(Reuters) - A nurse held in quarantine for Ebola monitoring in New Jersey plans to file a federal lawsuit challenging her confinement as a violation of her civil rights, her lawyer told Reuters on Sunday.
Norman Siegel, a well-known civil rights lawyer, said that Kaci Hickox's confinement after she returned from West Africa raised "serious constitutional and civil liberties issues," given that she remains asymptomatic and has not tested positive for Ebola."We're not going to dispute that the government has, under certain circumstances, the right to issue a quarantine," he said. "The policy is overly broad when applied to her. |
i mean in the US, everyone might have a case but come on lady... its for your own good and for everyone else...
story - (
New Window )
The child was vomiting and had a 103-degree fever when he was carried from his Bronx home by EMS workers wearing hazmat suits, neighbors said. He looked weak, said a neighbor.
He was really, really out of it.
The boy returned with his family from Guinea Saturday night and five members of the family were being quarantined inside their apartment, sources said.
http://nypost.com/2014/10/27/5-year-old-boy-being-tested-for-ebola-in-new-york-city/
And yes, we don't have an outbreak and don't want one.
I respect Dr.Fauci. I studied his book. He of all people should know some form of quarantine is indicated.
Leave it to the guys and gals with degrees in medicine and public health, counselor.
I think home quarantine is fine too, however, maybe the NY doc makes the case that it's not a perfect system? Maybe quarantine at home with outside supervision would work?
One thing I don't understand about the lawsuit is that the healthcare workers who go over to Africa are obviously somewhat altruistic. They know that they have to give up time and, sometimes income, etc. They want to health and they understand the disease and the problems associated with the disease. So, why wouldn't they just figure a "cooling off" period after leaving Africa is part of the package? Fears might be overblown and the risk small, but they've all seen first-hand the consequences if the disease comes to fruition. The resistance to post-work protocols seems a bit odd.
CNN article - ( New Window )
Michael BarbaroVerified account
@mikiebarb
NYT EXCLUSIVE: Christie says he's planning to release nurse later today if CDC an doctors sign off.
Link - ( New Window )
So it is essentially an extension of the contract.
This entire thing is a work in progress and there will be bumps in the road and suing because your feelings were hurt won't change that.
Quote:
She's not allowed to have her luggage and was given paper scrubs to wear. Hickox said she has no shower, no flushable toilet and the hospital gave her no television or any reading material. Mostly, she says, she stares at the walls.
CNN article - ( New Window )
i think this comes with the problem of risking throwing stuff out if she is sick...
this is all precaution and the public wants better action. What fucked this all up was the doctor in NYC. He wasnt careful and all we need is one fuck up to make this worse. I mean Duncan didnt get his family sick which is promising but these doctors should have some common sense and just for them and their families quarantine themselves.
they are getting paid anyways
Michael BarbaroVerified account
@mikiebarb
NYT EXCLUSIVE: Christie says he's planning to release nurse later today if CDC an doctors sign off. Link - ( New Window )
The problem in the Hickox case might have been less the quarantine itself than the arbitrary way the rules shifted while she was going through the protocol. The prevailing public sentiment seems to be that quarantining her was right, but that it was handled badly. I'm not sure there was any way to handle it well, and still impose quarantine on her. She followed the protocol as it existed, and was cleared. Her attorneys have a valid point that the compelling state interest for changing the rules and abridging her rights is pretty vague.
Was she ever asked to accept voluntary quarantine? If not, that might have been the smartest path; then it could be made mandatory for subsequent returnees. The hitch, of course, is that she might have refused.
I believe the point is to do everything possible to keep the virus from establishing a stronghold in this country. Until 1999, West Nile virus was rare, now it runs rampant every summer.
Quote:
She's not allowed to have her luggage and was given paper scrubs to wear. Hickox said she has no shower, no flushable toilet and the hospital gave her no television or any reading material. Mostly, she says, she stares at the walls.
CNN article - ( New Window )
I think going forward, quarantine will be different as stsea become prepared for it. Again, behind the eight ball being prepared.
Florida is announcing today that quarantine will be in house with examination twice daily by state health officials.
I shouldn't be that the states are required to come up with their own quarantine protocols.
Quote:
it never works out well. We have no massive outbreak in this country. Out of well over 300 million people all of 2 have contracted Ebola here, and they both worked with the patient that died when his viral load is at it's highest level and they have or are recovering. Chances are every person who posts on this thread knows more people than that themselves who have contracted the flu the past month, and that will kill up to 30,000 people this year.
I believe the point is to do everything possible to keep the virus from establishing a stronghold in this country. Until 1999, West Nile virus was rare, now it runs rampant every summer.
I think you have to admit that there is a slight difference between human to human transmitted diseases and mosquito borne diseases. You can't effectively quarantine mosquitoes or spray humanicides on people.
You don't have to. She went there on her own free volition as a hero to fight this disease that will probably never come anywhere near you partially due to the bravery of people like her and the Doctors that risk their lives to help others. What an idiotic thing to say.
I worry that the net result of the faux panic is that medical personnel will avoid going to areas where viruses are present because of the shit they have to deal with at home.
Take for instance the doctor in NC who has Ebola. The media made it a sideshow and pretty much called the guy's character into question for taking a subway or going bowling while asymptamatic. Then in the next breath, they will very quietly say that the virus can't be passed unless symptoms are present. So who did the guy harm?
It is pretty telling that the only US citizens here in the states who have contracted the virus are medical personnel. Telling because it illustrates just how hard it is to contract the virus. This isn't Africa with substandard treatment areas and substandard sanitation. Even the guy who died in TX didn't pass the virus to any family, only a worker.
Why has mass panic been caused by a virus that is this hard to pass? My thought is because we have 24 hour news stations with only about 1 hour a day of actual news to discuss.
These patients require a lot of care and it costs a lot of money to treat them. Plus it puts healthcare workers at risk. It is in all of our bests interests to make sure that anyone from that area is monitored for a period. Unfortunately self quarantine hasn't worked.
Almost everyone has the potential to be exposed to the flu. Not even a percentage of one percent of the people have a chance to be exposed to Ebola. - Yet what is the lead story on the news every night for the past month?
If you don't think it is hysteria, you are exactly the type of viewer the Media wants.
2. Court won't take the case, because they don't want the nurse in their building.
No matter how difficult it is for this virus to spread, once one of these people show signs of sickness it becomes a massive task tracking their prior movements, finding those they came in contact with, and then the businesses that these people walked into have the "Ebola stigma" tied to them and customers stop showing up.
It becomes a financial burden as well as a medical burden.
And please stop comparing it to the flu. The flu doesn't have a 70% kill rate.
As for this woman, suing is ridiculous. She wasn't imprisoned. She was monitored via quarantine process. Did she lose her job? Was she beaten or starved? Ridiculous...
Just like you supposedly can't compare Ebola to the flu, you really shouldn't compare medical treatment in a third-world country to that in the US.
You might as well start saying that malnutrition has a 50% mortality rate then.
The apparent limitations on what she doesn't have is ludicrous.
It is a deadly infection - one that should have precautions of the spread. It definitely should NOT be made out to be something that is likely to threaten the general public.
It is insanity to even try to determine what the mortality rates are anyway. Let's see - in Africa, you have tons of people dying from it in conditions not found here in the US - In the US, we've now had several people treated for the virus and the only one who has died was an African who didn't get proper medical treatment until it was too late.
Really small sample size, but the cure rate of american's contracting Ebola here in the US - 100%.
But yes, let's all get worried about this very dangerous virus. Let's make it the most prominent story over the past month.
A lot of resources are applied to these patients including plasma donors. God forbid the rate of infection climbs, you will also see the mortality rate climb. That's not to say that would happen, I'm just saying the quality of care is directly proportional to the number being cared for.
One can argue taking basic entertainment choices away and pretty much forcing her to live in a bubble is not only excessive, but unacceptable.
Quarantine her in isolation with a temperature monitor on her - not some sort of thing reserved for aliens or people with auto-immune diseases.
There is no rationale for her not to be allowed some modicum of personal effects and reading material.
GMAN4LIFE : 10:35 am : link : reply
when you dont quarantine yourself, you endanger everyone...
This is sort of my point. Who did he endanger? Everyone? He didn't endanger me.
You are right. Criminals get television and running water and get to talk to someone face to face. She was treated worse.
You sure as shit don't treat it like an internment camp.
Home quarantine, fine-tuned, is likely the best of all worlds, but comes with severe risks as well.
People who don't understand that the negative attention this situation has caused will have severe behavioral impacts are the ones that worry me.