I disagree with many on this site about our defense. It is not far off from being top 10 or better.
Our defensive line has 2 above average DE's IMO in Moore and JPP. (if franchised/signed) Hankins was very good this year and Ayers was arguably our best DL all year before the injury.
We need some help at linebacker but Kennard is a bright spot and if Beason can ever stay healthy, he is above average as well. Sign or draft at least one quality player here.
Our corners are the strength of the team. DRC when 100% is way above average, Prince is just as good, Thurmond, (if signed) and McBride are one heck of a group. Everyone thought we could have one of the best DB groups in the league and there is no reason to think otherwise this coming year.
Safeties, well we obviously need help here. Cooper Taylor could be promising, Nate Berhe is an unknown, (why didn't he get more playing time at end of year?) Rolle is probably gone, and Brown and Demps stink. Need at least one key signing/draft pickup here and maybe a cheap veteran.
With Spags, I'm confident in this defense. Hey, it can't get any worse right?
Hey, it can always be worse! You would like to think the Giants are due for a little help on the overall luck and injury front, though.
If we had healthy players and finished bottom of the league, that would make sense. But missing Prince, Beason, Thurmond, McBride, Ayers, and DRC being limpy most of the season, played a huge roll. Plus Fewell stinks.
Quote:
Going from a franchise and sometimes NFL historically bad defense to Top 10 defense is a long, long way.
If we had healthy players and finished bottom of the league, that would make sense. But missing Prince, Beason, Thurmond, McBride, Ayers, and DRC being limpy most of the season, played a huge roll. Plus Fewell stinks.
We were really bad even before the injuries.
I wonder how Reese plans to allocate the money on D going forward. IN the past the DL and DBs took up most of the money but right now outside of JPP's inevitable contract no one else on the DL is making much money at all. The money is actually being paid in the secondary. Hank is cheap for another few years. Moore the same. Wynn is cheap. Ayers is a vet making decent money...that's about it. I think Reese has plans on spending some money on the DL this off-season if the right FA comes along. Wouldn't be shocked if Reese tries to drop some money on a FA DT....he may even make a run at Suh. But I doubt he lands him since Suh will break the bank.
Reese has tried before. HE went after HAynesworth and got Canty for big bucks. At the time, the other DT (Joseph) was cheaper and cost controlled- kind of like today's DT situation.
last off-season the roster turnover was inevitable. But really, only 3 maybe 4 big moves were made with Schwartz, DRC and Jennings and I guess McClain and Walton...the latter two more of the under the radar variety. Then you had the multitude of stop gap or one year contracts with guys like McBRide and the other Corners...not to mention the Jerry and whatever the fuck the other OL slob's name was that was cut before the year was out. While last off-season looked sexy from afar, really only 3 truly big signings were handed out.
I think this off-season will see 2-3 big signings and then not much else. JPP tagged and one or two other vets brought in to reasonable large contracts. I'm thinking maybe a DL and Safety and OL.
That's my take...I think Reese has room to spend money along the DL if the right guys springs free and OL/Saftey will be addressed as need positions.
Quote:
In comment 12096946 Bold Ruler said:
Quote:
Going from a franchise and sometimes NFL historically bad defense to Top 10 defense is a long, long way.
If we had healthy players and finished bottom of the league, that would make sense. But missing Prince, Beason, Thurmond, McBride, Ayers, and DRC being limpy most of the season, played a huge roll. Plus Fewell stinks.
We were really bad even before the injuries.
that too
The Giants need to improve quickly on defense but I think they can at least get to average soon.
Average would be nice...
As much as I want a RB added I don't think it happens via FA but a draft pick could be added.
I think the Giants spend the majority of their loot on the defense this off-season. JPP, A safety and maybe even another DT will be targeted...the D needs some immediate help but I don't think it needs an overhaul. There's talent there.
I wonder how Reese plans to allocate the money on D going forward. IN the past the DL and DBs took up most of the money but right now outside of JPP's inevitable contract no one else on the DL is making much money at all. The money is actually being paid in the secondary. Hank is cheap for another few years. Moore the same. Wynn is cheap. Ayers is a vet making decent money...that's about it. I think Reese has plans on spending some money on the DL this off-season if the right FA comes along. Wouldn't be shocked if Reese tries to drop some money on a FA DT....he may even make a run at Suh. But I doubt he lands him since Suh will break the bank.
Reese has tried before. HE went after HAynesworth and got Canty for big bucks. At the time, the other DT (Joseph) was cheaper and cost controlled- kind of like today's DT situation.
last off-season the roster turnover was inevitable. But really, only 3 maybe 4 big moves were made with Schwartz, DRC and Jennings and I guess McClain and Walton...the latter two more of the under the radar variety. Then you had the multitude of stop gap or one year contracts with guys like McBRide and the other Corners...not to mention the Jerry and whatever the fuck the other OL slob's name was that was cut before the year was out. While last off-season looked sexy from afar, really only 3 truly big signings were handed out.
I think this off-season will see 2-3 big signings and then not much else. JPP tagged and one or two other vets brought in to reasonable large contracts. I'm thinking maybe a DL and Safety and OL.
That's my take...I think Reese has room to spend money along the DL if the right guys springs free and OL/Saftey will be addressed as need positions.
I did say IMO. He will have an impact next year. Of course I am judging them on if they are healthy. How can you judge them any other way. JPP, Ayers, Hankins, Moore, and a future draft pick = above average IMO. Those corners are everything though. They need to stay healthy.
Now he has a secondary that you can put on an island...I do think Thurmond comes back so you then have 3 corners that you can leave in 1 on 1 situations..
That will help the defensive line in turn because then spags can draw up blitzes without having to worry about the secondary being left on islands....
Of course that all changes once the inevitable secondary injuries start to happen...
Behre improves enough to at least press for starting job.
They need most of those things to happen to be top 10 in 2015. Unless Spags really is a defensive genius and can find a way to get guys like Stevie Brown, Herzlich and J. Williams to excel.
Tuck had just come off a tremendous SB and took over for Strahan. They still had Osi. Tollefson was a good rotation player. Kiwi had arguably his best year. Pierce was still at MLB. At that time, there was still hope that at least one of Goff, Wilkinson or Kehl would become at least competent LBs. And Blckburn was still there and useful. Which LB on the Giants is now even as good as Blackburn? I think Kennard can be a player, but lets see him play 16 games first.
Quote:
DEs and LBers starting in '08???
Tuck had just come off a tremendous SB and took over for Strahan. They still had Osi. Tollefson was a good rotation player. Kiwi had arguably his best year. Pierce was still at MLB. At that time, there was still hope that at least one of Goff, Wilkinson or Kehl would become at least competent LBs. And Blckburn was still there and useful. Which LB on the Giants is now even as good as Blackburn? I think Kennard can be a player, but lets see him play 16 games first.
Osi did not play that year...
They did have a good defensive line though with Tuck cofield Robbins and Kiwi
Pierce was the captain and leader of that defense...
Clark ended up playing well for the Giants
Really? Brown, Herzlich and Williams excel? Guys like that don't get better after 4 or 5 years of at best mediocrity. They are headed into the downside already.
Really? Brown, Herzlich and Williams excel? Guys like that don't get better after 4 or 5 years of at best mediocrity. They are headed into the downside already.
I don't expect any of those 3 are on the roster next year.
noticed we were talking to Josh Shaw (USC) at East/West Shrine practice - no surprise. big burly 61 200# CB who plays inside and out
Really? Brown, Herzlich and Williams excel? Guys like that don't get better after 4 or 5 years of at best mediocrity. They are headed into the downside already.
Kiwi played well, but he was still Kiwi -- maybe a good DC was getting the most out of his players.
Our Nickel CB was nothing to write home about. Our safeties were good -- none great.
The 2008 talent wasn't overwhelming by any stretch. Who was pro bowl worthy in that group besides Tuck? Spags was not coaching a line-up of HOFers.
We have no safeties, just one LB in Kennard and two good DLmen
Really? Brown, Herzlich and Williams excel? Guys like that don't get better after 4 or 5 years of at best mediocrity. They are headed into the downside already.
I like that he'll have Kennard, Wynn, Bromley, Moore, Taylor(if he can ever get healthy) Hankins and other young talent to work with..JPP is an unknown, FA-wise
In other words, we define players by their successes--but in football, an individual's success often depends upon his circumstances as well as his own talent and work ethic.
Joe Montana is "sainted" as one of the top quarterbacks of all time--and he was great. But if he had played in the Daryl Lamonica Oakland Raiders downfield system, he probably wouldn't haven't gotten a job (until they changed the system.)
Just saying, to diminish Spagnuolo's accomplishments back in the day by attributing it all to the quality of his players, well, Spags helped make some of those players better. Had they not won, their careers would have been less illustrious.
And it's just possible that Spag's new system will liberate a few on the current roster. No guarantees, but I'm looking forward to the new year.
I'm not too excited about resigning of Spags, but I guess it's better than maintaing the status quo...at least it's a change, right?
Also consider the amount of injuries the Giants had. The players didn't have confidence in the calls. There was a lot of issues this past year.
Quote:
Going from a franchise and sometimes NFL historically bad defense to Top 10 defense is a long, long way.
If we had healthy players and finished bottom of the league, that would make sense. But missing Prince, Beason, Thurmond, McBride, Ayers, and DRC being limpy most of the season, played a huge roll. Plus Fewell stinks.
The personnel didnt change a ton from Tim Lewis to Spagnuolo but the results did. Players play better in better systems. Barring catastrophic rash of injury, I see a similiar turnaround. The team most definitely has a good core on D if JPP is brought back. Reese will likely tweak and add as he does every year as well.
I think there is alot more than that especially if JPP comes back.
Quote:
do you get excited with only DRC, Prince, and Hankins on defense? These are the only legitimate starters that can be counted on for next year....
.
I think there is alot more than that especially if JPP comes back.
Moore ? Kennard ? Behre ? Jpp ? This defense might be young. But these guys have talent. They just haven't been used right
I was on board with Perry getting axed but the guy almost never had a dependable MIKE in his entire 5 year tenure here. He had Jon Goff in 2010 who got hurt and saw his career end abruptly and wasn't anything special to begin, he won a SB with Blackburn there the next year (and he wasn't even here the entire season) and then had Beason for about a half season in 2013.
We had Dan fucking Connor penciled in there going into the 2013 season.
I'm glad Spags is back but we've got to get him more to work with.