describes himself on his profile as "Ambassador fir Christ". That does not describe a coward like him who has now run away when he has been outed for what he really is. Come back and confess your sins and try to be a good Christian.
A "man" came into this world, performed countless number of miracles including raising people from the dead. He then willingly went to the cross to die a horrendous death, and then rose from the dead to prove he is not just a man.
This man then went on to confide with hundreds of friends before he beamed up to heaven. The proof of his life, miracles, and resurrection are all documented better than any book of antiquity.
Does that really come off as fiction to people?
Absolutely it does, and the funny part is that no one knows who actually wrote this excellent documented book
Moses wrote the first five books probably around 1500bc, so that puts the good book around 3500 years old, not 2000. The New Testament is about 2000 years old, but people of true faith usually believe in the veracity of both books- the first (erroneously referred to as the Old Testament) and the New Testament.
There is no evidence/none/nada of Moses writing anything in the bible. There is a claim that those are his words made by whoever wrote it, but zero proof of that
Wow, what just happened there? I knew you were a Bulldog in the way you could argue issues, but you managed to make me look kind and gentle compared to you. Ha
I guess they didn't appreciate your "this doesn't pass the test as science" argument. Oh well.......
Anyhow, I was criticized for not talking enough science, which admittedly is not my area of expertise, so I brought you in knowing you have several biology degrees and have plenty of time on your hand being retired. But I had no idea it would turn out this way. I guess they don't want to talk YOUR SCIENCE.
I don't see how I could add anything to that conversation so I might as well avoid it. All they want to talk about with me is how much I hate Jews. I'm weary of that dialogue. Let them think what they want.
I apologize for getting you involved. I'm not sure you are enjoying the conversation. I was really hoping to read some good scientific debate like Bill Nye vs. I forgot his name, but it never did happen. Thanks for trying. I owe you....I think.
Spock out
PS what is the Sandy Hook thing all about?
Delusional
This is exactly what I was waiting for. Nice to see that even after a total failure, spock thinks that his/Enoch's argument was a success. That's definitely delusional.
This god of theirs certainly seems ok with the free range stupid.
OK with it? Religion encourages it. What tree did Eve's apple come from? The tree of knowledge. Think about that - our original sin was a quest for knowledge.
obviously he's going to lie low for a bit hoping that all of this blows over. He just hasn't come to the full realization that he won't survive this epic fail, and it will trail him to every single thread from here on out.
Who knows, it may end in something positive. He may just fade away or he may keep his mouth shut on his overt-religiousness. One can hope.
I don't know if enoch is still reading this thread and I know that nobody is even replying to his nonsensical, rambling, delusional bullshit, but I don't want him to think he got the last end on me.
1) thanks for pointing out the clock experiments as if I didn't already learn about them in high school science class. the point is that you cannot test einstein's theories on gravity on a planetary scale (didn't even say relativity, which you brought into the discussion). So the experiments you referenced proved it on a.... "micro"level. You know, the same way natural selection has been replicated on a "micro"level and can be extrapolated to a macro level, you stupid fuck (though as it's been explained before, there isn't really a delineation between micro vs macro evolution).
2) you're the only idiot who thinks astronomy isn't science.
3) yes, you are hanging on semantics. how about this for a novel thought: I don't give a fuck if you call evolution science or not, it's clearly the way life has evolved on this planet, regardless of whatever the fuck your deluded brain wants to call it.
4) you really believe the ark story? what a moron. that concept of a flood is an archetype that has been used throughout countless religions and cultures, but yours is right because GAWDDD said so. plus you're actually dumb enough to still believe it.
5) stop using a stupid analogy like "code" and "program". these are imperfect analogies and the fact that you use them as if they're fool proof only highlights how delusional you are, and how far you have to contort your "arguments" to make sense.
6) by the way, the format of your posts and the RANDOM capitalization and STRANGE sentences comes off as if you're typing on shrooms. too bad you couldn't learn how to fucking put together a coherent thought or format basic text while you were busy getting your "biology" degrees.
7) how do you get a nun pregnant? a: dress her up as an altar boy.
8) why can't you ask jesus for directions? a: he's always pointing both ways.
9) did you hear about the time jesus played hockey? he wasn't very good, he kept getting nailed to the boards.
(to the people on BBI that are religious but whom are worthy of respecpt, such as steve in ky: I apologize in advance for those jokes, but if there's ever a time to pull them out, it would be to make enoch2201 feel uncomfortable. to balance it out, here's an indian joke:
"I don't see how I could add anything to that conversation so I might as well avoid it. All they want to talk about with me is how much I hate Jews. I'm weary of that dialogue. Let them think what they want."
Translation. They got the goods on me in my own words and there is no way I can continue to try to hide the fact anymore that I am an antisemitic bigot. I need to run away and hide rather than be a man and admit what I am. Darn it. It is checkmate.
that if someone was interested in being the best (Christian, Buddhist, Jewish, Hindu, Muslim) person they could be ....they would be so busy in productive debate with themselves they would have no time for bad debate with others.
I mean all of those strive at the living practice level for consistent practice of humility, tolerance, patience and compassion for others and community.
That takes a lot of hard self examination and emotional intelligence.
Which of the following concepts does not fit: humility, tolerance, compassion, community, emotional intelligence, self examination, aggressive debate using bad science?
It remains a little astonishing to me that Spock doesn't understand...
1) Adhering to a Messianic "Jewish" cult that sees no role in the world for Jews who don't convert;
2) Believing that non-converted Jews only have a role in Israel in generating the preconditions for the Rapture; and
3) Insisting that believers in God, including Jews, who do not see the light and accept Jesus as their personal savior are doomed to hell...
might be considered a little offensive. Then when he brings in his pit bull and describes BBI as being filled with "NY Jews"....game over.
Personally, I don't much give a rat's ass about Enoch, he was a hired gun who shot his load and will fade away.
But Spock, by contrast, should be permanently banned from imo. The only possible reason to keep him around is so the next time he raises his head above the fortress wall, we can shoot it off.
I hate using the gun metaphors, but they fit in this case.
"NY Jews" on BBI isn't necessarily racist. One can simply use it as a description. It is true. I suspect there more than likely is a higher population of posters on a NY Giants fan site that are both from NY and Jewish.
That said, when you consider the history and beliefs of the source and the context in which it was posted- He doesn't deserve the benefit of the doubt (that it was used purely as a description and innocent).
The reason I bring it up is because a few days ago I described an Asian guy as, "Asian" and was told it was racist. The exact quote was, "The Asian guy that works up front on C-Shift, I forget his name."
Don't get me wrong, I'm all for making awesome racist jokes at work. It just really irks me when someone says I'm being racist when I'm not even trying.
"NY Jews" on BBI isn't necessarily racist. One can simply use it as a description. It is true. I suspect there more than likely is a higher population of posters on a NY Giants fan site that are both from NY and Jewish.
That said, when you consider the history and beliefs of the source and the context in which it was posted- He doesn't deserve the benefit of the doubt (that it was used purely as a description and innocent).
The reason I bring it up is because a few days ago I described an Asian guy as, "Asian" and was told it was racist. The exact quote was, "The Asian guy that works up front on C-Shift, I forget his name."
Don't get me wrong, I'm all for making awesome racist jokes at work. It just really irks me when someone says I'm being racist when I'm not even trying.
Knowing you and how you think, that Asian comment was racist...REPENT, YOU RACIST PRICK!!!
"NY Jews" on BBI isn't necessarily racist. One can simply use it as a description. It is true. I suspect there more than likely is a higher population of posters on a NY Giants fan site that are both from NY and Jewish.
That said, when you consider the history and beliefs of the source and the context in which it was posted- He doesn't deserve the benefit of the doubt (that it was used purely as a description and innocent).
The reason I bring it up is because a few days ago I described an Asian guy as, "Asian" and was told it was racist. The exact quote was, "The Asian guy that works up front on C-Shift, I forget his name."
Don't get me wrong, I'm all for making awesome racist jokes at work. It just really irks me when someone says I'm being racist when I'm not even trying.
That would assume that all posters giving Spock a hard time were Jews. I don't believe that is true.
Should posters on BBI be banned for what they say on other websites?
I personally don't want spock banned either since he provides such awesome entertainment. However, when you bring little to the table and actually bring a rampant troll to the site just to back your idiotic ass up, I think that can be construed as something worthy of banning.
"NY Jews" on BBI isn't necessarily racist. One can simply use it as a description. It is true. I suspect there more than likely is a higher population of posters on a NY Giants fan site that are both from NY and Jewish.
That said, when you consider the history and beliefs of the source and the context in which it was posted- He doesn't deserve the benefit of the doubt (that it was used purely as a description and innocent).
The reason I bring it up is because a few days ago I described an Asian guy as, "Asian" and was told it was racist. The exact quote was, "The Asian guy that works up front on C-Shift, I forget his name."
Don't get me wrong, I'm all for making awesome racist jokes at work. It just really irks me when someone says I'm being racist when I'm not even trying.
Knowing you and how you think, that Asian comment was racist...REPENT, YOU RACIST PRICK!!!
Love you?...;)
I always love your brand of lovin', Ronald. What it lacks in girth and depth, it makes up for in being for "long time."
Should posters on BBI be banned for what they say on other websites?
I personally don't want spock banned either since he provides such awesome entertainment. However, when you bring little to the table and actually bring a rampant troll to the site just to back your idiotic ass up, I think that can be construed as something worthy of banning.
I would like back two of the posters I have most despised, Matt in Syracuse who is a total nut job and Buckyd, a serial liar and 9/11 truther. They provide entertainment plus I hate to shut anyone up no matter how much I disagree with them.
Egg creams?
or if they actually showed up for their duty
Quote:
In comment 12132698 Chef said:
Quote:
between Man and Chimp.... but there is never douche-baggery missing from BBI...
Man is not descended from chimps so that statement makes no sense.
The chimp to man connection is comical enough, but imo, the primordial soup to man wins first place for absurdity.
Predicable.
And both.
Quote:
A "man" came into this world, performed countless number of miracles including raising people from the dead. He then willingly went to the cross to die a horrendous death, and then rose from the dead to prove he is not just a man.
This man then went on to confide with hundreds of friends before he beamed up to heaven. The proof of his life, miracles, and resurrection are all documented better than any book of antiquity.
Does that really come off as fiction to people?
Absolutely it does, and the funny part is that no one knows who actually wrote this excellent documented book
There is no evidence/none/nada of Moses writing anything in the bible. There is a claim that those are his words made by whoever wrote it, but zero proof of that
He's in for such a surprise.
He's in for such a surprise.
LOL..Yeah i am, been on vacation down in Mexico. it is getting really good, but i Will stop doing it for now.
Actually, it was mary magdalene who snuck out on the 3rd day. Jesus left on the 4th as not to rouse any suspicion.
Just think if God added the special sauce
It's like a Stephen King novel. The first 50 pages are tedious, but once you're past that, it's gold.
Quote:
OMG, Enoch!
Wow, what just happened there? I knew you were a Bulldog in the way you could argue issues, but you managed to make me look kind and gentle compared to you. Ha
I guess they didn't appreciate your "this doesn't pass the test as science" argument. Oh well.......
Anyhow, I was criticized for not talking enough science, which admittedly is not my area of expertise, so I brought you in knowing you have several biology degrees and have plenty of time on your hand being retired. But I had no idea it would turn out this way. I guess they don't want to talk YOUR SCIENCE.
I don't see how I could add anything to that conversation so I might as well avoid it. All they want to talk about with me is how much I hate Jews. I'm weary of that dialogue. Let them think what they want.
I apologize for getting you involved. I'm not sure you are enjoying the conversation. I was really hoping to read some good scientific debate like Bill Nye vs. I forgot his name, but it never did happen. Thanks for trying. I owe you....I think.
Spock out
PS what is the Sandy Hook thing all about?
Delusional
This is exactly what I was waiting for. Nice to see that even after a total failure, spock thinks that his/Enoch's argument was a success. That's definitely delusional.
Think Enoch's going to answer that?
I just pictured Enoch in the Matrix after reading this post. Question is, did he take the blue pill or the red?
OK with it? Religion encourages it. What tree did Eve's apple come from? The tree of knowledge. Think about that - our original sin was a quest for knowledge.
I just pictured Enoch in the Matrix after reading this post. Question is, did he take the blue pill or the red?
He will be asleep soon.
Who knows, it may end in something positive. He may just fade away or he may keep his mouth shut on his overt-religiousness. One can hope.
1) thanks for pointing out the clock experiments as if I didn't already learn about them in high school science class. the point is that you cannot test einstein's theories on gravity on a planetary scale (didn't even say relativity, which you brought into the discussion). So the experiments you referenced proved it on a.... "micro"level. You know, the same way natural selection has been replicated on a "micro"level and can be extrapolated to a macro level, you stupid fuck (though as it's been explained before, there isn't really a delineation between micro vs macro evolution).
2) you're the only idiot who thinks astronomy isn't science.
3) yes, you are hanging on semantics. how about this for a novel thought: I don't give a fuck if you call evolution science or not, it's clearly the way life has evolved on this planet, regardless of whatever the fuck your deluded brain wants to call it.
4) you really believe the ark story? what a moron. that concept of a flood is an archetype that has been used throughout countless religions and cultures, but yours is right because GAWDDD said so. plus you're actually dumb enough to still believe it.
5) stop using a stupid analogy like "code" and "program". these are imperfect analogies and the fact that you use them as if they're fool proof only highlights how delusional you are, and how far you have to contort your "arguments" to make sense.
6) by the way, the format of your posts and the RANDOM capitalization and STRANGE sentences comes off as if you're typing on shrooms. too bad you couldn't learn how to fucking put together a coherent thought or format basic text while you were busy getting your "biology" degrees.
7) how do you get a nun pregnant? a: dress her up as an altar boy.
8) why can't you ask jesus for directions? a: he's always pointing both ways.
9) did you hear about the time jesus played hockey? he wasn't very good, he kept getting nailed to the boards.
(to the people on BBI that are religious but whom are worthy of respecpt, such as steve in ky: I apologize in advance for those jokes, but if there's ever a time to pull them out, it would be to make enoch2201 feel uncomfortable. to balance it out, here's an indian joke:
what time is it in india? a: 7-11 on the dot.
damn, that post was cathartic.
Translation. They got the goods on me in my own words and there is no way I can continue to try to hide the fact anymore that I am an antisemitic bigot. I need to run away and hide rather than be a man and admit what I am. Darn it. It is checkmate.
Some of those Lebron James free agency threads broke 100 pages, I think.
I mean all of those strive at the living practice level for consistent practice of humility, tolerance, patience and compassion for others and community.
That takes a lot of hard self examination and emotional intelligence.
Which of the following concepts does not fit: humility, tolerance, compassion, community, emotional intelligence, self examination, aggressive debate using bad science?
1) Adhering to a Messianic "Jewish" cult that sees no role in the world for Jews who don't convert;
2) Believing that non-converted Jews only have a role in Israel in generating the preconditions for the Rapture; and
3) Insisting that believers in God, including Jews, who do not see the light and accept Jesus as their personal savior are doomed to hell...
might be considered a little offensive. Then when he brings in his pit bull and describes BBI as being filled with "NY Jews"....game over.
Personally, I don't much give a rat's ass about Enoch, he was a hired gun who shot his load and will fade away.
But Spock, by contrast, should be permanently banned from imo. The only possible reason to keep him around is so the next time he raises his head above the fortress wall, we can shoot it off.
I hate using the gun metaphors, but they fit in this case.
Link - ( New Window )
That said, when you consider the history and beliefs of the source and the context in which it was posted- He doesn't deserve the benefit of the doubt (that it was used purely as a description and innocent).
The reason I bring it up is because a few days ago I described an Asian guy as, "Asian" and was told it was racist. The exact quote was, "The Asian guy that works up front on C-Shift, I forget his name."
Don't get me wrong, I'm all for making awesome racist jokes at work. It just really irks me when someone says I'm being racist when I'm not even trying.
That said, when you consider the history and beliefs of the source and the context in which it was posted- He doesn't deserve the benefit of the doubt (that it was used purely as a description and innocent).
The reason I bring it up is because a few days ago I described an Asian guy as, "Asian" and was told it was racist. The exact quote was, "The Asian guy that works up front on C-Shift, I forget his name."
Don't get me wrong, I'm all for making awesome racist jokes at work. It just really irks me when someone says I'm being racist when I'm not even trying.
Knowing you and how you think, that Asian comment was racist...REPENT, YOU RACIST PRICK!!!
Love you?...;)
That said, when you consider the history and beliefs of the source and the context in which it was posted- He doesn't deserve the benefit of the doubt (that it was used purely as a description and innocent).
The reason I bring it up is because a few days ago I described an Asian guy as, "Asian" and was told it was racist. The exact quote was, "The Asian guy that works up front on C-Shift, I forget his name."
Don't get me wrong, I'm all for making awesome racist jokes at work. It just really irks me when someone says I'm being racist when I'm not even trying.
I personally don't want spock banned either since he provides such awesome entertainment. However, when you bring little to the table and actually bring a rampant troll to the site just to back your idiotic ass up, I think that can be construed as something worthy of banning.
Quote:
"NY Jews" on BBI isn't necessarily racist. One can simply use it as a description. It is true. I suspect there more than likely is a higher population of posters on a NY Giants fan site that are both from NY and Jewish.
That said, when you consider the history and beliefs of the source and the context in which it was posted- He doesn't deserve the benefit of the doubt (that it was used purely as a description and innocent).
The reason I bring it up is because a few days ago I described an Asian guy as, "Asian" and was told it was racist. The exact quote was, "The Asian guy that works up front on C-Shift, I forget his name."
Don't get me wrong, I'm all for making awesome racist jokes at work. It just really irks me when someone says I'm being racist when I'm not even trying.
Knowing you and how you think, that Asian comment was racist...REPENT, YOU RACIST PRICK!!!
Love you?...;)
I always love your brand of lovin', Ronald. What it lacks in girth and depth, it makes up for in being for "long time."
It's not the size of the boat that matters but the motion in the ocean and the longevity. Just ask my wife...HEYYOOO!!!
I was just relating a thought (mostly about my narcissistic self and how I think).
Quote:
Should posters on BBI be banned for what they say on other websites?
I personally don't want spock banned either since he provides such awesome entertainment. However, when you bring little to the table and actually bring a rampant troll to the site just to back your idiotic ass up, I think that can be construed as something worthy of banning.
He's just trying to figure out what materials that he's used in other forums that he can copy and paste to bludgeon us with.
I still want to know about his thoughts on Sandy Hook.
Quote:
I see that you are checking up on this thread.
He's just trying to figure out what materials that he's used in other forums that he can copy and paste to bludgeon us with.
I still want to know about his thoughts on Sandy Hook.