Â
|
|
Quote: |
Greg described Ray as a Kamikaze player that plays with an unbelievable amount of competitiveness and a bit of nasty. You can tell watching him that he doesn’t like getting beat and comes back stronger. Ray is a quick twitch guy with natural explosive traits. He looked bigger than his listed weight when you watched him on tape. Greg thinks Ray could line up at DE. Ray was often moved inside to rush against guards and he killed guards. Ray has an explosive first step and he uses his hands well and he loves how he plays. Ross (Tucker) chimed in about some of Ray’s bad numbers at his Pro Day. Ross said he doesn’t know Ray’s ceiling but that at a minimum he could be a 6 – 9 sack guy and a lot of teams would take that. Greg added that teams would have to factor in his extreme competitiveness. Ross agreed and they both talked about Ray having the sort of motor and competitiveness you can’t develop. Ross said guys don’t develop toughness or competitiveness or a motor, they either have it or they don’t. Says guys don’t develop a work ethic after they get paid millions of guaranteed dollars. Greg added that he has talked to many long time scouts who say you can make guys stronger but you can’t make them more athletic. |
I'm not in love with Cooper or Kevin White and with all the OL available, I think when it all goes down guys like Collins, Peat, Scherff, Flowers, Clemmings, Humphries are too hard to distinguish between. It's a game of rock, paper, scissors when choosing between the top OT prospects. There are also some enormous guards out there and plenty of big RT prospects that can be had in rounds 2 and 3.
I think if a blue chip player is there, you pounce.
So for those who say he's not a top 10 talent they haven't actually watched any tape,and are listening to what some others have said and repeating it.
43 catches for 855 yards in 6 games last year,for 19.9 YPC.
as a Sophmore he averaged 18.6,and in 4 years has never averaged under 16.2. He's an absolute top 10 talent at the very least!!! The Giants should be so lucky to get this kid at 9. White and Cooper likely go before him due to the injury this past season that caused him to miss 7 games,so the Giants have an excellent chance of landing him at 9.
Contrary to popular belief on here,there are no OL worth a top 15 pick let alone at 9.
Beasley is likely gone when they pick,so Unless the Giants think he can be a 3 down LB in a 43 who can put his hand in the dirt and rush on 3rd down or obvious passing downs,then he's not the choice anyway. The only other option might be Shane Ray. Once again,IMO Parker would be the higher rated player.
There's no DT's that carry a top ten grade either IMO. Some on here have said Danny Shelton,but I don't think you draft a DT at 9 who would come out on 3rd down and obvious passing situations.
Malcom brown is a good player with a little pass rush ability but I don't think he's worthy of a top 10 selection either.
The Giants don't draft DT's in the first round anyway and I can't see that changing this year. Maybe if there were a player they just couldn't pass up,but there isn't one in this years draft other than Leanord Williams,and he'll be long gone.
So not only do I disagree very strongly that Parker isn't a top 10 pick,we're likely talking about him being the first receiver off the board if he doesn't break his foot and miss those 7 games.
Like Reese said last year about OBJ,when we were up and he was available,there was no discussion,Beckham was our guy.
This year Parker is likely going to be(there guy).
Unless Cooper drops to 9 somehow there should be no question who the pick is. if that happens Reese has a tough decision to make. I'd still go with Parker because the only thing Cooper has on him is route running,wich Parker has improved and will only get better with coaching.
I'm not as enamored with Kevin Whites 4.35 forty at the combine as most,as you just don't see it consistently on film. Not to mention he's a one year wonder. I'm not saying he's not going to be an excellent receiver,I'd just take Parker or Cooper over him without a second thought!!
Brandon Scherff
Wild Card: Shane Ray
Scherff is solid in all phases and projects at a high level to 4 positions. Rare combination of overall size and elite athleticism.
Shane Ray is a tough evaluation for the Giants. We'll need to embrace some defensive flexibility to maximize his impact. If we're prepared to do that he could be the pick.
Originally I had Peat, he still would be my choice if Dupree (DE) wasn't there. I, obviously have become a huge fan of Dupree and would now select him at #9. I have "0" concerns at RB and WR while we can address OT/OG later in the draft and UFA's. That leaves us a defense which didn't measure up last year compounded by the JPP situation. JMHO.
While I agree WR isn't a glaring weakness '0' concern strikes me as a cavalier attitude to hold toward one of the impact positions in the league imo.
Don't have the expertise to assess whether Peat, Collins, Or Scherff can play LT or will be career RT, or possibly a guard - but, that will be a big part of the discussion. If they draft one of those three - they start at RT and Pugh gets moved inside.
Don't want Ray, don't want Gregory, don't want Bud, don't want Scherff, don't want Shelton, what a shitty spot were in, I PRAY we trade back
Don't want Ray, don't want Gregory, don't want Bud, don't want Scherff, don't want Shelton, what a shitty spot were in, I PRAY we trade back
Now: Brandon Scherff
Didn't like Peat but have started warming up to him. Love both WR's but doubt they get there.
But recently I've moved away from "OL in the 1st". If Collins is there and we take him, I'd absolutely be cool with it. But right now I've got my eyes on pass rushers and receivers. Hoping for White or Gregory.
He doesn't play "pretty". He looks a little sloppy at times. But he gets results. Over and over and over again
I think we had two players recently that played that way: Diehl and Seubert
:)
And that does nothing to change my opinion.
I don't what any guru says, Ray is too slight to be a good DE in the 4-3 and nothing anyone says will sway me.
I've wanted one of the top DTs from the get to and that hasn't changed. Too soft in the middle. I'd be really happy with either Williams or Shelton. I don't really love any of the OTs in this draft.
I believe it will be Gregory.
2nd round: I am really hoping Gurley is still there.
2nd round: I am really hoping Gurley is still there.
Can you see Dallas or possibly Philly taking Gurley?
So for those who say he's not a top 10 talent they haven't actually watched any tape,and are listening to what some others have said and repeating it.
43 catches for 855 yards in 6 games last year,for 19.9 YPC.
as a Sophmore he averaged 18.6,and in 4 years has never averaged under 16.2. He's an absolute top 10 talent at the very least!!! The Giants should be so lucky to get this kid at 9. White and Cooper likely go before him due to the injury this past season that caused him to miss 7 games,so the Giants have an excellent chance of landing him at 9.
Contrary to popular belief on here,there are no OL worth a top 15 pick let alone at 9.
Beasley is likely gone when they pick,so Unless the Giants think he can be a 3 down LB in a 43 who can put his hand in the dirt and rush on 3rd down or obvious passing downs,then he's not the choice anyway. The only other option might be Shane Ray. Once again,IMO Parker would be the higher rated player.
There's no DT's that carry a top ten grade either IMO. Some on here have said Danny Shelton,but I don't think you draft a DT at 9 who would be a 2 down run stuffer and come out on 3rd down and obvious passing situations.
Malcom brown is a good player with a little pass rush ability but I don't think he's worthy of a top 10 selection either.
The Giants don't draft DT's in the first round anyway and I can't see that changing this year. Maybe if there were a player they just couldn't pass up,but there isn't one in this years draft other than Leanord Williams,and he'll be long gone.
So not only do I disagree very strongly that Parker isn't a top 10 pick,we're likely talking about him being the first receiver off the board if he doesn't break his foot and miss those 7 games.
Like Reese said last year about OBJ,when we were up and he was available,there was no discussion,Beckham was our guy.
This year Parker is likely going to be(there guy).
Unless Cooper drops to 9 somehow there should be no question who the pick is. if that happens Reese has a tough decision to make. I'd still go with Parker because the only thing Cooper has on him is route running,wich Parker has improved and will only get better with coaching.
I'm not as enamored with Kevin Whites 4.35 forty at the combine as most,as you just don't see it consistently on film. Not to mention he's a one year wonder. I'm not saying he's not going to be an excellent receiver,I'd just take Parker or Cooper over him without a second thought!!
Do you ascribe to some of the mindsets that say he does indeed have the feet to play OLT?
Still loving Devante Parker and his AJ Green game. Really like the idea of Parker or White with Beckham for the next 5 years.
But I also have a man crush on Odi.