for display only
Big Blue Interactive The Corner Forum  
Back to the Corner

Archived Thread

Williams hasn't looked like an NFL calibur RB this entire

eightshamrocks : 11/7/2014 6:14 pm
season. Yet Coughlin stubbornly continues to trot him out there as his starter week after week in Jennings absence. I do not understand at all why Hillis and Cox have not been given a chance to replace Williams's carries. They can't possibly be any worse. In fact, Hillis has looked pretty decent in his limited playing time, and has average 4.4 ypc compared to Williams's 3.0 ypc. Earth to Coughlin.....earth to Coughlin. Get Williams to the bench and insert Cox or Hillis as the starter this week. You truly have nothing to lose.....except your job of course.
agreed  
area junc : 11/7/2014 6:22 pm : link
when we drafted him i said here he reminded me of ron dayne and got blasted 4 it

may have shorted dayne

huge coaching error not getting cox involved in the gameplans the last 3 weeks to keep the defense honest
He looks nothing like Dayne...  
okiegiant : 11/7/2014 6:26 pm : link
He runs with power and has a nice burst.

Is he ready to be a number one back in the league, well obviously no, but he has only played a handful of games.

I realize this is a what have you done for me lately game but give the guy a little time before you cut him.

Patience is a virtue and certainly lacking.
It's like he immediately runs  
AnyoneButPhilly : 11/7/2014 6:31 pm : link
Right for the nearest defender. It seems like the only yardage he can get is outside the tackles.
I think  
Eric from BBI : Admin : 11/7/2014 6:32 pm : link
he's going to be a very good player.
Hillis right now  
LauderdaleMatty : 11/7/2014 6:34 pm : link
Is the better NFL RB. Williams has flashed a few times but he seems to get stoned way too often on the backfield. The pathetic OL run blocking doesn't help any of the RBs.
RE: I think  
kmed : 11/7/2014 6:37 pm : link
In comment 11964618 Eric from BBI said:
Quote:
he's going to be a very good player.


I'm not sure what anyone has seen to say he will be a very good player. I think it's fair to say that we haven't seen enough to say he won't be a good player, but except for the chris r factor, I'M interested to hear why.
The guy was drafted to a short  
Zebra3 : 11/7/2014 6:38 pm : link
Yardage back this year. To learn from Jennings and Wilson.
the NFL is a much faster game  
newmike2 : 11/7/2014 6:40 pm : link
that he's used to. I expect to see him run more like Bradshaw than Dayne in the future but he has to learn how to adjust to the speed and if he had a line in front of him, he would be putting up more respectable numbers.. as would the rest of the team.
i agree that  
dancing blue bear : 11/7/2014 6:47 pm : link
i think he is going to be a good player.

we have seen some to that end. great college back. he looked good in the preseason. measurables etc.

additionally, seems like a highly motivated, intelligent player. I don't think the nfl is going to be too much for him to learn.

on the feild he has looked really good once he has gotten to the second level. he hasn't gotten there often enough, and while that is partly his fault, it is also a collective failure by the team.
Build a proper OL  
spike : 11/7/2014 6:48 pm : link
and Williams will prosper
Coughlin and his coaches  
Rflairr : 11/7/2014 6:48 pm : link
haven't done a good job of coaching either
because  
Eric from BBI : Admin : 11/7/2014 6:50 pm : link
we've seen flashes of him making very good plays, including three in the last game.
Don't  
AcidTest : 11/7/2014 6:53 pm : link
agree.

Williams has no blocking. He could do a better job setting up blocks, but that will come with experience. He is a very good, punishing, RB.
Have you guys watched Hillis?  
BigBlueShock : 11/7/2014 6:54 pm : link
how the hell is he a better option? The guy has literally nothing going for him. And let's not get carried away with the YPC. Hillis has had a ton of his carries on 3rd and 75 type situations, of course he's gonna have more room to run.

It's startling that some of you would rather have a middling back up RB take snaps, a guy with zero upside, rather than a rookie still trying to learn the game.

Yeah, Peyton Hillis is the key to this season. Or Cox, for that matter. Unbelievable.
He he  
Dave in PA : 11/7/2014 7:04 pm : link
You said insert cox
Our OL hasn't looked NFL caliber.  
Blue21 : 11/7/2014 7:05 pm : link
.
You keep asking for Hillis  
David in LA : 11/7/2014 7:08 pm : link
the guy fucking sucks. Besides being slower than molasses, there's an odd contingency of fans here that really really want him to start. Probably the same group that thought David Douglas was going to be Wes Welker 2.0.
I wonder what the Monday threads are going to be like...  
RC02XX : 11/7/2014 7:17 pm : link
if Williams run for 100+ yards this Sunday against the Seahawks. Not saying he will, but it should be funny to see all of the reaction threads.

With that being said, I am optimistic that he will turn out to be a good (if not great) running back for the Giants.
hillis is what he is  
dancing blue bear : 11/7/2014 7:19 pm : link
i like him on the roster. good back up. good ST player. good third down back - pick up blitz, block, catch a swing or outlet pass. occasional run. but he isn't a starter. you cant give him more than 3-5 touches and expect anything good to happen. that is absurd.

Cox, on the other hand, i can see giving him some opportunities. he has looked ok in limited use. it would be worth a shot to see. he was down on the PS in the beggining of the season, so that maybe why it's taken a little bit longer. he seems like a try hard runner with some speed
RE: I think  
mrvax : 11/7/2014 7:24 pm : link
In comment 11964618 Eric from BBI said:
Quote:
he's going to be a very good player.


I think he has the same run blocking as Wilson did last year. It's a miracle the veterans Hillis and Jennings have found small creases. Give Williams time to grow into finding his. And I don't mean have him run as often as he does unless the Oline improves.
Cox looked awful  
pjcas18 : 11/7/2014 7:24 pm : link
in limited opportunities running the ball and returning kicks last year, absolutely terrible and last years OL might be better than this year's OL or similar so don't tell me last year's OL stunk.

He's on the roster as cheap insurance.

Hillis should get 25 carries a game if Cox is the only other option.

And he has one KO return, the first one of the game that wasn't brutal and people say he's flashed there. He's flashed more awfulness than anything else. I still don't know how he managed to return a kick, fielded cleanly, in stride, to the 7 yard line. No hesitation, returned to the 7 yard line, not fumbled and boxed around, not on a bounce, fielded cleanly, in stride, and I didn't think he should return it, but it wasn't like 10 yards deep at the back of the end zone, it was mid-way through at best.

He does not have an NFL future once he plays himself off the Giants. If he is a major part of the offense it means the Giants have thrown in the towel.

Not sure what you expect  
UConn4523 : 11/7/2014 7:26 pm : link
he's a rookie and was a 4th rounder for a reason. He's also behind a mediocre line at best and in an offense that desnt have a WR that needs double coverage (ODB will be but not yet).
Once Williams learns to be patient  
Bino5 : 11/7/2014 7:27 pm : link
He'll be a good RB that can wear down a defense. He's plenty quick, especially at that size.
Williams runs well but his vision is not what it should be.  
Del Shofner : 11/7/2014 7:28 pm : link
I think there are sometimes holes, even with our OL, but he doesn't seem to have his eyes open for them (yet). I think that's coachable.
IMO, Andre's biggest problem is his vision  
David in LA : 11/7/2014 7:32 pm : link
I know with RB's, you usually see immediate returns, but remember BC ran a completely different run blocking scheme. With our line, I think the ideal RB is someone with great cutback ability.
I think he was drafted for a specific role with this team... not to  
Shockeyisthebest80 : 11/7/2014 7:33 pm : link
be the every down back. Not that anyone could succeed with this line blocking, but he's not a fit for the scheme as an every down player.

It reminds me of last season when Wilson struggled behind the line, but washed up backs like Jacobs and Hillis had some success because their downhill style was a better fit for the line the Giants had.
I dont think Andre Willaims is a #1 or #2 back....  
nygiants1114 : 11/7/2014 8:01 pm : link
lack of explosion and vision...
Cox led the team in rush yards last week...on 2 carries  
SHO'NUFF : 11/7/2014 8:03 pm : link
no lie.
Williams  
Joey in VA : 11/7/2014 8:06 pm : link
Has a short area explosion that I have not seen in any football player since Lamar was healthy. He has an ability to stop, start and launch with tremendous power in almost no space, that is a truly rare and explosive quality. He has some learning to do, he needs an offense that fits him but this dude can play.
Don't be obtuse  
pjcas18 : 11/7/2014 8:10 pm : link
that's right, I'm quoting Andy Dufresne.

Cox gained 17 yards on the last play of a meaningless game and ran the shotgun draw on 3rd and 12 for 10 yards before the end of the half.

Doesn't the context mean something?
to be fair  
Steve in South Jersey : 11/7/2014 8:11 pm : link
the offensive line that he runs behind SUCKS. Give him a decent OL to block for him.
I'm not sure  
Joey in VA : 11/7/2014 8:12 pm : link
About the calibur of this post.
What do have in the kid?  
trueblueinpw : 11/7/2014 8:12 pm : link
I think its great Williams is playing. Let's see how he does for a season or two before we put into the Ron Dayne bin.

Some of you guys are tough to please. If Hillis and Cox were playing all the time, there'd be tons of BBIers complaining about how Coughlin never plays rookies.

I think this Williams kid is going to be a keeper. Hills is good for a few yards here and there and a blitz pick up or two, but I don't think he's a difference maker. And don't forget, Cox is probably really tired from all those kick offs he's brining back to the 13 yard line.
I'm with Joey on this one  
WeatherMan : 11/7/2014 8:13 pm : link
and the comparison earlier in this thread to Dayne is criminally bad. Williams punishes tacklers, I love the physicality of his running style, all he needs is a chance to get going - unfortunately the line is shit.
Great Thread  
Samiam : 11/7/2014 8:34 pm : link
He's played a handfull of games behind a weak OL in a new offense. You sure nailed this one.
I would reconsider my position  
David in LA : 11/7/2014 8:41 pm : link
if I ever found myself in agreement with dunces like Thomas and shonuff.
don't understand  
bluepepper : 11/7/2014 9:01 pm : link
what some of you guys are seeing. He has no vision, no cutback ability. Sure he can break a long run when there's a gaping hole but who can't?

Running back is a position guys should be able to play from day 1. And if they struggle it's with pass catching or blocking or maybe fumbling. Running? They should show that from the beginning. This guy isn't doing it.

Hope I am wrong, but very worried that he's going to be a total bust.
the problem for williams...  
nyblue56 : 11/7/2014 9:12 pm : link
is that he is not allowing the blocks to get into the defenders. right now he has one speed. Once it clicks for him where he allows the blockers to lock into the defender he will look much better and the Ol will look much better as well. Right now if the guard is pulling williams is beating him to the hole.
RE: Have you guys watched Hillis?  
eightshamrocks : 11/7/2014 9:21 pm : link
In comment 11964639 BigBlueShock said:
Quote:
how the hell is he a better option? The guy has literally nothing going for him. And let's not get carried away with the YPC. Hillis has had a ton of his carries on 3rd and 75 type situations, of course he's gonna have more room to run.

It's startling that some of you would rather have a middling back up RB take snaps, a guy with zero upside, rather than a rookie still trying to learn the game.

Yeah, Peyton Hillis is the key to this season. Or Cox, for that matter. Unbelievable.




Hilis has little going for him? How the hell is a 4.4 ypc avg little going for him? Expecialy compared to Williams pathetic 3.0? Hilis is slow, yes, but at least he has the vision an NFL RB needs to have. Williams doesn't have vision.
Williams has shown some flashes and looked good  
Matt M. : 11/7/2014 9:22 pm : link
in the summer. He is the only decent RB worthy of starting. Hillis is not as terrible as some make him sound, but he is a plodding backs and can't be fed the ball 20+ times. As for Cox, anyone who has seen anything...anything from Cox must be watching different games. Whether it was last year, pre-season, returning kicks, whatever..he has shown nothing in 2 seasons.
RE: You keep asking for Hillis  
eightshamrocks : 11/7/2014 9:24 pm : link
In comment 11964659 David in LA said:
Quote:
the guy fucking sucks. Besides being slower than molasses, there's an odd contingency of fans here that really really want him to start. Probably the same group that thought David Douglas was going to be Wes Welker 2.0.


Let me ask you something, was Chales Way slow? Yes, he was and he was a fucking beast. I think Hillis is a similar type runner to what Way was. I used to love to watch Way play the game, he was an absolute monster on the field.
RE: RE: Have you guys watched Hillis?  
BigBlueShock : 11/7/2014 9:27 pm : link
In comment 11964833 eightshamrocks said:
Quote:
In comment 11964639 BigBlueShock said:


Quote:


how the hell is he a better option? The guy has literally nothing going for him. And let's not get carried away with the YPC. Hillis has had a ton of his carries on 3rd and 75 type situations, of course he's gonna have more room to run.

It's startling that some of you would rather have a middling back up RB take snaps, a guy with zero upside, rather than a rookie still trying to learn the game.

Yeah, Peyton Hillis is the key to this season. Or Cox, for that matter. Unbelievable.





Hilis has little going for him? How the hell is a 4.4 ypc avg little going for him? Expecialy compared to Williams pathetic 3.0? Hilis is slow, yes, but at least he has the vision an NFL RB needs to have. Williams doesn't have vision.

If you had bothered to read the exact post that you replied to, you have the answer right in front of you. Hillis has gotten a ton of his yardage on 3rd and long draws. The defense is not stacked in the box like they are for a majority of Williams' carries. Did you not read that before asking that stupid question? What is wrong with this place?
I'm not sure what to make with some of these comments...  
damdevs : 11/7/2014 9:34 pm : link
First...some of you claim he's a rookie, he's young...ect etc...my question to you is what is the easiest position football to play outside of K & P? My answer RB...if there is something easier in football than taking a handoff and running with the ball than please let me know. Sometimes the excuses on this board just baffle me.

Second...as several have mentioned, he lacks vision.

Third...Not only does he lack vision, but he doesn't have very good lateral movement. He's got heavy feet and going side to side for him isn't easy.

Fourth...while I agree that our OL have done a pass poor job in run blocking, someone explain to my how and why Jennings was fourth in the league in rushing before he got hurt? It doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out that Jennings is miles better than Williams. Jennings has all of the attributes you want in a good Rb, while Williams lack several of them.

Why? Jennings has better vision, he can set up blocks, he can cut off of those blocks, and his lateral movement is light years better than Williams. What do you guys see when you compare the 2?

Look, from everything I've read about Williams, I think he is a fantastic kid and class act. I want him to succeed. I just don't think he's got the makings of a good RB in the nfl. You've got to be able create and get your own in the NFL if you're going to be considered a good RB. JMHO
RE: RE: RE: Have you guys watched Hillis?  
eightshamrocks : 11/7/2014 9:35 pm : link
In comment 11964840 BigBlueShock said:
Quote:
In comment 11964833 eightshamrocks said:


Quote:


In comment 11964639 BigBlueShock said:


Quote:


how the hell is he a better option? The guy has literally nothing going for him. And let's not get carried away with the YPC. Hillis has had a ton of his carries on 3rd and 75 type situations, of course he's gonna have more room to run.

It's startling that some of you would rather have a middling back up RB take snaps, a guy with zero upside, rather than a rookie still trying to learn the game.

Yeah, Peyton Hillis is the key to this season. Or Cox, for that matter. Unbelievable.





Hilis has little going for him? How the hell is a 4.4 ypc avg little going for him? Expecialy compared to Williams pathetic 3.0? Hilis is slow, yes, but at least he has the vision an NFL RB needs to have. Williams doesn't have vision.


If you had bothered to read the exact post that you replied to, you have the answer right in front of you. Hillis has gotten a ton of his yardage on 3rd and long draws. The defense is not stacked in the box like they are for a majority of Williams' carries. Did you not read that before asking that stupid question? What is wrong with this place?



And you have not addressed my point that Williams is lacking the vision an NFL RB needs. How many fucking times do we have to watch Williams run for 1, 0, or negative yardage?

I can think of maybe two instances where Hillis has run on third and long. Of course that has helped his average. No shit. My point still remains unchanged.
I give the edge to Hillis,  
Doomster : 11/7/2014 9:42 pm : link
in pass receiving, running to Williams......they both suck as far as pass blocking goes....
Hilis has been inconsistent in pass blocking  
eightshamrocks : 11/7/2014 9:48 pm : link
But, he did annihilate one guy in the Falcons game. It was one of the loudest hits I've ever heard watching a game on TV.
I'll  
Eric from BBI : Admin : 11/7/2014 9:56 pm : link
have to go back and check it out to make sure it was him, but there was one play in the last game where Williams absolutely crushed an oncoming blitzer.

He's getting better.
Right,.  
Rick5 : 11/7/2014 9:58 pm : link
It must be because TC and his staff of NFL professionals are idiots, and the casual fan knows much more. Makes perfect sense.
Don't see anything special  
Marty866b : 11/7/2014 10:09 pm : link
He appears to lack good vision and has little change of direction. Very hard to be a good runner if you have neither. Also he tends to go sideways before contact. Very disappointing IMO.
build an oline first  
Optimus-NY : 11/7/2014 10:16 pm : link
...
williams has been spotty  
hitdog42 : 11/7/2014 10:21 pm : link
as is expected with a rookie running behind a poor OL.
Williams will never be able to overcome weak interior line. hes not quick enough. the giants suck there. until we get a center with a pulse williams will struggle to be consistent.
The Giants have a choice. They can play Hillis who is a known  
Marty in Albany : 11/7/2014 10:32 pm : link
quantity and who is clearly a better blocker and receiver than Williams. The problem is that Hillis is not the long term solution to the Giant RB problems.

Apparently the Giants have opted to develop Williams and suffer through his growing pains this season. I assume that they think that by the end of the season they will know if Williams will be a starter next year or if they will have to spend a high draft choice on another RB. The Giants certainly can't answer that question if they don't play Williams.
Why won't Jennings  
pjcas18 : 11/7/2014 10:33 pm : link
be the starter next year?

I agree,  
prdave73 : 11/8/2014 12:14 am : link
I see a good player in Williams. I can see him developing into a good back going forward. We have to remember he is just a rookie still developing and the Giants Oline is not helping matters. So far I like what I see, and it can only get better as soon as the Giants fix the Oline issues.
He has some attributes that Joey mentioned that you just can't teach..  
Damon : 11/8/2014 1:06 am : link
What you can teach though, is patience. Which he presently does not have. He will get better. And he will hurt people.
Not to be critical of Williams,  
Reese's Pieces : 11/8/2014 2:04 am : link
but isn't it a lot to expect of a raw rookie who never caught a pass in college (Boston College, I believe) to take over the starting position so soon behind a shaky line?

Wouldn't it have made more sense in a period where running backs are not hot items to sign a free agent after Jennings was injured? Someone who had experience and still had some ability but was cut due to age and salary considerations?

Someone like, say, OJ Anderson. Would anyone have predicted that he would be a Super Bowl MVP?
I don't fault Williams at all, our offensive line play  
The Duke : 11/8/2014 2:54 am : link
has been atrocious the past few games. No running back can do it all himself, if the holes aren't there, even small creases, there's simply no place for him to go. You put Williams behind a solid OL and watch what he can do! Once he improves as a receiver and blocker he will be an every down back.
I had Ka'Deem Carey ranked higher than Williams  
Anakim : 11/8/2014 3:12 am : link
But I think Williams will be fine.
Holy shitballs.  
Randy in CT : 11/8/2014 6:42 am : link
If Williams reminds you of Dayne in ANY way, you need to stop watching football. Forever.
As UConn said  
aimrocky : 11/8/2014 7:04 am : link
It's a little shortsighted to judge a rookie RB behind a mediocre oline and no receiving weapons.

So far this draft class looks decent. With, potentially, another high set of picks coming, if we can duplicate the results from this class, we'll be on our way back to contending.
Williams should be a pretty good player  
bc4life : 11/8/2014 8:46 am : link
Combination of adjusting to the league and this type of offense. OLine hasn't been great either.

RE: Cox playing bad last year - Gale Sayers would struggle to run behind last year's OLine.

I like Williams and I'm rooting for him,  
barens : 11/8/2014 8:58 am : link
because he's an easy guy to root for, but I do question his vision, and that is something most running backs are born with. There's no questioning his power and explosion, especially once he makes his way past that first wave of defenders, but finding that hole has been a big issue.

I do think that his inability to be a threat out of the backfield is a bit hindering as well, really takes away any threat of a screen pass.
I always thought the Giants made a mistake with the RB corp  
Jimmy Googs : 11/8/2014 9:07 am : link
they came out of camp with.

Williams deserved his #2 spot behind Jennings but his style was always going to be more of a plodder. Hillis at #3 does not offer enough speed/juke to get significant carries. He is too much like Williams in the running dept. Therefore, any injury to Jennings left us with only the slow big-back running style.

Not sure what we are doing with Cox but if we are not going to use him, then we should have made sure we had a more experienced smaller back as a reserve too.
williams  
giantfanboy : 11/8/2014 9:37 am : link
i have been a huge critic of williams

Run blocking is an inexact science - because of the way defensive players move during the play and the way OL gets off the ball -
many times the available gap opens up in a slightly different place then the play was designed for .

I will say it a million times
he has no vision for the holes
just go back and look at the previous 3 games where Willams has started.
You can see during the plays that a cut back or choosing a different gap would have created large runs for Willams but he basically runs right into a bunch of Defensive lineman

One of the reasons is you seem him put his head down when he hits the line rather than looking up and potential altering his run.

Maybe he is a rookie and needs to learn -
the running lanes are there - if the lightbulb goes off in his head then our whole offense will take off like it did in the previous 3 wins .




"Has no vision" "lacks vision"  
BigBlueShock : 11/8/2014 9:49 am : link
I've seen that said on this thread about 100 times. From a bunch of freaking couch potatoes that have seen him play his first 3 NFL games.

Of course, the scouting reports coming out of college say differently, but eh. Who knows more than impatient Giants fans when it comes to judging a players potential? Why give him time to adjust to the NFL game when we can give up on a rookie after 3 games and plug a stud with incredible upside like Peyton Hillis in the lineup? Now THATS man with great vision!
Scouting report - ( New Window )
RE:  
chris r : 11/8/2014 10:05 am : link
In comment 11965017 BigBlueShock said:
Quote:
I've seen that said on this thread about 100 times. From a bunch of freaking couch potatoes that have seen him play his first 3 NFL games.

Of course, the scouting reports coming out of college say differently, but eh. Who knows more than impatient Giants fans when it comes to judging a players potential? Why give him time to adjust to the NFL game when we can give up on a rookie after 3 games and plug a stud with incredible upside like Peyton Hillis in the lineup? Now THATS man with great vision! Scouting report - ( New Window )


OK. So we shouldn't report what our eyes tell us? Its kind of a catch 22 situation then. People who go off scouting reports on players are slammed for only relying on the scouting report and not watching the guy play. Now we're told we shouldn't rely on our eyes, only someone else's.
How wide are these lanes?  
Doomster : 11/8/2014 10:07 am : link
About 6 inches? You want him to look and wait for holes? Then he will become Ron Dayne.....
Not at all  
BigBlueShock : 11/8/2014 10:11 am : link
the point is, how about you give him some time? I know it's the cool thing to do around here to whine, bitch, moan and complain when things aren't going well, but holy fuck. Give the dude some time. you want to sit on your couch and proclaim that he's useless and has no vision after 3 fucking games in the NFL. I'm sure we can create quite a list of RBs that strugglesd their first 3 games and went on to have great careers. Show some damn patience.

...  
SanFranGiantsFan : 11/8/2014 10:30 am : link
You can't run behind a line that doesn't block.
what line  
area junc : 11/8/2014 10:32 am : link
was jennings running behind?
...  
SanFranGiantsFan : 11/8/2014 10:33 am : link
Jennings is also a veteran, while Williams is a rookie. Unfair to compare the two.
RE: what line  
BigBlueShock : 11/8/2014 10:37 am : link
In comment 11965045 area junc said:
Quote:
was jennings running behind?

How long has Jennings been in the league? Also, Jennings had a lot of time with this OL in camp. Williams is a rookie! Why can't you guys understand this? It takes time to get used to the speed of the game. Comparing him to Jennings us utterly ridiculous. Do you think Jennings was as good his first 3 games in the NFL as he is now?

The only way Williams will improve is to get time on the field.
good article  
bc4life : 11/8/2014 10:42 am : link
this AM re: Williams working with Jennings.
There haven't been many holes open  
chops : 11/8/2014 10:42 am : link
for Williams. When the hole is there,he gets yardage.

This OL is less than average in blocking for RBs.

Runners tend to get long runs when they have a big hole.

I agree, he could do better. Unfortunately, he hasn't.
RE: Not at all  
eightshamrocks : 11/8/2014 10:46 am : link
In comment 11965031 BigBlueShock said:
Quote:
the point is, how about you give him some time? I know it's the cool thing to do around here to whine, bitch, moan and complain when things aren't going well, but holy fuck. Give the dude some time. you want to sit on your couch and proclaim that he's useless and has no vision after 3 fucking games in the NFL. I'm sure we can create quite a list of RBs that strugglesd their first 3 games and went on to have great careers. Show some damn patience.


Who said they are giving up on Williams? All I'm saying is that Hillis these past three games would have better option due to Williams inexperience. All the available evidence abcks up those claims: Hillis 4.4 ypc, Williams 3.0 ypc. I don't care that Hillis gained some of his yardage on 3rd and long draws-he still would of had a better avg than Williams.
RE: RE: Not at all  
BigBlueShock : 11/8/2014 10:55 am : link
In comment 11965056 eightshamrocks said:
Quote:
In comment 11965031 BigBlueShock said:


Quote:


the point is, how about you give him some time? I know it's the cool thing to do around here to whine, bitch, moan and complain when things aren't going well, but holy fuck. Give the dude some time. you want to sit on your couch and proclaim that he's useless and has no vision after 3 fucking games in the NFL. I'm sure we can create quite a list of RBs that strugglesd their first 3 games and went on to have great careers. Show some damn patience.




Who said they are giving up on Williams? All I'm saying is that Hillis these past three games would have better option due to Williams inexperience. All the available evidence abcks up those claims: Hillis 4.4 ypc, Williams 3.0 ypc. I don't care that Hillis gained some of his yardage on 3rd and long draws-he still would of had a better avg than Williams.


Umm, yeah, that's not what you said at all. Way to back track. You said he doesn't look like an NFL caliber running back and a ton of people on here are saying that he lacks vision. That doesn't sound to me at all like you said that Hillis was a better option because of inexperience. It sounds like you and others have determined that he sucks. After 3 games. And again, playing Hillis does NOTHING to help this team. Peyton Hillis would not have led this team to victory in any of the losses, had he played the entire game. Playing him accomplishes exactly nothing. He is not going to be on this team long term. Williams is. Playing Williams gets him much needed time and experience for the future. It's a no brainer, really.

If Hillis was capable of leading this team to the playoffs, sure, get him on the field. But truth is, that's not happening.
It's possible that he has the vision but it's a speed of play issue  
Bill L : 11/8/2014 10:57 am : link
Thats an experience thing. Once the game slows down he'll see the holes or decide to get to the holes more quickly.
RE: RE: RE: Not at all  
eightshamrocks : 11/8/2014 11:06 am : link
In comment 11965064 BigBlueShock said:
Quote:
In comment 11965056 eightshamrocks said:


Quote:


In comment 11965031 BigBlueShock said:


Quote:


the point is, how about you give him some time? I know it's the cool thing to do around here to whine, bitch, moan and complain when things aren't going well, but holy fuck. Give the dude some time. you want to sit on your couch and proclaim that he's useless and has no vision after 3 fucking games in the NFL. I'm sure we can create quite a list of RBs that strugglesd their first 3 games and went on to have great careers. Show some damn patience.




Who said they are giving up on Williams? All I'm saying is that Hillis these past three games would have better option due to Williams inexperience. All the available evidence abcks up those claims: Hillis 4.4 ypc, Williams 3.0 ypc. I don't care that Hillis gained some of his yardage on 3rd and long draws-he still would of had a better avg than Williams.



Umm, yeah, that's not what you said at all. Way to back track. You said he doesn't look like an NFL caliber running back and a ton of people on here are saying that he lacks vision. That doesn't sound to me at all like you said that Hillis was a better option because of inexperience. It sounds like you and others have determined that he sucks. After 3 games. And again, playing Hillis does NOTHING to help this team. Peyton Hillis would not have led this team to victory in any of the losses, had he played the entire game. Playing him accomplishes exactly nothing. He is not going to be on this team long term. Williams is. Playing Williams gets him much needed time and experience for the future. It's a no brainer, really.

If Hillis was capable of leading this team to the playoffs, sure, get him on the field. But truth is, that's not happening.


And you know this how? How could you possibly know that Hillis could not lead this team to victory these past three games? He wasn't given the chance, so we will never know. You say Williams will be on this team long term...as if that is a certainty. It certainly is not a certainty with the way he has looked these past three games. I'm not giving up on him yet, but to act like this guy is a lock to be on this roster for many years to come is far fetched. Who the Hell cares if Peyton Hillis will not be on this roster long term? That has NOTHING to do with the fact that he is the more polished, experienced runner when compared to Williams. The NFL is a win now league, not see if we can build something with depth league. Hillis with his experience would have given the Giants more of a chance to win these past three weeks. That is the bottom line.
Hahahahahahahahaha!  
BigBlueShock : 11/8/2014 11:27 am : link
Holy shitballs. Do you really think That Andre Williams is the reason that this team has gotten their asses kicked the past three games? Had Peyton Hillis been the RB, they may have won? It's all Williams' fault, huh? You are a fucking clown show. A simpleton. I cannot even believe I've wasted this much time with you. You're fucking ignorant. Or your related to Hillis. Maybe both.

I'm done here. Good luck
RE: Hahahahahahahahaha!  
eightshamrocks : 11/8/2014 12:58 pm : link
In comment 11965090 BigBlueShock said:
Quote:
Holy shitballs. Do you really think That Andre Williams is the reason that this team has gotten their asses kicked the past three games? Had Peyton Hillis been the RB, they may have won? It's all Williams' fault, huh? You are a fucking clown show. A simpleton. I cannot even believe I've wasted this much time with you. You're fucking ignorant. Or your related to Hillis. Maybe both.

I'm done here. Good luck


Congratulations. You didn't address any of my points and instead put words into my mouth. And I'm the clown show? Try addressing my points. For those who have watched the games, there can be ZERO argument for Williams to have started these games. He is either not good enough, or to inexperience. It is one or the other. Of course the online hasn't helped. Of course it isn't all Williams fault. But, he clearly should not have been starting. I never fucking said starting Hillis would have guaranteed victory-I merely said starting an experienced player at the position would have given the Giants a better chance of winning. So let me ask you, do you think Williams should start again this week, despite the fact that he has not been effective in a single game this season? You what the definition of insanity is, right? Doing the same thing over and over again and hoping for a different result. Here's a clue: Williams just isn't cutting it this season. He is not ready or not good enough to be a starting NFL RB, THIS SEASON.
example  
giantfanboy : 11/8/2014 1:18 pm : link
good article a couple of weeks ago
after the dallas game

to me , the same problems continued last week.

perhaps he will learn to read the blocks better
but after 3 games starting there is zero progress is a bit worrisome
Andre Williams' struggles in Dallas, the lack of blitzing and more in this week's Giants film review - ( New Window )
Willams has the talent  
Sneakers O'toole : 11/8/2014 1:20 pm : link
give the kid the time to develop
Should probably cut him  
rsjem1979 : 11/8/2014 2:33 pm : link
He hasn't run for 300 yards or become great at picking up blitzes in 3 weeks as a starter, that's more than enough time to make a decision on his potential.

Peyton Hillis is the guy to turn this season around.
I like Williams as a 4th quarter type bruiser back  
SHO'NUFF : 11/8/2014 5:40 pm : link
All I know is he is sloooooooow, but sure can pack a wallop.
RE: Cox looked awful  
dguy901 : 11/9/2014 9:49 am : link
In comment 11964709 pjcas18 said:
Quote:
in limited opportunities running the ball and returning kicks last year, absolutely terrible and last years OL might be better than this year's OL or similar so don't tell me last year's OL stunk.

He's on the roster as cheap insurance.

Hillis should get 25 carries a game if Cox is the only other option.

And he has one KO return, the first one of the game that wasn't brutal and people say he's flashed there. He's flashed more awfulness than anything else. I still don't know how he managed to return a kick, fielded cleanly, in stride, to the 7 yard line. No hesitation, returned to the 7 yard line, not fumbled and boxed around, not on a bounce, fielded cleanly, in stride, and I didn't think he should return it, but it wasn't like 10 yards deep at the back of the end zone, it was mid-way through at best.

He does not have an NFL future once he plays himself off the Giants. If he is a major part of the offense it means the Giants have thrown in the towel.

Huh?
He has decent hands to catch out of the backfield and he "is" our fastest RB. He hasn't been on the field with any starting caliber OL! To say he is a bust is akin to premature ejaculation, until he is in, you just don't know. How long did it take Bradshaw to see significant playing time! Williams is only in his 1st year and deserves patience. Now is the time to see what Cox and Washington can do! JMHO.
You guys act like  
BigBlueShock : 11/9/2014 10:16 am : link
the coaches and staff aren't around these guys every day of the week. They know full well what they have in these RBs. Hillis is what he is and Cox is what he is.

They don't need to stick them in a game "to see what they can do". Just because you havent seen them enough doesn't mean that they are some unknown.
Back to the Corner