And obviously have the same Star Wars fascination. Watched Episode 4 with my little dude already today waiting for the trailer to hit. I really hope they don't butcher this one like they did with the prequels.
It cannot be worse than episode 1. I was 6 when the original movie came out and am pumped for more Star Wars. I'll be there with my kids opening night.
potential spoilers based on leaks (that some of us avoided)?
I'm talking about what was in the trailer, and other than one thing which I could have spoiled but instead replaced with "something", I don't think I spoiled anything.
+1. I hated Episode 1-3 so bad I blocked them out of the franchise like I did with the 2nd and 3rd Matrix movies. Haydn Christensen was godawful. Lucas really shit the bed on them.
the guy makes compelling movies and is a very good director and creater of worlds/concepts. He's going to kill this project and I mean that in a good way.
God, that reeked of JJ Abrams. Look for massive plot holes and unbelievable coincidences.
His "Star Trek" movie was ruined for me when Kirk was marooned on a planet, ran into a cave and Spock just happened to be in that particular cave on that particular spot on that particularly huge fucking PLANET.
So glad that 80 seconds will keep me from wasting my money.
Not liking something ou know something about is 1 thing, but how you can deduce that trailer down to the movie looking terrible is beyond me. Makes no sense.
God, that reeked of JJ Abrams. Look for massive plot holes and unbelievable coincidences.
His "Star Trek" movie was ruined for me when Kirk was marooned on a planet, ran into a cave and Spock just happened to be in that particular cave on that particular spot on that particularly huge fucking PLANET.
It "reeked" of JJ Abrams yet had like 0 lens flares. It also didn't divulge a single note about the plot, so how is it that you've already decided it will have massive plot holes and unbelievable coincidences?
Christ, way to really view the trailer from a thoughtful, objective perspective. Doesn't sound like you have any bias against JJ Abrams whatsoever.
Yet, you'll still get in line and pay 15 bucks to see it
But, according to reports, this SW episode is supposed to take place SW VI +30 years; that saber and hand that fell from Luke when Vader cut it off? That is found, and they go on a mission to return it to the owner, or some such.
THIN-ASS plot, yes. But it's JJ, what do you expect? War and Peace?
But, according to reports, this SW episode is supposed to take place SW VI +30 years; that saber and hand that fell from Luke when Vader cut it off? That is found, and they go on a mission to return it to the owner, or some such.
THIN-ASS plot, yes. But it's JJ, what do you expect? War and Peace?
I also read spoilers on the internet, doesn't mean that they're true.
Again just anti-JJ Abrams bias. Not very thoughtful or objective.
And I can't understand anyone who accepted the original Star Wars movies with its accompanying plot holes that now rejects the possibility of similar films with plot holes. It's movie-going fun, entertainment, not art. Try to be less of a film critic and more like a young child, you know the one who just enjoyed the story and didn't worry too much about plot holes or the overuse of cinematic effects. It's much more fun that way
Link - ( New Window )
Star Wars - ( New Window )
Link - ( New Window )
My 3 year old jumped at the beginning when that Stormtrooper without his helmet popped up!
I thought the Storm Troopers were all clones of Janga Fett ?
What a geek.
Scrooge.
If the art that has been leaked is correct, is the Sith Lord/Inquisitor on Endor looking for "something"? Is that Endor in the snow?
Just imagining Han and Chewie in that Falcon taking on those tie fighters...
Yeah man, I'm psyched.
I'm talking about what was in the trailer, and other than one thing which I could have spoiled but instead replaced with "something", I don't think I spoiled anything.
+1. I hated Episode 1-3 so bad I blocked them out of the franchise like I did with the 2nd and 3rd Matrix movies. Haydn Christensen was godawful. Lucas really shit the bed on them.
To piggyback on what others have said, JJ Abrams used a ton of practical effects vs CGI for the sets.
How can anyone say its great or crap from 88 seconds? It looks like....star wars.
And UConn, I agree with what you say about JJ. It seems to be the in thing nowadays to put his filmmaking down.
God, that reeked of JJ Abrams. Look for massive plot holes and unbelievable coincidences.
His "Star Trek" movie was ruined for me when Kirk was marooned on a planet, ran into a cave and Spock just happened to be in that particular cave on that particular spot on that particularly huge fucking PLANET.
Not liking something ou know something about is 1 thing, but how you can deduce that trailer down to the movie looking terrible is beyond me. Makes no sense.
God, that reeked of JJ Abrams. Look for massive plot holes and unbelievable coincidences.
His "Star Trek" movie was ruined for me when Kirk was marooned on a planet, ran into a cave and Spock just happened to be in that particular cave on that particular spot on that particularly huge fucking PLANET.
It "reeked" of JJ Abrams yet had like 0 lens flares. It also didn't divulge a single note about the plot, so how is it that you've already decided it will have massive plot holes and unbelievable coincidences?
Christ, way to really view the trailer from a thoughtful, objective perspective. Doesn't sound like you have any bias against JJ Abrams whatsoever.
Yet, you'll still get in line and pay 15 bucks to see it
THIN-ASS plot, yes. But it's JJ, what do you expect? War and Peace?
THIN-ASS plot, yes. But it's JJ, what do you expect? War and Peace?
I also read spoilers on the internet, doesn't mean that they're true.
Again just anti-JJ Abrams bias. Not very thoughtful or objective.