According to Philly Voice's Jimmy Kempski, "evidence continues to build" that the Eagles plan to trade up for Oregon QB Marcus Mariota.
We've followed Kempski's work for years and can't ever remember him being wrong. Most notably, he called the DeSean Jackson release well in advance. Kempski acknowledges he previously believed Philly moving up for Mariota was "unrealistic," but now "it appears the Eagles are determined to get their guy." Moving up from No. 20 into the top-two picks would likely cost Philadelphia most of its 2015 draft class, and a 2016 first-round pick.
Source: Philly Voice
Feb 27 - 1:53 PM
The big question I have for BBI....
In an almost impossible scenario where Mariota fell to #9 and the Eagles offered the Giants
Their #1, #2, #3, #4 this year and #1 next year... would you guys have the balls to pull off the trade knowing you MAY have traded a 15 year superstar to the Eagles. I do it.
I would definitely do it, but this is the deal I want: 2015 #1, 2016 #1, 2016 #3, and Fletcher Cox.
Maybe Chip is a Giants fan after all!
Maybe Chip is a Giants fan after all!
SB ready team? Didnt they go 4-12 the year before he came? 8-8 the year before that? They've went 10-6 both years Kelly was there without having a top 15 QB.
To further that, the coach that was supposed to be a QB guru and RG3s biggest backer was run out of town and then he got a guy that literally throws him under the bus at every opportunity in Jay Gruden.
With health, Mariota will have Chip Kelly - who made Sanchez look decent for a few games - as his champion. Kelly will not be ousted any time soon, he just got all of that new found power.
I think it's foolish to compare the two situations and write it off as a franchise ruining move. It wasn't long ago that there were a LOT of questions circling the Eli trade.
For a trade giving up significant picks to work, Mariota must stay healthy and the Eagles must make a run this year. That is a lot to ask or expect.
Name one instance where giving up a bunch of picks actually paid dividends.
Keep in mind, this trade would be at least twice the magnitude of the eli deal and probably somewhere in the 3 times the number of pick range..
Quote:
is never a smart trade to mortgage almost an entire draft class or top picks across multiple years.
Name one instance where giving up a bunch of picks actually paid dividends.
Keep in mind, this trade would be at least twice the magnitude of the eli deal and probably somewhere in the 3 times the number of pick range..
Eli Manning?
What the Giants gave up for Eli will look like pennies compared to what it would take the Eagles to jump up into the top 10 for this.
I can't see how that is realistic at his salary.
What's interesting about the Giants trade-up for Eli is that the team FO - and specifically Reese - responded with a superb draft day in 2005 when they were shorn of their 1st rounder. A trade like that handicaps your drafting for a period of time so the GM has to up his game to maintain competitiveness.
And if it doesn't work (and let's face it--"working" means MM has to win them a lot of games) they could be in the basement for several years. Which is nice.
It would seem to me that would be an admission that maybe Kelly isn't all that to begin with.
MM is not a franchise QB.
His best shot is with Chip Kelly, but I don't see it being great.
Make Philly buy the #1 spot.
If I am Tampa or Tenn. I am telling anyone that will listen they are drafting him. Make Philly give up the house.
Also tell everyone the Rams are trying to move up.
TMS : 3:34 pm : link : reply
Kelly getting Mariota is big trouble for the rest of the NFC East. Hope it does not happen period.
TMS
aimrocky : 3:36 pm : link : reply
agree 100%. I'm not sure why anyone would want this.
The odds of a massive lopsided trade leading to long-term success are so small vs. the probability for failure. Even short term success can be a mirage. Just look at Washington. The first year of the RGIII trade everyone thought they found gold. Then the injury left him a shell and the team has had two horrific seasons.
The cost of Mariota will likely mean a lack of depth across the board in a couple of years, and Mariota is not even considered a sure-fire prospect.
The odds of a massive lopsided trade leading to long-term success are so small vs. the probability for failure.
This here about sums it up.
Mariota is obviously a great fit for Kelly's system, but what happens if the league catches up to it? What happens if that OL of theirs suddenly gets old? (Herremans is already out of there). I think the price to get MM will be staggering (I'm thinking their entire 2015 draft, their 2016 #1, and some combination of a 2016 #2, #3, and 2017 #1) but that being said, these are the Eagles. The same team that convinced GMs that AJ Feely was worth a #2. They might get a sweetheart deal.
The Raiders are like that dumb kid in your fantasy football league that everyone take turns ripping off...Wouldn't be surprised if they pawned off McCoy (with his ridiculous salary and probably a year or two away from the RB cliff of death) and only a couple of picks to get them to #4.
You never HAVE to do anything. Especially when you're already a rebuilding team at the bottom. If the Jets feel that Mariota is a system QB and Winston is slow and a headcase, then they'd be worse off by reaching for one of them at #6 than they would drafting an impact player at another position and stopgapping the QB position with whatever trash is on their roster or a journeyman option until they find something they like.
They could also pick a QB in the later rounds. I'm sure people said the '00 draft didn't have a franchise QB too.
MM is not a franchise QB.
His best shot is with Chip Kelly, but I don't see it being great.
It is a little bit to early for writing MM off as not being a franchise QB. The concern is how quickly he can assimilate to NFL formations and playing under center. He has incredible physical skills and appeared to be able to make the throws. At this point, it is looking like he will be the 1st QB taken in the draft and JW may not even be a 1st rd selection.
I could see the Jets going after a QB in FA. They have already been snake-bit on (2) QB's taken in rd#1! They also have a lot of other needs, especially WR and RB. JMHO.
Quote:
HAVE to take a QB. They have no NFL starting caliber player on their roster right now.
I could see the Jets going after a QB in FA. They have already been snake-bit on (2) QB's taken in rd#1! They also have a lot of other needs, especially WR and RB. JMHO.
What QB in FA? There are none. The best one is Mark Sanchez.
Quote:
In comment 12156479 spike said:
Quote:
HAVE to take a QB. They have no NFL starting caliber player on their roster right now.
I could see the Jets going after a QB in FA. They have already been snake-bit on (2) QB's taken in rd#1! They also have a lot of other needs, especially WR and RB. JMHO.
What QB in FA? There are none. The best one is Mark Sanchez.
You are right, I said it wrong. There are a few QB's that would be available via trade that teams might consider going for, current backups.
Quote:
HAVE to take a QB. They have no NFL starting caliber player on their roster right now.
I could see the Jets going after a QB in FA. They have already been snake-bit on (2) QB's taken in rd#1! They also have a lot of other needs, especially WR and RB. JMHO.
Sanchez and who?
Maybe they could contact the Giants and trade their 1st rounder this year and next for Nassib.
The Rams could grab a QB and trade Bradford to the Jets for some extra medical supplies.
Plenty of options for the Jets at QB.