I don't know the numbers, but there are very few people who actually don't believe in the science. But we rant on and on about it.
Even less who take the literal view of the early part of the bible.
As for the nuances of the intelligent design vs no design question, that can really be discussed with civility, which bar sadly seems to have not been met just above.
What is at hand here?
I am going to suggest, this fits a broader trend. I suggest one can see this trend in the national dialogue:
I.e., people go absolutely batshit crazy and want to talk for hours (or do 4,532 TV or 3,456 radio news shows on the subject) when they find people, facts and injustices etc, that seem to fit the prevalent narrative view and reinforce the rejection of the ideas that are not accepted in it. In many if not most of these instances I actually do agree with the premise of the media attention stories, as here, I do believe in the science.
That is not the point. Its that the choices of subjects and attention fit into trends.
For example, true facts about injustice in our history and current events...facts that certainly should be known about and understood, are covered again, and again, and again, in media, in the schools, on the speeches, to an absurd degree, while
Conversely, those other important facts and stories about our culture and history ..the ones that however, that don't jive with the prevalent narrative and its goal of shutting down certain millues, are flatly ignored.
So it is with this thread:
"Gee - gather round and see the freak, this proves the prevalent narrative!"
Seems to be the sentiment in many except the few dissenters.
yada yada yada, It is too bad, because, because - without all the name calling, the other bits were interesting and informative.
and- any name callers, regardless. of . which. side . they claim, seem more like the barbarians than those they claim to stimey.
First of all, I've clearly shown "evolution" isn't "Science". "Peer Review" is a Procedural Argument not a Substantive one. Also, Science isn't up for a Vote; Consensus doesn't = TRUTH. "Peer Review" is not a Step in the Scientific Method. Check out the Journal of Creation (it's "Peer Reviewed" by credentialed scientists)
But what you've actually shown is that you have no understanding of science at all. Zip, zero, nada, zilch.
First of all, I've clearly shown "evolution" isn't "Science". "Peer Review" is a Procedural Argument not a Substantive one. Also, Science isn't up for a Vote; Consensus doesn't = TRUTH. "Peer Review" is not a Step in the Scientific Method. Check out the Journal of Creation (it's "Peer Reviewed" by credentialed scientists)
But what you've actually shown is that you have no understanding of science at all. Zip, zero, nada, zilch.
Sir, please show some respect to a scientist with multiple degrees and 20 years in the armed services. He single handedly and successfully refuted thousands of others scientists when it comes to the scientific methodology.
#1- Man was created from dust, not Monkees. (although I've always suspected that Peter Tork could be the second coming)
#2- The thousands of years old book told me so. And of course, that book is the confirmed word of god because in the book god says it's his word. (He also says that wimmin should keep their pie holes shut and be subservient- so it's got that going for it too.)
Once you accept the truth of 1 and 2, the next steps are abundantly clear.
You must set about showing to the world that evolution can't possibly be true.
No evidence will ever matter because of 1 and 2.
What's funny is the lengths that folks will go and the intentional lies they will spew to get rid of what they perceive as a threat to god's unemployment fund.
#1- Man was created from dust, not Monkees. (although I've always suspected that Peter Tork could be the second coming)
#2- The thousands of years old book told me so. And of course, that book is the confirmed word of god because in the book god says it's his word. (He also says that wimmin should keep their pie holes shut and be subservient- so it's got that going for it too.)
Once you accept the truth of 1 and 2, the next steps are abundantly clear.
You must set about showing to the world that evolution can't possibly be true.
No evidence will ever matter because of 1 and 2.
Define Scientific Evidence? Please provide some..?
Then, can you speak to:
1. Functional DNA/RNA/Proteins NEVER spontaneously form "naturally", outside already existing cells, from Sugars, Bases, Phosphates, and Aminos, respectively.
It's Physically and Chemically IMPOSSIBLE.
That's just the Hardware! ??
2. How Did Stupid Atoms Write Their Own Software...?
3. The Universe Creating Itself From Nothing...?
regards
RE: RE: Let's see. Reasons why evolution is wrong:
#1- Man was created from dust, not Monkees. (although I've always suspected that Peter Tork could be the second coming)
#2- The thousands of years old book told me so. And of course, that book is the confirmed word of god because in the book god says it's his word. (He also says that wimmin should keep their pie holes shut and be subservient- so it's got that going for it too.)
Once you accept the truth of 1 and 2, the next steps are abundantly clear.
You must set about showing to the world that evolution can't possibly be true.
No evidence will ever matter because of 1 and 2.
Define Scientific Evidence? Please provide some..?
Then, can you speak to:
1. Functional DNA/RNA/Proteins NEVER spontaneously form "naturally", outside already existing cells, from Sugars, Bases, Phosphates, and Aminos, respectively.
It's Physically and Chemically IMPOSSIBLE.
That's just the Hardware! ??
2. How Did Stupid Atoms Write Their Own Software...?
3. The Universe Creating Itself From Nothing...?
regards
Software, hardware, DNA, RNA, blah blah blah...
You use a lot of scientific words and cite a ton of sources yet say pretty much nothing of substance. Just stop.
First of all, I've clearly shown "evolution" isn't "Science". "Peer Review" is a Procedural Argument not a Substantive one. Also, Science isn't up for a Vote; Consensus doesn't = TRUTH. "Peer Review" is not a Step in the Scientific Method. Check out the Journal of Creation (it's "Peer Reviewed" by credentialed scientists)
But what you've actually shown is that you have no understanding of science at all. Zip, zero, nada, zilch.
Thanks for your Baseless "Opinion" (Fallacy). Can you show where?
Then can you tell us "Your" understanding of Science...?
#1- Man was created from dust, not Monkees. (although I've always suspected that Peter Tork could be the second coming)
#2- The thousands of years old book told me so. And of course, that book is the confirmed word of god because in the book god says it's his word. (He also says that wimmin should keep their pie holes shut and be subservient- so it's got that going for it too.)
Once you accept the truth of 1 and 2, the next steps are abundantly clear.
You must set about showing to the world that evolution can't possibly be true.
No evidence will ever matter because of 1 and 2.
Define Scientific Evidence? Please provide some..?
Then, can you speak to:
1. Functional DNA/RNA/Proteins NEVER spontaneously form "naturally", outside already existing cells, from Sugars, Bases, Phosphates, and Aminos, respectively.
It's Physically and Chemically IMPOSSIBLE.
That's just the Hardware! ??
2. How Did Stupid Atoms Write Their Own Software...?
3. The Universe Creating Itself From Nothing...?
regards
Software, hardware, DNA, RNA, blah blah blah...
You use a lot of scientific words and cite a ton of sources yet say pretty much nothing of substance. Just stop.
Hmmm. I performed a reading level assessment on the post you replied to using SMOG Grade and Fleschh-Kincaid Index and it averaged roughly 5th Grade.
Either you have some serious reading comprehension issues or cognitive dissonance is ruling the roost.
We have had fans of other teams post here so I'm not implying it is a prerequisite or anything, I'm just curious.
Too Funny. I'm originally from the Home of The World Champion Pittsburgh Steelers!!
Always liked the Giants however... especially when they beat up on the Cowgirls. Tell Cruz to stop flashing that Illuminati sign...the Salsa can stay, hope his knee heals up. Beckham is scary good.
Beef up that defensive line, draft some Linebackers, O-Line---start over.
google Enoch2021. Spock recruited from another forum, and apparently being a fucking jesus freak as well as troll is his full-time job. This is what he does...scary, but true.
Hmmm. I performed a reading level assessment on the post you replied to using SMOG Grade and Fleschh-Kincaid Index and it averaged roughly 5th Grade.
Either you have some serious reading comprehension issues or cognitive dissonance is ruling the roost.
regards
Haha...I admit that I'm probably mentally challenged to some degree. I mean, I did join the Marine Corps...so that explains it. Since you used your irrelevant military experience as something of a credential in an earlier post, what do I get as my prize for doing the same? I mean, I was in the military, so I must have a valid point, no?
But it's rather sad that you come here to back up your boy Spock when you're not even a fan of the Giants. And in doing so, you've done a banged up job of providing nothing of substance beyond trying to obscure the weakness in your (and Spock's) argument through use of long diatribes. It's a known tactic used by those, who can't clearly and concisely articulate their points.
google Enoch2021. Spock recruited from another forum, and apparently being a fucking jesus freak as well as troll is his full-time job. This is what he does...scary, but true.
Nah, nothing effing weird about that. Not at all.
And it was the suspicion behind my 2/17/2015 4:02 pm post.
He doesn't even understand the Feynman quote that purports to highlight his "knowledge" (fallacy) of the scientific method (fallacy). One that doesn't say what he thinks it says.
We have had fans of other teams post here so I'm not implying it is a prerequisite or anything, I'm just curious.
Too Funny. I'm originally from the Home of The World Champion Pittsburgh Steelers!!
Always liked the Giants however... especially when they beat up on the Cowgirls. Tell Cruz to stop flashing that Illuminati sign...the Salsa can stay, hope his knee heals up. Beckham is scary good.
Beef up that defensive line, draft some Linebackers, O-Line---start over.
regards
So, you aren't a fan--at least you don't sound like one. You are a troll. Fuck off?
You're a breathe of fresh air...critical thinking appears to be a lost art.
1. The woman in the interview said the car doors were open, Chopper footage reveals the doors were closed.
2. 3 MSM outlets said that all the weapons were registered to Nancy. AR 15 is already illegal in the State of CT... how can she register an illegal weapon?
3. When & Pics of the 600 kids evacuated along with 600 parents coming to pick them up.
4. Church of Satan East Coast Hub = you guessed it Newtown CT!!
rob reporting on the least surprising information of the thread
if this Enoch2012 is the same Enoch2012 on YouTube that I just googled, he is a fucking Sandy Hook Truther.
In response to some dumb bitch making comments about how Sandy Hook was/may have been a false flag event, this jackass commented:
Quote:
Enoch2021 commented on a video 2 years ago
You're a breathe of fresh air...critical thinking appears to be a lost art.
1. The woman in the interview said the car doors were open, Chopper footage reveals the doors were closed.
2. 3 MSM outlets said that all the weapons were registered to Nancy. AR 15 is already illegal in the State of CT... how can she register an illegal weapon?
3. When & Pics of the 600 kids evacuated along with 600 parents coming to pick them up.
4. Church of Satan East Coast Hub = you guessed it Newtown CT!!
You're a breathe of fresh air...critical thinking appears to be a lost art.
1. The woman in the interview said the car doors were open, Chopper footage reveals the doors were closed.
2. 3 MSM outlets said that all the weapons were registered to Nancy. AR 15 is already illegal in the State of CT... how can she register an illegal weapon?
3. When & Pics of the 600 kids evacuated along with 600 parents coming to pick them up.
4. Church of Satan East Coast Hub = you guessed it Newtown CT!!
Hmmm. I performed a reading level assessment on the post you replied to using SMOG Grade and Fleschh-Kincaid Index and it averaged roughly 5th Grade.
Either you have some serious reading comprehension issues or cognitive dissonance is ruling the roost.
regards
Haha...I admit that I'm probably mentally challenged to some degree. I mean, I did join the Marine Corps...so that explains it. Since you used your irrelevant military experience as something of a credential in an earlier post, what do I get as my prize for doing the same? I mean, I was in the military, so I must have a valid point, no?
But it's rather sad that you come here to back up your boy Spock when you're not even a fan of the Giants. And in doing so, you've done a banged up job of providing nothing of substance beyond trying to obscure the weakness in your (and Spock's) argument through use of long diatribes. It's a known tactic used by those, who can't clearly and concisely articulate their points.
It is known as gobblygook whic is defined as language that is meaningless or is made unintelligible by excessive use of abstruse technical terms; nonsense.
Just when I thought this thread was petering out...
We have had fans of other teams post here so I'm not implying it is a prerequisite or anything, I'm just curious.
Too Funny. I'm originally from the Home of The World Champion Pittsburgh Steelers!!
Always liked the Giants however... especially when they beat up on the Cowgirls. Tell Cruz to stop flashing that Illuminati sign...the Salsa can stay, hope his knee heals up. Beckham is scary good.
Beef up that defensive line, draft some Linebackers, O-Line---start over.
regards
Well as a Christian myself I would suggest that simply coming here just to argue this is likely not as beneficial as you may believe it is and since you like football I would recommend as a new member that you consider adding something to some other threads and get to know some other members, and they you and more importantly the tenor of the forum itself.
Technically religious threads are against the forum rules and while we are occasionally given some latitudes I believe we should try our best to respect that. I am reluctant to but will sometimes post specifics about my beliefs but usually only if I think something specific about the bible or my faith is being completely misunderstood or misquoted in attempt to at least better clarify for those that may be interested in the difference, or if asked something directly from a member but even then I try to remember what the rules ask of us and keep it short and to the point. Long debates on religious or political themed topic is clearly not respecting the rules of the forum and I think we should respect that as hard as that may personally be for some especially because while not always ironically it is often those that are against any form of religion that seem to initially bring up the topic.
google Enoch2021. Spock recruited from another forum, and apparently being a fucking jesus freak as well as troll is his full-time job. This is what he does...scary, but true.
You mean you typed my handle into google and tracked me down !! Astonishing. Scotland Yard should be calling any minute.
Does the mere fact that I don't change my handle tell you anything?
Spock's a good man and spent some months on the receiving end of what you just been through. Tactically, a wise move...wouldn't you say?
So now that your done super sleuthing the inconsequential irrelevant background noise....much like being overly preoccupied with where the bear came from while getting mauled.... Type in: "How Did Stupid Atoms Write Their Own Software" and see what it says, report back with the answer.
regards
RE: RE: Let's see. Reasons why evolution is wrong:
#1- Man was created from dust, not Monkees. (although I've always suspected that Peter Tork could be the second coming)
#2- The thousands of years old book told me so. And of course, that book is the confirmed word of god because in the book god says it's his word. (He also says that wimmin should keep their pie holes shut and be subservient- so it's got that going for it too.)
Once you accept the truth of 1 and 2, the next steps are abundantly clear.
You must set about showing to the world that evolution can't possibly be true.
No evidence will ever matter because of 1 and 2.
Define Scientific Evidence? Please provide some..?
Then, can you speak to:
1. Functional DNA/RNA/Proteins NEVER spontaneously form "naturally", outside already existing cells, from Sugars, Bases, Phosphates, and Aminos, respectively.
It's Physically and Chemically IMPOSSIBLE.
That's just the Hardware! ??
2. How Did Stupid Atoms Write Their Own Software...?
3. The Universe Creating Itself From Nothing...?
regards
If you actually want to engage in debate, you should at the very least do as you ask of others first. Specifically you haven't addressed kicker's posts to you which refute all of your creepy pasta that you've been posting. Your breach of ediquitte by not responding to him point by point is like jumping straight from "Dog dare" to "Triple dog dare" which at the very least is disappointing and leads me to believe that any points that you can't refute you'll either ignore completely or attempt to misdirect with more pseudoscience.
So, no. It isn't my turn. It's still yours.
I do admire your skills when it comes to debating this topic, tho. Although I find them to be intentionally disingenuous, it's obvious you've had plenty of practice masking your untruths in such a way as to appear as "solid science" to most lay people. Funny that once you run across someone that recognizes it for the bullshit it is and refutes it with logic and evidence that you stop interacting with that person and ignore the evidence. Does that make you feel like you "won"? Or are you motivated more by the praise you receive from others when you "win"?
made the science work? And we don't understand much of science?
But yelling at science to provide proof while you stand behind a "God" figure is questionable on a good day.
He is right though... Evolution has not be proven and you can't prove it in this argument. However while he keeps spouting Evolution is not a science because it can't be proven is wrong. It is a scientific theory.
"A scientific theory is a well-substantiated explanation of some aspect of the natural world that is acquired through the scientific method and repeatedly tested and confirmed through observation and experimentation.[1][2] As with most (if not all) forms of scientific knowledge, scientific theories are inductive in nature and aim for predictive power and explanatory force.[3][4]
The strength of a scientific theory is related to the diversity of phenomena it can explain, and to its elegance and simplicity (Occam's razor). As additional scientific evidence is gathered, a scientific theory may be rejected or modified if it does not fit the new empirical findings- in such circumstances, a more accurate theory is then desired. In certain cases, the less-accurate unmodified scientific theory can still be treated as a theory if it is useful (due to its sheer simplicity) as an approximation under specific conditions (e.g. Newton's laws of motion as an approximation to special relativity at velocities which are small relative to the speed of light).
Scientific theories are testable and make falsifiable predictions.[5] They describe the causal elements responsible for a particular natural phenomenon, and are used to explain and predict aspects of the physical universe or specific areas of inquiry (e.g. electricity, chemistry, astronomy). Scientists use theories as a foundation to gain further scientific knowledge, as well as to accomplish goals such as inventing technology or curing disease. Scientific theories are the most reliable, rigorous, and comprehensive form of scientific knowledge.[3] This is significantly different from the common usage of the word "theory", which implies that something is a conjecture, hypothesis, or guess (i.e., unsubstantiated and speculative).[6]"
Thus the scientific theory of evolution is absolutely science, but not proven science. You are confusing the two. What you can prove is almost all the stories in the bible are made up. It is funny because as the church and bibles hold strong that everything happened as written in the bible... Some like Enoch and Spock like to branch out and say... Oh wait the world is millions of years old and the reason things were brought forth were because God programmed the DNA on each and every living being. That things don't mutate and evolve on their own. What is there proof of that? DNA is dumb atoms so some man up in the sky obviously wrote the code.
Let's take a virus for example. Virus change and mutate as they are exposed to different elements right. That is why somethings that kill virus will no longer be affective because the Virus adapts and changes. How can that be when the Virus is dumb? Obviously according to you God is up there writing the software?
google Enoch2021. Spock recruited from another forum, and apparently being a fucking jesus freak as well as troll is his full-time job. This is what he does...scary, but true.
You mean you typed my handle into google and tracked me down !! Astonishing. Scotland Yard should be calling any minute.
Does the mere fact that I don't change my handle tell you anything?
Spock's a good man and spent some months on the receiving end of what you just been through. Tactically, a wise move...wouldn't you say?
So now that your done super sleuthing the inconsequential irrelevant background noise....much like being overly preoccupied with where the bear came from while getting mauled.... Type in: "How Did Stupid Atoms Write Their Own Software" and see what it says, report back with the answer.
regards
You grossly overestimate your own abilities. Maybe on Christian sites with a degraded level of intelligence due to inbreeding do you warrant any consideration - here, in case you haven't noticed, you are being laughed at for your posts, and now the fact that you are a truther reveals all we need to know about your "thinking".
Maybe fuck off and take Spock with you back to what I can only assume is Christian Mingle?
RE: RE: RE: Let's see. Reasons why evolution is wrong:
#1- Man was created from dust, not Monkees. (although I've always suspected that Peter Tork could be the second coming)
#2- The thousands of years old book told me so. And of course, that book is the confirmed word of god because in the book god says it's his word. (He also says that wimmin should keep their pie holes shut and be subservient- so it's got that going for it too.)
Once you accept the truth of 1 and 2, the next steps are abundantly clear.
You must set about showing to the world that evolution can't possibly be true.
No evidence will ever matter because of 1 and 2.
Define Scientific Evidence? Please provide some..?
Then, can you speak to:
1. Functional DNA/RNA/Proteins NEVER spontaneously form "naturally", outside already existing cells, from Sugars, Bases, Phosphates, and Aminos, respectively.
It's Physically and Chemically IMPOSSIBLE.
That's just the Hardware! ??
2. How Did Stupid Atoms Write Their Own Software...?
3. The Universe Creating Itself From Nothing...?
regards
If you actually want to engage in debate, you should at the very least do as you ask of others first. Specifically you haven't addressed kicker's posts to you which refute all of your creepy pasta that you've been posting. Your breach of ediquitte by not responding to him point by point is like jumping straight from "Dog dare" to "Triple dog dare" which at the very least is disappointing and leads me to believe that any points that you can't refute you'll either ignore completely or attempt to misdirect with more pseudoscience.
So, no. It isn't my turn. It's still yours.
I do admire your skills when it comes to debating this topic, tho. Although I find them to be intentionally disingenuous, it's obvious you've had plenty of practice masking your untruths in such a way as to appear as "solid science" to most lay people. Funny that once you run across someone that recognizes it for the bullshit it is and refutes it with logic and evidence that you stop interacting with that person and ignore the evidence. Does that make you feel like you "won"? Or are you motivated more by the praise you receive from others when you "win"?
He moved on without answering me when I asked him to define a term he used "same kind of organism". He has a problem when anyone takes him off his script.
He moved on without answering me when I asked him to define a term he used "same kind of organism". He has a problem when anyone takes him off his script.
Exactly.. I pointed this out yesterday. He is just cutting an pasting from an old argument he has had many times before. He isn't actually answering anyone's questions. He is just putting the next post up for people to see.
They closed that thread because it got too ugly- mostly against me-but I was hoping you would come to my aid, with your background. When a similar thread opens I will notify you my email.
The website is called bigblueinteractive.com if you want to become a member now. Trust me, the discussion will pop up again soon and I want you ready this time. I am not lying, there was not one other opposing voice who stood up but mine.
This is a NY Giants website, so as you can imagine, many NY Jews cursing me out because I will not relent by telling them there is only one path to God and it runs through Jesus.
From Spock to Enoch2021 asking for his help on BBI:
Quote:
They closed that thread because it got too ugly- mostly against me-but I was hoping you would come to my aid, with your background. When a similar thread opens I will notify you my email.
The website is called bigblueinteractive.com if you want to become a member now. Trust me, the discussion will pop up again soon and I want you ready this time. I am not lying, there was not one other opposing voice who stood up but mine.
This is a NY Giants website, so as you can imagine, many NY Jews cursing me out because I will not relent by telling them there is only one path to God and it runs through Jesus.
Thanks Enoch,
Spock out
ps. Point me to the best scientific anti evolution website you know. It has to be written by qualified scientists. Thanks.
Enoch2021's reply to confirm that he joined and will team up with Spock:
Quote:
Just Joined :)
Don't really know of any single website that is "anti evolution".....you have AIG and CMI that have Credentialed Scientists.
Just email me when they start the shenanigans and we'll get to cases :thumbsup:
Spock giving Enoch2021 a handjob as his appreciation:
Quote:
Oh, brother, I can't wait. You are the type of bulldog that God made just for websites like that. I can't wait for round 2. (I can't begin them because we are not supposed to talk religion or politics, but people do anyhow, especially during the football offseason.)
But here is a copy of the address of the thread I participated in. Enjoy the read. Of course, I am Spock.
http://corner.bigblu...2&thread=510213
It may be possible to add a comment, I'm not sure. You can try.
This is a NY Giants website, so as you can imagine, many NY Jews cursing me out because I will not relent by telling them there is only one path to God and it runs through Jesus.
They closed that thread because it got too ugly- mostly against me-but I was hoping you would come to my aid, with your background. When a similar thread opens I will notify you my email.
The website is called bigblueinteractive.com if you want to become a member now. Trust me, the discussion will pop up again soon and I want you ready this time. I am not lying, there was not one other opposing voice who stood up but mine.
This is a NY Giants website, so as you can imagine, many NY Jews cursing me out because I will not relent by telling them there is only one path to God and it runs through Jesus.
They closed that thread because it got too ugly- mostly against me-but I was hoping you would come to my aid, with your background. When a similar thread opens I will notify you my email.
The website is called bigblueinteractive.com if you want to become a member now. Trust me, the discussion will pop up again soon and I want you ready this time. I am not lying, there was not one other opposing voice who stood up but mine.
This is a NY Giants website, so as you can imagine, many NY Jews cursing me out because I will not relent by telling them there is only one path to God and it runs through Jesus.
Thanks Enoch,
Spock out
Wow... Let me help you here... I am not a "NY Jew" ... You sir are a complete dick
I don't know the numbers, but there are very few people who actually don't believe in the science. But we rant on and on about it.
Even less who take the literal view of the early part of the bible.
As for the nuances of the intelligent design vs no design question, that can really be discussed with civility, which bar sadly seems to have not been met just above.
What is at hand here?
I am going to suggest, this fits a broader trend. I suggest one can see this trend in the national dialogue:
I.e., people go absolutely batshit crazy and want to talk for hours (or do 4,532 TV or 3,456 radio news shows on the subject) when they find people, facts and injustices etc, that seem to fit the prevalent narrative view and reinforce the rejection of the ideas that are not accepted in it. In many if not most of these instances I actually do agree with the premise of the media attention stories, as here, I do believe in the science.
That is not the point. Its that the choices of subjects and attention fit into trends.
For example, true facts about injustice in our history and current events...facts that certainly should be known about and understood, are covered again, and again, and again, in media, in the schools, on the speeches, to an absurd degree, while
Conversely, those other important facts and stories about our culture and history ..the ones that however, that don't jive with the prevalent narrative and its goal of shutting down certain millues, are flatly ignored.
So it is with this thread:
"Gee - gather round and see the freak, this proves the prevalent narrative!"
Seems to be the sentiment in many except the few dissenters.
yada yada yada, It is too bad, because, because - without all the name calling, the other bits were interesting and informative.
and- any name callers, regardless. of . which. side . they claim, seem more like the barbarians than those they claim to stimey.
Taint?
But what you've actually shown is that you have no understanding of science at all. Zip, zero, nada, zilch.
Quote:
First of all, I've clearly shown "evolution" isn't "Science". "Peer Review" is a Procedural Argument not a Substantive one. Also, Science isn't up for a Vote; Consensus doesn't = TRUTH. "Peer Review" is not a Step in the Scientific Method. Check out the Journal of Creation (it's "Peer Reviewed" by credentialed scientists)
But what you've actually shown is that you have no understanding of science at all. Zip, zero, nada, zilch.
Sir, please show some respect to a scientist with multiple degrees and 20 years in the armed services. He single handedly and successfully refuted thousands of others scientists when it comes to the scientific methodology.
#2- The thousands of years old book told me so. And of course, that book is the confirmed word of god because in the book god says it's his word. (He also says that wimmin should keep their pie holes shut and be subservient- so it's got that going for it too.)
Once you accept the truth of 1 and 2, the next steps are abundantly clear.
You must set about showing to the world that evolution can't possibly be true.
No evidence will ever matter because of 1 and 2.
What's funny is the lengths that folks will go and the intentional lies they will spew to get rid of what they perceive as a threat to god's unemployment fund.
#2- The thousands of years old book told me so. And of course, that book is the confirmed word of god because in the book god says it's his word. (He also says that wimmin should keep their pie holes shut and be subservient- so it's got that going for it too.)
Once you accept the truth of 1 and 2, the next steps are abundantly clear.
You must set about showing to the world that evolution can't possibly be true.
No evidence will ever matter because of 1 and 2.
Define Scientific Evidence? Please provide some..?
Then, can you speak to:
1. Functional DNA/RNA/Proteins NEVER spontaneously form "naturally", outside already existing cells, from Sugars, Bases, Phosphates, and Aminos, respectively.
It's Physically and Chemically IMPOSSIBLE.
That's just the Hardware! ??
2. How Did Stupid Atoms Write Their Own Software...?
3. The Universe Creating Itself From Nothing...?
regards
Quote:
#1- Man was created from dust, not Monkees. (although I've always suspected that Peter Tork could be the second coming)
#2- The thousands of years old book told me so. And of course, that book is the confirmed word of god because in the book god says it's his word. (He also says that wimmin should keep their pie holes shut and be subservient- so it's got that going for it too.)
Once you accept the truth of 1 and 2, the next steps are abundantly clear.
You must set about showing to the world that evolution can't possibly be true.
No evidence will ever matter because of 1 and 2.
Define Scientific Evidence? Please provide some..?
Then, can you speak to:
1. Functional DNA/RNA/Proteins NEVER spontaneously form "naturally", outside already existing cells, from Sugars, Bases, Phosphates, and Aminos, respectively.
It's Physically and Chemically IMPOSSIBLE.
That's just the Hardware! ??
2. How Did Stupid Atoms Write Their Own Software...?
3. The Universe Creating Itself From Nothing...?
regards
Software, hardware, DNA, RNA, blah blah blah...
You use a lot of scientific words and cite a ton of sources yet say pretty much nothing of substance. Just stop.
But yelling at science to provide proof while you stand behind a "God" figure is questionable on a good day.
Quote:
First of all, I've clearly shown "evolution" isn't "Science". "Peer Review" is a Procedural Argument not a Substantive one. Also, Science isn't up for a Vote; Consensus doesn't = TRUTH. "Peer Review" is not a Step in the Scientific Method. Check out the Journal of Creation (it's "Peer Reviewed" by credentialed scientists)
But what you've actually shown is that you have no understanding of science at all. Zip, zero, nada, zilch.
Thanks for your Baseless "Opinion" (Fallacy). Can you show where?
Then can you tell us "Your" understanding of Science...?
Thanks
We have had fans of other teams post here so I'm not implying it is a prerequisite or anything, I'm just curious.
Quote:
In comment 12140985 Cam in MO said:
Quote:
#1- Man was created from dust, not Monkees. (although I've always suspected that Peter Tork could be the second coming)
#2- The thousands of years old book told me so. And of course, that book is the confirmed word of god because in the book god says it's his word. (He also says that wimmin should keep their pie holes shut and be subservient- so it's got that going for it too.)
Once you accept the truth of 1 and 2, the next steps are abundantly clear.
You must set about showing to the world that evolution can't possibly be true.
No evidence will ever matter because of 1 and 2.
Define Scientific Evidence? Please provide some..?
Then, can you speak to:
1. Functional DNA/RNA/Proteins NEVER spontaneously form "naturally", outside already existing cells, from Sugars, Bases, Phosphates, and Aminos, respectively.
It's Physically and Chemically IMPOSSIBLE.
That's just the Hardware! ??
2. How Did Stupid Atoms Write Their Own Software...?
3. The Universe Creating Itself From Nothing...?
regards
Software, hardware, DNA, RNA, blah blah blah...
You use a lot of scientific words and cite a ton of sources yet say pretty much nothing of substance. Just stop.
Hmmm. I performed a reading level assessment on the post you replied to using SMOG Grade and Fleschh-Kincaid Index and it averaged roughly 5th Grade.
Either you have some serious reading comprehension issues or cognitive dissonance is ruling the roost.
regards
We have had fans of other teams post here so I'm not implying it is a prerequisite or anything, I'm just curious.
Too Funny. I'm originally from the Home of The World Champion Pittsburgh Steelers!!
Always liked the Giants however... especially when they beat up on the Cowgirls. Tell Cruz to stop flashing that Illuminati sign...the Salsa can stay, hope his knee heals up. Beckham is scary good.
Beef up that defensive line, draft some Linebackers, O-Line---start over.
regards
Heh.
Either you have some serious reading comprehension issues or cognitive dissonance is ruling the roost.
regards
Haha...I admit that I'm probably mentally challenged to some degree. I mean, I did join the Marine Corps...so that explains it. Since you used your irrelevant military experience as something of a credential in an earlier post, what do I get as my prize for doing the same? I mean, I was in the military, so I must have a valid point, no?
But it's rather sad that you come here to back up your boy Spock when you're not even a fan of the Giants. And in doing so, you've done a banged up job of providing nothing of substance beyond trying to obscure the weakness in your (and Spock's) argument through use of long diatribes. It's a known tactic used by those, who can't clearly and concisely articulate their points.
Nah, nothing effing weird about that. Not at all.
And it was the suspicion behind my 2/17/2015 4:02 pm post.
Regards.
Quote:
I'm curious if you a NY Giant fan?
We have had fans of other teams post here so I'm not implying it is a prerequisite or anything, I'm just curious.
Too Funny. I'm originally from the Home of The World Champion Pittsburgh Steelers!!
Always liked the Giants however... especially when they beat up on the Cowgirls. Tell Cruz to stop flashing that Illuminati sign...the Salsa can stay, hope his knee heals up. Beckham is scary good.
Beef up that defensive line, draft some Linebackers, O-Line---start over.
regards
Ummm...the Patriots are champions?
You're a breathe of fresh air...critical thinking appears to be a lost art.
1. The woman in the interview said the car doors were open, Chopper footage reveals the doors were closed.
2. 3 MSM outlets said that all the weapons were registered to Nancy. AR 15 is already illegal in the State of CT... how can she register an illegal weapon?
3. When & Pics of the 600 kids evacuated along with 600 parents coming to pick them up.
4. Church of Satan East Coast Hub = you guessed it Newtown CT!!
In response to some dumb bitch making comments about how Sandy Hook was/may have been a false flag event, this jackass commented:
You're a breathe of fresh air...critical thinking appears to be a lost art.
1. The woman in the interview said the car doors were open, Chopper footage reveals the doors were closed.
2. 3 MSM outlets said that all the weapons were registered to Nancy. AR 15 is already illegal in the State of CT... how can she register an illegal weapon?
3. When & Pics of the 600 kids evacuated along with 600 parents coming to pick them up.
4. Church of Satan East Coast Hub = you guessed it Newtown CT!!
Link - ( New Window )
You're a breathe of fresh air...critical thinking appears to be a lost art.
1. The woman in the interview said the car doors were open, Chopper footage reveals the doors were closed.
2. 3 MSM outlets said that all the weapons were registered to Nancy. AR 15 is already illegal in the State of CT... how can she register an illegal weapon?
3. When & Pics of the 600 kids evacuated along with 600 parents coming to pick them up.
4. Church of Satan East Coast Hub = you guessed it Newtown CT!!
Seriously?
Great horse to back, Spock.
Quote:
Hmmm. I performed a reading level assessment on the post you replied to using SMOG Grade and Fleschh-Kincaid Index and it averaged roughly 5th Grade.
Either you have some serious reading comprehension issues or cognitive dissonance is ruling the roost.
regards
Haha...I admit that I'm probably mentally challenged to some degree. I mean, I did join the Marine Corps...so that explains it. Since you used your irrelevant military experience as something of a credential in an earlier post, what do I get as my prize for doing the same? I mean, I was in the military, so I must have a valid point, no?
But it's rather sad that you come here to back up your boy Spock when you're not even a fan of the Giants. And in doing so, you've done a banged up job of providing nothing of substance beyond trying to obscure the weakness in your (and Spock's) argument through use of long diatribes. It's a known tactic used by those, who can't clearly and concisely articulate their points.
Seriously...what kind of a scientist is Enoch that Spock keeps referring to him as a scientist?
And if that fucking dude was a Marine, I will choke someone.
Couldn't agree more.
Quote:
I'm curious if you a NY Giant fan?
We have had fans of other teams post here so I'm not implying it is a prerequisite or anything, I'm just curious.
Too Funny. I'm originally from the Home of The World Champion Pittsburgh Steelers!!
Always liked the Giants however... especially when they beat up on the Cowgirls. Tell Cruz to stop flashing that Illuminati sign...the Salsa can stay, hope his knee heals up. Beckham is scary good.
Beef up that defensive line, draft some Linebackers, O-Line---start over.
regards
Well as a Christian myself I would suggest that simply coming here just to argue this is likely not as beneficial as you may believe it is and since you like football I would recommend as a new member that you consider adding something to some other threads and get to know some other members, and they you and more importantly the tenor of the forum itself.
Technically religious threads are against the forum rules and while we are occasionally given some latitudes I believe we should try our best to respect that. I am reluctant to but will sometimes post specifics about my beliefs but usually only if I think something specific about the bible or my faith is being completely misunderstood or misquoted in attempt to at least better clarify for those that may be interested in the difference, or if asked something directly from a member but even then I try to remember what the rules ask of us and keep it short and to the point. Long debates on religious or political themed topic is clearly not respecting the rules of the forum and I think we should respect that as hard as that may personally be for some especially because while not always ironically it is often those that are against any form of religion that seem to initially bring up the topic.
You mean you typed my handle into google and tracked me down !! Astonishing. Scotland Yard should be calling any minute.
Does the mere fact that I don't change my handle tell you anything?
Spock's a good man and spent some months on the receiving end of what you just been through. Tactically, a wise move...wouldn't you say?
So now that your done super sleuthing the inconsequential irrelevant background noise....much like being overly preoccupied with where the bear came from while getting mauled.... Type in: "How Did Stupid Atoms Write Their Own Software" and see what it says, report back with the answer.
regards
Quote:
#1- Man was created from dust, not Monkees. (although I've always suspected that Peter Tork could be the second coming)
#2- The thousands of years old book told me so. And of course, that book is the confirmed word of god because in the book god says it's his word. (He also says that wimmin should keep their pie holes shut and be subservient- so it's got that going for it too.)
Once you accept the truth of 1 and 2, the next steps are abundantly clear.
You must set about showing to the world that evolution can't possibly be true.
No evidence will ever matter because of 1 and 2.
Define Scientific Evidence? Please provide some..?
Then, can you speak to:
1. Functional DNA/RNA/Proteins NEVER spontaneously form "naturally", outside already existing cells, from Sugars, Bases, Phosphates, and Aminos, respectively.
It's Physically and Chemically IMPOSSIBLE.
That's just the Hardware! ??
2. How Did Stupid Atoms Write Their Own Software...?
3. The Universe Creating Itself From Nothing...?
regards
If you actually want to engage in debate, you should at the very least do as you ask of others first. Specifically you haven't addressed kicker's posts to you which refute all of your creepy pasta that you've been posting. Your breach of ediquitte by not responding to him point by point is like jumping straight from "Dog dare" to "Triple dog dare" which at the very least is disappointing and leads me to believe that any points that you can't refute you'll either ignore completely or attempt to misdirect with more pseudoscience.
So, no. It isn't my turn. It's still yours.
I do admire your skills when it comes to debating this topic, tho. Although I find them to be intentionally disingenuous, it's obvious you've had plenty of practice masking your untruths in such a way as to appear as "solid science" to most lay people. Funny that once you run across someone that recognizes it for the bullshit it is and refutes it with logic and evidence that you stop interacting with that person and ignore the evidence. Does that make you feel like you "won"? Or are you motivated more by the praise you receive from others when you "win"?
That's cute.
But yelling at science to provide proof while you stand behind a "God" figure is questionable on a good day.
He is right though... Evolution has not be proven and you can't prove it in this argument. However while he keeps spouting Evolution is not a science because it can't be proven is wrong. It is a scientific theory.
"A scientific theory is a well-substantiated explanation of some aspect of the natural world that is acquired through the scientific method and repeatedly tested and confirmed through observation and experimentation.[1][2] As with most (if not all) forms of scientific knowledge, scientific theories are inductive in nature and aim for predictive power and explanatory force.[3][4]
The strength of a scientific theory is related to the diversity of phenomena it can explain, and to its elegance and simplicity (Occam's razor). As additional scientific evidence is gathered, a scientific theory may be rejected or modified if it does not fit the new empirical findings- in such circumstances, a more accurate theory is then desired. In certain cases, the less-accurate unmodified scientific theory can still be treated as a theory if it is useful (due to its sheer simplicity) as an approximation under specific conditions (e.g. Newton's laws of motion as an approximation to special relativity at velocities which are small relative to the speed of light).
Scientific theories are testable and make falsifiable predictions.[5] They describe the causal elements responsible for a particular natural phenomenon, and are used to explain and predict aspects of the physical universe or specific areas of inquiry (e.g. electricity, chemistry, astronomy). Scientists use theories as a foundation to gain further scientific knowledge, as well as to accomplish goals such as inventing technology or curing disease. Scientific theories are the most reliable, rigorous, and comprehensive form of scientific knowledge.[3] This is significantly different from the common usage of the word "theory", which implies that something is a conjecture, hypothesis, or guess (i.e., unsubstantiated and speculative).[6]"
Thus the scientific theory of evolution is absolutely science, but not proven science. You are confusing the two. What you can prove is almost all the stories in the bible are made up. It is funny because as the church and bibles hold strong that everything happened as written in the bible... Some like Enoch and Spock like to branch out and say... Oh wait the world is millions of years old and the reason things were brought forth were because God programmed the DNA on each and every living being. That things don't mutate and evolve on their own. What is there proof of that? DNA is dumb atoms so some man up in the sky obviously wrote the code.
Let's take a virus for example. Virus change and mutate as they are exposed to different elements right. That is why somethings that kill virus will no longer be affective because the Virus adapts and changes. How can that be when the Virus is dumb? Obviously according to you God is up there writing the software?
#TeamSpock - ( New Window )
Quote:
google Enoch2021. Spock recruited from another forum, and apparently being a fucking jesus freak as well as troll is his full-time job. This is what he does...scary, but true.
You mean you typed my handle into google and tracked me down !! Astonishing. Scotland Yard should be calling any minute.
Does the mere fact that I don't change my handle tell you anything?
Spock's a good man and spent some months on the receiving end of what you just been through. Tactically, a wise move...wouldn't you say?
So now that your done super sleuthing the inconsequential irrelevant background noise....much like being overly preoccupied with where the bear came from while getting mauled.... Type in: "How Did Stupid Atoms Write Their Own Software" and see what it says, report back with the answer.
regards
You grossly overestimate your own abilities. Maybe on Christian sites with a degraded level of intelligence due to inbreeding do you warrant any consideration - here, in case you haven't noticed, you are being laughed at for your posts, and now the fact that you are a truther reveals all we need to know about your "thinking".
Maybe fuck off and take Spock with you back to what I can only assume is Christian Mingle?
Quote:
In comment 12140985 Cam in MO said:
Quote:
#1- Man was created from dust, not Monkees. (although I've always suspected that Peter Tork could be the second coming)
#2- The thousands of years old book told me so. And of course, that book is the confirmed word of god because in the book god says it's his word. (He also says that wimmin should keep their pie holes shut and be subservient- so it's got that going for it too.)
Once you accept the truth of 1 and 2, the next steps are abundantly clear.
You must set about showing to the world that evolution can't possibly be true.
No evidence will ever matter because of 1 and 2.
Define Scientific Evidence? Please provide some..?
Then, can you speak to:
1. Functional DNA/RNA/Proteins NEVER spontaneously form "naturally", outside already existing cells, from Sugars, Bases, Phosphates, and Aminos, respectively.
It's Physically and Chemically IMPOSSIBLE.
That's just the Hardware! ??
2. How Did Stupid Atoms Write Their Own Software...?
3. The Universe Creating Itself From Nothing...?
regards
If you actually want to engage in debate, you should at the very least do as you ask of others first. Specifically you haven't addressed kicker's posts to you which refute all of your creepy pasta that you've been posting. Your breach of ediquitte by not responding to him point by point is like jumping straight from "Dog dare" to "Triple dog dare" which at the very least is disappointing and leads me to believe that any points that you can't refute you'll either ignore completely or attempt to misdirect with more pseudoscience.
So, no. It isn't my turn. It's still yours.
I do admire your skills when it comes to debating this topic, tho. Although I find them to be intentionally disingenuous, it's obvious you've had plenty of practice masking your untruths in such a way as to appear as "solid science" to most lay people. Funny that once you run across someone that recognizes it for the bullshit it is and refutes it with logic and evidence that you stop interacting with that person and ignore the evidence. Does that make you feel like you "won"? Or are you motivated more by the praise you receive from others when you "win"?
He moved on without answering me when I asked him to define a term he used "same kind of organism". He has a problem when anyone takes him off his script.
Exactly.. I pointed this out yesterday. He is just cutting an pasting from an old argument he has had many times before. He isn't actually answering anyone's questions. He is just putting the next post up for people to see.
The website is called bigblueinteractive.com if you want to become a member now. Trust me, the discussion will pop up again soon and I want you ready this time. I am not lying, there was not one other opposing voice who stood up but mine.
This is a NY Giants website, so as you can imagine, many NY Jews cursing me out because I will not relent by telling them there is only one path to God and it runs through Jesus.
Thanks Enoch,
Spock out
A plea for a "bulldog that God made" to assist with those pesky "NY Jews".
Wowza.
Also - some read this aloud without cracking:
"Point me to the best scientific anti evolution website you know. It has to be written by qualified scientists."
From Spock to Enoch2021 asking for his help on BBI:
The website is called bigblueinteractive.com if you want to become a member now. Trust me, the discussion will pop up again soon and I want you ready this time. I am not lying, there was not one other opposing voice who stood up but mine.
This is a NY Giants website, so as you can imagine, many NY Jews cursing me out because I will not relent by telling them there is only one path to God and it runs through Jesus.
Thanks Enoch,
Spock out
ps. Point me to the best scientific anti evolution website you know. It has to be written by qualified scientists. Thanks.
Enoch2021's reply to confirm that he joined and will team up with Spock:
Don't really know of any single website that is "anti evolution".....you have AIG and CMI that have Credentialed Scientists.
Just email me when they start the shenanigans and we'll get to cases :thumbsup:
Spock giving Enoch2021 a handjob as his appreciation:
But here is a copy of the address of the thread I participated in. Enjoy the read. Of course, I am Spock.
http://corner.bigblu...2&thread=510213
It may be possible to add a comment, I'm not sure. You can try.
HEY ENOCH IT IS BACK UP. GO GET EM!!!!!!!!!!!
Can't make this shit up...pure awesomeness.
Quote:
They closed that thread because it got too ugly- mostly against me-but I was hoping you would come to my aid, with your background. When a similar thread opens I will notify you my email.
The website is called bigblueinteractive.com if you want to become a member now. Trust me, the discussion will pop up again soon and I want you ready this time. I am not lying, there was not one other opposing voice who stood up but mine.
This is a NY Giants website, so as you can imagine, many NY Jews cursing me out because I will not relent by telling them there is only one path to God and it runs through Jesus.
Thanks Enoch,
Spock out
Darn New York Jews....
Quote:
They closed that thread because it got too ugly- mostly against me-but I was hoping you would come to my aid, with your background. When a similar thread opens I will notify you my email.
The website is called bigblueinteractive.com if you want to become a member now. Trust me, the discussion will pop up again soon and I want you ready this time. I am not lying, there was not one other opposing voice who stood up but mine.
This is a NY Giants website, so as you can imagine, many NY Jews cursing me out because I will not relent by telling them there is only one path to God and it runs through Jesus.
Thanks Enoch,
Spock out
Wow... Let me help you here... I am not a "NY Jew" ... You sir are a complete dick