Flaherty. Beatty was good, then bad, then decent enough this year. I don't know, I like Flaherty, but I think he should be held accountable.


We won in 2011 because that was the one year in Eli's career where he went into god mode
I can deal with the fact that Prince simply can't handle Dez Bryant.  
Shockeyisthebest80 : 10/20/2014 1:06 am : link
That's a physical issue.

I can't deal with Gavin Escobar running wide open through the secondary and guys looking at each other like "I thought you had him!?!?"

The mental mistakes are maddening and make them look like a badly coached team.
RE: Joey in VA  
Joey in VA : 10/20/2014 5:52 am : link
In comment 11930263 Vin_Cuccs said:
Quote:
Here is yet another example: Dallas lost their best two defensive players (Sean Lee and DeMarcus Ware) prior to the season. They literally signed guys off the street. And they lost another pretty good player (Morris Claiborne) after a few games. But yet the guys they had playing surely beat the Giants asses.

Why? Coaching.

No way. Bruce Carter can play, so can Durant and McClain, you don't know who they are but that doesn't make them bad players. Look at what their DL did to us up front, that's not coaching that bigger better players across the board. Coaching is nowhere near what it's cracked up to be. You have a few very good coaches, some crap and the rest can be put in a pile. The Cowboys have premium talent on offense across the board and fast aggressive LBs who can tackle and a big deep DL that doesn't have a list of names you know but did they look untalented yesterday?

Talent wins, period. Coaches can help, schemes can help but this game comes down to the basics no matter how you slice it. Can you beat the man across from you ? No fiery speech or coaching tape can make you whip someone, you do that with leverage, speed, power and explosion coupled with knowledge of the position. You get that from your position coaches but this is the NFL, not pop warner, these guys know how to coach. It's WHO they coach that matters. This same idiot DC won a SB...because of great coaching? Is Spags the mastermind a great coach? NO. They both had insane DL talent and won because of it. They weren't great coaches, Dallas doesn't have great coaching they have very good football players.

I'm sorry you don't see that, perhaps spend a Sunday watching everyone BUT us and you'll see how poor our talent is.
...  
SanFranGiantsFan : 10/20/2014 6:03 am : link
I think you overrate our talent. I don't think our talent is all that good.
RE: RE: Joey in VA  
Dan in WNY : 10/20/2014 6:27 am : link
In comment 11930833 Joey in VA said:
Quote:


No way. Bruce Carter can play, so can Durant and McClain, you don't know who they are but that doesn't make them bad players. Look at what their DL did to us up front, that's not coaching that bigger better players across the board. Coaching is nowhere near what it's cracked up to be. You have a few very good coaches, some crap and the rest can be put in a pile. The Cowboys have premium talent on offense across the board and fast aggressive LBs who can tackle and a big deep DL that doesn't have a list of names you know but did they look untalented yesterday?

Talent wins, period. Coaches can help, schemes can help but this game comes down to the basics no matter how you slice it. Can you beat the man across from you ? No fiery speech or coaching tape can make you whip someone, you do that with leverage, speed, power and explosion coupled with knowledge of the position. You get that from your position coaches but this is the NFL, not pop warner, these guys know how to coach. It's WHO they coach that matters. This same idiot DC won a SB...because of great coaching? Is Spags the mastermind a great coach? NO. They both had insane DL talent and won because of it. They weren't great coaches, Dallas doesn't have great coaching they have very good football players.

I'm sorry you don't see that, perhaps spend a Sunday watching everyone BUT us and you'll see how poor our talent is.


Good post. Dallas also has finally gotten smart and is running the ball, taking pressure off Romo.
Re: talent  
Vin_Cuccs : 10/20/2014 6:51 am : link
I'm sorry but I just can't buy the fact that Dallas is more talented.

Durant, Carter and McClain are head and shoulders above Beason, McClain and Kennard/Williams?

Selvie, Hayden, Melton and Crawford are head and shoulders about Pierre-Paul, Kiwanuka, Jenkins and Hankins?

Church, Carr, Heath and Scandrick are better than Rodgers-Cromartie, Amukamara, Rolle and Demps?

I can make an argument that on paper, the Giants defense is better on every level.

So where is this issue coming from? In my humble opinion it is a lack of motivation, preparation and in-game adjustments by the coaching staff.
Re: talent on the o-linemen  
Vin_Cuccs : 10/20/2014 6:57 am : link
So between Pugh, Richburg, Beatty, Mosley, Brewer and Herman, all drafted recently, none of them can play?

I refuse to believe that all these players were/are just busts. If Reese misses on a few of them, I get that but all 6 of them? That sounds like a lack of ability to develop young offensive linemen to me.

So why is it that Dallas can sign throw away linemen like Ronald Leary and Jeremy Pernell and they step in and perform flawlessly?

In my opinion deficiency in coaching.
The divide in talent..  
FatMan in Charlotte : 10/20/2014 7:11 am : link
between teams (and even between players) has become razor thin.

That's why things like injuries factor so much into a team's success or failure. It is why if you lose a top WR like the Benagls did or several OL like the Falcons, you go from looking like a playoff team to an also-ran pretty quickly.

What has hurt the Giants recently is cluster injuries. Average depth isn't too bad, but get to the bottom of the barrel and you get screwed.

The OL isn't terrible. There's talent there - but a guy like Pugh is going to develop more quickly when he doesn't have to be the main guy from day 1. Inconsistency may not be a reflection of coaching - it may be a reflection of having a turnstile at certain OL positions. Dallas can afford to plug in new guys, because there are veteran lineman to tutor them. The Giants really don't have that.

On the flip side, the DL does. That's why young players seem to come along much more quickly on the DL as Giants. They are able to be more effective because they have veterans there to help and more overall talent to work with.

regarding the quality of the 2007 Giants relative to the 2011 team  
Greg from LI : 10/20/2014 8:21 am : link
I've made that same argument. Look at the trajectory of the team from 2005-2008: 11-5, 8-8, 10-6, 12-4. That was a really good team that had one off year in 2006. They got off to a slow start in 2007, and, following the disappointment in 2006, a lot of people wrote them off. Plus they hadn't won a playoff game in either of the previous two years, so people were skeptical of them even after they finished the season strong. They won it all and then were the best team in football for most of 2008 before injuries and controversy took their toll.

Now look at the 2011 team in that context. From 2009-2013, the Giants have gone 8-8, 10-6 (but collapsed late in the year and missed the playoffs), 9-7, 9-7 and 7-9. One playoff berth in that span. Yes, they got hot and made it count, but this is a franchise that's been treading water in recent seasons. 2011 was an abberration, there's no other way to put it.
I agree with it being time to move on.  
St. Jimmy : 10/20/2014 9:34 am : link
In fact, it was time to move on last year from Coughlin. Keeping Coughlin here is a short term answer even if it works out. The guy is not likely to be around 5 years from now as coach even if this team was to win the division this year which is out the window after the last two weeks.

I do not think the issue talent vs. coaching can be determined with the current state of the team. There is likely an issue with both so the ownership needs to move on from Tom. Let Reese pick his guy and if things do not improve within a few seasons, Reese should be gone.
RE: regarding the quality of the 2007 Giants relative to the 2011 team  
BrettNYG10 : 10/20/2014 11:50 am : link
In comment 11930932 Greg from LI said:
Quote:
I've made that same argument. Look at the trajectory of the team from 2005-2008: 11-5, 8-8, 10-6, 12-4. That was a really good team that had one off year in 2006. They got off to a slow start in 2007, and, following the disappointment in 2006, a lot of people wrote them off. Plus they hadn't won a playoff game in either of the previous two years, so people were skeptical of them even after they finished the season strong. They won it all and then were the best team in football for most of 2008 before injuries and controversy took their toll.

Now look at the 2011 team in that context. From 2009-2013, the Giants have gone 8-8, 10-6 (but collapsed late in the year and missed the playoffs), 9-7, 9-7 and 7-9. One playoff berth in that span. Yes, they got hot and made it count, but this is a franchise that's been treading water in recent seasons. 2011 was an abberration, there's no other way to put it.


I actually thought 2010 was a really good team - I thought we were going to make a run that year.

But 2007 was a really good team. But that was a year with a lot of high quality teams - and we played three of them in the playoffs.
Pages: 1 2 3 <<Prev | Show All |
Back to the Corner