for display only
Big Blue Interactive The Corner Forum  
Back to the Corner

Archived Thread

K. Gilbride on PFT: NYG should move Pugh inside to Guard

FranknWeezer : 4/1/2015 6:49 pm
Didn't hear it myself. Just passing along for BBI.

Quote:
Pete Damilatis & #8207;@PFF_Pete 24m24 minutes ago
Interesting to hear Kevin Gilbride say on @PFTonNBCSN the Giants should move Justin Pugh inside to guard. Certainly knows him well.
1 retweet 1 favorite
Reply Retweet1 Favorite1
More
NFL Philosophy & #8207;@NFLosophy 22m22 minutes ago
@PFF_Pete @PFTonNBCSN He mauls on the interior. He could be a stud inside.
Pages: 1 2 <<Prev | Show All |
Shit - then Gilbride is no smarter  
mrvax : 4/1/2015 8:40 pm : link
than an average BBI poster. Pugh took a few snaps at guard at his senior bowl. That's it unless he tried it in high school.

He's a tackle, not a guard, tackle, not a guard. Repeat after me...
HH it's Killdrive just sayin  
gtt350 : 4/1/2015 8:42 pm : link
.
Leonard Davis  
jbeintherockies : 4/1/2015 8:52 pm : link
Leonard Davis was drafted in the first round of the 2001 NFL draft. He came out of Uni of Texas as a left tackle. Once he got to the NFL, he played some tackle until he settled in as a very highly paid guard.

Just because a player comes out of the college ranks playing a certain position doesn't mean that is his ideal position in the NFL.


All-Pro Scouting Services, L.L.C.
Leonard Davis

Recently I conducted an interview with Leonard Davis, the All-American LT for the Texas Longhorns. Leonard is projected to be a top 10 selection in this April's draft and is one of the best looking OT prospects in the past few years. His large frame(6'6", 370), combined with surprising speed(5.15/40)allows him to be a very versatile tackle. Many project him as playing on the right side, but Leonard is a NATURAL LT. We'll see how he'll be utilized, but it's sure he's a devestating blocker.
The difference is their weight  
robbieballs2003 : 4/1/2015 9:01 pm : link
Pugh is like 300 pounds soaking wet. How is he going to take on 330 pound DTs? I'm not saying he can't but I just don't see how he is a mauler inside when that has never been his game. So, he's never mauled 270 pound DEs but now he's gonna maul guys that outweigh him?
RE: The difference is their weight  
Jay on the Island : 4/1/2015 9:27 pm : link
In comment 12214029 robbieballs2003 said:
Quote:
Pugh is like 300 pounds soaking wet. How is he going to take on 330 pound DTs? I'm not saying he can't but I just don't see how he is a mauler inside when that has never been his game. So, he's never mauled 270 pound DEs but now he's gonna maul guys that outweigh him?

Actually Pugh put on weight last year and went into the season at 315lbs. If he moves to guard he can afford to put on another 10-15 lbs to help him handle the bigger DT's.
Link - ( New Window )
Thanks Jay  
robbieballs2003 : 4/1/2015 9:32 pm : link
However, he took a step back this passed year. Maybe the extra weight didn't help him
RE: Thanks Jay  
Big Blue '56 : 4/1/2015 9:37 pm : link
In comment 12214062 robbieballs2003 said:
Quote:
However, he took a step back this passed year. Maybe the extra weight didn't help him


Remember, he played most of the year with one useful arm, not ideal for an OL
The team has hinted at it  
Coach Mason : 4/1/2015 10:00 pm : link
And David Diehl mentioned it too.

As area junc said he has good feet and a pretty good Guard build if he adds some weight (which his frame can handle).
Pugh can move  
RAIN : 4/1/2015 11:09 pm : link
he has great balance. If a guard can't maul, he better be able to pull or get out to the second level.. which is what people would expect out of him.
Evan Mathis is an all pro at a listed weight of 298  
Ten Ton Hammer : 4/1/2015 11:27 pm : link
It can be done.
RE: The difference is their weight  
jbeintherockies : 4/1/2015 11:53 pm : link
In comment 12214029 robbieballs2003 said:
Quote:
Pugh is like 300 pounds soaking wet. How is he going to take on 330 pound DTs? I'm not saying he can't but I just don't see how he is a mauler inside when that has never been his game. So, he's never mauled 270 pound DEs but now he's gonna maul guys that outweigh him?

Snee wasn't exactly a monster and he handled himself just fine. I think Snee was listed at 6'2" 305.
Richie Seubert didn't ....  
Manny in CA : 4/2/2015 12:23 am : link
"Maul" anybody, ever, BUT when he was healthy was probably the best pulling guard in the NFL.

Richie was quick, smart and had excellent technique, timing and vision - things Pugh seems to have.

Pugh's problem - he isn't wide enough or strong enough to seal the corner or strong enough to plow holes in the defense (the way Reggie McKinzie used to).

When the Giants were dominating the NFC East, that's what they were doing best the inside tackle (with Seubert pulling to trap the MLB); Snee stopping the DT in his tracks and Mac throwing the DE at the corner, if he thought about making the tackle.

Hard to disagree with Kevin; he was there when the running game was at it's best.
He  
SoZKillA : 4/2/2015 12:35 am : link
Struggles with bigger DEs. What do you think heavier and stronger DTs are going to do to him ?
Pugh is definately not ideally a RT  
chris r : 4/2/2015 12:45 am : link
RT is a power position and he's not a power player. Plus playing on the outside exposes his lack of length. He's best suited for an athletic, pulling LG in the Seubert mold IMO.
As just about every scout not on the Giants payroll has stated  
Bob in Newburgh : 4/2/2015 7:57 am : link
based on physical characteristics Pugh's optimum NFL position is OG.

He lacks the length and bulk causing him to overcome a lot with perfect technique to win his battles at OT.
Agree that he could be a good LG. If they get Scherff at RT, Schwartz  
Victor in CT : 4/2/2015 8:36 am : link
comes back at RG and Richburg is the answer atC, then they are going to be a right-running team behind Scherff and Schwartz. Pugh would then be the pulling guard.

I also don't think he has been good enough at Tackle to say that he can't be moved.
I agree that Pugh hasn't shown any tendency to be a mauler,  
Section331 : 4/2/2015 9:26 am : link
but that doesn't mean he can't be effective inside. Play angles, influence the DT to go where you want him to, Pugh is smart enough to figure it out.
Coughlin said that they want Pugh at 318.  
drkenneth : 4/2/2015 9:35 am : link
He said that a year or so ago.
guard  
Les in TO : 4/2/2015 9:47 am : link
can he pull? can he move or stop 330+ defensive tackles? not against the move on its face, but since he's never played the position before i'm cautious about making any declarations that it's going to be successful.
It's bound to happen  
JonC : 4/2/2015 10:06 am : link
Beatty at LT and potentially the #9 pick at RT (and quite possibly Beatty's successor at LT) finally kicks Pugh inside.

Pugh is built like a guard, squat and compact, short arms and legs. He's mobile, technical, can hit moving targets on the pull. He's reportedly up close to 320 and strength will improve as he physically matures, and the blocking schemes NYG utilizes are less about mano y mano power. His game isn't best suited to RT which requires power and lateral movement ability, he's a placeholder out there. imo.

I'd like to see this happen  
Curtis in VA : 4/2/2015 10:08 am : link
.
Reading the tea leaves for some time now  
JonC : 4/2/2015 10:11 am : link
The regime has all but said he's the RT until they find a better one, and they are actively looking now.
Pugh has quick feet  
section125 : 4/2/2015 10:11 am : link
and glides pretty well. I don't see him as a place holder. He might very well be a better LT than RT.

It would be interesting to see how he does at guard.
I think the LT talk is unlikely  
JonC : 4/2/2015 10:13 am : link
and mostly fans saying it.
NYG wants big tackles  
JonC : 4/2/2015 10:16 am : link
6'6 330+, powerful, physically able to secure their edge. Look at the current prospects they're scouting, all at least 6'5 325 and demonstrated powerful tackles. Pugh's profile falls short, they're looking for an upgrade.
If what you are saying is true  
Bones : 4/2/2015 3:24 pm : link
Then there is no doubt in my mind they go OT with their first pick. They could get a good G at 40, but there is no guarantee there will be a starting caliber T at 40, and they need someone to start right away on the OL.
If a pass rusher they want slips  
JonC : 4/2/2015 3:27 pm : link
they'll pick him, second choice would be a WR. If they're all gone (and I'd wager they will be), then I'd wager they go OT. I think the top OTs will grade out higher than Shelton, Waynes, etc.
imv  
JonC : 4/2/2015 3:27 pm : link
.
So they invested a number 1 pick on a guy  
Headhunter : 4/2/2015 3:29 pm : link
who doesn't fit the profile of the position they drafted him for?
Scherff could play RT  
BeerFridge : 4/2/2015 3:31 pm : link
#TeamScherff
RE: So they invested a number 1 pick on a guy  
Klaatu : 4/2/2015 3:31 pm : link
In comment 12214999 Headhunter said:
Quote:
who doesn't fit the profile of the position they drafted him for?


Yup. They were desperate for OTs and he was the last one standing.
couldn't be that desperate  
Headhunter : 4/2/2015 3:33 pm : link
that they would draft for a need and the guy drafted doesn't fit the need.
The Pugh draft pick is spent.  
BeerFridge : 4/2/2015 3:37 pm : link
That's sunk cost. It only matters what's best for the team now. If making a pick for a RT and moving Pugh inside is best for the team, so be it.
Well, it was either him or Menelik Watson.  
Klaatu : 4/2/2015 3:39 pm : link
Watson was the next OT to go off the board. Pugh's not as tall, and his arms are shorter, but he was, what, a three year starter at OT? Watson was very, very raw.
This place is a joke  
Headhunter : 4/2/2015 3:42 pm : link
Justin Pugh makes the PFWA All Rookie team gets hurt the next year and now he is not good enough to play the position he was drafted to play
Missing the point  
JonC : 4/2/2015 3:43 pm : link
and the actual argument.
I understand that if there is a guy available  
Headhunter : 4/2/2015 3:45 pm : link
that is better than Pugh at his position and you get him, by all means put him in the spot. What I find incredulous is that you don't think he is good enough to play the position
I think he's better suited at LG  
JonC : 4/2/2015 3:50 pm : link
and that an upgrade at RT can be procured, even as early as #9 in this draft. Win win. KG agrees, other NFL types concur, and if you read the tea leaves the regime is moving in that direction.
if he remains at RT, so be it  
JonC : 4/2/2015 3:51 pm : link
but resting on laurels is poor strategy, especially for a team that's struggling a bit to rebuild.
Everyone on the Oline can be upgraded  
Headhunter : 4/2/2015 3:53 pm : link
we have no All Pros, this I agree
RE: Everyone on the Oline can be upgraded  
Klaatu : 4/2/2015 3:57 pm : link
In comment 12215045 Headhunter said:
Quote:
we have no All Pros, this I agree


Well, there you have it. But I wouldn't make any assumptions about Pugh or anyone else until after the draft.
I am only disareeing  
Headhunter : 4/2/2015 3:59 pm : link
with what I thought I read that he is not a Giant Right Tackle
RE: SwirlingEddie  
Disgruntled NYGfan : 4/2/2015 5:46 pm : link
In comment 12213998 jbeintherockies said:
Quote:
Have you ever seen a guard play tackle? Pugh looks like a guard playing tackle. Can he do it? Yes. But I think he would be an awesome guard (pulling, screening, etc).


Yes, David Diehl.
RE: couldn't be that desperate  
Great White Ghost : 4/2/2015 6:34 pm : link
In comment 12215007 Headhunter said:
Quote:
that they would draft for a need and the guy drafted doesn't fit the need.
Right, OK, after diehl , Snee and McKenzie were all obviously done, as the boards here screaming they were long before they all actually got canned. They needed an OL< he was the best one available.A guy that was a RT that projected to guard was just fine at the time, especially since we had shit. He was a Giants type of player, and this team historically has no issues whatever with switching guys into diff positions than their natural one.Gilbride in particular wasn't much for matching personell to scheme, felt you were supposed to know all positions so you could be used where needed. that's common knowledge. Don't know that any team has valued "versatility" as much as the Giants over the last 10 years...
RE: guard  
mrvax : 4/2/2015 7:21 pm : link
In comment 12214401 Les in TO said:
Quote:
can he pull? can he move or stop 330+ defensive tackles? not against the move on its face, but since he's never played the position before i'm cautious about making any declarations that it's going to be successful.


Exactly, Les. Again, Radar is is incorrect.
I recall that when Pugh  
fkap : 4/2/2015 7:56 pm : link
was drafted, Giants hinted that the long term plan was to move him inside.
GWG  
fkap : 4/2/2015 7:59 pm : link
agree with you on the Giants putting a lot of emphasis on versatility.

Personally, I don't think it has served them well. you end up with a bunch of jack of all trades, master of none. it's a trait that is fine for a backup, but not for your starters.
RE: RE: Thanks Jay  
TheShade : 4/2/2015 10:17 pm : link
In comment 12214066 Big Blue '56 said:
Quote:
In comment 12214062 robbieballs2003 said:


Quote:


However, he took a step back this passed year. Maybe the extra weight didn't help him



Remember, he played most of the year with one useful arm, not ideal for an OL


he also played a few games with a quad injury before he was forced to sit out. Coughlin questioned why he couldn't play through it like he was doing before then. When he came back from the injury he was very good though, basically shutting down Chris Long during the Rams game, and that ain't an easy task.
Our O-line needs an infusion of power  
Torrag : 4/2/2015 10:37 pm : link
Too many 'wall-off' blockers and finesse types imo. I don't care where Pugh plays I just want to draft a lineman that is going to kick the crap out of the other team for a change.
^Scherff/Collins/Flowers/Tomlinson/Jackson...  
Torrag : 4/2/2015 10:40 pm : link
...all profile as power players that would give our line a different dimension.
Pages: 1 2 <<Prev | Show All |
Back to the Corner