at a larger man who may or may not be armed for no apparent reason, no. That is indeed a new one for me.
Larger man? Zimmerman outweighed him by 27 lbs. So the guy who has an actual gun does not want to start a fight with someone who may have one? OK
If he didnt want to start a fight why did he go back? why did his girlfriend find it necessarry to tell him to just go home and not go looking for trouble? Your case has no merits, thus why Zimmerman was found not guilty.
So if your going to use his GF testimony as evidence, you would then have to use all of it correct? If that is the case then you have right there all the evidence of Zimmerman starting the fight and being the one on top while martin was the one calling for help. That makes all of Zimmermans testimony a lie then threatening Martin. I mean, we can't just claim one part was accurate (Her claiming Martin said he was almost back to his house) and ignore the rest can we?
RE: RE: RE: What are the odds of another George Zimmerman
You mean like with rodney king who kept getting in trouble until he was killed, not by the police? Like that? Or is it different?
Just to be clear, this is a white vs black issue for you?
To be clear, I think there are a lot of racists on this forum, and they aren't all white.The most vocal ones aren't.I think it's a double standard issue.I think you can't go about spreading racist attitudes, and then crying about racial injustice. I think integrity is the basis for any real discussion , and integrity is replaced by hatred in the minds of many of those who post most often.I think a lot of sophistry and back patting goes on amongst a certain group, whereby the reinforce each others false beliefs and sense of self righteousness.
Do I think it's a black and white issue?I do. I don't think it should be, but I think it is.I don't think it's whites who make it a racial issue, however.
Just like I don't think Daniel Gray should have been a race issue. Had it been a white guy arrested 20 times, with an arrest record getting increasingly frequent and increasingly violent as time wore on, I don't think anyone gives a flying fuck if he dies after a "rough ride" obviously getting arrested and apprehended by the police means shit in Baltimore, as he just keeps getting released, no matter what he does. I'll take it a step further and point to a mayor who like Nero watched her city burn while ordering law not to be enforced.
You have a black mayor, a black DA, a black Police chief, 3 out of 6 officers involved in that incident are black, and a mayor that lets riot run rampant because "the system" is at fault, a system in a city , and state, run by black democrats for 50 years, their system, that they run, and have run, for half a century, and then try and blame outside forces for the awful state of affairs in Baltimore, one of their own making one where the only real outside forces consist of massive amounts of federal cash flowing into both the city and state for education, making it like I think the third highest recipient in the country, with math and reading skills both below 20th%, regardless of how much money is thrown at them.They bring in al Sharpton, the famous conciliator to work his Magic, like he did in the Tawana Brawley case.I know parasites and opportunists posing as leaders and healers when I see them.They exist in real life, in politics, and on the interwebz as well.
I think it's a black and white issue when one side says the other side is guilty of this that and the other thing, and then refuse to own their own stinky shit, and pretend like the rest of us have to portend it doesn't stink. Your shit stinks. Bad.
Why the hell is he going to start a fight instead of drawing his weapon? That makes absolutely no sense.
You can't just draw your firearm in Florida. The only time you can draw your firearm is in a stand your ground situation where your life is in danger, and you pretty much have to fire it.
Wrong.
Stand your ground in Florida means nothing more than you don't have to retreat.
Why stand your ground was never used as a defense in the Martin case? It didn't apply and wouldn't fly.
Self defense was the was the defense used and is damn near the same in every state.
A concealed weapons permitted carrier can draw and use his weapon of choice in any of a number of situations legally.
RE: If you drank it would give you cover for being a
Honestly, I can't believe he still has supporters.
On January 9, 2015, Zimmerman was arrested by Lake Murray police and charged with aggravated assault with a weapon after allegedly throwing a wine bottle at his ex-girlfriend.
Supporters? I don't give a flying fuck what he's done since then, and if any of you were honest, neither do any of you. This is entirely about what happened several years ago, otherwise none of this would be posted here so you guys can engage in yet another session of furious back-patting.
This. You can easily subscribe to the theory that Trayvon defended himself. If you ignore witness accounts and pesky facts.
I think he's at least somewhat mentally unstable. And he allowed himself to think that because he was found not guilty, that he is like some vigilante superhero above the law now. I wouldn't say the guy has supporters at all. There are those that believe his version of what happened on the night he shot Trayvon was pretty close to the truth (the version supported by physical evidence and eyewitnesses). Everything since then, however, really is irrelevant as to what happened, and it would surprise no one to see him in future legal trouble in some way or another.
Oh... so I guess only Zimmerman had the right to defend himself that night huh? Oh wait... he wasn't the one being followed by a guy with a gun was he?
You don't need to guess. A jury found him innocent.
So by this statement "A jury found him innocent" Does that mean everyone found innocent was not guilty of the crime? Kasey Anthony, Robert Durst, OJ? they were all innocent and did not do the crime correct?
Didn't you already say OJ was innocent?
No I did not...And really that is a weak attempt at not answering the question because you know it will make you look silly when you do.
So lets try this again:
Since you feel that a jury finding someone not guilty means they are innocent, does that mean you believe Kasey Anthony, Robert Durst, and OJ are innocent and did not commit those crimes?
I think what is silly is you pretending it's some eort of established fact Zimmerman is guilty of anything, especially since he was tried. What is silly is you assuming everyone like you wishes him harm and sees it as just he got shot in the face. I don't look silly, but you look like the sick vengeful hateful person you are.
Pretty sure we've known each other (here) for years and years. BTW: Just to de-rail the thread, I finally got a very good job last month. C#.NET+SQL+Web+mvc+WebAPI stuff. I really like this job! Haven't had a good job in a long time.
Do you still place programmers? Are most positions perm, contract or contract-to-hire? I went through Vaco and it was going to be contract-to-hire but went perm at the last minute, which is what I really wanted.
at a larger man who may or may not be armed for no apparent reason, no. That is indeed a new one for me.
Larger man? Zimmerman outweighed him by 27 lbs. So the guy who has an actual gun does not want to start a fight with someone who may have one? OK
If he didnt want to start a fight why did he go back? why did his girlfriend find it necessarry to tell him to just go home and not go looking for trouble? Your case has no merits, thus why Zimmerman was found not guilty.
So if your going to use his GF testimony as evidence, you would then have to use all of it correct? If that is the case then you have right there all the evidence of Zimmerman starting the fight and being the one on top while martin was the one calling for help. That makes all of Zimmermans testimony a lie then threatening Martin. I mean, we can't just claim one part was accurate (Her claiming Martin said he was almost back to his house) and ignore the rest can we?
You make fallacious statements and when cornered you dont own your shit, you continually try and expand the point, the scope of initial claims in the hope you can obfuscate the issue,and attempt to turn the argument on it's head. As far as what "we can believe" we can believe whatever we find to be credible, and not believe that which is not.
Your claims that Zimmerman was the one on top and the one that started the fight make you look like the idiot you are. Even the witness said martin was on top.You're just not very bright, are you. Go chase your tail, bumpkin.
Hahaha....everybody's a racist except you. The legend of Great White Power continues.
Right, that's what I said. Don't jherk your little stump too hard pretending you have somethign to say, or that anyone is listening, or that you have a clue what you're talking about.You're a punk ass bitch jumping on someone else's bandwagon to try and get some street cred here. You're a non entity, now fuckoff, boy.
Hahaha....everybody's a racist except you. The legend of Great White Power continues.
Right, that's what I said. Don't jherk your little stump too hard pretending you have somethign to say, or that anyone is listening, or that you have a clue what you're talking about.You're a punk ass bitch jumping on someone else's bandwagon to try and get some street cred here. You're a non entity, now fuckoff, boy.
Street cred? Boy?
Don't you have some Alex Jones tin foil hats to put together you racist shit stain??
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: OR. Maybe he IS a fucking lunatic...
Honestly, I can't believe he still has supporters.
On January 9, 2015, Zimmerman was arrested by Lake Murray police and charged with aggravated assault with a weapon after allegedly throwing a wine bottle at his ex-girlfriend.
Supporters? I don't give a flying fuck what he's done since then, and if any of you were honest, neither do any of you. This is entirely about what happened several years ago, otherwise none of this would be posted here so you guys can engage in yet another session of furious back-patting.
This. You can easily subscribe to the theory that Trayvon defended himself. If you ignore witness accounts and pesky facts.
I think he's at least somewhat mentally unstable. And he allowed himself to think that because he was found not guilty, that he is like some vigilante superhero above the law now. I wouldn't say the guy has supporters at all. There are those that believe his version of what happened on the night he shot Trayvon was pretty close to the truth (the version supported by physical evidence and eyewitnesses). Everything since then, however, really is irrelevant as to what happened, and it would surprise no one to see him in future legal trouble in some way or another.
Oh... so I guess only Zimmerman had the right to defend himself that night huh? Oh wait... he wasn't the one being followed by a guy with a gun was he?
You don't need to guess. A jury found him innocent.
I don't even know what this means in response to my post. I'm not interested in arguing with you GWG. I've witnessed first hand the type of poster you are and I'm not interested in even debating with you. You've made your point with me.
I'm amazed he has Internet acess in his bunker, tbh. And I'm surprised he has time to argue something as trivial as this while the military is planning a joint strike with law enforcement to take out all of the red states.
Hahaha....everybody's a racist except you. The legend of Great White Power continues.
Right, that's what I said. Don't jherk your little stump too hard pretending you have somethign to say, or that anyone is listening, or that you have a clue what you're talking about.You're a punk ass bitch jumping on someone else's bandwagon to try and get some street cred here. You're a non entity, now fuckoff, boy.
Street cred? Boy?
Don't you have some Alex Jones tin foil hats to put together you racist shit stain??
Like I said, all you can do is try and glom onto someone else's tired shit.You're weak and lacking.Come back when you fit into your big boy pants.You're like a little fish I catch, make dance on my line for a bit, then release hoping it will grow up and come back bigger and smarter in a few years and give me a better fight when it isn't just a little fish like you.
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: never seen a fight where an armed man up and takes a swing
at a larger man who may or may not be armed for no apparent reason, no. That is indeed a new one for me.
Larger man? Zimmerman outweighed him by 27 lbs. So the guy who has an actual gun does not want to start a fight with someone who may have one? OK
If he didnt want to start a fight why did he go back? why did his girlfriend find it necessarry to tell him to just go home and not go looking for trouble? Your case has no merits, thus why Zimmerman was found not guilty.
So if your going to use his GF testimony as evidence, you would then have to use all of it correct? If that is the case then you have right there all the evidence of Zimmerman starting the fight and being the one on top while martin was the one calling for help. That makes all of Zimmermans testimony a lie then threatening Martin. I mean, we can't just claim one part was accurate (Her claiming Martin said he was almost back to his house) and ignore the rest can we?
You make fallacious statements and when cornered you dont own your shit, you continually try and expand the point, the scope of initial claims in the hope you can obfuscate the issue,and attempt to turn the argument on it's head. As far as what "we can believe" we can believe whatever we find to be credible, and not believe that which is not.
Your claims that Zimmerman was the one on top and the one that started the fight make you look like the idiot you are. Even the witness said martin was on top.You're just not very bright, are you. Go chase your tail, bumpkin.
WTF is it with some of these posters on here. They write shit and then don't understand what the hell they wrote.
YOUR THE ONE who used his GF's testimony as proof he "went back" to Zimmerman. I am merely pointing that if your going to use her testimony for that, you have to use all of what she testified about. If you do that then, her claims that she heard Martin telling Zimmerman to "get off of me" have to apply and that means Zimmerman lied about Martin being on top.
Why the fuck do I have to explain to you your own fucking argument? You can't use just part of what she said, you have to use all of it then and that means Zimmerman was the agressor and the one one beating Martin up.
Why the hell is he going to start a fight instead of drawing his weapon? That makes absolutely no sense.
You can't just draw your firearm in Florida. The only time you can draw your firearm is in a stand your ground situation where your life is in danger, and you pretty much have to fire it.
Wrong.
Stand your ground in Florida means nothing more than you don't have to retreat.
Why stand your ground was never used as a defense in the Martin case? It didn't apply and wouldn't fly.
Self defense was the was the defense used and is damn near the same in every state.
A concealed weapons permitted carrier can draw and use his weapon of choice in any of a number of situations legally.
Not when someone is walking through a neighborhood doing nothing wrong. You can't just pull your gun and legally approach someone because you believe someone wearing a hoodie might want to rob a house
I'm amazed he has Internet acess in his bunker, tbh. And I'm surprised he has time to argue something as trivial as this while the military is planning a joint strike with law enforcement to take out all of the red states.
And thats what someone does when they can't argue whats said, pretend the other party said something they didn't so they CAN take issue.Keep trying to put words in my mouth, I got something to put in yours.You'll like it I promise.
The devil you say! I'm nonplussed! Is that the right word?
Apparently she wasn't very convincing.
So based on that logic, I take it you believe OJ is innocent correct?
Since there is virtually no exculpatory evidence that should have cleared OJ....no. But invoking OJ is a pretty good sign that you don't have a whole helluva lot to use here.
Yeah I guess those gloves not fitting was a fantasy
Which just shows how twisted partial and lacking credibility anything you have to say is.Tell us how OJ is innocent, but martin is guilty. Hypocrite. It's clear what you think and who you support is based not on facts but the color of their skin.
You really are a stupid fuck aren't you? Nowhere in the context of that discussion you have quoted did i say OJ was innocent. You fail on basic reading skills
Honestly, I can't believe he still has supporters.
On January 9, 2015, Zimmerman was arrested by Lake Murray police and charged with aggravated assault with a weapon after allegedly throwing a wine bottle at his ex-girlfriend.
Supporters? I don't give a flying fuck what he's done since then, and if any of you were honest, neither do any of you. This is entirely about what happened several years ago, otherwise none of this would be posted here so you guys can engage in yet another session of furious back-patting.
This. You can easily subscribe to the theory that Trayvon defended himself. If you ignore witness accounts and pesky facts.
I think he's at least somewhat mentally unstable. And he allowed himself to think that because he was found not guilty, that he is like some vigilante superhero above the law now. I wouldn't say the guy has supporters at all. There are those that believe his version of what happened on the night he shot Trayvon was pretty close to the truth (the version supported by physical evidence and eyewitnesses). Everything since then, however, really is irrelevant as to what happened, and it would surprise no one to see him in future legal trouble in some way or another.
Oh... so I guess only Zimmerman had the right to defend himself that night huh? Oh wait... he wasn't the one being followed by a guy with a gun was he?
You don't need to guess. A jury found him innocent.
So by this statement "A jury found him innocent" Does that mean everyone found innocent was not guilty of the crime? Kasey Anthony, Robert Durst, OJ? they were all innocent and did not do the crime correct?
Didn't you already say OJ was innocent?
No I did not...And really that is a weak attempt at not answering the question because you know it will make you look silly when you do.
So lets try this again:
Since you feel that a jury finding someone not guilty means they are innocent, does that mean you believe Kasey Anthony, Robert Durst, and OJ are innocent and did not commit those crimes?
I think what is silly is you pretending it's some eort of established fact Zimmerman is guilty of anything, especially since he was tried. What is silly is you assuming everyone like you wishes him harm and sees it as just he got shot in the face. I don't look silly, but you look like the sick vengeful hateful person you are.
So in other words because you made the stupid claim that someone being found "Not Guilty" means they are innocent. me pointing out how completely silly that claim is means you lack the nads to answer the question. You keep dodging it like a pussy, so lets try it again Einstein.:
Since YOU BELIEVE that a "not guilty" decision means someone is innocent, does that mean you feel that Kasey Anthony, Robert Durst, and OJ are also innocent?
This is really easy even for you. You claimed a not guilty meant someone was innocent. Does that also mean those mentioned are innocent people who did not do the crime?
Grow a set of balls and answer the simple question. Do so though before you get banned again for good this time, it won't be long in coming
I'm amazed he has Internet acess in his bunker, tbh. And I'm surprised he has time to argue something as trivial as this while the military is planning a joint strike with law enforcement to take out all of the red states.
And thats what someone does when they can't argue whats said, pretend the other party said something they didn't so they CAN take issue.Keep trying to put words in my mouth, I got something to put in yours.You'll like it I promise.
His bunker = Mom's basement
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: never seen a fight where an armed man up and takes a swing
at a larger man who may or may not be armed for no apparent reason, no. That is indeed a new one for me.
Larger man? Zimmerman outweighed him by 27 lbs. So the guy who has an actual gun does not want to start a fight with someone who may have one? OK
If he didnt want to start a fight why did he go back? why did his girlfriend find it necessarry to tell him to just go home and not go looking for trouble? Your case has no merits, thus why Zimmerman was found not guilty.
So if your going to use his GF testimony as evidence, you would then have to use all of it correct? If that is the case then you have right there all the evidence of Zimmerman starting the fight and being the one on top while martin was the one calling for help. That makes all of Zimmermans testimony a lie then threatening Martin. I mean, we can't just claim one part was accurate (Her claiming Martin said he was almost back to his house) and ignore the rest can we?
You make fallacious statements and when cornered you dont own your shit, you continually try and expand the point, the scope of initial claims in the hope you can obfuscate the issue,and attempt to turn the argument on it's head. As far as what "we can believe" we can believe whatever we find to be credible, and not believe that which is not.
Your claims that Zimmerman was the one on top and the one that started the fight make you look like the idiot you are. Even the witness said martin was on top.You're just not very bright, are you. Go chase your tail, bumpkin.
WTF is it with some of these posters on here. They write shit and then don't understand what the hell they wrote.
YOUR THE ONE who used his GF's testimony as proof he "went back" to Zimmerman. I am merely pointing that if your going to use her testimony for that, you have to use all of what she testified about. If you do that then, her claims that she heard Martin telling Zimmerman to "get off of me" have to apply and that means Zimmerman lied about Martin being on top.
Why the fuck do I have to explain to you your own fucking argument? You can't use just part of what she said, you have to use all of it then and that means Zimmerman was the aggressor and the one one beating Martin up.
I know what I wrote and I know what I said, and I dont have to do a fucking thing.You dont get to tell people what to think or tell them what they have to consider, especially when someone does the same to you and you ignore facts and logic .You can maintain Zimmerman assaulted martin and Zimmerman was on top, but you occupy a lonely position, most anyone with a brain, like the jury in the case disagree.
The fact remains his girlfreind said she told him not to go back. you can lie and pretend she didnt, but she did. You can try and raise other issues and other points, but why would anyone engage with someone dealing in bad faith? one thing if you respond to any issue, it gets resolved, and we move on. But this isn't a dialogue. You don't have dialogues. You verbally assault and insult anyone with a different opinion.Don't mistake whats going on here. This isn't a discussion. This is you trying to be internet tough guy and someone calling you on your bullshit, and you trying to obfuscate the issue.You want a civil discussion, then have one, but you don't and you won't. You're a thug and a wannabe bully.Acting like a gentleman isn't something you're capable of.
My God, you are really just an insignificant moron who does not have one whit about what they are talking about. Go away little boy, the adults are talking
I will try one last time and do so in a manner you might be able to un
Now, I have asked you repeatedly to respond to that silly ass "Not guilty means your innocent" logic you used earlier. But you keep running from answering the question i asked with regards to that. We all know why you are doing that, because it makes your point extremely silly and naive. but lets hope you can answer this simple question without running from it also
Thats treue also. How Graziano makes the jump form Tyree saying he doesn't approve, to all of a sudden claiming hateful and damaging actions is bullshit.I'm tired of this hysterical whining
bullshit and will fight it wherever I find it.who the hell is graziano to be telling us what we should or shouldn't approve of.I leave you alone, you leave me alone, but go fuck yourselves wheb you want to tell me how to think or nake moral judgements on it, cause guess what, then ill start passing moral judgements on other people for being dicksucks. And i don't really give a shit who it offends anymore. those who are offended tend to be the most vile sorts of people anyway.most parts of the world fagotism is treated as a mental illness, or a crime.i don't really give a shit is some closeted fag in the giants locker room was thinking about coming out and now feels he can't. Maybe we get lucky and he asks to be traded, and furthermore others of their ilk avoid signign with us in the future. If Mara and Tasxh had that in mind, Bravo.The whole soncept of them " scrambling for damage control" is hirseshit. The did it, and they don't give 2 shits who is butthurt over it.Theyw ant to hire a gay player, go right ahead. They want to hire 20, thats fine too.They want to hire a gay GM< i'm down with that also. But don't presume to tell me how to feel about it. What a man thinks in his own head id his own fucking business, and he has a right to express it if he wants.
You wanna call me a bigot, go right ahead.Doesn't make me one.somehow now saying anything other than promoting fagotry is a hate crime. i call bullshit.Also tyree is right. Go find the fag gene, otherwise shut the fuck up about how you were born this way and can't help yourself.Bigots make you sick? Fagots make me sick. too bad.If me saying thst is a crime, then I think you are a sick twisted bastard.Tyree has every right to hisd opinion and doesnt owe his integrity as a man and a human being to an employer. There are plenty of ameerican men whio think homosexuality is sick and disgussting, but they simply wont say so in public because they might be adversely affected. these men are characterless weasels. At least Tyree has the courage of his convictions.anyone don't like my opinion can go pound it up their ass along with whatever else they like to shove up there.Graziano makes me sick.
Imagine how incoherent he would be if he actually drank?
This right here is excellence defined as far as nutjob posting goes:
Quote:
If Mara and Tasxh had that in mind, Bravo.The whole soncept of them " scrambling for damage control" is hirseshit. The did it, and they don't give 2 shits who is butthurt over it.
I'm amazed he has Internet acess in his bunker, tbh. And I'm surprised he has time to argue something as trivial as this while the military is planning a joint strike with law enforcement to take out all of the red states.
And thats what someone does when they can't argue whats said, pretend the other party said something they didn't so they CAN take issue.Keep trying to put words in my mouth, I got something to put in yours.You'll like it I promise.
Flattered, but no thanks! No worries, I'm a smexe fuck and used to it.
Anyway, before all of arousing homoeroticism got throw in Id like to respond:
I wasn't trying to disprove anything you've typed. Haven't even read it. I thought that was pretty obvious. I was just providing your background based on your recent posting history here to "color" (haha) what you've typed for those that don't know.
I figure it's kinda like going through a dead teenager's phone and splashing it all over certain media outlets. Ya know, to "be informed". (I used quotes because I don't like being disingenuous. I'm doing it so folks have something to confirm their biases about you- I consider it a public service.)
I took the whole blow job proposition as the "not very secure in his sexuality" kind of insult, or maybe the plain old mostly innocent "that's just how we did insults when we were kids" - not the "self loathing projecting" type.
And his level of holding a coherent and logical conversation is that of a drunk 15 year old moron, and his level of typing is that of a 9 year old, who barely learned how to type.
I weep for those, who have to deal with him in person on a daily basis. And I weep for the Corps that this jackass homophobic racist wore the EGA once. But hey, what the hell do I know? I'm a gay rights supporting, minority, PLC pogue according to him.
And his level of holding a coherent and logical conversation is that of a drunk 15 year old moron, and his level of typing is that of a 9 year old, who barely learned how to type.
I weep for those, who have to deal with him in person on a daily basis. And I weep for the Corps that this jackass homophobic racist wore the EGA once. But hey, what the hell do I know? I'm a gay rights supporting, minority, PLC pogue according to him.
I'm sorry, I referred to you or implied you're a minority somewhere?as usual, you're a liar.
Post your Annopolis dilpoma or GTFO, pogue.Put up or shut up.And stop being such a whining woman. You follow me around, toss grenades and cry like a total bitch when you get anything back. You're weak, spineless.I'm in your head, not the other way around. It's you who follows me around looking for a bone or acknowledgement. Go make some friends, and fuckoff.I happen to know for a fact i pay absolutely no attention to you unless your jumping up and down throwing handgrenades begging for attention. like I said I feel sorry for you. was pathetic to watch you in that other thread. toss a comment in and you were good for another 12 hours. it was sad, like I said, and goes a ways to explain how we lsot the last few wars we've fought and can't even take care of our own personell anymore when I come to understand guys like you think they are our best and bravest. you understand shit about how to fight and win wars.Funny, I think it's you who are a disgrace to my beloved corps.Don't think it didn't escape me that the one time I attempted to even discuss actual doctrine and doctrine development you fled like a girl.Another inept uninformed officer.Probably an Amos fan as well.
This thread is an 'Add water and mix' Instant Classic
Now, I have asked you repeatedly to respond to that silly ass "Not guilty means your innocent" logic you used earlier. But you keep running from answering the question i asked with regards to that. We all know why you are doing that, because it makes your point extremely silly and naive. but lets hope you can answer this simple question without running from it also
Here, I'll throw you a bone.Say for the sake or argument, you're right. say for the sake or argument it's obvious that a not guilty vote doesn't mean he's innocent. Take it a step further, and pretend that anyone with half a brain actually knows that.Yet that's not what I put out there. Now, you seem quite content to leave it at that, and come to what, for you, is the obvius conclusion, that I am of below avg intelligence. If youre good with that, then you stay there.Vut assuming that what I wrote above is self apparent, it begs the question, why would I say that?
Do you suppose I had no reason, or that I truly believe the verdicts showed Zimmerman had no blame.Lets see if you're as smart as you think.
You tried to discuss doctrine with me? Dude, you probably barely understanding squad tactics, let alone actual doctrine. Stay in your lane, fool.
And you don't have to believe anything about me. To you, I'm a nobody. However, I'm also that nobody, who has gotten into your head to the point that you can't do anything but get irate whenever I post in response to your idiotic posts. And I do admit that I get a ton of laughs out of pushing your buttons because it's so damn easy. And all I get in response is you calling me a pogue or a terrible officer or whatever lame insults you can throw my way. But then again, your lengthy, error-ridden diatribes are always welcome, so I do have to thank you for some awesome entertainment.
Also, you can go on and insult those of us, who did do our part in these conflicts by talking about how we lost multiple wars, but in the end, the extent to your conflict while in the Corps was to decide whether you should bang that Thai hooker during a MEU. But hey, don't mind us, who actually lost friends in actual combat. I'm sure you've lost some of yours as well...well, at least to venereal disease or something similar.
And don't worry, I lead a very uneventful life, so I will definitely spend my time hounding you until you either decide to leave BBI or get banned for doing something that comes natural to you, which is to be a homophobic, racist, conspiracy theorist moron. That the least I can do for my favorite teufel hunden on BBI.
But I do wish you a fine evening. Carry on the good fight, my man!
Quote:
In comment 12281679 Greg from LI said:
Quote:
at a larger man who may or may not be armed for no apparent reason, no. That is indeed a new one for me.
Larger man? Zimmerman outweighed him by 27 lbs. So the guy who has an actual gun does not want to start a fight with someone who may have one? OK
If he didnt want to start a fight why did he go back? why did his girlfriend find it necessarry to tell him to just go home and not go looking for trouble? Your case has no merits, thus why Zimmerman was found not guilty.
So if your going to use his GF testimony as evidence, you would then have to use all of it correct? If that is the case then you have right there all the evidence of Zimmerman starting the fight and being the one on top while martin was the one calling for help. That makes all of Zimmermans testimony a lie then threatening Martin. I mean, we can't just claim one part was accurate (Her claiming Martin said he was almost back to his house) and ignore the rest can we?
Quote:
In comment 12281462 Headhunter said:
Quote:
misunderstanding in 2015? 3-5 sounds about right
You mean like with rodney king who kept getting in trouble until he was killed, not by the police? Like that? Or is it different?
Just to be clear, this is a white vs black issue for you?
Do I think it's a black and white issue?I do. I don't think it should be, but I think it is.I don't think it's whites who make it a racial issue, however.
Just like I don't think Daniel Gray should have been a race issue. Had it been a white guy arrested 20 times, with an arrest record getting increasingly frequent and increasingly violent as time wore on, I don't think anyone gives a flying fuck if he dies after a "rough ride" obviously getting arrested and apprehended by the police means shit in Baltimore, as he just keeps getting released, no matter what he does. I'll take it a step further and point to a mayor who like Nero watched her city burn while ordering law not to be enforced.
You have a black mayor, a black DA, a black Police chief, 3 out of 6 officers involved in that incident are black, and a mayor that lets riot run rampant because "the system" is at fault, a system in a city , and state, run by black democrats for 50 years, their system, that they run, and have run, for half a century, and then try and blame outside forces for the awful state of affairs in Baltimore, one of their own making one where the only real outside forces consist of massive amounts of federal cash flowing into both the city and state for education, making it like I think the third highest recipient in the country, with math and reading skills both below 20th%, regardless of how much money is thrown at them.They bring in al Sharpton, the famous conciliator to work his Magic, like he did in the Tawana Brawley case.I know parasites and opportunists posing as leaders and healers when I see them.They exist in real life, in politics, and on the interwebz as well.
I think it's a black and white issue when one side says the other side is guilty of this that and the other thing, and then refuse to own their own stinky shit, and pretend like the rest of us have to portend it doesn't stink. Your shit stinks. Bad.
Quote:
Why the hell is he going to start a fight instead of drawing his weapon? That makes absolutely no sense.
You can't just draw your firearm in Florida. The only time you can draw your firearm is in a stand your ground situation where your life is in danger, and you pretty much have to fire it.
Wrong.
Stand your ground in Florida means nothing more than you don't have to retreat.
Why stand your ground was never used as a defense in the Martin case? It didn't apply and wouldn't fly.
Self defense was the was the defense used and is damn near the same in every state.
A concealed weapons permitted carrier can draw and use his weapon of choice in any of a number of situations legally.
Quote:
In comment 12281980 montanagiant said:
Quote:
In comment 12281914 Great White Ghost said:
Quote:
In comment 12281512 T-Bone said:
Quote:
In comment 12281503 allstarjim said:
Quote:
In comment 12281468 Greg from LI said:
Quote:
In comment 12281463 x meadowlander said:
Quote:
Honestly, I can't believe he still has supporters.
On January 9, 2015, Zimmerman was arrested by Lake Murray police and charged with aggravated assault with a weapon after allegedly throwing a wine bottle at his ex-girlfriend.
Supporters? I don't give a flying fuck what he's done since then, and if any of you were honest, neither do any of you. This is entirely about what happened several years ago, otherwise none of this would be posted here so you guys can engage in yet another session of furious back-patting.
This. You can easily subscribe to the theory that Trayvon defended himself. If you ignore witness accounts and pesky facts.
I think he's at least somewhat mentally unstable. And he allowed himself to think that because he was found not guilty, that he is like some vigilante superhero above the law now. I wouldn't say the guy has supporters at all. There are those that believe his version of what happened on the night he shot Trayvon was pretty close to the truth (the version supported by physical evidence and eyewitnesses). Everything since then, however, really is irrelevant as to what happened, and it would surprise no one to see him in future legal trouble in some way or another.
Oh... so I guess only Zimmerman had the right to defend himself that night huh? Oh wait... he wasn't the one being followed by a guy with a gun was he?
You don't need to guess. A jury found him innocent.
So by this statement "A jury found him innocent" Does that mean everyone found innocent was not guilty of the crime? Kasey Anthony, Robert Durst, OJ? they were all innocent and did not do the crime correct?
Didn't you already say OJ was innocent?
No I did not...And really that is a weak attempt at not answering the question because you know it will make you look silly when you do.
So lets try this again:
Since you feel that a jury finding someone not guilty means they are innocent, does that mean you believe Kasey Anthony, Robert Durst, and OJ are innocent and did not commit those crimes?
Pretty sure we've known each other (here) for years and years. BTW: Just to de-rail the thread, I finally got a very good job last month. C#.NET+SQL+Web+mvc+WebAPI stuff. I really like this job! Haven't had a good job in a long time.
Do you still place programmers? Are most positions perm, contract or contract-to-hire? I went through Vaco and it was going to be contract-to-hire but went perm at the last minute, which is what I really wanted.
Quote:
In comment 12281696 montanagiant said:
Quote:
In comment 12281679 Greg from LI said:
Quote:
at a larger man who may or may not be armed for no apparent reason, no. That is indeed a new one for me.
Larger man? Zimmerman outweighed him by 27 lbs. So the guy who has an actual gun does not want to start a fight with someone who may have one? OK
If he didnt want to start a fight why did he go back? why did his girlfriend find it necessarry to tell him to just go home and not go looking for trouble? Your case has no merits, thus why Zimmerman was found not guilty.
So if your going to use his GF testimony as evidence, you would then have to use all of it correct? If that is the case then you have right there all the evidence of Zimmerman starting the fight and being the one on top while martin was the one calling for help. That makes all of Zimmermans testimony a lie then threatening Martin. I mean, we can't just claim one part was accurate (Her claiming Martin said he was almost back to his house) and ignore the rest can we?
Your claims that Zimmerman was the one on top and the one that started the fight make you look like the idiot you are. Even the witness said martin was on top.You're just not very bright, are you. Go chase your tail, bumpkin.
Quote:
Hahaha....everybody's a racist except you. The legend of Great White Power continues.
Right, that's what I said. Don't jherk your little stump too hard pretending you have somethign to say, or that anyone is listening, or that you have a clue what you're talking about.You're a punk ass bitch jumping on someone else's bandwagon to try and get some street cred here. You're a non entity, now fuckoff, boy.
Street cred? Boy?
Don't you have some Alex Jones tin foil hats to put together you racist shit stain??
Quote:
In comment 12281503 allstarjim said:
Quote:
In comment 12281468 Greg from LI said:
Quote:
In comment 12281463 x meadowlander said:
Quote:
Honestly, I can't believe he still has supporters.
On January 9, 2015, Zimmerman was arrested by Lake Murray police and charged with aggravated assault with a weapon after allegedly throwing a wine bottle at his ex-girlfriend.
Supporters? I don't give a flying fuck what he's done since then, and if any of you were honest, neither do any of you. This is entirely about what happened several years ago, otherwise none of this would be posted here so you guys can engage in yet another session of furious back-patting.
This. You can easily subscribe to the theory that Trayvon defended himself. If you ignore witness accounts and pesky facts.
I think he's at least somewhat mentally unstable. And he allowed himself to think that because he was found not guilty, that he is like some vigilante superhero above the law now. I wouldn't say the guy has supporters at all. There are those that believe his version of what happened on the night he shot Trayvon was pretty close to the truth (the version supported by physical evidence and eyewitnesses). Everything since then, however, really is irrelevant as to what happened, and it would surprise no one to see him in future legal trouble in some way or another.
Oh... so I guess only Zimmerman had the right to defend himself that night huh? Oh wait... he wasn't the one being followed by a guy with a gun was he?
You don't need to guess. A jury found him innocent.
I don't even know what this means in response to my post. I'm not interested in arguing with you GWG. I've witnessed first hand the type of poster you are and I'm not interested in even debating with you. You've made your point with me.
Quote:
In comment 12282074 rut17 said:
Quote:
Hahaha....everybody's a racist except you. The legend of Great White Power continues.
Right, that's what I said. Don't jherk your little stump too hard pretending you have somethign to say, or that anyone is listening, or that you have a clue what you're talking about.You're a punk ass bitch jumping on someone else's bandwagon to try and get some street cred here. You're a non entity, now fuckoff, boy.
Street cred? Boy?
Don't you have some Alex Jones tin foil hats to put together you racist shit stain??
Quote:
In comment 12281990 Great White Ghost said:
Quote:
In comment 12281696 montanagiant said:
Quote:
In comment 12281679 Greg from LI said:
Quote:
at a larger man who may or may not be armed for no apparent reason, no. That is indeed a new one for me.
Larger man? Zimmerman outweighed him by 27 lbs. So the guy who has an actual gun does not want to start a fight with someone who may have one? OK
If he didnt want to start a fight why did he go back? why did his girlfriend find it necessarry to tell him to just go home and not go looking for trouble? Your case has no merits, thus why Zimmerman was found not guilty.
So if your going to use his GF testimony as evidence, you would then have to use all of it correct? If that is the case then you have right there all the evidence of Zimmerman starting the fight and being the one on top while martin was the one calling for help. That makes all of Zimmermans testimony a lie then threatening Martin. I mean, we can't just claim one part was accurate (Her claiming Martin said he was almost back to his house) and ignore the rest can we?
You make fallacious statements and when cornered you dont own your shit, you continually try and expand the point, the scope of initial claims in the hope you can obfuscate the issue,and attempt to turn the argument on it's head. As far as what "we can believe" we can believe whatever we find to be credible, and not believe that which is not.
Your claims that Zimmerman was the one on top and the one that started the fight make you look like the idiot you are. Even the witness said martin was on top.You're just not very bright, are you. Go chase your tail, bumpkin.
WTF is it with some of these posters on here. They write shit and then don't understand what the hell they wrote.
YOUR THE ONE who used his GF's testimony as proof he "went back" to Zimmerman. I am merely pointing that if your going to use her testimony for that, you have to use all of what she testified about. If you do that then, her claims that she heard Martin telling Zimmerman to "get off of me" have to apply and that means Zimmerman lied about Martin being on top.
Why the fuck do I have to explain to you your own fucking argument? You can't use just part of what she said, you have to use all of it then and that means Zimmerman was the agressor and the one one beating Martin up.
Quote:
Quote:
Why the hell is he going to start a fight instead of drawing his weapon? That makes absolutely no sense.
You can't just draw your firearm in Florida. The only time you can draw your firearm is in a stand your ground situation where your life is in danger, and you pretty much have to fire it.
Wrong.
Stand your ground in Florida means nothing more than you don't have to retreat.
Why stand your ground was never used as a defense in the Martin case? It didn't apply and wouldn't fly.
Self defense was the was the defense used and is damn near the same in every state.
A concealed weapons permitted carrier can draw and use his weapon of choice in any of a number of situations legally.
Not when someone is walking through a neighborhood doing nothing wrong. You can't just pull your gun and legally approach someone because you believe someone wearing a hoodie might want to rob a house
Quote:
In comment 12281574 Greg from LI said:
Quote:
In comment 12281566 montanagiant said:
Quote:
In comment 12281561 Greg from LI said:
Quote:
The devil you say! I'm nonplussed! Is that the right word?
Apparently she wasn't very convincing.
So based on that logic, I take it you believe OJ is innocent correct?
Since there is virtually no exculpatory evidence that should have cleared OJ....no. But invoking OJ is a pretty good sign that you don't have a whole helluva lot to use here.
Yeah I guess those gloves not fitting was a fantasy
Which just shows how twisted partial and lacking credibility anything you have to say is.Tell us how OJ is innocent, but martin is guilty. Hypocrite. It's clear what you think and who you support is based not on facts but the color of their skin.
You really are a stupid fuck aren't you? Nowhere in the context of that discussion you have quoted did i say OJ was innocent. You fail on basic reading skills
So these threads aren't endlessly long.
Thank you.......
Quote:
In comment 12281995 Great White Ghost said:
Quote:
In comment 12281980 montanagiant said:
Quote:
In comment 12281914 Great White Ghost said:
Quote:
In comment 12281512 T-Bone said:
Quote:
In comment 12281503 allstarjim said:
Quote:
In comment 12281468 Greg from LI said:
Quote:
In comment 12281463 x meadowlander said:
Quote:
Honestly, I can't believe he still has supporters.
On January 9, 2015, Zimmerman was arrested by Lake Murray police and charged with aggravated assault with a weapon after allegedly throwing a wine bottle at his ex-girlfriend.
Supporters? I don't give a flying fuck what he's done since then, and if any of you were honest, neither do any of you. This is entirely about what happened several years ago, otherwise none of this would be posted here so you guys can engage in yet another session of furious back-patting.
This. You can easily subscribe to the theory that Trayvon defended himself. If you ignore witness accounts and pesky facts.
I think he's at least somewhat mentally unstable. And he allowed himself to think that because he was found not guilty, that he is like some vigilante superhero above the law now. I wouldn't say the guy has supporters at all. There are those that believe his version of what happened on the night he shot Trayvon was pretty close to the truth (the version supported by physical evidence and eyewitnesses). Everything since then, however, really is irrelevant as to what happened, and it would surprise no one to see him in future legal trouble in some way or another.
Oh... so I guess only Zimmerman had the right to defend himself that night huh? Oh wait... he wasn't the one being followed by a guy with a gun was he?
You don't need to guess. A jury found him innocent.
So by this statement "A jury found him innocent" Does that mean everyone found innocent was not guilty of the crime? Kasey Anthony, Robert Durst, OJ? they were all innocent and did not do the crime correct?
Didn't you already say OJ was innocent?
No I did not...And really that is a weak attempt at not answering the question because you know it will make you look silly when you do.
So lets try this again:
Since you feel that a jury finding someone not guilty means they are innocent, does that mean you believe Kasey Anthony, Robert Durst, and OJ are innocent and did not commit those crimes?
I think what is silly is you pretending it's some eort of established fact Zimmerman is guilty of anything, especially since he was tried. What is silly is you assuming everyone like you wishes him harm and sees it as just he got shot in the face. I don't look silly, but you look like the sick vengeful hateful person you are.
So in other words because you made the stupid claim that someone being found "Not Guilty" means they are innocent. me pointing out how completely silly that claim is means you lack the nads to answer the question. You keep dodging it like a pussy, so lets try it again Einstein.:
Since YOU BELIEVE that a "not guilty" decision means someone is innocent, does that mean you feel that Kasey Anthony, Robert Durst, and OJ are also innocent?
This is really easy even for you. You claimed a not guilty meant someone was innocent. Does that also mean those mentioned are innocent people who did not do the crime?
Grow a set of balls and answer the simple question. Do so though before you get banned again for good this time, it won't be long in coming
So these threads aren't endlessly long.
Thank you.......
Yes sorry
Quote:
I'm amazed he has Internet acess in his bunker, tbh. And I'm surprised he has time to argue something as trivial as this while the military is planning a joint strike with law enforcement to take out all of the red states.
And thats what someone does when they can't argue whats said, pretend the other party said something they didn't so they CAN take issue.Keep trying to put words in my mouth, I got something to put in yours.You'll like it I promise.
His bunker = Mom's basement
Quote:
In comment 12282056 montanagiant said:
Quote:
In comment 12281990 Great White Ghost said:
Quote:
In comment 12281696 montanagiant said:
Quote:
In comment 12281679 Greg from LI said:
Quote:
at a larger man who may or may not be armed for no apparent reason, no. That is indeed a new one for me.
Larger man? Zimmerman outweighed him by 27 lbs. So the guy who has an actual gun does not want to start a fight with someone who may have one? OK
If he didnt want to start a fight why did he go back? why did his girlfriend find it necessarry to tell him to just go home and not go looking for trouble? Your case has no merits, thus why Zimmerman was found not guilty.
So if your going to use his GF testimony as evidence, you would then have to use all of it correct? If that is the case then you have right there all the evidence of Zimmerman starting the fight and being the one on top while martin was the one calling for help. That makes all of Zimmermans testimony a lie then threatening Martin. I mean, we can't just claim one part was accurate (Her claiming Martin said he was almost back to his house) and ignore the rest can we?
You make fallacious statements and when cornered you dont own your shit, you continually try and expand the point, the scope of initial claims in the hope you can obfuscate the issue,and attempt to turn the argument on it's head. As far as what "we can believe" we can believe whatever we find to be credible, and not believe that which is not.
Your claims that Zimmerman was the one on top and the one that started the fight make you look like the idiot you are. Even the witness said martin was on top.You're just not very bright, are you. Go chase your tail, bumpkin.
WTF is it with some of these posters on here. They write shit and then don't understand what the hell they wrote.
YOUR THE ONE who used his GF's testimony as proof he "went back" to Zimmerman. I am merely pointing that if your going to use her testimony for that, you have to use all of what she testified about. If you do that then, her claims that she heard Martin telling Zimmerman to "get off of me" have to apply and that means Zimmerman lied about Martin being on top.
Why the fuck do I have to explain to you your own fucking argument? You can't use just part of what she said, you have to use all of it then and that means Zimmerman was the aggressor and the one one beating Martin up.
The fact remains his girlfreind said she told him not to go back. you can lie and pretend she didnt, but she did. You can try and raise other issues and other points, but why would anyone engage with someone dealing in bad faith? one thing if you respond to any issue, it gets resolved, and we move on. But this isn't a dialogue. You don't have dialogues. You verbally assault and insult anyone with a different opinion.Don't mistake whats going on here. This isn't a discussion. This is you trying to be internet tough guy and someone calling you on your bullshit, and you trying to obfuscate the issue.You want a civil discussion, then have one, but you don't and you won't. You're a thug and a wannabe bully.Acting like a gentleman isn't something you're capable of.
Now, I have asked you repeatedly to respond to that silly ass "Not guilty means your innocent" logic you used earlier. But you keep running from answering the question i asked with regards to that. We all know why you are doing that, because it makes your point extremely silly and naive. but lets hope you can answer this simple question without running from it also
Thats treue also. How Graziano makes the jump form Tyree saying he doesn't approve, to all of a sudden claiming hateful and damaging actions is bullshit.I'm tired of this hysterical whining
bullshit and will fight it wherever I find it.who the hell is graziano to be telling us what we should or shouldn't approve of.I leave you alone, you leave me alone, but go fuck yourselves wheb you want to tell me how to think or nake moral judgements on it, cause guess what, then ill start passing moral judgements on other people for being dicksucks. And i don't really give a shit who it offends anymore. those who are offended tend to be the most vile sorts of people anyway.most parts of the world fagotism is treated as a mental illness, or a crime.i don't really give a shit is some closeted fag in the giants locker room was thinking about coming out and now feels he can't. Maybe we get lucky and he asks to be traded, and furthermore others of their ilk avoid signign with us in the future. If Mara and Tasxh had that in mind, Bravo.The whole soncept of them " scrambling for damage control" is hirseshit. The did it, and they don't give 2 shits who is butthurt over it.Theyw ant to hire a gay player, go right ahead. They want to hire 20, thats fine too.They want to hire a gay GM< i'm down with that also. But don't presume to tell me how to feel about it. What a man thinks in his own head id his own fucking business, and he has a right to express it if he wants.
You wanna call me a bigot, go right ahead.Doesn't make me one.somehow now saying anything other than promoting fagotry is a hate crime. i call bullshit.Also tyree is right. Go find the fag gene, otherwise shut the fuck up about how you were born this way and can't help yourself.Bigots make you sick? Fagots make me sick. too bad.If me saying thst is a crime, then I think you are a sick twisted bastard.Tyree has every right to hisd opinion and doesnt owe his integrity as a man and a human being to an employer. There are plenty of ameerican men whio think homosexuality is sick and disgussting, but they simply wont say so in public because they might be adversely affected. these men are characterless weasels. At least Tyree has the courage of his convictions.anyone don't like my opinion can go pound it up their ass along with whatever else they like to shove up there.Graziano makes me sick.
Deep breaths.
Imagine how incoherent he would be if he actually drank?
Quote:
5th grade level post he wrote?
Imagine how incoherent he would be if he actually drank?
This right here is excellence defined as far as nutjob posting goes:
Quote:
I'm amazed he has Internet acess in his bunker, tbh. And I'm surprised he has time to argue something as trivial as this while the military is planning a joint strike with law enforcement to take out all of the red states.
And thats what someone does when they can't argue whats said, pretend the other party said something they didn't so they CAN take issue.Keep trying to put words in my mouth, I got something to put in yours.You'll like it I promise.
Flattered, but no thanks! No worries, I'm a smexe fuck and used to it.
Anyway, before all of arousing homoeroticism got throw in Id like to respond:
I wasn't trying to disprove anything you've typed. Haven't even read it. I thought that was pretty obvious. I was just providing your background based on your recent posting history here to "color" (haha) what you've typed for those that don't know.
I figure it's kinda like going through a dead teenager's phone and splashing it all over certain media outlets. Ya know, to "be informed". (I used quotes because I don't like being disingenuous. I'm doing it so folks have something to confirm their biases about you- I consider it a public service.)
And:
I took the whole blow job proposition as the "not very secure in his sexuality" kind of insult, or maybe the plain old mostly innocent "that's just how we did insults when we were kids" - not the "self loathing projecting" type.
Thanks for the refresh!
I weep for those, who have to deal with him in person on a daily basis. And I weep for the Corps that this jackass homophobic racist wore the EGA once. But hey, what the hell do I know? I'm a gay rights supporting, minority, PLC pogue according to him.
Now, back to our regularly scheduled bickering.
I did not notice the gorilla. Seriously.
The Inevitable Return Of The Great White Dope - ( New Window )
Quote:
I did not notice the gorilla. Seriously.
There's a gorilla in that picture??
I weep for those, who have to deal with him in person on a daily basis. And I weep for the Corps that this jackass homophobic racist wore the EGA once. But hey, what the hell do I know? I'm a gay rights supporting, minority, PLC pogue according to him.
Post your Annopolis dilpoma or GTFO, pogue.Put up or shut up.And stop being such a whining woman. You follow me around, toss grenades and cry like a total bitch when you get anything back. You're weak, spineless.I'm in your head, not the other way around. It's you who follows me around looking for a bone or acknowledgement. Go make some friends, and fuckoff.I happen to know for a fact i pay absolutely no attention to you unless your jumping up and down throwing handgrenades begging for attention. like I said I feel sorry for you. was pathetic to watch you in that other thread. toss a comment in and you were good for another 12 hours. it was sad, like I said, and goes a ways to explain how we lsot the last few wars we've fought and can't even take care of our own personell anymore when I come to understand guys like you think they are our best and bravest. you understand shit about how to fight and win wars.Funny, I think it's you who are a disgrace to my beloved corps.Don't think it didn't escape me that the one time I attempted to even discuss actual doctrine and doctrine development you fled like a girl.Another inept uninformed officer.Probably an Amos fan as well.
I'm setting it at 11. And taking the over.
Now, I have asked you repeatedly to respond to that silly ass "Not guilty means your innocent" logic you used earlier. But you keep running from answering the question i asked with regards to that. We all know why you are doing that, because it makes your point extremely silly and naive. but lets hope you can answer this simple question without running from it also
Do you suppose I had no reason, or that I truly believe the verdicts showed Zimmerman had no blame.Lets see if you're as smart as you think.
And you don't have to believe anything about me. To you, I'm a nobody. However, I'm also that nobody, who has gotten into your head to the point that you can't do anything but get irate whenever I post in response to your idiotic posts. And I do admit that I get a ton of laughs out of pushing your buttons because it's so damn easy. And all I get in response is you calling me a pogue or a terrible officer or whatever lame insults you can throw my way. But then again, your lengthy, error-ridden diatribes are always welcome, so I do have to thank you for some awesome entertainment.
Also, you can go on and insult those of us, who did do our part in these conflicts by talking about how we lost multiple wars, but in the end, the extent to your conflict while in the Corps was to decide whether you should bang that Thai hooker during a MEU. But hey, don't mind us, who actually lost friends in actual combat. I'm sure you've lost some of yours as well...well, at least to venereal disease or something similar.
And don't worry, I lead a very uneventful life, so I will definitely spend my time hounding you until you either decide to leave BBI or get banned for doing something that comes natural to you, which is to be a homophobic, racist, conspiracy theorist moron. That the least I can do for my favorite teufel hunden on BBI.
But I do wish you a fine evening. Carry on the good fight, my man!