And has 3 years under his belt.
Victor Cruz was 2 years older than Randle is now when he started with us.
Randle's production, by year:
2012-298 yds
2013-611 yds
2014-938 yds
1847 career yds,avg 616 yds a year, 12 career TDS
1 fumble.
His production has increased by over 300 yds a year every year.In 131 career carries he has 1 fumble.One.
JPP is more than 2 years older, and is constantly touted for how young he is and how much upside there is to him.
He's STILL one of the youngest guys on the team, of over 90+ guys listed on the roster, 6, just six, are younger.
He's 6 months older than Beckham, who just got here and is a babe by NFL standards.
And he's not damaged.If we don't resign him after the year, one in which I think he's only going to get better, I think it will be more our loss than his.I also think some people are going to be suprised at what his next contract offer is.
My question is, why does what seems to me like most of this board think this guy is done, a waste, has no upside, won't improve, but ultimately and most of all won't be resigned and don't want him resigned?
As far as other holes that need filling, free agency does that well - and while the pool of players available has an element of hit and miss, its a much surer thing than filling holes in the draft. The Giants have some money this off-season and I expect them to spend it.
2015: $2,896,250
2016: $3,475,500
2017: $4,054,750
The projected cap hits for the 2015 #9 pick are about the same - a tiny bit higher. The $2.33MM number this year wouldn't really push the Giants' allocation to WRs beyond reason, with Beckham around $2.37MM and Randle still on his cheap rookie deal at $1.04MM. Cruz is the killer at $8MM+; but given his health situation, he's currently more of an argument for drafting a WR at 9 than against it.
Positional allocation of cap dollars becomes a bigger issue for 2016. At that point, there probably won't be room for Cruz's $9.9MM cap hit and a big second contract for Randle. There might not be room for either, if the 2015 #9 pick is a WR. But that problem might solve itself, if Randle doesn't earn a big payday, or if Cruz doesn't return to form.
Link - ( New Window )
And if you don't think that their are no ties on a big board where you are comparing apples to oranges, and everything on film is subjective analysis anyway then you are not thinking.
I would just love for the Giants to draft a WR at #9 to have that person or RR or Cruz sit on their ass all season while we stink elsewhere.
That said, I wouldnt mind taking a chance on Green-Beckham in the 2nd round if hes there, provided that we have addressed the OL or DL position in the first round.
It was a nice 2 game stretch where he took advantage of the attention ODB was getting and padded his final season numbers. But overall I just wasn't impressed with is season.
Name me the one skill that Randle has that really sets him apart from an average #2 WR? He's really not "great" at any one thing, and he isn't a technician either. He's just a pretty good 2/3 WR imo, he's never shown even a hint of being a true #1 WR.
Those last 2 games were nice and I'm glad he has one more season to prove me wrong. But as of right now he's just a pretty averagish player.
If he just needs more time to learn the plays, he should have a breakout season coming up.
It just seems like he's a slow learner to me at home watching on TV. Could be wrong....
I still want another WR because I am not sure what to expect from Cruz and again, we may or may not re-sign RR. So I still want more offensive talent surrounding eli.
I don't think so.
If he performs up to his expectations in 2015, why not?
His route running is suspect....does not possess great speed....
But, this is his 4th year....he either gets it or doesn't....it's also a contract year.....if he has a big year, it will be hard to re-sign him.....
It was a nice 2 game stretch where he took advantage of the attention ODB was getting and padded his final season numbers. But overall I just wasn't impressed with is season.
Name me the one skill that Randle has that really sets him apart from an average #2 WR? He's really not "great" at any one thing, and he isn't a technician either. He's just a pretty good 2/3 WR imo, he's never shown even a hint of being a true #1 WR.
Those last 2 games were nice and I'm glad he has one more season to prove me wrong. But as of right now he's just a pretty averagish player.
I agree with you but with Beckham being great and Cruz potentially being a very good number 2, Randle being an average 2/3 is more than enough. Especially with all the other holes the team has.
Quote:
Are you going to give him a 2nd contract?
I don't think so.
If he performs up to his expectations in 2015, why not?
So you pay a guy who's had 1 year out of 4 "up to his expectations"?
Does that sound like wise investment to you?
Ruben Randle won't be on the team in 2016. Cruz is coming off a major knee, Our RBs need an upgrade, TEs are Meh.
Ruben Randle won't be on the team in 2016. Cruz is coming off a major knee, Our RBs need an upgrade, TEs are Meh.
Its not a fact. How many weapons does Brady have. Or Wilson last year?
Look- I'm not suggesting that the OL and D don't need to be addressed.
I just find it funny that all of a sudden people think the defense is a massive train wreck. I'm not as down on the defense as a lot of folks are.
I think getting rid of Fewell is addition by subtraction, we have top CBs, JPP will be back, Hankins looks to be a legit DT, Moore/Ayers/Wynn/Kennard. It isn't THAT bad.
We get the same people who piss and moan about the LBs, when it's clear the organization doesn't value them as much. Yet, these people still scram for a LB high in the draft.
Randle's chances of being on this team in 2016 are minimal.
Look- I'm not suggesting that the OL and D don't need to be addressed.
I just find it funny that all of a sudden people think the defense is a massive train wreck. I'm not as down on the defense as a lot of folks are.
I think getting rid of Fewell is addition by subtraction, we have top CBs, JPP will be back, Hankins looks to be a legit DT, Moore/Ayers/Wynn/Kennard. It isn't THAT bad.
We get the same people who piss and moan about the LBs, when it's clear the organization doesn't value them as much. Yet, these people still scram for a LB high in the draft.
Brady and Wilson both had one elite weapon and a bunch of other average at best weapons.
We have one elite weapon and a bunch of other average weapons + Cruz being an x factor.
Another weapon would be nice but there are so many other needs I'm not sure if its a must right now.
Shit- If the D makes 2 stops last year, we probably win 2 more games.
That being said, I'm cool with adding another DL somewhere, just not sure the it will be at #9.
As of right now, it looks like WR or one of the OL is best value.
2008 big need safety (started 7th round draft pick Michael Johnson in 2007) Pick Safety Kenny Phillips
2009 Biggest need wr after Plax arrest - - Pick Hakeem Nicks
2010 BPA Pick (JPP)
2011 Prince was a combination need/BPA pick
2012 Biggest Need running back after Bradshaw/Jacobs decline- - Pick RB Wilson
2013 Biggest need tackle - - pick T Pugh of Syracuse
2014 BPA Pick at a position of need (OBJ)
I think getting rid of Fewell is addition by subtraction, we have top CBs, JPP will be back, Hankins looks to be a legit DT, Moore/Ayers/Wynn/Kennard. It isn't THAT bad.
Spag's doesn't have the horses.....
Who are your backup corners if one goes down again?
How do you know JPP will be back? And if franchised, how will he play?
Hankins is your only tested lineman....right now, Ayers can't lift a coffee cup.....Moore is not a starter, yet.....Wynn had one game he can show the grand kids.....Kennard, has to stay on the field, and if he can, has to make plays....
Who is your MLB? Who are your starting safeties? You will need two DE's, one DT, and you will need backups everywhere...
What if?
we need a RC, and Wison is BPA. we desperately need a OL the next year after diehl and snee are gone, Pugh is BPA. Next year, Nicks leaves,we take a WR#1,because hey, BPA. My ass.
BPA is subjective, players are ranked by tier, not in some strict numerical order.they can take whoever they like from a row of players and call him BPA without technically lying.
Quote:
In comment 12151992 drkenneth said:
Quote:
Are you going to give him a 2nd contract?
I don't think so.
If he performs up to his expectations in 2015, why not?
So you pay a guy who's had 1 year out of 4 "up to his expectations"?
Does that sound like wise investment to you?
I don't understand why you think this is so crazy.
He's improved year to year, and it's not like he's going to command a ton of money to re-sign unless, like many receivers, he suddenly has a breakout year in year 4.
I'm also extremely confident our pick at #9 is Fowler, Cooper or White. I dont think anyone outside those 3 is worthy of our 9th pick.
We could drop down a few and get Shaq still if those 3 are gone
Randle Maturing > - ( New Window )
The key point to remember about Manningham is that he struggled through an injury-plagued contract year, opening the door to Cruz's breakout season. His knee problems go all the way back to 2006, and he entered free agency as damaged goods - Super Bowl hero or not. Say what you will about Randle; he's really durable. Has he ever missed a game at any level? That's a huge difference between him and Mario, and suggests that he will be able to stay on the field and continue his improvement in 2015. Randle also doesn't carry the drug risk that has dogged Manningham throughout his career, nor does he bear the stigma of a Wonderlic score more befitting a parakeet than a human being.
If Randle raises his receiving total by 300 yards this season, as he has in each previous year of his career, or even by 200, he will be very popular next March. While that's a big "if", obviously. it's well within the realm of possibility.