for display only
Big Blue Interactive The Corner Forum  
Back to the Corner

Archived Thread

We have a 23 y/o WR coming off a 71 rec, 938 yd, 3 TD season

Danny Kanell : 4/10/2015 12:28 pm
I sometimes find myself forgetting about what Randle did last year. What can we reasonably expect from him? Has he figured it out? Is this offense much more suited for him than Gilbride's offense?

If he has finally "figured it out", his skillset really is a perfect compliment to Beckham and Cruz.
Hey, at least he's not pouting out a window somewhere.  
Shepherdsam : 4/10/2015 12:29 pm : link


amirite?
What he needs to demonstrate  
JonC : 4/10/2015 12:29 pm : link
is exactly what he did down the stretch. Versus the Rams etc, the lightbulb certainly went on, it needs to stay on.
However, he is in the last year of his deal.  
robbieballs2003 : 4/10/2015 12:30 pm : link
If he has another big year he may want too much money. If he doesn't have a good year then are we going to resign him?
DK  
figgy2989 : 4/10/2015 12:31 pm : link
It seems he definitely figured it out and had a breakout year. He was also on the same page with Eli.

Keep in mind once Cruz went out he was the number 2 guy. With a healthy Cruz, he will be the number 3. That might limit the number of balls thrown his way.

It really is all dependant on how Cruz comes back and if he can be effective.
The issue is he is FA after 2015.  
drkenneth : 4/10/2015 12:38 pm : link
You really willing to offer him $$$?

That's the bottom line here. I think there is a slim chance he's on this team in 2016.
28th in receiving yards in the NFL  
ZogZerg : 4/10/2015 12:38 pm : link
Not bad for a #2, considering there are 32 NFL teams.
I think he's always gotten a bit of a rough go from the fans.  
j_rud : 4/10/2015 12:39 pm : link
We knew coming in that he was physically talented but would need some time to learn the finer points of being an NFL receiver. He's built upon each year: 19/298/3 as a rookie, 41/611/6 sophomore season, and 71/938/3 this past year. He's improving each year and he really turned it on down the stretch. He's had some brain farts and bad days, but if we hadn't become spoiled with young breakout stars like Nicks, Cruz, and Beckham I don't think he'd catch the heat he does. If he continues to develop as he has he should be a weapon this year.
I think Beckham really lit a fire under Randle's ass, too.  
bceagle05 : 4/10/2015 12:40 pm : link
Hope that continues. I think special talents and competitors like Beckham and Matt Harvey can have that effect on teammates.
Yes, you re-sign him. Or else you continue a trend of letting our  
yatqb : 4/10/2015 12:42 pm : link
high draft choices walk for nothing, only to be replaced by other high draft choices. This is NOT the way to develop a roster with depth and some continuity.
Even if VC comes back top notch  
old man : 4/10/2015 12:42 pm : link
Everybody's thrown tos will come down because we will run more(the plan, at least).
RR has to make both the easy and tough catchs, and equally important, run good routes.
That said, his contract gives him enough incentive for a good year, even if it is 45 catch and a good percentage against thrown tos.
If not, Harris, Parker?, Washington, in '16.
he played horribly  
OBJesus : 4/10/2015 12:43 pm : link
For the entire year up till the last few games where he fluffed up those numbers in the seasons garbage time, we know what RR is at this point, a decent #3, a bad #2, and a absolute laughing stock as a #1

He's a bad route runner and a drop machine who consistently has his hands in retarted placements trying to catch the ball (I've never seen anything like it) but somehow how makes the occasional spec
RE: DK  
OBJesus : 4/10/2015 12:44 pm : link
In comment 12227119 figgy2989 said:
Quote:
It seems he definitely figured it out and had a breakout year. He was also on the same page with Eli.

Keep in mind once Cruz went out he was the number 2 guy. With a healthy Cruz, he will be the number 3. That might limit the number of balls thrown his way.

It really is all dependant on how Cruz comes back and if he can be effective.


Don't be fooled by bulk numbers, considering his amount of targets those numbers are actually pretty pedestrian
Honestly  
OBJesus : 4/10/2015 12:45 pm : link
Parker was far superior to him last year
RE: he played horribly  
figgy2989 : 4/10/2015 12:46 pm : link
In comment 12227151 OBJesus said:
Quote:
For the entire year up till the last few games where he fluffed up those numbers in the seasons garbage time, we know what RR is at this point, a decent #3, a bad #2, and a absolute laughing stock as a #1

He's a bad route runner and a drop machine who consistently has his hands in retarted placements trying to catch the ball (I've never seen anything like it) but somehow how makes the occasional spec


I guess you are forgetting the first Skins game and the 49er performance?

I forgot he was so young  
Kevin in Annapolis : 4/10/2015 12:46 pm : link
basically the same age a White
I don't think Randle was terrible...  
Dunedin81 : 4/10/2015 12:47 pm : link
but putting up gaudy stats in a WR-friendly system doesn't necessarily wow me. Pure numbers said Myers was a good receiving TE and a sold sign. He wasn't either one. If Randle can provide a solid complement to OBJ and hopefully Cruz this year great, but nothing I saw last year said that is going to happen.
RE: Honestly  
figgy2989 : 4/10/2015 12:47 pm : link
In comment 12227157 OBJesus said:
Quote:
Parker was far superior to him last year


Really?
If 71 catches is considered a bad number 2...  
figgy2989 : 4/10/2015 12:50 pm : link
Then sign me up for a bad number 2 every year.

OBJESUS  
Old Dirty Beckham : 4/10/2015 12:51 pm : link
That's simply false and you cant actually believe that.

Randle is a really good #3 wr and a so-so #2 Wr. Not reliable enough. Seems he only gets open when the coverage dictates it.
Randle had 4 TD's  
averagejoe : 4/10/2015 12:54 pm : link
The call vs Washington was a travesty. Randle can play. He can be a solid number two here in this offense. Many teams would welcome him. I expect him to have a solid season playing the entire year with OBJ.
Football stats don't tend to tell reliable stories.  
Mr. Bungle : 4/10/2015 1:01 pm : link
A more reliable story about Randle is told by just watching him game-in and game-out.

He still seems to struggle with the mental aspects of playing WR at the NFL level. I wouldn't call him a bust, but I don't think we've gotten enough out of him so far based on his draft position. If Cruz and Beckham stay healthy, Randle will serve well as a third-option type for Eli on the outside. But I don't think Eli has enough trust in him to rely on him frequently.

I also was concerned to hear the announcers say last year that the Giants believe they have to get Randle involved early in games to keep him focused and interested. To me, that's a red flag on a guy. I want my team's players to get an adrenaline rush just by leaving the tunnel and hitting the field pre-game.
For me  
gmen9892 : 4/10/2015 1:08 pm : link
If Randle gives Eli the same solid third option that Manningham provided him with in 2011, and we have a healthy Cruz, this offense will flirt with being a Top 5 unit in the league.

Randle had skills to matchup with teams #2 CB for most of the year last year and did pretty well. Going against #3 CB's this year, I would expect him to win that matchup more often than not. I also think that him being a #3 this year will keep his numbers down and also allow us to sign him back at a reasonable price.

Worst case, Cruz is not what he was prior to the injury and Randle is a very solid in house insurance policy. Gives the Giants another year of evaluation to see what he can do.l
If a Giant did well  
Headhunter : 4/10/2015 1:10 pm : link
1) playing garbage teams

2) in a contract year

3) rinse & repeat
RE: he played horribly  
Klaatu : 4/10/2015 1:10 pm : link
In comment 12227151 OBJesus said:
Quote:
For the entire year up till the last few games where he fluffed up those numbers in the seasons garbage time...


That's not entirely accurate.

Although he had two monster games at the end of the season - 6/132 against the Rams, 6/158 against Philly - Randle actually had more receptions in the first eight games of the season - 38 - than he did in the last eight - 33.

First eight games, 38 for 370 yards, 2 TDs. Last eight, 33 for 568 yards, 1 TD. Subtract the last two games, 27/278. Sure, he had some bumps along the way, but he was fairly consistent throughout the year.
I wonder where Randle stands with Coughlin?  
Emlen'sGremlins : 4/10/2015 1:14 pm : link
There were multiple disciplinary actions last season.
Quietest 71 reception season ever  
jeff57 : 4/10/2015 1:18 pm : link
.
I like Rueben.  
LI NHB : 4/10/2015 1:20 pm : link
I don't like OBJesus.
I like Rueben  
ANGPASS : 4/10/2015 1:38 pm : link
but i am not buying the "is that the real RR in the last 2 weeks" nonsense. That is 2 games. we were all excited after his rookie year when he lit up philly in the last game for 2 TDs. Jernigan looked to light it up at the end of the previous season. that translated over soooo well.

Overall. I like randle but we need to prepare as if he is not going to keep producing. if he does, great because you can cut cruz if he does not produce. it is a sad position but you can't get too connected. If cruz is not 100% next year and randle stinks it up, then we need 2 wrs.
What is the logic behind not expecting him to produce  
Headhunter : 4/10/2015 1:43 pm : link
walk me through the thought process. I'm guessing you make assumptions based on your view of the world and project them to the rest of us.
RE: If a Giant did well  
UConn4523 : 4/10/2015 1:46 pm : link
In comment 12227212 Headhunter said:
Quote:
1) playing garbage teams

2) in a contract year

3) rinse & repeat


It really is as simple as that. It's so hard to hve an actual conversation about it. All other teams must only play the Pats and Seahawks each week if you comb through some of these threads.

My favorite are the ones about X player being too good in their final year and not being able to afford them. Let's for from X player to suck so we can afford them next year!
It's all mental for Randle  
JonC : 4/10/2015 1:46 pm : link
The areas he needs to improve are : route running, consistent concentration, learn to catch with his hands, use his catch radius and body to his advantage to block out defenders, etc.

Improve those areas and become more consistent, and he'll be a good NFL WR. One that would be worth keeping in terms of the money it will take to keep him off the open market (which is no gimme unless he cleans up his game).
For = root  
UConn4523 : 4/10/2015 1:47 pm : link
*
RE: RE: Honestly  
OBJesus : 4/10/2015 1:58 pm : link
In comment 12227164 figgy2989 said:
Quote:
In comment 12227157 OBJesus said:


Quote:


Parker was far superior to him last year



Really?


Parker was one of the best 3rd down receivers in the league and has wayyy more reliable hands, every time a ball goes RRs way.. I fully expect him to drop it
RE: RE: he played horribly  
OBJesus : 4/10/2015 2:02 pm : link
In comment 12227215 Klaatu said:
Quote:
In comment 12227151 OBJesus said:


Quote:


For the entire year up till the last few games where he fluffed up those numbers in the seasons garbage time...



That's not entirely accurate.

Although he had two monster games at the end of the season - 6/132 against the Rams, 6/158 against Philly - Randle actually had more receptions in the first eight games of the season - 38 - than he did in the last eight - 33.

First eight games, 38 for 370 yards, 2 TDs. Last eight, 33 for 568 yards, 1 TD. Subtract the last two games, 27/278. Sure, he had some bumps along the way, but he was fairly consistent throughout the year.


So 1/3rd of his yards came in 1/8th of his games, that doesn't screamn consistency to me, the one thing that RR is consistent with is dropping the ball, pretty much every week it seems
RE: RE: RE: Honestly  
Victor in CT : 4/10/2015 2:02 pm : link
In comment 12227288 OBJesus said:
Quote:
In comment 12227164 figgy2989 said:


Quote:


In comment 12227157 OBJesus said:


Quote:


Parker was far superior to him last year



Really?



Parker was one of the best 3rd down receivers in the league and has wayyy more reliable hands, every time a ball goes RRs way.. I fully expect him to drop it


Really? If true he must have had 800 balls hit him in the hands and only held 71. I don't recall him being thrown to that often.

It's true he needs to be more consistent and more mentally alert. I don't know what you're watching to lead you to such a conclusion. Nor do I see how you could possibly make a statement that "Parker was one of the best 3rd down receivers in the league and has wayyy more reliable hands".
RE: I like Rueben.  
OBJesus : 4/10/2015 2:08 pm : link
In comment 12227242 LI NHB said:
Quote:
I don't like OBJesus.


If you like Randle as an NFL WR you must not know how to properly catch a football, cause anyone who does know how to can clearly see Randle does NOT, which I think is the bare minimum you can ask out of any professional WR, don't get me wrong as long as the game is played by humans there will be drops, even the best of WRs are bound to drop some easy receptions, but it's the way he does it sometimes, puts his hands in a position so retarted I couldn't even fathom trying to catch a football that way, it's sooo awkward, and it's frustrating to see an NFL WR look like the nerdy kid in gym class who never played a sport in his life trying to catch a ball
RE: RE: RE: RE: Honestly  
OBJesus : 4/10/2015 2:10 pm : link
In comment 12227292 Victor in CT said:
Quote:
In comment 12227288 OBJesus said:


Quote:


In comment 12227164 figgy2989 said:


Quote:


In comment 12227157 OBJesus said:


Quote:


Parker was far superior to him last year



Really?



Parker was one of the best 3rd down receivers in the league and has wayyy more reliable hands, every time a ball goes RRs way.. I fully expect him to drop it



Really? If true he must have had 800 balls hit him in the hands and only held 71. I don't recall him being thrown to that often.

It's true he needs to be more consistent and more mentally alert. I don't know what you're watching to lead you to such a conclusion. Nor do I see how you could possibly make a statement that "Parker was one of the best 3rd down receivers in the league and has wayyy more reliable hands".


Because statistically he was one of the best 3rd down receivers in the league and had a much lower drop rate...
As opposed to Steve Smith,Nicks, OBJ  
Coach Mason : 4/10/2015 2:11 pm : link
Randle has taken a lot longer to 'mature' than many of the top 2 round receivers we've drafted under Reese.

He's talented no doubt, but way too inconsistent relative to his talent.

However he is exactly the type of player I think explodes in a contract year. He likely comes out on a mission this year so he can land a huge contract.

That could pay huge dividends for us in 2015 but don't know if I'd trust him after he gets the $$$. That is why (along with the Cruz unknown) I'd have no issue going WR if the value is there.
the troll returneth  
JonC : 4/10/2015 2:11 pm : link
with his 179th handle.
Watch at about the 44 second mark...  
okiegiant : 4/10/2015 2:14 pm : link
Talk about a guy who looks like he can't catch...
Do some people honestly believe what they say? - ( New Window )
But we have seen players in contract years,  
Doomster : 4/10/2015 2:15 pm : link
not produce....maybe he will....I hope Eli shows him how it's done....
RE: If 71 catches is considered a bad number 2...  
OBJesus : 4/10/2015 2:15 pm : link
In comment 12227172 figgy2989 said:
Quote:
Then sign me up for a bad number 2 every year.


71 catches on 127 targets is not very good... at all
RE: Watch at about the 44 second mark...  
OBJesus : 4/10/2015 2:18 pm : link
In comment 12227323 okiegiant said:
Quote:
Talk about a guy who looks like he can't catch... Do some people honestly believe what they say? - ( New Window )


1. I said he good for the occasional SPEC

2. Really? You need to pull out a highlight reel of him to sell him? I look good in a "highlight reel" everybody does, watch what he does throughout the course of a game and it tells a whole different story, do you assess collegiate prospects based on their "highlights" lmao but I don't know what I'm talking about.. sheesh
odell had 130 targets  
OBJesus : 4/10/2015 2:21 pm : link
Look at his numbers in 130 targets compared to what RR did with 127... it's borderline laughable
hes the love child  
RIZZBIZZ : 4/10/2015 2:26 pm : link
of Tim Carter, Ron Dixon and Sinorice Moss.
Handle makes me think  
yupbjac27 : 4/10/2015 2:28 pm : link
he's getting what he wants. Let's tone it down
RE: RE: Watch at about the 44 second mark...  
gidiefor : Mod : 4/10/2015 2:31 pm : link
In comment 12227337 OBJesus said:

Quote:
I don't know what I'm talking about.. sheesh


It's refreshing tha tyou'l admit this -- because in reading everything you wrote above -- it's clear that you haven't a clue about what you are talking about
ObtuseJesus.  
Klaatu : 4/10/2015 2:32 pm : link
The point is that he was pulling in about four receptions per game for about forty yards each throughout the year. Even if you factor in the last two games, the numbers don't really change that much. I call that consistency.

And as for drops, well ...
dont get whats the big deal with my name  
OBJesus : 4/10/2015 2:32 pm : link
Did I stumble onto an eagles forum...? I saw it on another forum and thought it was hillarious, just like how I think it's hillarious when relevant numbers that actually matter and have some context come out the subject needs to be changed LOL
RE: RE: RE: Watch at about the 44 second mark...  
OBJesus : 4/10/2015 2:34 pm : link
In comment 12227361 gidiefor said:
Quote:
In comment 12227337 OBJesus said:



Quote:


I don't know what I'm talking about.. sheesh



It's refreshing tha tyou'l admit this -- because in reading everything you wrote above -- it's clear that you haven't a clue about what you are talking about


You're right RR is a god with his amazing catch percentage on his absurd amount of targets

Except it's terrible
RE: But we have seen players in contract years,  
Coach Mason : 4/10/2015 2:35 pm : link
In comment 12227326 Doomster said:
Quote:
not produce....maybe he will....I hope Eli shows him how it's done....


It can happen but it usually is due to injury more than anything else.

Randle I think will be very focused on having a career year. Year 2 of MacAdoo's system should only help.
Id jump to personal attacks too  
OBJesus : 4/10/2015 2:37 pm : link
If I completely had my argument shut down by numbers, I can't imagine how frustrating that is... Ouch

Sure sign of an intellectual though.....
I'm not saying he has the greatest hands in the NFL...  
okiegiant : 4/10/2015 2:43 pm : link
I am merely refuting your claim he gets his hands in "retarted(sic)" positions(by the way, really?).

This comment alone shows you see what you wish.
So, Randle has a drop rate of 3.2%...Parker 7.1%.  
Klaatu : 4/10/2015 2:43 pm : link
But Parker is the man. Got it.
RE: ObtuseJesus.  
OBJesus : 4/10/2015 2:43 pm : link
In comment 12227362 Klaatu said:
Quote:
The point is that he was pulling in about four receptions per game for about forty yards each throughout the year. Even if you factor in the last two games, the numbers don't really change that much. I call that consistency.

And as for drops, well ...


I wish I could say hes consistenyl mediocre but he isn't even that, he pulls a big game out of his hat every once in a while, go look at his game by game stats on Google, looks like a lot of way up games and way down games, if you wanna see what consistency looks like look up odells game by game stats when you're done
So, Randle sucks if he's not as good as Beckman?  
Klaatu : 4/10/2015 2:45 pm : link
Got it.
What do personal attacks have to do with intellectuism?  
Headhunter : 4/10/2015 2:45 pm : link
Not a damn thing
Headhunter, he's a troll, and trolls deserve derision.  
Klaatu : 4/10/2015 2:47 pm : link
Hence, Dumpster, Salty Meathead, and now ObtuseJesus.
I am not a  
AnishPatel : 4/10/2015 2:50 pm : link
fan of RR. Too inconsistent. This is his contract year so hopefully he fairs betters than Nicks did.

Hard to believe though that he is only 23 years old. Hopefully he can take the next step and become consistent. If he and Cruz aren't playing at a high level I hate to see how much we would struggle in the passing game having to rely yet again on OBJ.
You get your lunch handed to you and  
Headhunter : 4/10/2015 2:50 pm : link
you can curl up into a fetal position and think you have maintained something that is only important to you
Just responding to the idiocy of  
Headhunter : 4/10/2015 2:53 pm : link
if you have to curse or use personal attacks you've lost the argument. This was decided by who/whom?
RE: I'm not saying he has the greatest hands in the NFL...  
OBJesus : 4/10/2015 2:56 pm : link
In comment 12227386 okiegiant said:
Quote:
I am merely refuting your claim he gets his hands in "retarted(sic)" positions(by the way, really?).

This comment alone shows you see what you wish.


I'll never forget the time (cause I watched the replay 5 times in a row to confirm I wasn't crazy) that he tried to catch a ball with his left hand vertical and his right hand horizontal... stick your left arm straight out with your palm facing the direction you're looking (like your about to catch a baseball) than stick your right arm out and rotate your wrist 90 degrees upward (like you're about to karate chop down on something) now put your hands next to each other, and try to catch a football that way you're going to be catching the front tip of the ball in your left hand and the side of the ball with your right hand, this is the madness I have witnessed him try to attack a ball with maybe I get on him a little bit too much for that incident but that is sooo bad and uncoordinated the image of that is just burned in my head and I can't get over how an NFL receiver does that
RE: Just responding to the idiocy of  
OBJesus : 4/10/2015 2:58 pm : link
In comment 12227409 Headhunter said:
Quote:
if you have to curse or use personal attacks you've lost the argument. This was decided by who/whom?


You never were on the debate team were you, that's pretty much the first rule of debate... if you're not intelligent enough to stick to the subject, that you have to mindlessly hurl insults... You lost, pretty simple concept to grasp if you know the basics of psychology
RE: What do personal attacks have to do with intellectuism?  
OBJesus : 4/10/2015 3:00 pm : link
In comment 12227392 Headhunter said:
Quote:
Not a damn thing


It shows you can't articulate a viable rebuttal which cause frustration and leads to... insults

GG
RE: So, Randle sucks if he's not as good as Beckman?  
OBJesus : 4/10/2015 3:02 pm : link
In comment 12227391 Klaatu said:
Quote:
Got it.


you're underplaying the disparity between the numbers, there are plenty of guys who aren't half as good as Beckham but their adjust number with randles amount of targets would be much closer to Beckham's than his are
adjusted numbers  
OBJesus : 4/10/2015 3:03 pm : link
***

Auto correct killing me, and I know that'll be the next thing someone jumps on me for lol
I just F****King  
Boatie Warrant : 4/10/2015 3:04 pm : link
curse all the time. That way that argument is not valid.
I'm pretty sure Stephen Hawking would call someone a dumbass  
j_rud : 4/10/2015 3:06 pm : link
if the shoe fit.
people pull out the "troll" card on just about anything here  
OBJesus : 4/10/2015 3:09 pm : link
OMG he thinks there's a player on the giants that isn't very good!!!! Troll!!! I make a mock draft and want Todd Gurley after a trade back, troll!!! Eli is a future HOFer, troll!!! I like ice cream, troll!!! It's not even consistent it's literally anything lol

But back on subject his totals on 127 targets are not good, borderline awful actually...

Again does that come from the same rule makers  
Headhunter : 4/10/2015 3:10 pm : link
as never start a sentence with a preposition? Because you say it, doesn't make it so
Randle ranked 23rd in targets last year  
fanatic II : 4/10/2015 3:10 pm : link
with 127, OBJ had 132.

Top WRs with the same number of targets, TY Hilton 130, Calvin Johnson 128, and Randall Cobb 126.

The reason for the numbers is he got the looks.

With Cruz coming back and OBJ getting even more targets, means Randle will get less targets and putting up equivalent numbers will be very difficult. You may have witnessed his best year, if he remains in NY.
Headhunter lecturing on grammar,  
Shepherdsam : 4/10/2015 3:11 pm : link
holy fuckballs the end of days is here.
Think of some of the truly awful receivers this team  
j_rud : 4/10/2015 3:13 pm : link
has put on the field in the last decade, the Tim Carter's and Sinorice Moss's of the world, and tell me RR is a bad football player. We all knew coming in that the mental aspect of the was his biggest weakness and that often takes a few seasons to work out. But he's consistently improved and finished last season on a tear.

RE: I'm pretty sure Stephen Hawking would call someone a dumbass  
OBJesus : 4/10/2015 3:16 pm : link
In comment 12227442 j_rud said:
Quote:
if the shoe fit.


Except he'd probably have a lot more to say even if that's peppered in there, you know who counters a point with nothing but "oh yeah? Well you're stupid"? Children, who brains can't proccess anything more than that

Perfect example^ see how I came back at you with an actual point pertaining to yours? That's what's missing, it wouldn't have taken any thought what so ever for me to say to you "you're an idiot" or "you're a troll etc" I can't belive I'm the only one here who knows how debate works, ever see a politician pull that kinda shit? His campaign would be over, why? It shows weak mindedness
RE: Think of some of the truly awful receivers this team  
OBJesus : 4/10/2015 3:20 pm : link
In comment 12227456 j_rud said:
Quote:
has put on the field in the last decade, the Tim Carter's and Sinorice Moss's of the world, and tell me RR is a bad football player. We all knew coming in that the mental aspect of the was his biggest weakness and that often takes a few seasons to work out. But he's consistently improved and finished last season on a tear.


RR is a far superior athlete to them but his hands are right on par with theirs, I think even they could have put up these pedestrian numbers if they were targeted 127 TIMES! People aren't getting how bad the production is for that amount, our own Preston Parker would have better numbers than that if you adjusted his totals to 137 targets
You lost here:  
Victor in CT : 4/10/2015 3:21 pm : link
So, Randle has a drop rate of 3.2%...Parker 7.1%.
Klaatu : 2:43 pm : link : reply
But Parker is the man. Got it.

Now go away.
There are people I've met  
Headhunter : 4/10/2015 3:27 pm : link
that can't go 7 words without dropping a let's say colorful adjective that can slice you and dice you intellectually and you'd realize it after you picked your jaw off the ground. Shepardsam how's Langejessica these days?
think about it  
mdc1 : 4/10/2015 3:28 pm : link
he has been in 2 systems now, TC's and now a new one. Seems like you need to see one more season. Secondly, we have no idea what Cruz 2.0 looks like. The very thought that our GM brought it up is a serious concern until proven wrong.
RE: RE: I like Rueben.  
mdc1 : 4/10/2015 3:29 pm : link
In comment 12227305 OBJesus said:
Quote:
In comment 12227242 LI NHB said:


Quote:


I don't like OBJesus.



If you like Randle as an NFL WR you must not know how to properly catch a football, cause anyone who does know how to can clearly see Randle does NOT, which I think is the bare minimum you can ask out of any professional WR, don't get me wrong as long as the game is played by humans there will be drops, even the best of WRs are bound to drop some easy receptions, but it's the way he does it sometimes, puts his hands in a position so retarted I couldn't even fathom trying to catch a football that way, it's sooo awkward, and it's frustrating to see an NFL WR look like the nerdy kid in gym class who never played a sport in his life trying to catch a ball


really, so you are suggesting our crack talent team drafted a wide receiver who cannot catch a football properly? Seriously?
RE: You lost here:  
OBJesus : 4/10/2015 3:35 pm : link
In comment 12227477 Victor in CT said:
Quote:
So, Randle has a drop rate of 3.2%...Parker 7.1%.
Klaatu : 2:43 pm : link : reply
But Parker is the man. Got it.

Now go away.


Official drops are a joke, they only count if the ball hits you dead in the chest and there's no defender within 5 yards of you, remember how many drops we had as a team the first 2 weeks? I remember counting at least 15 (prob more) victor Cruz alone had like 3-4 BRUTAL ones just in week 1 I know we all remember that, yet after week 2 as a team we "officially" had like 4 drops, get the fuck out of here with that, try going back and actually watching and assessing tape and than tell me RR isn't a drop machine and Preston Parker doesn't have reliable hands, that way I'll be able to confirm that you have no idea what you're looking at when you watch games, and you sure as hell never put on pads
And I know this is an I should just walk away moment...  
okiegiant : 4/10/2015 3:38 pm : link
but I'm still waiting for clarification on the "retarted" comment.
Somehow  
OBJesus : 4/10/2015 3:39 pm : link
Randle didn't even get credited for 5 drops this year.... go watch all 16 games again and tell me he didn't drop FIVE passes this season lololol
You're an idiot. Your method of targets- catches = drops is  
Victor in CT : 4/10/2015 3:47 pm : link
valid but official drops are bogus? NOt to mention that Randle has been on the field for all 48 games of his career, has a better YPC average You're a moron. Your entire premise is ridiculous. Parker is a ham and egger journeyman. You come and here and stir shit and think it passes for analysis.

If you had a brain and new anything about what game you were watching you would not make such a claim. If you want to say that Randle has been inconsistent and lacking in focus, agreed. And that he has to show that he is real player this year or else, agreed as well. But to dismiss his talent is absurd and claim some journeyman who was undrafted and OUT OF FOOOTBALL FOR ALL OF 2013 after being cut by the Saints is the "best 3rd down receiver in the league" is idiotic.
parker beat him by a pretty good margain as far as the eye test goes  
OBJesus : 4/10/2015 3:49 pm : link
Which is all that matters but if you wanna try and sum up a recover by numbers, you're best bet is to go by catch percentage based on targets... guess who won?
RE: parker beat him by a pretty good margain as far as the eye test goes  
Victor in CT : 4/10/2015 3:50 pm : link
In comment 12227540 OBJesus said:
Quote:
Which is all that matters but if you wanna try and sum up a recover by numbers, you're best bet is to go by catch percentage based on targets... guess who won?


Then your real name must be Stevie Wonder. Buh BYE
RE: parker beat him by a pretty good margain as far as the eye test goes  
figgy2989 : 4/10/2015 3:51 pm : link
In comment 12227540 OBJesus said:
Quote:
Which is all that matters but if you wanna try and sum up a recover by numbers, you're best bet is to go by catch percentage based on targets... guess who won?


Then you need a better set of glasses
RE: You're an idiot. Your method of targets- catches = drops is  
OBJesus : 4/10/2015 3:57 pm : link
In comment 12227538 Victor in CT said:
Quote:
valid but official drops are bogus? NOt to mention that Randle has been on the field for all 48 games of his career, has a better YPC average You're a moron. Your entire premise is ridiculous. Parker is a ham and egger journeyman. You come and here and stir shit and think it passes for analysis.

If you had a brain and new anything about what game you were watching you would not make such a claim. If you want to say that Randle has been inconsistent and lacking in focus, agreed. And that he has to show that he is real player this year or else, agreed as well. But to dismiss his talent is absurd and claim some journeyman who was undrafted and OUT OF FOOOTBALL FOR ALL OF 2013 after being cut by the Saints is the "best 3rd down receiver in the league" is idiotic.


Never said he was, but I remember late in the season them showing receiving stats on 3rd down and Preston Parker was right near the top in efficiency and all the announcers were praising him.. doesn't matter what he did the year before on some other team, and I did some more research and a lot of beat writers praised his work on 3rd down when he was with tampa.

If you do some more research 90% of the football world thinks official drops are a joke as it's a very subjective "stat" I was just reading an old article about us in the begging of last year and the writer specifically said Victor Cruz had 3 drops (depending on who you ask) I'm looking at all the drop leaders last year and the list ends after about 20 players or so the lowest of which had 5, and RR is not on the list, yet some how Cruz racked up 8 in his short season (as bad as it was early on) either way you're telling me RR didn't have 5 drops last season???? C'mon now, that right there proves how big of a joke "official" drops are
RE: RE: You're an idiot. Your method of targets- catches = drops is  
Victor in CT : 4/10/2015 4:00 pm : link
In comment 12227551 OBJesus said:
Quote:
In comment 12227538 Victor in CT said:


Quote:


valid but official drops are bogus? NOt to mention that Randle has been on the field for all 48 games of his career, has a better YPC average You're a moron. Your entire premise is ridiculous. Parker is a ham and egger journeyman. You come and here and stir shit and think it passes for analysis.

If you had a brain and new anything about what game you were watching you would not make such a claim. If you want to say that Randle has been inconsistent and lacking in focus, agreed. And that he has to show that he is real player this year or else, agreed as well. But to dismiss his talent is absurd and claim some journeyman who was undrafted and OUT OF FOOOTBALL FOR ALL OF 2013 after being cut by the Saints is the "best 3rd down receiver in the league" is idiotic.



Never said he was, but I remember late in the season them showing receiving stats on 3rd down and Preston Parker was right near the top in efficiency and all the announcers were praising him.. doesn't matter what he did the year before on some other team, and I did some more research and a lot of beat writers praised his work on 3rd down when he was with tampa.

If you do some more research 90% of the football world thinks official drops are a joke as it's a very subjective "stat" I was just reading an old article about us in the begging of last year and the writer specifically said Victor Cruz had 3 drops (depending on who you ask) I'm looking at all the drop leaders last year and the list ends after about 20 players or so the lowest of which had 5, and RR is not on the list, yet some how Cruz racked up 8 in his short season (as bad as it was early on) either way you're telling me RR didn't have 5 drops last season???? C'mon now, that right there proves how big of a joke "official" drops are


And based on "targets" is valid? So the QB "targets" WR but throws it at his feet, or over his head and that is a negative to the receiver? Again, you are an idiot. Go away.
and im not dismissing RRs talent  
OBJesus : 4/10/2015 4:00 pm : link
Like I said before he's a solid #3 and has the build and athleticism of a #1 (the only reason he's in this league) but his hands and route running will forever keep him from being anything close to a #1 WR and every single one of us knows that, and honestly there's nothing I hate more than a drop machine, Eli can get the ball to anyone at any time, I'd rather have someone who's 5'10 runs a 4.6 40 but catches everything that hits his hands over a Ruben randle type
what game are you referring to where you heard that stat?  
figgy2989 : 4/10/2015 4:01 pm : link
Considering he only had 36 total receptions on the year, I find that hard to believe
RE: RE: RE: You're an idiot. Your method of targets- catches = drops is  
OBJesus : 4/10/2015 4:06 pm : link
In comment 12227555 Victor in CT said:
Quote:
In comment 12227551 OBJesus said:


Quote:


In comment 12227538 Victor in CT said:


Quote:


valid but official drops are bogus? NOt to mention that Randle has been on the field for all 48 games of his career, has a better YPC average You're a moron. Your entire premise is ridiculous. Parker is a ham and egger journeyman. You come and here and stir shit and think it passes for analysis.

If you had a brain and new anything about what game you were watching you would not make such a claim. If you want to say that Randle has been inconsistent and lacking in focus, agreed. And that he has to show that he is real player this year or else, agreed as well. But to dismiss his talent is absurd and claim some journeyman who was undrafted and OUT OF FOOOTBALL FOR ALL OF 2013 after being cut by the Saints is the "best 3rd down receiver in the league" is idiotic.



Never said he was, but I remember late in the season them showing receiving stats on 3rd down and Preston Parker was right near the top in efficiency and all the announcers were praising him.. doesn't matter what he did the year before on some other team, and I did some more research and a lot of beat writers praised his work on 3rd down when he was with tampa.

If you do some more research 90% of the football world thinks official drops are a joke as it's a very subjective "stat" I was just reading an old article about us in the begging of last year and the writer specifically said Victor Cruz had 3 drops (depending on who you ask) I'm looking at all the drop leaders last year and the list ends after about 20 players or so the lowest of which had 5, and RR is not on the list, yet some how Cruz racked up 8 in his short season (as bad as it was early on) either way you're telling me RR didn't have 5 drops last season???? C'mon now, that right there proves how big of a joke "official" drops are



And based on "targets" is valid? So the QB "targets" WR but throws it at his feet, or over his head and that is a negative to the receiver? Again, you are an idiot. Go away.


Balances out, notice Beckham had a way higher % than both of them, I guess Eli just coincedntly gave him more catchable balls? Naa what you're saying could be applied to everyone so imo it balances it out, if you're going to try to sum up a WR on paper without ever watching him that's the best stat to do it with, not the totals posted in the OP that have 0 context what so ever

Oh and did you stop to think that the throw at the receivers feet or whatever could be the receivers fault....? Maybe he didn't generate any kind of separation, maybe he wasn't where he was supposed to be, but it's not like RR has ever had a reputation for both of those .....LOLOL what's it like watching your point go through a paper shredder I'm curious?
RE: what game are you referring to where you heard that stat?  
OBJesus : 4/10/2015 4:06 pm : link
In comment 12227557 figgy2989 said:
Quote:
Considering he only had 36 total receptions on the year, I find that hard to believe


Which stat?
RE: RE: what game are you referring to where you heard that stat?  
OBJesus : 4/10/2015 4:11 pm : link
In comment 12227573 OBJesus said:
Quote:
In comment 12227557 figgy2989 said:


Quote:


Considering he only had 36 total receptions on the year, I find that hard to believe



Which stat?


Ohhh the 3rd down stat? Like I said it was during one of the game braocasts late in the year, it was an efficiency stat, didn't have anything to do with bulk iirc
You stated in one of your rants above  
figgy2989 : 4/10/2015 4:13 pm : link
That you heard during a game that Parker was towards the top of the league in third down efficiency.

Unless everyone of his 36 catches was on third down...that is a bit of a reach, no?
Thank you Danny,  
oldog : 4/10/2015 4:17 pm : link
too bad your thoughtful, insightful, thread got trolled.
RE: RE: DK  
Moondawg : 4/10/2015 4:19 pm : link
In comment 12227155 OBJesus said:
Quote:
In comment 12227119 figgy2989 said:


Quote:


It seems he definitely figured it out and had a breakout year. He was also on the same page with Eli.

Keep in mind once Cruz went out he was the number 2 guy. With a healthy Cruz, he will be the number 3. That might limit the number of balls thrown his way.

It really is all dependant on how Cruz comes back and if he can be effective.



Don't be fooled by bulk numbers, considering his amount of targets those numbers are actually pretty pedestrian


He stepped up in the end, though, big time. He finally started consistently willing balls that were contested.
OBJesus  
OBJXIII : 4/10/2015 4:21 pm : link
I never post, been primarily a lurker for 8 years. I'm logging in right now literally to tell you to GO FUCK YOURSELF you dumb little turd. I give it 10 days before you get banned, troll. I look forward to your next handle and retarded posts playing devils advocate shitting on this team.
Fuck you.
im shitting on the whole team  
OBJesus : 4/10/2015 4:23 pm : link
For criticizing a player I feel hurts our team? I bet you LOVED CC Brown in his time here
RE: You stated in one of your rants above  
OBJesus : 4/10/2015 4:28 pm : link
In comment 12227584 figgy2989 said:
Quote:
That you heard during a game that Parker was towards the top of the league in third down efficiency.

Unless everyone of his 36 catches was on third down...that is a bit of a reach, no?


Never said he was #1 in anything, but that hear was near the top, and actually most of his catches prob were on 3rd down am I seriously the only one that remembers the work he did on 3rd down for us... Jeez, how quickly people forget
misread  
OBJesus : 4/10/2015 4:33 pm : link
Thought you said he was THE top, but yeah unfortunately I don't have every statistic in the football world at my disposal but if anyone has recordings of the games late in the year you'll surely find itz I remember the graphic coming up and the commentators praising him about it and also remember not being surprised, he was very reliable in those spots, and it was clear Eli really gained trust in him
ok i was able to dig up this stat  
OBJesus : 4/10/2015 4:39 pm : link
20 of his 36 catches were for first downs ON third down, 17th in the league in that total,pretty good bulk stat for someone who only had 36 catches on 56 targets
I have to hand it to the original poster here  
gidiefor : Mod : 4/10/2015 4:44 pm : link
I didn't think at first there was anything I could give him credit for -- but he aptly named himself for a person who clearly wants to be nailed to a cross
Randle is fine if he can just clean up his inconsistancies  
chris r : 4/10/2015 4:47 pm : link
people are a little bit spoiled by our 2011 receiver trio. That was all time good and you certainly don't need to be that good to win. In fact, Beckham + a bunch of average receivers is more than enough if we can shore up other areas of the team.
RE: Randle is fine if he can just clean up his inconsistancies  
OBJesus : 4/10/2015 4:51 pm : link
In comment 12227646 chris r said:
Quote:
people are a little bit spoiled by our 2011 receiver trio. That was all time good and you certainly don't need to be that good to win. In fact, Beckham + a bunch of average receivers is more than enough if we can shore up other areas of the team.


His primary inconsistencies seem irreparable at this point, maybe not the route running, but there's really no way to coach bad hands.. unfortunately
I'm still in wait and see mode with Randle  
PatersonPlank : 4/10/2015 4:59 pm : link
If I'm not mistaken, and I don't have time to look this up, but I think a lot of his success came once OBJ was established. So this means that when he was the guy with Cruz out he got stopped, but when defenses focused on OBJ he was able to make some catches. To me he sounds like a #3 WR, especially once Cruz comes back to man the slot.
RE: I have to hand it to the original poster here  
gidiefor : Mod : 4/10/2015 5:02 pm : link
In comment 12227640 gidiefor said:
Quote:
I didn't think at first there was anything I could give him credit for -- but he aptly named himself for a person who clearly wants to be nailed to a cross



Sorry Danny - not referring to you -- referring to - OBJesus - the demented thread derailer
OBJesus made this thread  
Randy in CT : 4/10/2015 5:02 pm : link
a disaster
ironic name considering im the only one still talking about randle  
OBJesus : 4/10/2015 5:03 pm : link
Now everyone is on the subject that I'm a troll cause I don't think randle is very good
people bash our 2x SB MVP and hero relentlessly  
OBJesus : 4/10/2015 5:05 pm : link
But if you knock Ruben randle you're not a true giants fan, I'm ashamed of our fan base
RE: OBJesus made this thread  
OBJesus : 4/10/2015 5:07 pm : link
In comment 12227674 Randy in CT said:
Quote:
a disaster


Sorry to ruin the thread of fantasies and delusions with facts and relevant numbers that actually have context... I now know this is no place to bring logic, or any sort of in depth football knowledge, thanks for letting me know
sonny  
gidiefor : Mod : 4/10/2015 5:14 pm : link
you are clearly having cognitive issues with the difference between in and out.

for instance ---- you used the phrase "in depth" - and you are clearly "out of your depth"

in fact convoluted and confused also leap to the mind readily - and then you circle back around and attack the credibility of everyone else arguing with you -- great stuff -- are you older than 12?

RE: sonny  
OBJesus : 4/10/2015 5:24 pm : link
In comment 12227691 gidiefor said:
Quote:
you are clearly having cognitive issues with the difference between in and out.

for instance ---- you used the phrase "in depth" - and you are clearly "out of your depth"

in fact convoluted and confused also leap to the mind readily - and then you circle back around and attack the credibility of everyone else arguing with you -- great stuff -- are you older than 12?


I'd be mad too if I was debating a subject with someone and their knowledge on the subject was far superior to mine despite the fact I care very much about it, not one point I made in relation to anything football could be denied, people wanna disagree so badly but can't articulate any sort of valid rebuttal (because there's not one to be made) so they get mad and try to change the subject lol classic aversion, I see right through every one of you people and that is just one of the many reasons I'm so far ahead of you right now, you guys must get dizzy watching me run circles around you, I expected more when I came here.. obviously it's nothing but casual fans who know very little about the game and never played it
Obvious troll is obvious  
Moondawg : 4/10/2015 5:25 pm : link
.
so many  
OBJesus : 4/10/2015 5:27 pm : link
jimmies rustled lol
and over ruben god damn randle  
OBJesus : 4/10/2015 5:30 pm : link
Yet if I called Eli an mediocre QB no one would give a shit, sickening. Gotta be one of the most confused fan bases in the world.
Ok - OK Lol  
gidiefor : Mod : 4/10/2015 5:31 pm : link
you are far ahead of all of us --

-- please stay out front there and keep moving

by the way -- watch out for Randy - if you stay out front he can bean you
RE: Ok - OK Lol  
OBJesus : 4/10/2015 5:34 pm : link
In comment 12227711 gidiefor said:
Quote:
you are far ahead of all of us --

-- please stay out front there and keep moving

by the way -- watch out for Randy - if you stay out front he can bean you


1/10
when you come back in your next troll life  
Larry in Pencilvania : 4/10/2015 8:06 pm : link
Please come back as oblronhubbard so I know it's you. Also table has that same quality of frustration that Manningham provided. Sometimes makes you smile others smh
should say  
Larry in Pencilvania : 4/10/2015 8:06 pm : link
Randle has
Some players have a hard time  
mrvax : 4/10/2015 8:36 pm : link
grasping a complex playbook and I think Randle benefited from the new system. He may have been thinking too much about what to do instead of just using his talent to do it. Hope he gets better and better.
RE: when you come back in your next troll life  
OBJesus : 4/10/2015 8:39 pm : link
In comment 12227897 Larry in Pencilvania said:
Quote:
Please come back as oblronhubbard so I know it's you. Also table has that same quality of frustration that Manningham provided. Sometimes makes you smile others smh


Idk what people think I'm gonna get banned for... cause I state my opinion and am told "fuck you" for it? Lol dream on fellas you're never gonna get your way, don't be mad a superior mind has come to steal your clout.. over and out, motha fucks
when someone has to tell me they have a superior mind  
Headhunter : 4/10/2015 8:43 pm : link
I've found it to be the opposite a 100 percent of the time
RE: when someone has to tell me they have a superior mind  
OBJesus : 4/10/2015 10:21 pm : link
In comment 12227959 Headhunter said:
Quote:
I've found it to be the opposite a 100 percent of the time


Try me then...

Maybe youd like to counter a point I had on the subject? No one else seems to have the capability, just disagreeing to disagree really, no reasoning or anything viable to back up their objection, a challenge would be a welcomed change
Hopefully we see the  
Big Rick in FL : 4/10/2015 10:26 pm : link
Guy we saw after he came back from being benched for a few quarters. He finally flashed that potential that had the Giants considering him in the 1st round. He was nearly unstoppable in those two games. He has 290 yards and a TD against the Rams & Eagles. I believe he also had a 40 yard TD called back because of a BS holding penalty.

With Odell in his 2nd year & Cruz coming back Randle should see a lot of single coverage against teams #2 or #3 CB. If Odell keeps doing what he did last year, Cruz returns to 75% of the player he was & Randle continues to get better we could very well have the best offense in the league. Throw in Rashad, Donnell, Vereen, Andre Williams, Dwayne & Marcus Harris and it could be scary for opposing defenses.

I'm really excited to see Odell this year. He was the only good position player on our Offense for 8 of the last 10 weeks and was destroying teams whose only real game plan was to shut him down. If teams have to worry about the above mentioned players I think Odell could have somewhere between 1600-1800 yards and 16-18 TDs.
Nope not interested  
Headhunter : 4/10/2015 10:32 pm : link
I'll stick to my guns. You tell me you have a superior mind rather than allowing us/ me make that determination based on the content you put forth, you feel compelled to toot your own horn claiming to have a superior mind. That is when you proved the opposite keeping a perfect 100 percent of self proclaimed superior mind being anything but superior , rather it shows an inferior mind
Thanks, Clittu  
Doomster : 4/10/2015 10:34 pm : link
Headhunter, he's a troll, and trolls deserve derision.
Klaatu : 2:47 pm : link : reply
Hence, Dumpster, Salty Meathead, and now ObtuseJesus.
RE: Nope not interested  
OBJesus : 4/11/2015 12:51 pm : link
In comment 12228190 Headhunter said:
Quote:
I'll stick to my guns. You tell me you have a superior mind rather than allowing us/ me make that determination based on the content you put forth, you feel compelled to toot your own horn claiming to have a superior mind. That is when you proved the opposite keeping a perfect 100 percent of self proclaimed superior mind being anything but superior , rather it shows an inferior mind


I'd run away too
Hey look at me I'm smart  
Headhunter : 4/11/2015 2:01 pm : link
Nobody else knows it, so I'll tell you I've got a superior mind. My mind works at a level most humans can't concieve of. I am brilliant
OBJesus
Back to the Corner