for display only
Big Blue Interactive The Corner Forum  
Back to the Corner

Archived Thread

Rebuilding the front 7 on defense.

scott in albany : 11/15/2014 2:03 pm
This off season the giants are going to have to rebuild the front 7. Should they rebuild for a 4/3 or a 3/4? If you are going to move to a 3/4 now is the time to do it.

The linebacker position has to be completely rebuilt no matter what way they go.

The d-line has a couple of players that do fit a 3/4. JPP is perfect for a 3/4 and hankins i think can play the nose tackle.

If the giants drafted another 3/4 DE and rebuild the LB position through the draft and free agency i can see them making this transition just as easily as rebuilding the 4/3

Of course this includes a new DC.
I think they should look for the best D coor  
hitdog42 : 11/15/2014 2:11 pm : link
available... and be open to both 3-4 and 4-3.
People hear will cry and whine that we dont have the personnel... we CLEARLY dont have the personnel for a good 4-3 either. we are just as close to a good 3-4 defense as we are 4-3.... so to me it comes down to what coordinator is available.
I think JPP might actually  
PEEJ : 11/15/2014 2:19 pm : link
be better as a 3-4 DE. He doesn't have the quick first step of a top 4-3 end. Problem is he'll want a contract like a top DE and really won't be worth the investment.

I predict that the Giants will move to a 3-4 and let JPP go. They'll say they let him walk because he didn't fit the new system. *grin*
Hitdog  
scott in albany : 11/15/2014 2:21 pm : link
Exactly. I have to admit i am ready for the giants to go back to the 3/4. Now is the time.
They should  
cokeduplt : 11/15/2014 2:27 pm : link
Switch a 3-4 at some point because it seems like finding 3-4 personnel is easier than finding 4-3 personnel.
Coke  
scott in albany : 11/15/2014 2:41 pm : link
I agree. It is hard to find a very good middle linebacker in the draft to play the 4/3 in the NFl. The giants never figured out that position is key in a 4/3.
3-4 or 4-3  
TommyWiseau : 11/15/2014 2:48 pm : link
Doesnt matter if we just keep trotting out bums at the LB position and have no pass rush. If it's easier to find 3-4 talent then make the damn switch, thisfront office needs all the help they can get
Switching  
AcidTest : 11/15/2014 2:48 pm : link
to a 3-4 means they have to find a shitload of LBs. They barely have one or two now, and have no track record of being able to fill this position.

As far as JPP is concerned, my fear is that they will resign him to a monster contract that he doesn't deserve.
What do you think?  
scott in albany : 11/15/2014 3:04 pm : link
Is JPP a better 4/3 DE or a better 3/4 DE. This may be key to the future of our defense.
JPP  
stretch234 : 11/15/2014 3:20 pm : link
He is not a 3-4 DE he is too light. He would have to get to his weight he was 2 years ago at 295 when people bitched he was too slow.

None of the guys they have right now are built as 3-4 ends, except for Jenkins, which means you will need all new DE or You basically waste Moore since he was a hand down guy in college.

Get a competent DC

JPP gets lot of crap because all people want to look at is sack numbers. He is a 25 yr old top level DE. It is hard to find guys like him
JPP is one of the few top players  
arnief : 11/15/2014 3:26 pm : link
at his position the Giants have in 2014. A smart coaching staff would be happy to game plan around his strengths.
This is a discussion worth having...if  
Emil : 11/15/2014 4:24 pm : link
You assume the following:

1. JPP and Kiwi are gone
2. Moore can play rush OLB
3. You have someone/can get someone who plays NT
4. We are getting a new DC

I think #4 is assured. Fewell has never had a good defense here, despite last year's illusion.

I don't know who the NT is on this team. I think looking to Hankins to play NT would be a waste of his talents, but I do think he "could" do it. If you're looking for a guy to just take on double teams I think Kuhn can do that at a bargain basement price. There are different opinions on what makes a good NT. I think it all depends on scheme. Jay Ratliff played an effective NT for the Cowboys and he was on the lighter side.

I think Moore can play one of the OLB spots. Before people get too bent out of shape about him being a hand in the dirt guy, DeMarcus Ware was a hand in the dirt guy in a 3-4, and so was LT the vast majority of the time. So I don't think any disqualifies Moore from being that OLB in a 3-4. He seems to pass the eye test as being athletic enough.

Bromley might make a nice DE in a 3-4. Not sure about Ayers. He has moved inside on passing downs, but not sure about his ability to an every down DE in a 3-4.

I do think this all comes down to who a new DC would be. I would agree with the statement that finding 3-4 front seven players has become easier. More and more colleges run the 3-4 and it makes it easy to employ those tweener DE that are plentiful in college. I don't think one one system is any better than the other, it is just all dependent on available personnel. I like the 3-4 (if you have the personnel) because you can get more athleticism on the field, but if you don't have the horses, it is a disaster. I remember watching Dwight Freeney trying to play OLB his final year with the Colts, or Aaron Kapman in Green Bay. It was sad to watch very good DEs become average rush LBs. The Giants won't have this problem as they currently don't have any good DEs.

I wish JPP would turn it around, because then this would all be moot.
RE: JPP is one of the few top players  
Emil : 11/15/2014 4:25 pm : link
In comment 11978827 arnief said:
Quote:
at his position the Giants have in 2014. A smart coaching staff would be happy to game plan around his strengths.


The question with JPP is do the Giants think he can return to double digit sack form. His in-line for his big contract years, but if he is not a 6-8 sack a year guy the Giants can't tie up that kind of money in an under-achieving player.
I mean  
Emil : 11/15/2014 4:28 pm : link
if he is ONLY a 6-8 sack a year guy
we could easily  
area junc : 11/15/2014 5:09 pm : link
switch to a 3-4

i would b all about drafting the kid from clemson in the top 10 if we do
RE: we could easily  
Emil : 11/15/2014 5:16 pm : link
In comment 11978914 area junc said:
Quote:
switch to a 3-4

i would b all about drafting the kid from clemson in the top 10 if we do


Not so sure Beasley has the strength you want at the point of attack. He is going to have to show an ability to engage the OT and hold the point of attack in run defense before I would be happy with the Giants taking him.
Emil on the right track  
JonC : 11/15/2014 5:19 pm : link
Saying JPP could excel as a 3-4 DE is a failure to understand 3-4 or 4-3 and what JPP does best.

Hankins could play NT but is it the best use of his talents? I say no.
I really like the 3-4 defense better. Much more flexible  
Jupiter : 11/15/2014 5:51 pm : link
for schemes and players.

The key is and always has been a good NT (or two) but there are a lot of college tackles who can take on two blockers, clog the middle, but may not be great pass rushers.

A lot of LBs can fit in different spots in a 3-4 but may not be talented enough to efficiently perform at any position in a 4-3. Think about LBs who looked great in a 3-4 and didn't do squat when they moved to a 4-3. Recent Dolphins history is an example. The reverse doesn't happen too often. A guy who looks good in a 4-3 will always find a place in a 3-4.

Think back to the 15 years that the Giants played a 3-4 and name some LBs (other than LT, Carson and Banks) who could have performed as well in the 4-3 as the 3-4. And it wasn't because the Giants were only drafting LBs for a 3-4.
RE: Emil on the right track  
Emil : 11/15/2014 5:59 pm : link
In comment 11978928 JonC said:
Quote:
Saying JPP could excel as a 3-4 DE is a failure to understand 3-4 or 4-3 and what JPP does best.

Hankins could play NT but is it the best use of his talents? I say no.


Yeah, I really think Hankins would be diminished in a 3-4. I just don't see him having the same impact as a 3-4 DE, and NT would be making one of your best DL a sacrificial lamb.

As much as I like the 3-4, if the Giants keep JPP (and if the decision was being made today I think they would...at the right price) I still think the team's best bet is to stick with the 4-3. Have to remember, Beason is expected back and if healthy he is a good 4-3 MLB. Fact remains, the Giants can't fix all of their problems in one offseason. With issues still to be dealt with on offense, a complete overhaul of the defense might be a bridge too far.
If you go 3-4  
mrvax : 11/15/2014 6:03 pm : link
I'd expect Moore would have to learn to be an OLB. Ayers & JPP would play DE. I suppose Kinard would be an ILB.
Don't think JPP is here next year  
bc4life : 11/15/2014 6:05 pm : link
Given what Joseph got in FA, I think a team or two will be willing to throw insane $$$ his way.
you people who think JPP would be a good 3-4 DE are wrong  
Blue Blood : 11/15/2014 6:17 pm : link
just flat out wrong and dont understand the differences between a 4-3 and a 3-4 end.. it has little to do with size and everything to do with technique..

Also you dont seem to understand the responsibilities of linebackers in a 3-4...

And failure to realize that to effectively run a 3-4 defense you need two nose tackles.. the Giants might have one.. you need a minimum of 6-8 quality linebackers.. the Giants dont even have 3..

The Giants dont need to switch their defense.. they need to get better players in the defense they already run..
RE: If you go 3-4  
Emil : 11/15/2014 6:21 pm : link
In comment 11978974 mrvax said:
Quote:
I'd expect Moore would have to learn to be an OLB. Ayers & JPP would play DE. I suppose Kinard would be an ILB.


Yes, Moore would be an OLB, but no way JPP moves to DE in a 3-4. Not his skillset, and a waste of his talent/potential. You also don't give 3-4 DEs HUGE contracts and JPP no doubt knows that as well. I would be willing to bet that if JPP believed the Giants were headed for a 3-4 he would not sign here. Look at the deal KC just gave Allen Bailey, one of their 3-4 DEs. 4 years 25 MIL, 15 MIL gurantee, 10 MIL signing bonus. And he is a pretty good DE. JPP is looking for 3x that.

RE: Don't think JPP is here next year  
Emil : 11/15/2014 6:24 pm : link
In comment 11978978 bc4life said:
Quote:
Given what Joseph got in FA, I think a team or two will be willing to throw insane $$$ his way.


Not sure you can make the comparison between Linval Joseph and JPP from a contact perspective. That being said, JPP will be looking for top dollar, but unless he starts producing it is unlikely anyone is going to give him what he is looking for. His best bet is to sign a short term contract and reset his value. Unless he gets double digit sacks, no one is going to pay him that 80% of JJ Watt's contract he is shooting for.
RE: you people who think JPP would be a good 3-4 DE are wrong  
Emil : 11/15/2014 6:24 pm : link
In comment 11978996 Blue Blood said:
Quote:
just flat out wrong and dont understand the differences between a 4-3 and a 3-4 end.. it has little to do with size and everything to do with technique..

Also you dont seem to understand the responsibilities of linebackers in a 3-4...

And failure to realize that to effectively run a 3-4 defense you need two nose tackles.. the Giants might have one.. you need a minimum of 6-8 quality linebackers.. the Giants dont even have 3..

The Giants dont need to switch their defense.. they need to get better players in the defense they already run..


Well said, right on.
New DC will do wonders  
ZogZerg : 11/15/2014 6:53 pm : link
Fewell should have been fired years ago.
i hear you emil  
area junc : 11/15/2014 7:33 pm : link
but the guy is an absolute beast pass rusher. his frame is crazy
JPP's skills have not improved over the last few years  
joe48 : 11/15/2014 8:14 pm : link
I know he was hurt the past two years. His 2011 season was great because he had great players around him, He could freelance. He now faces double teams and does not have a strong supporting cast. He has not improved his skill set. Relies on a bull rush. Good against the run but definitely not a disruptive force. That is on the coaches and him. I do not expect him to become a better pass rusher until he works on improving his skills. Maybe new coaching can help reach a higher level but I would not give him a big contract at his current level.
I would not offer JPP  
Blue Blood : 11/15/2014 9:14 pm : link
anything over about 8 million a year average..
RE: i hear you emil  
Emil : 11/15/2014 9:19 pm : link
In comment 11979078 area junc said:
Quote:
but the guy is an absolute beast pass rusher. his frame is crazy


You do have to wonder how much bulk he can add, but you also worry that it might take away from his overall athleticism. He impresses me too, I just have concerns about how his game translates.
To play a 3-4, you need a nose tackle who can occupy two  
GeofromNJ : 11/15/2014 11:55 pm : link
offensive linemen. The Giants don't have a defensive tackle who can do that. Hankins comes closest, but even he gets pushed around.
and you need TWO  
Blue Blood : 11/15/2014 11:57 pm : link
not one.. you need a back up
Great NT's and great pass rushing OLB's are hard to find  
SGMen : 11/16/2014 12:36 am : link
I do believe that Hankins could be a serviceable NT.
I believe JPP would likely be a better 3-4 DE than 4-3.
We'd need to find another DE and a backup NT.
A 3-4 would likely mean Jenkins, Patterson and Kiwi are all gone.

At LB, I think beason could man one ILB spot and McClain the other with Kennard on the outside and Moore on the outside. Moore would need to play around 250 to 255.

Yada Yada Yada - this whole defense needs a complete and total overhaul, all 11 plus key backups. Purge, draft, UFA's. Big off-season coming.
3/4 is the way to go  
OburgBob : 11/16/2014 7:18 am : link
with all the speed and multiple fast paced west coast type offense in the NFL today. Fast and versatile lb's are a must. Fire Fewell !!!
no matter what system they use, they need at least 5  
Victor in CT : 11/16/2014 7:38 am : link
replacements to the front 7. They have nothing up front.
RE: To play a 3-4, you need a nose tackle who can occupy two  
hitdog42 : 11/16/2014 7:54 am : link
In comment 11979473 GeofromNJ said:
Quote:
offensive linemen. The Giants don't have a defensive tackle who can do that. Hankins comes closest, but even he gets pushed around.


to play a 4-3... u either need 2 stud DEs... multiple 2 way DTs... 3 safeties, a stud MLB, outside LBs that can cover...
oh wait we dont have any of that either.
thus making it absurd that people highlight the things with a 3-4 we dont have....

seems everyone on BBI is mr... dont bring JPP back tough guy... and at the same time refused to consider a 3-4 because of JPP.

we dont have any players where production or fit would shift so massively that would prevent us from changing to whatever system the best new D coordinator brings.
they have been rebuilding the front 7 for a while now  
mdc1 : 11/16/2014 11:49 am : link
I think it is time for a new approach and dump the coaches. Time to clean house. This is systemic now.
Back to the Corner