for display only
Big Blue Interactive The Corner Forum  
Back to the Corner

Archived Thread

Re-watching tape: Cullen Jenkins vs Zack Martin

Eric from BBI : Admin : 10/20/2014 1:24 pm
Cullen Jenkins is a good football player.

Zack Martin absolutely destroyed him in the first quarter (Jenkins only played about 11 snaps before injury).

Martin is already really, really good.
Pages: 1 2 3 | Show All |  Next>>
well  
Giants2012 : 10/20/2014 1:25 pm : link
that's awful news.
Eric  
Matt M. : 10/20/2014 1:26 pm : link
Agreed. He is already their best OL. That said, I think the number of people who keep looking back at the draft and not selecting him are misguided. It's not like we bombed with our pick. If we had Martin and not Beckham, would our season look significantly better right now? I'm not so sure.
No shit bro!!!!! Martin was a fucking beast.  
Victor in CT : 10/20/2014 1:27 pm : link
Funny, in the NYDN Hank Gola preview yesterday, the "Scout Says" blurb was that Martin has been a beast, seems to take out "two at a time". You wouldn't have a collapsing middle with him at RG.

Well, maybe a smaller collapse since Walton would probably still be in there. :-)
Matt M.  
Eric from BBI : Admin : 10/20/2014 1:27 pm : link
as long as Beckham continues to pan out, I have no problem with the pick.

We have equally huge holes at WR and OL.

But Martin is a stud. So is their OC and LT.
RE: Eric  
Victor in CT : 10/20/2014 1:28 pm : link
In comment 11931857 Matt M. said:
Quote:
Agreed. He is already their best OL. That said, I think the number of people who keep looking back at the draft and not selecting him are misguided. It's not like we bombed with our pick. If we had Martin and not Beckham, would our season look significantly better right now? I'm not so sure.

'

I'm not looking back. I said it on draft day. I was floored when the Giants passed on him.
....  
Micko : 10/20/2014 1:28 pm : link
If you add up the number of times John Jerry has blown a play and it has killed a drive I imagine you could argue that the Giants could have a significantly better record. Sometimes it's just one block that keeps a drive alive.
Not really news. Martin  
section125 : 10/20/2014 1:29 pm : link
was probably the best offensive lineman in the draft. Not unhappy with the Beckham pick as he looks legit, but would have prefered Martin. But Beckham and Richburg was a pretty good draft.
RE: Matt M.  
Victor in CT : 10/20/2014 1:30 pm : link
In comment 11931866 Eric from BBI said:
Quote:
as long as Beckham continues to pan out, I have no problem with the pick.

We have equally huge holes at WR and OL.

But Martin is a stud. So is their OC and LT.


The problem there is with the shitty line play Eli can't wait for Beckham to get deep on anyone. I would argue that they could get more big plays with just competent receivers and a stud line than with great WRs and a poor line. Give Eli the time and he will make the plays. He has proven it again and again.
Their LT is a stud  
bc4life : 10/20/2014 1:30 pm : link
that our DE recorded tow sacks on and was a force against the run.
Hopefully we add another 1st or 2nd round lineman next year  
BlueHurricane : 10/20/2014 1:30 pm : link
And if we do we basically would have done the same thing Dallas did. We are just one year behind them in the progression. Richburgh is a very good player as well. Pugh has looked like he can play. Add another and the line will no longer be an issue.
with so many  
Down With JPP : 10/20/2014 1:31 pm : link
holes that we had to fill, I am not upset with Beckham and Richburg. Going forward, it will be easier for us to find quality guards over a possible number 1 WR. So I am fine with it.
Guys  
Bernie : 10/20/2014 1:33 pm : link
you are forgetting that at that point, the Giants had signed Schwartz and thought that Snee would be able to go. Not saying I agree with it as I was hoping they would take Martin.
RE: Guys  
Victor in CT : 10/20/2014 1:35 pm : link
In comment 11931894 Bernie said:
Quote:
you are forgetting that at that point, the Giants had signed Schwartz and thought that Snee would be able to go. Not saying I agree with it as I was hoping they would take Martin.


Counting on Snee was just plain stupid. He hasn't been healthy for 3 years
RE: Guys  
RobCarpenter : 10/20/2014 1:35 pm : link
In comment 11931894 Bernie said:
Quote:
you are forgetting that at that point, the Giants had signed Schwartz and thought that Snee would be able to go. Not saying I agree with it as I was hoping they would take Martin.


I hope they didn't think Snee could go.

And if they'd taken Martin they wouldn't have taken Richburg. So it's not as if the OL wouldn't still have holes. Rome wasn't built in a day.
Eric, victor  
Matt M. : 10/20/2014 1:36 pm : link
I actually agree with both of you. I was surprised they passed on Martin, but happy they selected Beckham. Without Beckham, right now, WR would be a huge hole with Cruz done for the year and a question for well he can perform next year. So, their OL would be a little better, but their WRs would be far worse.

Think about it this way...right now our best OL might be Richburg. If we drafted Martin, we probably wouldn't have drafted Richburg. So, we would only have been upgrading our lone decent spot on the OL.
good football player  
bc4life : 10/20/2014 1:36 pm : link
who is also 33 years old, might want to weigh that in
Martin seems like a great idea - but Dallas had Dez Bryant out there  
jcn56 : 10/20/2014 1:37 pm : link
if they had our WRs, tell me about how potent that Dallas O would be.
This speaks to Giant philosophy  
oldutican : 10/20/2014 1:38 pm : link
for those 2 positions. Since Eli came, they have used numerous premium picks on WRs, and very few on O-linemen. Yes, they have lost Wrs to injury and FA, but it sure seems they believe Eli needs WRs more than o-linemen.
Not surprised  
jeff57 : 10/20/2014 1:39 pm : link
As I've said many times, they should have taken Martin.
The upper management  
OldPolack : 10/20/2014 1:46 pm : link
meaning the Mara's are at fault.
RE: This speaks to Giant philosophy  
Ten Ton Hammer : 10/20/2014 1:50 pm : link
In comment 11931911 oldutican said:
Quote:
for those 2 positions. Since Eli came, they have used numerous premium picks on WRs, and very few on O-linemen. Yes, they have lost Wrs to injury and FA, but it sure seems they believe Eli needs WRs more than o-linemen.


They've long believed you can get offensive linemen without drafting in the first round. And why not? the offensive line TC built when he first got here didn't have high profile guys other than Snee, and 2nd pick.

O'Hara was a cast off from a perennial loser franchise, Seubert undrafted, and Diehl a late-round guy.


Zack Martin sucks  
oipolloi : 10/20/2014 1:52 pm : link
.
We got two top line starters instead of one  
PatersonPlank : 10/20/2014 1:53 pm : link
I think we did a good job.
i was thinking about this and the talent in next year's draft  
DavidinBMNY : 10/20/2014 1:54 pm : link
What if next year the NYG copy this blue print from Dallas. get a stud tackle and move pugh inside and richburg to center.
Again  
BlueHurricane : 10/20/2014 1:55 pm : link
We are on the same track they ran (but we also have a stud WR too)

Draft another lineman in the first or second next year and we will be fine.
pure hallucination  
jsboston : 10/20/2014 1:56 pm : link
Martin would have been a much better pick. And we absolutely would have a better record.

Romo had all day to throw, with nobody around him. Eli had no time at all.

If you give a good QB all day to throw, somebody will get open.

I love Beckham, but he was not the right pick.

I am not sure how you see that adding Zach Martin  
Ten Ton Hammer : 10/20/2014 1:57 pm : link
would suddenly mean Eli has all day to throw.

He does not have 10 arms.
Yup  
rasbutant : 10/20/2014 1:59 pm : link
there are some pretty good football players in the NFL.
no, we'd still have problems  
jsboston : 10/20/2014 1:59 pm : link
but adding a WR doesn't solve the problems.

we should have drafting OL until it's fixed. it starts with the OL.

guess what, we suck. and we're gonna suck next week too. get used to it.
jsboston  
Matt M. : 10/20/2014 1:59 pm : link
I don't think it's fair to say he would have been a much better pick. Our OL would look a little better, but not significantly because he would repalce our best OL to date, in Richburg. Who knows who the Giants would have selected next, but it probably wouldn't have been Richburg. Now, if the Giants took those guys 1 and 2, then I think our OL would have had a significantly better look.
agree, it's debatable  
jsboston : 10/20/2014 2:05 pm : link
but my point is that our OL is terrible and it needs to be fixed. even if it requires drastic measures.

I'd rather have a stud OL and let the FO go find receivers than an OL that is just bad with good receivers.

A first and a second round pick in the last two drafts on OL  
Ten Ton Hammer : 10/20/2014 2:06 pm : link
Free Agent dollars spent on OL.

They are addressing it.

The right way to do this is not drafting 7 OL in a single year just to appease people and improve your chances of hitting a home run. They needed talent in other places too.

The Cowboys have been rebuilding their offensive line since they drafted Tyron Smith in 2011.


sure  
jsboston : 10/20/2014 2:09 pm : link
but we picked a RB in the first just a couple of years ago.

that was just stupid. if there's one position you can pick up later in the draft or in free agency it's RB.

it's not about appeasement. it's about being smart.

happy to debate it, but we suck. and until our OL gets better we will continue to suck.
RE: RE: Matt M.  
Giants11 : 10/20/2014 2:11 pm : link
In comment 11931878 Victor in CT said:
Quote:
The problem there is with the shitty line play Eli can't wait for Beckham to get deep on anyone. I would argue that they could get more big plays with just competent receivers and a stud line than with great WRs and a poor line. Give Eli the time and he will make the plays. He has proven it again and again.


Seriously? 5 of the 7 games this year Eli has had plenty of time to throw. They barely touched him yesterday. Sure the run blocking has been awful the past 2 weeks, but come on Eli had time yesterday. The problem is our coaching staff put out one of the most pathetically play scared game plans I have ever seen in almost 40 years of watching this team.
Cyril Richardson  
TruBlue56 : 10/20/2014 2:13 pm : link
would have been nice in the 3rd round. He is starting right now for the Bills at LG. Even Gabe Jackson is looking good and has started for the Raiders at LG. Point is that we should have drafted another lineman in the 3rd round. It would be better than having Jerry or Walton right now.
Imagine this team if they didn't have OBJ?  
BLUATHRT : 10/20/2014 2:18 pm : link
It would be Randle and Parker as the top 2 WR's. A talent at WR is far more of a commodity than a OG, plain and simple. Hindsight GM is a dangerous game to play. The OBJ pick was a good one.
I see the stupid is back again  
mrvax : 10/20/2014 2:18 pm : link
You want (with hindsight) Martin & either Lee or Matthews.
No thanks. I'd rather have Beckham & Richburg. So did the NY Giants brass.
Who f'n cares at this point  
dep026 : 10/20/2014 2:19 pm : link
we drafted OBJ because our WRs were some of the worst in the league.

Randle will probably be nothing more than average, Cruz's career is done. OBJ is going to be a very good WR. Lets be happy we have him.
RE: Imagine this team if they didn't have OBJ?  
jeff57 : 10/20/2014 2:23 pm : link
In comment 11932030 BLUATHRT said:
Quote:
It would be Randle and Parker as the top 2 WR's. A talent at WR is far more of a commodity than a OG, plain and simple. Hindsight GM is a dangerous game to play. The OBJ pick was a good one.


It's not hindsight when you say it ahead of time.

I disagree with you. You have to build from the lines out. We're starting Walton and Jerry. Enough said.
RE: RE: Imagine this team if they didn't have OBJ?  
dep026 : 10/20/2014 2:24 pm : link
In comment 11932038 jeff57 said:
Quote:
In comment 11932030 BLUATHRT said:


Quote:


It would be Randle and Parker as the top 2 WR's. A talent at WR is far more of a commodity than a OG, plain and simple. Hindsight GM is a dangerous game to play. The OBJ pick was a good one.



It's not hindsight when you say it ahead of time.

I disagree with you. You have to build from the lines out. We're starting Walton and Jerry. Enough said.


Take Jerry out of the equation because Schwartz should be starting.
RE: A first and a second round pick in the last two drafts on OL  
Greg from LI : 10/20/2014 2:25 pm : link
In comment 11931993 Ten Ton Hammer said:
Quote:
The Cowboys have been rebuilding their offensive line since they drafted Tyron Smith in 2011.


This is something to keep in mind. It's been a multiyear process for Dallas.
OBJ and Richburg were very good picks  
TruBlue56 : 10/20/2014 2:25 pm : link
The pick that should be in questions is the 3rd round pick for Bromley. We could have gotten a starter at guard in that spot.
RE: A first and a second round pick in the last two drafts on OL  
Jacobs27 : 10/20/2014 2:26 pm : link
In comment 11931993 Ten Ton Hammer said:
Quote:
Free Agent dollars spent on OL.

They are addressing it.

The right way to do this is not drafting 7 OL in a single year just to appease people and improve your chances of hitting a home run. They needed talent in other places too.

The Cowboys have been rebuilding their offensive line since they drafted Tyron Smith in 2011.


Bingo. So many posters here act like we ignored the OL this offseason. Using a #1 draft pick, #2 and signing a big dollar free agent his hardly ignoring the line. As huge a need as OL was this offseason it was far from our only need.
Don't know how many people caught "Finding Giants"  
Giants11 : 10/20/2014 2:27 pm : link
last week on the NFL Network but it was all about the draft. The interesting thing in the war room is that there was very little hesitation about their picks this year. Virtually none at all. They were all in agreement, especially as the draft wore on. I mean they even discussed trading up for Andre Williams. There seemed to be little to no hesitation about taking Beckham there over Martin. They were all over Richburg too. They even showed tape from the Senior Bowl and them gushing over him there as the best C in the draft.
RE: OBJ and Richburg were very good picks  
jeff57 : 10/20/2014 2:28 pm : link
In comment 11932044 TruBlue56 said:
Quote:
The pick that should be in questions is the 3rd round pick for Bromley. We could have gotten a starter at guard in that spot.


You mean, never play Jay?
And OBJ scored twice and looks to be completely legit.  
arcarsenal : 10/20/2014 2:29 pm : link
The mistake wasn't passing on Martin, it was not targeting the OL more around 2012 when it was painfully obvious that we needed to start rebuilding it. After taking Beatty in the 2nd rd in 2009, we went 3 straight years without taking an offensive lineman any higher than the 4th round.
And the Bromley "he never plays" people..  
arcarsenal : 10/20/2014 2:31 pm : link
.. Joseph spent most of his Sundays inactive in 2010. It's not terribly abnormal, nor is it an indictment on the player.
In a week where Cullen Jenkins is hurt  
Ten Ton Hammer : 10/20/2014 2:33 pm : link
suddenly the joke about Bromley never playing isn't so funny.
we need to draft OL studs too  
spike : 10/20/2014 2:35 pm : link
who on our current OL would you call a "stud"?
RE: And the Bromley  
jeff57 : 10/20/2014 2:35 pm : link
In comment 11932057 arcarsenal said:
Quote:
.. Joseph spent most of his Sundays inactive in 2010. It's not terribly abnormal, nor is it an indictment on the player.


I'd like to see how many third rounders this year haven't gotten on the field.
Pages: 1 2 3 | Show All |  Next>>
Back to the Corner