Duke junior Rasheed Sulaimon was dismissed from the men's basketball team on Jan. 29, 2015, with no official explanation given. According to a report published today by the Chronicle, Duke's student newspaper, Sulaimon was dismissed more than a year after he was accused of sexually assaulting two female students. The Chronicle also reports that high-ranking members of the university's athletic department were aware of the allegations as early as March 2014, and violated federal law by failing to report them.
The Chronicle reports that the allegations against Sulaimon were made on two separate occasions at a student retreat called Common Ground, which is held once each semester, and cites multiple witnesses at each retreat.
Deadspin link - (
New Window )
Wanting to gather the facts is fine with me, since i wouldnt expect them to just start kicking kids off the team jsut because someone says they did something, but they should have reported it to at least the school.
The Hunting Ground - ( New Window )
Wanting to gather the facts is fine with me, since i wouldnt expect them to just start kicking kids off the team jsut because someone says they did something, but they should have reported it to at least the school.
Why should they "gather facts"? They're not law enforcement. They're not even student discipline. Pass it up the chain, if he is cleared or if there isn't enough to go forward so be it but let the people actually responsible for sorting this shit out do it.
Feel free to tell me I'm wrong.
Preempt - I'm not trying to defending sexual assault. If Duke did this the administrators should be fired and face legal consequences. But it doesn't compare to what PSU did.
Feel free to tell me I'm wrong.
Preempt - I'm not trying to defending sexual assault. If Duke did this the administrators should be fired and face legal consequences. But it doesn't compare to what PSU did.
Should the coach be fired?
Feel free to tell me I'm wrong.
Preempt - I'm not trying to defending sexual assault. If Duke did this the administrators should be fired and face legal consequences. But it doesn't compare to what PSU did.
McQueary reported he "had seen something inappropriate" to Paterno. Paterno reported what McQueary had said he had seen to the AD and the chief of campus police. The AD and chief of campus police then met with McQueary and took his statement. The AD reported the meeting results to the university president. The university president reported the incident to the Second Mile, where Sandusky was getting the kids. As of yet, nothing has been heard from, and no investigation of, the Second Mile charity. This is how it was covered up.
Quote:
Penn State covered up child abuse by a coach and I think that's a whole other level then covering up sexual assault by college aged kids.
Feel free to tell me I'm wrong.
Preempt - I'm not trying to defending sexual assault. If Duke did this the administrators should be fired and face legal consequences. But it doesn't compare to what PSU did.
Should the coach be fired?
In the PSU case, yeah I think JoPa should have been fired. The Freeh Report indicates enough people knew and a blind-eye was turned. The Head Coach is responsible for his coaches and players. In the Duke case, if evidence comes forward that Coach K tried to cover it up, then yeah he should be fired too.
I just can't trust any entity that has a shit load of power and needs to keep earning shit loads of money. This shit never surprises me. And the bags of shit at the top that perpetuate the lies and coverups are one in the same. Yeah they look oh so nice on TV performing lip service and they look so nice at the fund raisers...but these people are all the same. They all need to win and they all need power. Guess how far these people will go to remain at the top?
[quote]
Quote:
The Chronicle also reports that high-ranking members of the university's athletic department were aware of the allegations as early as March 2014, and violated federal law by failing to report them.
I don't believe the Clery Act requires the reporting to law enforcement of third-hand allegations. Absent the reporting of a crime by the victims or witnesses, or any other evidence, the school's only obligation appears to be to follow its own internal reporting and investigation processes. Based on only what's been reported here, that senior administrators were notified, it would appear that Duke has at least followed the law in this matter.