for display only
Big Blue Interactive The Corner Forum  
Back to the Corner

Archived Thread

Lets talk a little DL here (draft)

Sy'56 : 1/21/2015 3:10 pm
As much as NYG needs OL help, I think they need to bring in some young, fresh talent to DE and DT. Keeping FA out of it, I've come up with a list of names I would consider in each tier of the draft (Day 1/Day 2). We can dicuss Day 3 at a later time.

Round 1

DT Leonard Williams - USC - 6'4/295
DT Danny Shelton - Washington - 6'2/243
DE Alvin Dupree - Kentucky - 6'3/264
DE Shane Ray - Missouri - 6'3/255

Williams is still the grade in this class for me, but Shelton is really close. He is the closest thing we have seen to Ngata, one of the rarest prospects I have ever seen. Dupree and Ray are questionable DEs for the 4-3 but like I said a few weeks ago, NYG needs to get innovative sometimes and be able to throw a guy like that in to the system. They are elite-caliber edge guys with rare explosion and functional strength. They need to be considered.

Round 2/3

DE Arik Armstead - Oregon - 6'8/298
DE Henry Anderson - Stanford - 6'6/287
DT Carl Davis - Iowa - 6'5/321
DE Owamagbe Odigihizuwa - UCLA - 6'3/266
DE Nate Orchard - Utah - 6'3/251
DT Malcom Brown - Texas - 6'4/320

A lot of value in this group and there are probably a few more names we can toss in there. Armstead and Odigiizuwa were not top notch producers in college but they are very tools rich. I think both can be STARS in the league. That are both worth taking in round 2 because they aren't just athlete, they have alot of football player in them. Anderson was a favorite of min yesterday and I have a few guys in Mobile saying he looks like the best DL at the Senior Bowl. Doesn't surprise me at all. I've spoken about Davis a few times, he just screams NFL when you watch him on tape. Better version of Linval Joseph, but similar style.


Pages: 1 2 | Show All |  Next>>
Shelton better gain some weight, stat  
JonC : 1/21/2015 3:16 pm : link
It will be interesting to see if the DL at #9 grade out higher than OT and WR.
RE: Shelton better gain some weight, stat  
jeff57 : 1/21/2015 3:18 pm : link
In comment 12104158 JonC said:
Quote:
It will be interesting to see if the DL at #9 grade out higher than OT and WR.


Should be 343.
Odigihizuwa could be a nice pick at 40.  
jeff57 : 1/21/2015 3:19 pm : link
A steal at 74.
Shelton is 343, not 243  
Sy'56 : 1/21/2015 3:20 pm : link
.
my post was tounge in cheek  
JonC : 1/21/2015 3:20 pm : link
.
Fowler isn't a consideration for you in the first round?  
shockeyisthebest8056 : 1/21/2015 3:20 pm : link
...
tongue  
JonC : 1/21/2015 3:21 pm : link
.
Sy,  
Simms11 : 1/21/2015 3:22 pm : link
Can you envision the Giants drafting a questionable starter (DE), in a 4-3, at #9? Very risky and if it fails, the GM would be crucified. IMO, highly unlikely.
RE: Fowler isn't a consideration for you in the first round?  
Sy'56 : 1/21/2015 3:22 pm : link
In comment 12104173 shockeyisthebest8056 said:
Quote:
...


Not huge on Fowler. I'll have him somewhere in the 35-45 range but I don't see the fit in the 4-3. He is too light in the pants. His upside is a Melvin Ingram type, probably needs a 3-4 only.
RE: Sy,  
Sy'56 : 1/21/2015 3:24 pm : link
In comment 12104177 Simms11 said:
Quote:
Can you envision the Giants drafting a questionable starter (DE), in a 4-3, at #9? Very risky and if it fails, the GM would be crucified. IMO, highly unlikely.


What I think NYG should do doesn't correlate with what I think they will do.

They are a pretty stubborn group of decision makers in the draft I think. So to answer your question, I do not think they will draft Ray at #9, or even consider him.
Ray vs Dupree vs Fowler  
Osix_ : 1/21/2015 3:25 pm : link
How would you compare those 3 guys as prospects. Who fits best here?

I'm not a big fan of any of these edge rushers at #9.

Shelton on the otherhand is my guy right now. Eats space makes plays. Simple to see the impact with him.

DL  
chris r : 1/21/2015 3:25 pm : link
seems like a strong possibility. We have 2 known good quantities on the DL, and that's assuming JPP resigns.
I don't think we draft Fowler rd1  
Osix_ : 1/21/2015 3:26 pm : link
Because he does seem to have a little too much Sintim in him.
Shelton would be value at 9  
jeff57 : 1/21/2015 3:26 pm : link
Odds are they won't go that way though. And he could be taken before then.
RE: Ray vs Dupree vs Fowler  
Sy'56 : 1/21/2015 3:28 pm : link
In comment 12104183 Osix_ said:
Quote:
How would you compare those 3 guys as prospects. Who fits best here?

I'm not a big fan of any of these edge rushers at #9.

Shelton on the otherhand is my guy right now. Eats space makes plays. Simple to see the impact with him.


Ray is the most explosive of them all. He can go 0-60 right away with good pad level and functional power. He doesn't weight a lot, but he hits as hard as anyone.

Dupree is the best fit for a traditional 4-3 scheme. He might have the most upside of the three.

Fowler if a scheme/role specific guy that I don't see being a dominant caliber guy at all. Solid? Yes. But nothing I would go crazy over.
Sy  
giants#1 : 1/21/2015 3:33 pm : link
were you grading prospects when Osi came out? Curious to see if he would fall in the same category as a guy like Ray.

RE: Sy  
Sy'56 : 1/21/2015 3:34 pm : link
In comment 12104202 giants#1 said:
Quote:
were you grading prospects when Osi came out? Curious to see if he would fall in the same category as a guy like Ray.


I wasn't scouting at that time.
Its so early, so much will change.  
wgenesis123 : 1/21/2015 3:39 pm : link
Right now I get the feeling there will be more value at 9 at other positions including D-line than O-line. No blue goose tackle for offense in this draft.
I know they're two completely different DTs  
Osix_ : 1/21/2015 3:41 pm : link
But as of right now, do you grade Shelton as highly as you graded Donald last year? Obviously Shelton is more of a NT and doesn't explode like Donald does. But he might be the better prospect because of how rare elite guys at his size are.
The DE from UCLA  
Phil in LA : 1/21/2015 3:44 pm : link
is a Spags type.
RE: I know they're two completely different DTs  
Sy'56 : 1/21/2015 3:45 pm : link
In comment 12104215 Osix_ said:
Quote:
But as of right now, do you grade Shelton as highly as you graded Donald last year? Obviously Shelton is more of a NT and doesn't explode like Donald does. But he might be the better prospect because of how rare elite guys at his size are.


Completely different players, but Shelton will likely finish with a very similar, maybe even higher, grade than Donald.
Watched the one on one's last night  
RAIN : 1/21/2015 3:52 pm : link
Nate Orchard, looked like someone who might present some nice value..nice opportunity as a speed rusher.

Anderson, DE from Stanford seemed versatile with some decent get off.
Carl Davis..  
RAIN : 1/21/2015 3:53 pm : link
though, looked really good. A versatile DE/DT type. I'd expect a 3-4 team would look at him in the mid to late first as an end.
Anderson is such a good technician  
Sy'56 : 1/21/2015 3:54 pm : link
Does all the little things right and he is so long and strong. JJ watt type
Agree that they need DL help at both T and E.  
Red Dog : 1/21/2015 4:01 pm : link
And as much as I think the OL is priority number one, I also think the DL is priority number one A, with Safety close behind.

I have always been in the "winning starts up front" camp, as is TC, so I don't care how they address these needs as long as they give them priority over receivers, corners, or other positions where they are pretty well set, and even over other obvious needs like 'backers, TEs, and RBs.
If this version of Williams is in the draft last year  
Osix_ : 1/21/2015 4:02 pm : link
Do you think Clowney still goes #1 after such a lackluster season? Williams and Watt on the same DL would be sick.
I like Fowler more than you do.  
shockeyisthebest8056 : 1/21/2015 4:07 pm : link
I was impressed by how effective he was rushing the passer in the 2 and 3 point stance. I also like his overall effort and competitiveness. I wouldn't compare him to Melvin Ingram in any way other than they're both not particularly tall. Fowler is a better athlete and is physically different... long arms and cut body. I'll be very interested to see his exact measurements at the combine.

I don't think Shane Ray can play 4-3 end at all, but if the team is convinced he's a special athlete, then that may merit a change to a Seahawks' style of 4-3 defense.
RE: If this version of Williams is in the draft last year  
Sy'56 : 1/21/2015 4:13 pm : link
In comment 12104252 Osix_ said:
Quote:
Do you think Clowney still goes #1 after such a lackluster season? Williams and Watt on the same DL would be sick.


I don't think anyone would have passed Clowney at this time last year. Monday Morning QBs will say Clowney shouldn't have gone #1...but everyone would have seen him as #1 no matter what.
The Dallas OL  
bceagle05 : 1/21/2015 4:17 pm : link
will never be far from the Giants' minds this offseason. If Shelton is there I could see them jumping at the chance to put him next to Hankins. I'm sure a lot of it depends on their opinion of Bromley.
Bromley shouldn't stop us from taking a DT we like  
David in LA : 1/21/2015 4:25 pm : link
.
Sy, any thoughts on Anthony Chickillo?  
sjnyfan : 1/21/2015 4:26 pm : link
He had a good Shrine week of practices and game. Low production at Miami but maybe because of playing out of position as a 3-4 DE instead of 4-3. I like his first step, how he turns power into speed and his motor. Top 100 maybe?
RE: Sy, any thoughts on Anthony Chickillo?  
Sy'56 : 1/21/2015 4:28 pm : link
In comment 12104300 sjnyfan said:
Quote:
He had a good Shrine week of practices and game. Low production at Miami but maybe because of playing out of position as a 3-4 DE instead of 4-3. I like his first step, how he turns power into speed and his motor. Top 100 maybe?


Top 100 is a possibility. He looked good at Shrine but the OL talent there was pretty bad.

He was put in to a tough spot at Miami having to play in a 3-4. I don't see any star in him, but a solid 4-3 DE that can backup both spots and play 1-15 snaps per game? Sure.
Good stuff Sy, Thanks  
Victor in CT : 1/21/2015 4:36 pm : link
........
If DT Shelton is there at #9 you take him  
SGMen : 1/21/2015 4:37 pm : link
I know we have Bromley on the roster and he may yet start but you don't pass up big bodies who can not only stop the run but also push the pocket some.
Whether you love or hate Bromley  
Sy'56 : 1/21/2015 4:38 pm : link
He doesn't factor in to a Shelton decision.
What's your take on Eli Harold?  
Dunedin81 : 1/21/2015 4:41 pm : link
Kiper apparently said he could have a 1st round grade. He'll measure well and probably run well and there is some good tape, but he doesn't look like a first round talent to me.
RE: What's your take on Eli Harold?  
Sy'56 : 1/21/2015 5:04 pm : link
In comment 12104312 Dunedin81 said:
Quote:
Kiper apparently said he could have a 1st round grade. He'll measure well and probably run well and there is some good tape, but he doesn't look like a first round talent to me.


He has a lot of tape where he does look the part. And he is pretty tools rich. Here is my summary from my report on him:

Junior entry. Tools-rich with a high ceiling if he can continue to physically develop on the current track he has been on. Harold will also need to improve his skill set. He needs to work on his pass rush repertoire and consistent use of technique and mechanics. He shows superb movement in space and plays an aggressive brand of football. He knows how to finish and there is a lot of quick reaction associated with his game. He should be viewed as a developmental prospect that won’t need too long before he is ready for an important role as an edge rusher.

Final Grade: 3rd round
Preston Smith from Miss St  
I wanna be Torbor, sucka : 1/21/2015 5:09 pm : link
had a really solid year. Do you see him as a 3rd round guy?

Also, Lorenzo Mauldin interests me. He could be the type of guy that fills the role the Giants had pegged for O'Brien Schofield.
I think they'll buy a cheap run stuffing DT  
Phil in LA : 1/21/2015 5:12 pm : link
for the rotation. Then draft a Spags type pass rush DE in the draft. Might take another DT late.
I want another angry DT in the worst way  
djm : 1/21/2015 5:33 pm : link
Joseph was good and would have been a decent luxury but I am not losing sleep over his departure. I just wish we could add a legit body next to Hankins. Joseph was just that...but maybe we can replace him with a better talent via FA or the draft.

Wouldn't give up on Bromley  
Phil in LA : 1/21/2015 5:34 pm : link
yet.
We just seem to have  
Doomster : 1/21/2015 5:46 pm : link
a revolving door at DT.....should have kept Cofield instead of Canty.......maybe we should have kept LJ.......
It was a significant blow to the DE talent pool when...  
Torrag : 1/21/2015 5:52 pm : link
...Shawn Oakman opted to return to Baylor for another season. Exactly the type of player I'd like to see Spags coaching up. He would have been a real possibility at #9 and the perfect fit for Giants scheme.
My  
AcidTest : 1/21/2015 6:16 pm : link
favorites: Williams, Shelton, Armstead, Davis, the kid from UCLA, and Malcolm Brown.

Don't think we'll get anywhere near Williams, and I don't want to trade up to do so. Shelton would be great at #9. Incredibly stout against the run, and with surprising good pursuit. Not just a phone booth guy. He and Hankins would be a great pair of DTs. Bring Bromley in for relief and on pass rush downs.

I still think Armstead should have gone back for another year, especially after being plagued by his ankle injury. But there is no question about his size speed combination. Could easily see him being BPA at #40, but he's likely to go before then IMO.

Davis would be a great pick at #40. Doesn't offer quite what Shelton does, but he's taller, and again, he and Hankins would really do wonders for the run defense.

I also like Eli Harold. He'd be a great pick in the third, but I'd be surprised if he lasts that long.

We need OL and DL, and this draft is loaded in those areas.
Right at this moment, I think we go  
Bake54 : 1/21/2015 6:40 pm : link
DT, OL or S in the first round. WR, TE or DE in the 2nd round. Sign a starting S and a starting OL, another LB in free agency. Look for RB depth later in the draft.

That WR from Miami seems to be a good fit for them.
RE: My  
SGMen : 1/21/2015 6:43 pm : link
In comment 12104408 AcidTest said:
Quote:
favorites: Williams, Shelton, Armstead, Davis, the kid from UCLA, and Malcolm Brown.

Don't think we'll get anywhere near Williams, and I don't want to trade up to do so. Shelton would be great at #9. Incredibly stout against the run, and with surprising good pursuit. Not just a phone booth guy. He and Hankins would be a great pair of DTs. Bring Bromley in for relief and on pass rush downs.

I still think Armstead should have gone back for another year, especially after being plagued by his ankle injury. But there is no question about his size speed combination. Could easily see him being BPA at #40, but he's likely to go before then IMO.

Davis would be a great pick at #40. Doesn't offer quite what Shelton does, but he's taller, and again, he and Hankins would really do wonders for the run defense.

I also like Eli Harold. He'd be a great pick in the third, but I'd be surprised if he lasts that long.

We need OL and DL, and this draft is loaded in those areas.
Exactly right about Bromley coming in for relief. You clearly need 3 DTs in today's NFL. Nothing wrong with having a #1, #2 and #3 round pick rotation! If DT Shelton is there and I think he will be I say pick him up!
Arik Armstead  
Amtoft : 1/21/2015 6:45 pm : link
is probably one of the most over rated players in this draft.
Wow - Shelton reminds you of Ngata  
Giants2012 : 1/21/2015 7:08 pm : link
A Ngata type is very appealing even though the team needs OL.

Tougher draft to figure this year when compared to last year IMO.
RE: It was a significant blow to the DE talent pool when...  
jeff57 : 1/21/2015 7:20 pm : link
In comment 12104396 Torrag said:
Quote:
...Shawn Oakman opted to return to Baylor for another season. Exactly the type of player I'd like to see Spags coaching up. He would have been a real possibility at #9 and the perfect fit for Giants scheme.


Too raw. Was smart to go back for more seasoning.
He's no 'rawer' than JPP was coming out  
Torrag : 1/21/2015 7:34 pm : link
...the point being it would have been good for us if he entered the draft. I agree that IF he stays healthy he will be a strong candidate for a top 3 selection in 2016. IMO Oakman would still have cracked the Top 10 this year.
Pages: 1 2 | Show All |  Next>>
Back to the Corner