|
|
Quote: |
And while Tisch believes Tom Coughlin gives the franchise an advantage at the outset of every season because he checks off every box necessary for a head coach, he's on board with the win-or-else mandate. "I agree with that," Tisch said. "I think the Giants have a tradition of stability supporting a head coach, supporting a general manager. I don't want to say we're adverse to change, but we like stability as the owner style. It was certainly that way before my family got involved in 1991. It is very much sort of a part of the Mara DNA, which I'm extremely respectful of. "But at a certain point, when change is necessary, and if obviously things do have to change, we will do that." |
When it comes from John Mara blame is directed mostly at the coaches. Tisch being a little more removed from the process likely has a little different perspective.
It's not up to me and I hope it's moot, but I could see another failed season resulting in more than just a head coaching change.
Exactly... IMO, this is on the front office more than the coach.
IF it truly were win or else you would think JPP/ELI would have been done by now freeing up cap space to bring in OL and Safety help.
Does this make ownership evil? No, because above anything else a pro football franchise is a for-profit business. It's nice to get your picture taken with the Lombardi trophy, but not as nice as depositing big fat juicy checks to your various bank accounts.
Funny that he mentions disappointments in personnel selection ... an area plastered with John Mara's fingerprints.