for display only
Big Blue Interactive The Corner Forum  
Back to the Corner

Archived Thread

NJ.Com's Powell's rationale re Giants' leverage with JPP

Big Blue '56 : 3/1/2015 10:24 am
Quote:
Even the NFL's second-tier defensive ends, like the Seahawks' Michael Bennett or the Buccaneers' Michael Johnson received a contract in the $8-10 million range annually, and Pierre-Paul's raw numbers probably placed him in the $10-12 million range. That number might be too rich for the Giants' tastes, given the fact that Pierre-Paul has an injury history, with back and shoulder problems, and a motor that tends to run hot and cold.

term, that $14-15 million in salary will make Pierre-Paul very happy. But it doesn't mean he would necessarily be any closer to retiring as a Giant. Assuming Pierre-Paul plays under the tag in 2015, the Giants could use that year to evaluate him further and see if a healthy, motivated Pierre-Paul can sustain his good production at the end of 2014 through an entire season.

It's a gamble, to be sure, but one that could be mitigated by how the Giants use their No. 9 pick in the draft this spring. There are several top defensive end prospects projected to go in the top 10-15 picks, including Florida's Dante Fowler Jr. and Nebraska's Randy Gregory. If the Giants use their top pick on one of those players, it gives them the potential leverage they need in contract negotiations with Pierre-Paul.

If Pierre-Paul has a banner 2015, another double-digit sack season with his typically strong play against the run, then the Giants are protected by having a young replacement on their roster if he prices himself out of their budget next offseason.

This is why it is so important for Reese to hit on his top pick, and why selecting another wide receiver in the first round is an unnecessary luxury for the team if the contract stalemate with Pierre-Paul isn't resolved by the draft.

Even with Pierre-Paul on the roster next season, the defensive line is sorely in need of an upgrade, and a player like Fowler or Gregory would give defensive coordinator Steve Spagnuolo an opportunity to recreate the relentless pass rush that the Giants rode to Super Bowl victories in 2007 and 2011.

If everything broke right, meaning Pierre-Paul stays healthy and has a good season, Fowler or Gregory or another defensive end prospect shows promise as a rookie, and their salary cap remained in good health after the 2015 season, then it's a win-win for the Giants. They get another crack at keeping Pierre-Paul in a Giants' uniform next winter, and have a rising stud on the defensive line to pair him or replace him with.


Read entire article in case I've screwed up context


Link - ( New Window )
Pages: 1 2 <<Prev | Show All |
Gregory  
BigBlueCane : 3/1/2015 1:52 pm : link
looks like a 3-4 OLB more then a DE to me. Fowler or bust if we stay in the top ten and have to pick a defensive player.

And yes, WR is a luxury in the current league. If the rules change again, then maybe that changes as well.
RE: Don't agree with this:  
Stupendamatic : 3/1/2015 2:04 pm : link
In comment 12157770 Big Blue '56 said:
Quote:


Quote:


This is why it is so important for Reese to hit on his top pick, and why selecting another wide receiver in the first round is an unnecessary luxury for the team if the contract stalemate with Pierre-Paul isn't resolved by the draft.



Yup, that's where he lost me.
Toth  
JonC : 3/1/2015 2:31 pm : link
BPA. If that's a DE, terrific, but right now the projections lean towards a WR before a DE.
JPP's  
PaulN : 3/1/2015 2:42 pm : link
Production and talent is not the issue here at all, the issue here and the reason for the Giants cautious approach to JPP is all health related, a bad back is real big issue. The Giants would be better served to franchise JPP, see how he holds up this season, then make a more informed decision next off season, there is only one problem with what I just said, if he has a career year this season then it will cost us a fortune to sign him long term. With the number of tackles he had this season so high, if he repeated that and basically repeated his stoutness against the run, and then also racked up 17 sacks on top of that, his contract could eclipse every DE in the league next off season when you take his age into consideration. So the bullshit about his level of play is just that, he has not ben quite as good due to his injury, that aside he is probably the second best DE in the league.
RE: Toth  
shockeyisthebest8056 : 3/1/2015 2:51 pm : link
In comment 12157978 JonC said:
Quote:
BPA. If that's a DE, terrific, but right now the projections lean towards a WR before a DE.


Bingo.

Can you imagine if the Arizona Cardinals said they couldn't take Larry Fitzgerald in 2004 draft because Anquan Boldin just had an amazing rookie season? With a top 10 pick, draft the BPA.
RE: RE: Toth  
OC2.0 : 3/1/2015 2:59 pm : link
In comment 12157989 shockeyisthebest8056 said:
Quote:
In comment 12157978 JonC said:


Quote:


BPA. If that's a DE, terrific, but right now the projections lean towards a WR before a DE.



Bingo.

Can you imagine if the Arizona Cardinals said they couldn't take Larry Fitzgerald in 2004 draft because Anquan Boldin just had an amazing rookie season? With a top 10 pick, draft the BPA.


And 1. Plus Spags should shift JPP to LDE & let Moore or a pick either sink or swim @ RDE, imo
RE: Toth  
Toth029 : 3/1/2015 3:07 pm : link
In comment 12157978 JonC said:
Quote:
BPA. If that's a DE, terrific, but right now the projections lean towards a WR before a DE.

I am fine with that.

I do think they'll take a DE though, sometime in the first three rounds.
RE: Right now  
dguy901 : 3/1/2015 3:09 pm : link
In comment 12157793 JonC said:
Quote:
no 4-3 DE stacks up at #9, imo. Powell's looking at that pick like a fan ...

If Dupree impresses on the bench at his pro-day, I think he moves up big time! Then again, I am the one who liked Armstead, what do I know!
If we go DE, Dupree  
SGMen : 3/1/2015 3:18 pm : link
Gregory is just too light. OLB n 3-4 defense.

RE: JPP Compensation  
dguy901 : 3/1/2015 3:26 pm : link
In comment 12157843 geelabee said:
Quote:
Has to be based on a realistic assessment based on where the Giants rank JPP relative to the top 10 DEs based on both production, potential, and youth...there is a market for DE THATS already established...its that simple...its not based on what the morons on this board think he should get...or personal feelings it should be based on the market...what really pisses me off is people interjecting personal feels and jealousy into the discussion.

THE ONLY QUESTION TO BE ASKED HERE IS GIVE ME A TRUE ASSESMENT WHERE JPP RANKS RELATIVE TO THE TOP 10 DE...BASED ON PRODUCTION, YOUTH, AND POTENTIAL UPSIDE...THATS ALL!!

Bottom line is he only had 3.5 sacks thru the 1st 11 games. He had 9 in the last 5 games against less than steller offenses. The $12-13m/yr figure is on the high side unless it is incentive laden. JMHO.
RE: Interesting Read  
AcidTest : 3/1/2015 4:35 pm : link
In comment 12157919 Emil said:
Quote:
But I'll never understand why people keep mentioning Randy Gregory and the Giants in the same sentence. He is 235lbs, which limits him to a 3-4. I'm not optimistic the Giants can find a 4-3 DE at #9. The strength of the 1st round as far as pass rushers go is the 3-4 OLB. Unless a player surges, DE might need to be addressed in the 2nd or 3rd round.


^This.
RE: RE: JPP Compensation  
Scyber : 3/1/2015 5:28 pm : link
In comment 12158026 dguy901 said:
Quote:
Bottom line is he only had 3.5 sacks thru the 1st 11 games. He had 9 in the last 5 games against less than steller offenses. The $12-13m/yr figure is on the high side unless it is incentive laden. JMHO.


All pass rushers pile up sacks against bad teams. There is a reason those teams are bad. It isn't unique to JPP. Half of JJ Watt's sacks came agains the Jags and the Titans.
....  
AnishPatel : 3/1/2015 6:19 pm : link
Quote:
This is why it is so important for Reese to hit on his top pick, and why selecting another wide receiver in the first round is an unnecessary luxury.



I disagree. It's not a luxury. Our offense has 1 good player, and we still have to see how he handles year 2. Bill B called it a "Cruz and Nicks game", well what is it now? OBJ and....? Surround Eli with talent so he can be productive during these last years. These numbers may be the difference between HOF and not. He showed he can do well in this system. Let's add to the skill players and give him the players to excel.

So I disagree with the notion that it's a luxury.
RE: ....  
chris r : 3/1/2015 6:22 pm : link
In comment 12158367 AnishPatel said:
Quote:


Quote:


This is why it is so important for Reese to hit on his top pick, and why selecting another wide receiver in the first round is an unnecessary luxury.




I disagree. It's not a luxury. Our offense has 1 good player, and we still have to see how he handles year 2. Bill B called it a "Cruz and Nicks game", well what is it now? OBJ and....? Surround Eli with talent so he can be productive during these last years. These numbers may be the difference between HOF and not. He showed he can do well in this system. Let's add to the skill players and give him the players to excel.

So I disagree with the notion that it's a luxury.


I assume you mean one good weapon not player (Eli?). But how many good weapons does NE and Seattle have? Beckham is already Gronk or Lynch caliber. The rest of the skill position players on both teams are pretty average and I think the Giants compare well. The problem is that on the OL and on defense, those teams kick the Giants ass.

So we could use another weapon but we certainly don't need one IMO.
JPP  
Dragon : 3/1/2015 7:06 pm : link
This issue with JPP is will we ever see that special player again its been three years of tease but no real great player. So do we pay 12-16 mil for someone who is just a 6-8 mil value maybe. He seems to be healthy but the production is lacking for a guy we all feel should be one of the top three DE's in the game. His play against the run is well beyond good but the ability to make the game changing plays has all but disappeared. Here is a something to consider if this was JJ Watt would anyone not think we have to sign this guy no matter the cost? That's the difference in the JPP discussion will this guy be worthy of 12 mil or more for the next five seasons. The scary part of this is that I'm sure management is as concerned about this as we all are and not sure what the best move is really either.
I've said a few times the Giants  
mrvax : 3/1/2015 7:15 pm : link
will try to gauge exactly how much $ it will take to sign JPP. They will probably have a good idea if they will pay what he wants prior to the draft.

I'm thinking that if JPP looks too expensive, the Giants could give a lot more weight to drafting a possible replacement. If they take a DE, it may very well signal the final year of JPP as a Giant.
RE: I like fowler at 9  
mrvax : 3/1/2015 7:18 pm : link
In comment 12157790 RicFlair said:
Quote:
I like fowler at 9


I have no 1st round favorite pick this year but since last month, Fowler is my predicted Giants pick if he's there. Spags would be very happy with a young speedster he could play at OLB or anywhere on the line (for some plays).

They got McAdoo a shiney new WR, they might get Spags a guy he really wants this year. Our defense up front, well,...frankly it sucks.
Question: Does anyone know  
mrvax : 3/1/2015 7:39 pm : link
if the Giants are leaning toward an exclusive or a non-exclusive tag for JPP?
RE: RE: ....  
AnishPatel : 3/1/2015 8:04 pm : link
Seattle has their scheme where they run with Wilson, as we saw 1st hand, and Beast mode. Not sure what his status is. That a long is a ball busting scheme to defend. However, if you can, the Seahawks can be beaten.

NE is always on autopilot. They maximize their talents. They don't have a boner for balance like we do or try to maintain. If Bill feels like he needs Brady to throw 283182 a game, then so be it. They play to their strengths and that's why both are all time greats. It's amazing how they be successful year after year.

Having said that now, I couldn't give two shits what those teams have. I care about my team and increasing the firepower of our offense which is just 1 player. Plus I want to see how he can do in his 2nd season now that everyone knows about him. That would mean someone would need to step up. I saw countless times when Eli did have time to pass, that no one got open. That was painful to see. When finally he gets time, and no one can find space to get open.

So now that Eli is 34, I want more talent surrounding him. It's not like we can't go what we need and limited to 1 draft pick for the whole draft. We still have free agency and the draft to round out our roster. I am not worried about filling areas of concern.
New England  
bc4life : 3/2/2015 8:23 am : link
has also had a pretty good O-Line, no peaks or valleys - just solid consistent play.
You should be able to pay franchise players  
#10* : 3/2/2015 10:15 am : link
on both sides of the ball. Eli is on offense and JPP is obviously the franchise player on defense. No one else comes close in that discussion for us.

Health, nobody is really 100% healthy in the NFL all the time. Is there a health clause that could be put in the language lol. Pay JPP or pay Suh but leveraging him with 'Gregory' is not going to work when he can get the money elsewhere. Just put 12 as the hard limit w/incentives.
ill keep saying it  
djm : 3/2/2015 10:58 am : link
if JPP was on another team these last 5 years BBI members would be tripping all over themselves to sign this guy.

Good rookie year. Best player on a super bowl champion. Solid 3rd year. Slipped in his 4th year following surgery but still managed to play most games and still played against the run. Bounce back 5th season that saw him mget better as the year progressed...

We know JPP can play here. We know he can play through injuries. We know he can dominate in big spots and literally carry a defense in January and February. We know the defensive talent base slipped badly in 2012 and 2014 yet JPP still played well. We know when the talent is in place JPP is the best player on this defense and a top 3 DE in all of football.

We also know that JPP got hurt and has the back thing and that's certainly something to be leery of but in the NFL injuries are always a concern. Every player is a risk. JPP showed that he is pretty far removed from any back issues and the surgery he got performed (microdiscectomy) is the least invasive and easiest back surgery to deal with.

I really really really don't want to FT JPP. But we pretty much have to re-sign him. I'd rather be wrong and re-sign him then be wrong and let him walk.

And just remember JPP's first 5 years completely dwarf Strahan's first five years. It's not even close actually. The guy has a chance to put together a very special career. He needs to stay a Giant. If i'm wrong so be it...that's life.
Pages: 1 2 <<Prev | Show All |
Back to the Corner