So this is a developing story from my hometown of Rochester. Earlier in the week, Aquinas high school was forced to forfeit its sectionals playoff win over a rules violation and was eliminated from the Section V tournament.
The rules violation was that it's star quarterback (legit D1 prospect) was declared ineligible AFTER winning the sectional game, because he had only played in 2 regular season games after breaking his hand. The little known rule is that a player must be active for 3 regular season games to qualify for sectionals. Allegedly the rule wasn't even discovered until post game, when Section V received an annomous tip about the rule book.
Aquinas is now suing Section V and the NYSPHSSA to overturn the ruling and play in the game on Saturday.
Sort of a crazy story that keeps getting more and more dramatic and highlights just how serious high school football is taken. Even in Rochester.
Rochester D & C - (
New Window )
So basically, you have a star player who got hurt during the first few games, comes back for the playoffs and because he didn't play in three contests the team has to forfeit the win? That rule needs to be revised/changed ASAP.
I wonder if someone from Rush-Henrietta was the anonymous source...
What if you are the starting guard who gets hurt? Obviously, the other team only has a certain amount of game film on the opposing team. How would they know if that kid didn't play all year?
Best team in the state this year is most likely Archbishop Stepinac. Yet if they win the CHSFL, that's it for them. No chance to play in the state playoffs.
They play 8 regular season games, 3 county playoff games (2 if you have a first round bye), then the Long Island Championship. Unless they cut the regular season or limit the amount of playoff teams, it will never work to have a true state champion.
Similar situation in NYC with the public championships. CHSFL is a different animial all together.
That would be a chicken shit way to win if you just played a game and lost, then try to win on a technicality.
After reading the article, it looks like this kid in question is a junior. If it the team that they had just beat, I would pray that they are on the schedule next year and run up the score like no tomorrow.
I don't remember when or why they put the rule in, but it's legit. HCs and ADs should know it and there's no real excuse for getting caught with your pants down. I think they'll have to eat the loss.
I don't know the current Pittsford coaches so I have no idea if they would/could have been the anonymous source. I'd guess that if they wanted to be more competitive and they knew the rule, they'd have brought it up before the game and not after.
The only reason I know the rule is legit is we had a similar situation. We learned about the rule and sat the player.
Wouldn't have mattered much if he played. We won that game but lost in the finals to a better team.
I'll find out in the next few days if it's statewide or section V only. It'll be a hot topic of conversation the next few days.
Down here on LI, this Saturday is the end of the regular season. With the playoffs starting next week, I would be curious to see if this story gains some steam and makes its way down here to Section 8 and Section 11. You know there will be coach's, AD's and certainly parents all over this if it is a statewide rule.
Guess both teams just practice/prepare as if they are playing...
Purely my speculation.
It's been in the book since the 80s after a few kids transferred at the end of the year to get on a better team.
I know Dick Cerone well. Dick is the head of section V football. He's an ethical man whose integrity is without question. He's also an ex AD for Aquinas, so the suggestions made by some of the local Aquinas supporters that he has some personal issue with the school is complete horseshit.
Good to know that this is a statewide rule, however, I believe it should be reviwed/updated by the NYSPHSSA. I completely understand the intent of the rule and how it came about, but a kid who get's hurt early in the year should not be "ineligible" to play in a playoff game if he did not suit up for 3 total games.
Makes no sense and after this fiasco, hopefully they will put some ammendments to the rule in place.
Yeah that is the part i don't get. The player was not "inactive" since they don't have such a thing, and there is no way they mean that a player would have to actually be in on a play over 3 games in order for the team to be in the playoffs. There are players on every HS team that may not play but are there for back-up in case the depth at their position is gone
I don't remember when or why they put the rule in, but it's legit. HCs and ADs should know it and there's no real excuse for getting caught with your pants down. I think they'll have to eat the loss.
I don't know the current Pittsford coaches so I have no idea if they would/could have been the anonymous source. I'd guess that if they wanted to be more competitive and they knew the rule, they'd have brought it up before the game and not after.
But couldnt the argument be made that he is not "Off the team", he is just not playing? I'm sure he was at practices all year long so what determines him on the team or not?
A contestant, or athletic team shall not represent a school except in conformance with all rules and regulations. Is shall be the duty of trustees and boards of education to require that athletic activities be limited to competition between secondary school students.
To be eligible for sectional, intersectional or state competition, at team must have completed in six (6) school schedules contests which occurred on six (6) different dates during the season.
For the sports of baseball, basketball , field hockey, football, ice hockey lacrosse, soccer, softball and volleyball an individual is eligible for the team if he/she has been an eligible participant on a team in that sport in that school for a minimum of six (6) scheduled contests during the regular season. For football, a stude nt must be an eligible participant for a minimum of three (3) contests.
For the sports of archery, badminton, bowling, cross country, fencing, golf, gymnastics, rifle, skiing, swimming, tennis, outdoor track, winter track and wrestling an individual must also have represented their school in six (6) scheduled contests during the season to be eligible. These required contests must occur on six (6) different dates and must be conducted prior to the conclusion of the team 's regular schedule.
Section Athletic Councils may request in writing approval of the State Executive Committee to adjust the number of school schedules contests required on an annual basis. The request is to be submitted prior to the governing board me eting. School districts may submit a written request to the Section for adjustment of contests for individual participant based on medical documentation that confirms the individual was not able to particiapte in the required number of contests. NOTE: For the sports of golf and girls gymnastics, a waiver of the Representation Standard may be granted by the NYSPHSAA Executive Director when a student has qualified for participation in the current school year's NYSPHSAA Championship event and has subsequently transferred to a NYSPHSAA member school. The athlete must meet all other eligibility standards, including transfer, to receive the waiver."
To me the issue of "an anonymous source" makes this bullshit. If an individual doesn't want to put their name on a complaint then the league shouldn't consider it a legitimate complaint, IMHO.
Eligibility ruling knocks Aquinas out of playoffs - ( New Window )
A contestant, or athletic team shall not represent a school except in conformance with all rules and regulations. Is shall be the duty of trustees and boards of education to require that athletic activities be limited to competition between secondary school students.
To be eligible for sectional, intersectional or state competition, at team must have completed in six (6) school schedules contests which occurred on six (6) different dates during the season.
For the sports of baseball, basketball , field hockey, football, ice hockey lacrosse, soccer, softball and volleyball an individual is eligible for the team if he/she has been an eligible participant on a team in that sport in that school for a minimum of six (6) scheduled contests during the regular season. For football, a stude nt must be an eligible participant for a minimum of three (3) contests.
For the sports of archery, badminton, bowling, cross country, fencing, golf, gymnastics, rifle, skiing, swimming, tennis, outdoor track, winter track and wrestling an individual must also have represented their school in six (6) scheduled contests during the season to be eligible. These required contests must occur on six (6) different dates and must be conducted prior to the conclusion of the team 's regular schedule.
Section Athletic Councils may request in writing approval of the State Executive Committee to adjust the number of school schedules contests required on an annual basis. The request is to be submitted prior to the governing board me eting. School districts may submit a written request to the Section for adjustment of contests for individual participant based on medical documentation that confirms the individual was not able to particiapte in the required number of contests. NOTE: For the sports of golf and girls gymnastics, a waiver of the Representation Standard may be granted by the NYSPHSAA Executive Director when a student has qualified for participation in the current school year's NYSPHSAA Championship event and has subsequently transferred to a NYSPHSAA member school. The athlete must meet all other eligibility standards, including transfer, to receive the waiver."
To me the issue of "an anonymous source" makes this bullshit. If an individual doesn't want to put their name on a complaint then the league shouldn't consider it a legitimate complaint, IMHO. Eligibility ruling knocks Aquinas out of playoffs - ( New Window )
But is the intent of the rule to eliminate injured players who come back, or to stop ringers being put on a team at the last moment? That's the crux of the matter here. I don't think the target of this rule is an injured player