for display only
Big Blue Interactive The Corner Forum  
Back to the Corner

Archived Thread

Giants are 2 years away from competing

joe48 : 10/27/2014 10:23 am
After watching the Steelers game plan on Sunday I came to a realization that our team better hope the Colts have a lot of turnovers. As bad as the Steelers have played this year they still have the playmakers to beat a high scoring team like the Colts. The Giants do not have the firepower on offense and our defense gives up too many big plays especially on third down to make me optomistic about our chances. The more I watch some of the better teams it is obvious that we are pretty much 2 years away from being a playoff team. Injuries, poor drafts and some bad coaching have put this team down in the bottom third competitively. In our division I see the Cowboys and Eagles getting better as we struggle to field a team with better talent that is in need of better coaching.
Pages: 1 2 | Show All |  Next>>
Can't disagree with anything you just said  
Bold Ruler : Mod : 10/27/2014 10:25 am : link
.
we just played Dallas fairly close  
bc4life : 10/27/2014 10:29 am : link
for most of the game and eventually the more talented and less injury depleted team came out ahead.

Team should continue to get better this year and make a serious run next year. Had everyone stayed healthy this year we might have made playoffs.
In the pre-season..  
FatMan in Charlotte : 10/27/2014 10:34 am : link
you'd be hard-pressed to find anyone who thought Dallas would be decent this year. Now, we are holding them up as standards and we are 2 years away from doing anything?

The reality of the NFL is that it is ridiculous to say that any team is two years away from competing.
.  
SoZKillA : 10/27/2014 10:36 am : link
The NFL is Year to Year.

Please stop with this.

This team healthy is competitive  
BillT : 10/27/2014 10:38 am : link
This team starting 3 third string DB and 2 second string LB and a second string RB and backups at WR and a backup G, not so much.
a win  
Les in TO : 10/27/2014 10:38 am : link
sunday night will change a lot of perspectives. hoperfully we get some injured troops back particularly jennings and DRC.
RE: .  
djl8699 : 10/27/2014 10:39 am : link
In comment 11941760 SoZKillA said:
Quote:
The NFL is Year to Year.

Please stop with this.


The NFL can be week to week at times. Did anybody think we had a chance after the 2nd Redskins loss in 2011? No way. Not saying they're gonna win it all this year, but things change so much from week to week that it's impossible to predict what will happen 2 years from now.
Sounds about right  
natefit : 10/27/2014 10:39 am : link
Any given Sunday? Sure. Over the course of a season? No.
Then of course  
JoefromPa : 10/27/2014 10:48 am : link
if Giant go 2-2 in next we might find out that the Giants were only 4 weeks away from competing.
This team has not won 10 games twice under TC  
joe48 : 10/27/2014 10:49 am : link
What makes you think we can do it it now with less talent and these coaches?
What do you mean by "competing"?  
Jupiter : 10/27/2014 10:50 am : link
I haven't given up hope of making the playoffs this year and I am positive they make the playoffs next year. Is that "competing"?

Did they compete in 2007-2008? Did they compete in 2011-2012?

I think we all have learned that, with this QB and this coach, the Giants just need to get to the dance.

Wanna dump the coach or replace the QB? "Competing" will take on a different meaning.
One of many things needed is to improve their speed on the team  
micky : 10/27/2014 10:51 am : link
especially, on defensive side of ball.
If they're not going to be competitive until 2016, they're fucked.  
Riggies : 10/27/2014 10:52 am : link
They have a 33 year old QB and an almost 68 year old HC. Team-wide, they have one single player who would probably qualify as top ten at his position by majority consensus in JPP (4-3 DE) and, while not old yet, there's a fair chance he's not much longer for this team, given the contract he'll be out for. Their other better players are guys like Rolle or one year aging stop gaps like Ayers, who aren't long term solutions.

If they're two more seasons away from the playoffs in theory, they're probably farther than that in terms of any type [moderately] successful run in reality.
I cannot continue to live off our past experiences  
joe48 : 10/27/2014 10:55 am : link
I need to see consistent higher level play from our current squad. Have not seen this in over 2 years. Am i missing something?
FWIW, they've had 4 seasons of 10+ wins under Coughlin  
4thand17 : 10/27/2014 10:56 am : link
'05, '07, '08 and '10.

More importantly, I realize things don't look great, but there is no reason to give up on this year AND next year.
i would change the OP a bit  
shabu : 10/27/2014 10:58 am : link
I would change the OP a bit ( title ) and say, Giants are 2 years away from contending for the superbowl.

I think we need 2 OL, 1 TE, 1 WR on Offense

Defense, 1-2 DL, 1 LB, 1 S

And most of all we need playmakers, guys that can break games open ( ala Cruz, Nicks, Tuck, Stra, Osi, Eli, JPP, Bradshaw ).

I don't see players like that on this team and some are not what they once were either. They could come from the roster, but I don't see where for TE/DE/LB/OL

RE: One of many things needed is to improve their speed on the team  
BillT : 10/27/2014 10:58 am : link
In comment 11941809 micky said:
Quote:
especially, on defensive side of ball.


You know folks say this and I think are DRC, Rolle, Prince, J. Williams, Demps, Thurmond, Brown even a healthy Beason or McLain really not fast enough given their positions? Don't see it.
RE: i would change the OP a bit  
BillT : 10/27/2014 11:05 am : link
In comment 11941831 shabu said:
Quote:
They could come from the roster, but I don't see where for TE/DE/LB/OL


So Donnell, Moore, Kennard, and Richburg don't have any possibility of being those players.
I agree with Micky  
Jupiter : 10/27/2014 11:05 am : link
The Giants may lack star talent (although sometimes stars are uncovered by the media only because the team wins), but the real problem is that they are really slow (or more like NOT QUICK) on defense.

The offense could use more speed from the backups too, but that's a lesser issue. Unfortunately, the slower players happen to be special teams players and that's the other problem.
Are people stuck on last year with the 3rd down complaints?  
USAF NYG Fan : 10/27/2014 11:10 am : link
I don't mean to pick on the thread starter as I'm reading this from several different posters. We are 11th defensively on 3rd downs (barely out of top 10) and the last team we played is #1 offensively on 3rd downs (by a large margin). We have issues but I don't view our 3rd downs as one of them (offense or defense).

We could really benefit from a good guard or 2 on the offensive line (depending on what Schwartz gives us). Another good west coast style RB would be great as well. Learn how to blitz effectively (maybe a better DC). I don't think that's 2 years out.

Could use a few less injuries each year I suppose as well.

http://espn.go.com/nfl/statistics/team/_/stat/downs/sort/thirdDownConvPct/position/defense - ( New Window )
the dallas game wasnt that close - this is how I saw it  
5J : 10/27/2014 11:22 am : link
they beat us by 10. they did not throw an incomplete pass the entire 2nd half. we couldnt stop their offense. we couldnt drive the length of the field on their defense. we got a lucky break on the interception by Prince because the WR fell down. we couldnt dtop their RB. we couldnt run the ball effectively.
That's an important point - the Dallas game  
ij_reilly : 10/27/2014 11:38 am : link
It was not as close as the score. The Giants were soundly beaten. When I read TC's comments the day after, I felt like we must have been watching two different games! Again, the Giants were soundly beaten by the Cowboys.

And whipped (non-competitive) by the Eagles.

This Colts game could be quite telling. Another non-competitive game? Could be. I hope not. I lived through "non-competitive" in the 70s.
As soon  
PaulN : 10/27/2014 11:40 am : link
As you say that we have bad coaching, your post went from some interest to sounding like an idiot. Of coarse you could dismiss what I just said, or you could get you head out of your ass and understand we have a coach that has won 2 Superbowls in the modern NFL! To call him bad is as stupid and ridiculous a statement as you can make. If you want a change for the sake of change, that is fine, to shake up the organization, that is all understandable, but never call this coach and what he does as bad coaching, because then you are an idiot.
Whine,  
oldog : 10/27/2014 11:41 am : link
whine.
you are what your record says you are  
I Love Clams Casino : 10/27/2014 11:42 am : link
a 3rd place team...not the dregs of the league, but still not very good. I'd put the Giants in the bottom 3rd of the league, but near the top of the bottom 3rd....about #25

Teams that are worse than the Giants are Washington, Jets, Jax, Tenn, Houston, Raiders, Vikings, Bears, Rams
RE: a win  
Great White Ghost : 10/27/2014 11:44 am : link
In comment 11941769 Les in TO said:
Quote:
sunday night will change a lot of perspectives. hoperfully we get some injured troops back particularly jennings and DRC.



^^^THIS. Wise words.
RE: RE: One of many things needed is to improve their speed on the team  
section125 : 10/27/2014 11:44 am : link
In comment 11941834 BillT said:
Quote:
In comment 11941809 micky said:


Quote:


especially, on defensive side of ball.



You know folks say this and I think are DRC, Rolle, Prince, J. Williams, Demps, Thurmond, Brown even a healthy Beason or McLain really not fast enough given their positions? Don't see it.


I agree BillT. Just what speed do they need to increase? Some 320 DT? Beckham and Randle aren't fast enough? I could see the need for some strength.
RE: What do you mean by  
Great White Ghost : 10/27/2014 11:50 am : link
In comment 11941807 Jupiter said:
Quote:
I haven't given up hope of making the playoffs this year and I am positive they make the playoffs next year. Is that "competing"?

Did they compete in 2007-2008? Did they compete in 2011-2012?

I think we all have learned that, with this QB and this coach, the Giants just need to get to the dance.

Wanna dump the coach or replace the QB? "Competing" will take on a different meaning.
2007 they were 0-2, and down 17-0 at the half in game 3 vs Wash. We know how that ended.We'll see what they look like after the bye.

Realistically, I wouldn't be hoping for a SB until 2016, but I expect them to "compete" every year(I'd define that as making the playoffs), I'm sure the FO does as well.Add Wilson, Schwartz,Beason from game one, a healthy Thurmond, Cruz and DRC, who's to say we wouldn't have been doing better this year?
RE: In the pre-season..  
Big Blue '56 : 10/27/2014 12:26 pm : link
In comment 11941752 FatMan in Charlotte said:
Quote:
you'd be hard-pressed to find anyone who thought Dallas would be decent this year. Now, we are holding them up as standards and we are 2 years away from doing anything?

The reality of the NFL is that it is ridiculous to say that any team is two years away from competing.


But they will...It's a week to week thing..2 games ago we were competitive..Now, we're two years away..
RE: .  
Milton : 10/27/2014 12:32 pm : link
In comment 11941760 SoZKillA said:
Quote:
The NFL is Year to Year.

Please stop with this.
Used to be the NFL was year to year. The new reality is that it is month to month, if not week to week.
Anything  
natefit : 10/27/2014 12:36 pm : link
CANT happen. Were a mediocre team having a mediocre season. Make the best of it and dont take it too seriously.
Functioning Special Teams  
rocco8112 : 10/27/2014 12:36 pm : link
and the Giants beat the Cardinals.

If Donnell does not cough up his first fumble, would it surprise anyone if the Giants drive to tie it up and maybe pull out the win?

There are very few, maybe no, consistent powerhouse teams in the NFL anymore. The Giants have to play better and recapture a winning culture. This is a new roster compared to what we have seen most of TC's tenure.

Let's see how the rest of the season plays out.

I also do not think it is going out on too much of a limb to predict that either the Eagles or Cowboys, maybe both, will fall back to Earth.

....  
BrettNYG10 : 10/27/2014 12:37 pm : link
I think we can make it next year.
joe48  
FJ : 10/27/2014 12:46 pm : link
That explosive Steelers team scored only 6 points against the Ravens and only 10 against the Browns. If you are going to compare the Giants to the Steelers, your argument should not be that we are 2 years away from competing; it should be that as bad as we looked against the Eagles, we might just come out and score 50 points in one of our upcoming games. Your example (the Steelers) does not in any way support the argument that you've tried to make.
RE: In the pre-season..  
HomerJones45 : 10/27/2014 12:51 pm : link
In comment 11941752 FatMan in Charlotte said:
Quote:
you'd be hard-pressed to find anyone who thought Dallas would be decent this year. Now, we are holding them up as standards and we are 2 years away from doing anything?

The reality of the NFL is that it is ridiculous to say that any team is two years away from competing.
Exactly. What nonsense.

There are so many here still caught in the old days. The league has been leveled almost completely. Teams go hot and cold, a penalty at the wrong time, a key injury, one draft and you go can go from the outhouse to the penthouse and back again.

Dallas is a Romo or Murray injury from heading back to the cellar from whence they came. The hot teams now may not be the hot teams come December. Take heart.
Ha, so for the OP, let me get this straight  
Mike in Long Beach : 10/27/2014 12:53 pm : link
You start this post off by saying "as bad as the Steelers have played this year," then go on to say they still beat a high scoring team like the Colts.

You deducted from your information that we are two years away from competing, as opposed to the opposite, which would be/should have been that anybody can compete with anybody.

I'm not even saying that is the case, but you literally drew the opposite logical conclusion based on the facts you presented.
RE: we just played Dallas fairly close  
bradshaw44 : 10/27/2014 12:53 pm : link
In comment 11941745 bc4life said:
Quote:
for most of the game and eventually the more talented and less injury depleted team came out ahead.

Team should continue to get better this year and make a serious run next year. Had everyone stayed healthy this year we might have made playoffs.


Dallas' defense is more decimated then ours.
The correlation to the Steelers..  
FatMan in Charlotte : 10/27/2014 12:57 pm : link
is pretty comical. i can imagine that if the Giants beat indy, and SF but lose to Jacksonville that we won't bitch, right?

Because the Steelers have some pretty bad losses.

Christ only on BBI can we have threads hoping we give efforts like the steelers - - - - or Jets.
Let me just clarify about the Steelers  
joe48 : 10/27/2014 1:06 pm : link
They have a stud running back and a top 5 wide receiver and we do not. We do not have the horses. Too many injured FA busts.
And..  
FatMan in Charlotte : 10/27/2014 1:08 pm : link
our FA busts are whom exactly?
The Steelers are 5-3, with two out of their next three against the  
Riggies : 10/27/2014 1:09 pm : link
Titans and Jets. They may not make the playoffs this year, but they're still right there and very much in the thick of things at this point.

The Giants are 3-4, heading into a brutal schedule stretch, and are all but eliminated from serious playoff contention already in October if you realistically look at how the NFC is shaping up and what their losses have been.

Some might bitch about a couple ugly losses (though, hey, they weren't shut out yet), but the Steelers are easily in a better position than the Giants are right now. Logically, why wouldn't anyone want more of their "effort" and less of ours?
RE: The correlation to the Steelers..  
micky : 10/27/2014 1:10 pm : link
In comment 11942158 FatMan in Charlotte said:
Quote:
is pretty comical. i can imagine that if the Giants beat indy, and SF but lose to Jacksonville that we won't bitch, right?

Because the Steelers have some pretty bad losses.

Christ only on BBI can we have threads hoping we give efforts like the steelers - - - - or Jets.



Well you know FMIC, the jets should be an inspiration for the giants...(courtesy of a BBI thread)
Our team is fine, with the right game plan  
#10* : 10/27/2014 1:10 pm : link
we can beat any team in the league. Problem is we rarely have the right game plans.

When we get some of our players back we'll be competitive.
RE: In the pre-season..  
AnishPatel : 10/27/2014 1:19 pm : link
In comment 11941752 FatMan in Charlotte said:
Quote:
you'd be hard-pressed to find anyone who thought Dallas would be decent this year. Now, we are holding them up as standards and we are 2 years away from doing anything?

The reality of the NFL is that it is ridiculous to say that any team is two years away from competing.


We knew the offense had talent but the question was the shitshow defense.The defense with no name guys have played well.

3 first round picks on the OL has made them really good. Factor in Murray being productive and staying healthy and you get a good team.

For us, we have a lot of holes. It depends on drafting and our free agent signings.I do believe we are couple years away to address our weakness on both sides of the ball.

Best move by Dallas was adding 3 first round picks to the OL. Now they are playing at a very high level. Factor in balance running and passing, and now that offense is efficient.

That team has impressed me a lot.
Game plan = Eli to OBJ  
joe48 : 10/27/2014 1:20 pm : link
I am looking forward to the development between these 2 the rest of the year.
Anyone who doesn't see  
oldutican : 10/27/2014 1:33 pm : link
Dallas has more talent than the Giants is stupid. The difference is on offense. QB as good as ours and better RBs, Wrs, TEs and O-line. Their 1st rd picks are excelling, Giants not so much. Some of that due to injury, but it is what it is.
RE: Anyone who doesn't see  
BillT : 10/27/2014 1:45 pm : link
In comment 11942251 oldutican said:
Quote:
Dallas has more talent than the Giants is stupid. The difference is on offense. QB as good as ours and better RBs, Wrs, TEs and O-line. Their 1st rd picks are excelling, Giants not so much. Some of that due to injury, but it is what it is.


Romo hasn't been as good as Eli for a single day of his life. They have a top RB and one, count um one, great WR. Their #2 WR is on track for another 40 catch 700 yard season. Their #2 TE has 6 starts, 0 catches and their #3 TE Escobar has 7 catches in 7 games. Love their OL.
I watched  
SBlue46 : 10/27/2014 1:52 pm : link
Eagles....Fowles had all day...so did brees and rogers...
our oline is embarrassing
We will have  
old man : 10/27/2014 2:03 pm : link
another large player turnover, likely 1/2,or about 14, players this coming offseason, which is pretty close to average NFL team player turnovers-12.
And most of us can name 10 right off the top.
Even in a lesser quantity/quality FA and draft this coming offseason, they will 'be competitive' in '15, with now a 2nd year OC, and some younger talent on D.
'16 should be a great year.
RE: I watched  
FJ : 10/27/2014 2:07 pm : link
In comment 11942353 SBlue46 said:
Quote:
Eagles....Fowles had all day...so did brees and rogers...
our oline is embarrassing

Great examples! You realize that Fowles [sic] and Rogers [sic] both lost yesterday, right?
Pages: 1 2 | Show All |  Next>>
Back to the Corner