You tried to discuss doctrine with me? Dude, you probably barely understanding squad tactics, let alone actual doctrine. Stay in your lane, fool.
And you don't have to believe anything about me. To you, I'm a nobody. However, I'm also that nobody, who has gotten into your head to the point that you can't do anything but get irate whenever I post in response to your idiotic posts. And I do admit that I get a ton of laughs out of pushing your buttons because it's so damn easy. And all I get in response is you calling me a pogue or a terrible officer or whatever lame insults you can throw my way. But then again, your lengthy, error-ridden diatribes are always welcome, so I do have to thank you for some awesome entertainment.
Also, you can go on and insult those of us, who did do our part in these conflicts by talking about how we lost multiple wars, but in the end, the extent to your conflict while in the Corps was to decide whether you should bang that Thai hooker during a MEU. But hey, don't mind us, who actually lost friends in actual combat. I'm sure you've lost some of yours as well...well, at least to venereal disease or something similar.
And don't worry, I lead a very uneventful life, so I will definitely spend my time hounding you until you either decide to leave BBI or get banned for doing something that comes natural to you, which is to be a homophobic, racist, conspiracy theorist moron. That the least I can do for my favorite teufel hunden on BBI.
But I do wish you a fine evening. Carry on the good fight, my man!
Annapois diploma or GTFO, PLC pogue.
RE: RE: I will try one last time and do so in a manner you might be able to un
Now, I have asked you repeatedly to respond to that silly ass "Not guilty means your innocent" logic you used earlier. But you keep running from answering the question i asked with regards to that. We all know why you are doing that, because it makes your point extremely silly and naive. but lets hope you can answer this simple question without running from it also
Here, I'll throw you a bone.Say for the sake or argument, you're right. say for the sake or argument it's obvious that a not guilty vote doesn't mean he's innocent. Take it a step further, and pretend that anyone with half a brain actually knows that.Yet that's not what I put out there. Now, you seem quite content to leave it at that, and come to what, for you, is the obvius conclusion, that I am of below avg intelligence. If youre good with that, then you stay there.Vut assuming that what I wrote above is self apparent, it begs the question, why would I say that?
Do you suppose I had no reason, or that I truly believe the verdicts showed Zimmerman had no blame.Lets see if you're as smart as you think.
You failed once again to answer the question that directly points to your point about his GF's testimony. If you can't back your idiocy, don't post it then because all you are doing is making a fool of yourself. You truly show your ignorance with regards to subjects when you do stupid shit like that. Don't make a claim if you can't stand behind it
Now, I have asked you repeatedly to respond to that silly ass "Not guilty means your innocent" logic you used earlier. But you keep running from answering the question i asked with regards to that. We all know why you are doing that, because it makes your point extremely silly and naive. but lets hope you can answer this simple question without running from it also
Here, I'll throw you a bone.Say for the sake or argument, you're right. say for the sake or argument it's obvious that a not guilty vote doesn't mean he's innocent. Take it a step further, and pretend that anyone with half a brain actually knows that.Yet that's not what I put out there. Now, you seem quite content to leave it at that, and come to what, for you, is the obvius conclusion, that I am of below avg intelligence. If youre good with that, then you stay there.Vut assuming that what I wrote above is self apparent, it begs the question, why would I say that?
Do you suppose I had no reason, or that I truly believe the verdicts showed Zimmerman had no blame.Lets see if you're as smart as you think.
You failed once again to answer the question that directly points to your point about his GF's testimony. If you can't back your idiocy, don't post it then because all you are doing is making a fool of yourself. You truly show your ignorance with regards to subjects when you do stupid shit like that. Don't make a claim if you can't stand behind it
the only thing that's happened is you've shown what at idiot you are.I gave you a chance. And you're common, much as I suspected.
I always knew you wouldn't because once i backed you into the corner using your own nonsense it hit you that you fucked up. lol...its like dealing with a 8 year old child who lied.
What is going to be your next handle when you get banned again?
Aren't you then just going to throw out some lame Ring Knocker insult? I mean you are pretty predictable.
And there are some here who can vouch for my bona fide nature of my background. That's enough as far as I see it.
Sweet dreams, my angry friend.
Dont get upset and go away all mad. after all it was you who started questioning other peopels backgrounds. Dont cry you got exposed, PLC pogue.
What is your background you keep claiming? obviously its not teaching grammar, so clue us all in. you claimed you teach military tactics, where on Earth does this happen at? And please tell me we are not talking about Dungeon and Dragons tactics are we?
You can go on line like GWG like this idiot did and get all the slang. It is a term meant to degrade support staff like cooks, paper pushers, etc.. Anyone who has actually served though understands they also serve an important function, its just the wanna-be's who think they don't.
I would also throw in an assault on the English language and proper logic to that list. But I'm sure Antisemitism will also be added to the list shortly.
Deep in the Vietnamese jungles, he is known as the deadly White Ghost, a stealthy guerilla killer who continues to wage war against the Viet Cong, even though the war ended over a decade before. He is, in reality, Steve Shepard, a former U.S. Intelligence Officer with the Special Forces squad, a man listed MIA when his unit was slaughtered during an ambush. Since then, he has chosen to remain in the jungle. His only companion is his Vietnamese wife. This jungle actioner follows what happens when the U.S. military decides to try and bring him back to the U.S. Unfortunately, the former Green Beret officer chosen to lead the mission is Shepard's sworn enemy Walker, a man who seems more interested in bringing him back in a body bag. But will he succeed? This film went direct to video.
Deep in the Vietnamese jungles, he is known as the deadly White Ghost, a stealthy guerilla killer who continues to wage war against the Viet Cong, even though the war ended over a decade before. He is, in reality, Steve Shepard, a former U.S. Intelligence Officer with the Special Forces squad, a man listed MIA when his unit was slaughtered during an ambush. Since then, he has chosen to remain in the jungle. His only companion is his Vietnamese wife. This jungle actioner follows what happens when the U.S. military decides to try and bring him back to the U.S. Unfortunately, the former Green Beret officer chosen to lead the mission is Shepard's sworn enemy Walker, a man who seems more interested in bringing him back in a body bag. But will he succeed? This film went direct to video.
Link - ( New Window )
You are GWG's Walker, Ronnie. But will you succeed?
Some people and incidents are too far off central tendency to usefully use to discuss anything...imho.
But I am interested in asking...but wish the response kept private and not discussed.
GWG....for whatever reason and at this point top lost in time to be your fault or something anyone can overcome...can you take a day or so privately and ask yourself of this is worth it? It cannot be good for anyone to spend time in so much opposition. It's stress without a healthy payoff. It strikes me as unhealthy for you. I realize that opposition triggers stubborn opposition in all of us. But none of this or any one here is worth stress.
Secondly, there comes a time when the best inside any poster is lost and replaced by too much enjoyment at hammering the errant nail.
Don't misunderstand me....too many possible conversations wrecked by GWG and brownstones need to self stroke instead of discuss...but at some point none of us do well so far from our best. And we get into the practice of put down before give and take discussion that makes it hard for opposing and interesting view points to be submitted even if civilly done.
To slay the monster we become a new monster that wrecks what we originally objected to...decency and civic discourse.
No replies encouraged....just food for personal thought. I don't know what to do... but it sure seems like a lot of threads are going to be wrecked rehashing and re trying emotions long unanchored from original offense.
Your post definitely makes me question my own part in these back-and-forths with GWG. For some strange reason, I just feel compelled to push his buttons, and that's most definitely not a recipe for good discussions in any thread.
So for that, I will refrain from interacting with GWG, no matter if I enjoy seeing him get all discombobulated.
Here's a photo of George's car. Bullet hole through the window and one through the lower part of the passenger door Notice how deeply tinted the windows are and the location of the bullet hole. Again this is the same vehicle Zimmerman has been driving since the Martin altercation. Plus Zimmerman had moved out of Florida and was visiting his mom when this happened.
I've attached the arrest record of this Apperson guy who reminds me of that Slingblade character.
Interesting how quickly Mark Nejame got on this case to represent Apperson. This is the same attorney that George Zimmerman first went to. Nejame declined but referred Zimmerman to Mark O'Meara whom he later hired. I guess Nejame and O'Meara are good friends. Court record of Matt Apperson - ( New Window )
never hinged on him being a model citizen, it was whether or not what he did was criminal in that place and time. And while certainly some trouble has probably found him as a result of what happened, and no doubt the experience of being one of the most hated men in America probably took a toll, one can acknowledge that he is very likely an asshole without having to admit a mistake in trying to interpret what happened with Trayvon Martin.
Yeah its a weird phenomenon. I don't know the right way to handle these circles. Never did. It's like how do you discourage the discouraging without discouraging what we want to encourage?
Talk about bad English...re read that question three times and tell me we are not far off course.
Hopefully see you down the road my friend.
RE: RE: RE: RE: aaaaand.....again.....all this has fuck-all to do with the Martin
Greg seriously? Not understand why you are defending him, is he a friend or something? LOL
Do you not see that this guy historically inserts himself into situations that he shouldn't be in, over and over and over and over again? Doesn't raise a red flag to you? At all?
Inserts himself in situations.....where is that in the Florida criminal code? If you can find it for me, I'll give you a round of applause.
Check out Bernie Goetz. Similar situation IF GZ was trying to instigate a 'justified' shooting. Goetz was found innocent but he was tried for murder. If he had a past like GZ and it was introduced in court what would have happened?
Wasn't Bernie Goetz being mugged? That's not similar at all, unless you are one of those people that just sees a white man shooting a black teen and lumps it all together. Which makes you part of the problem. btw.
Your post definitely makes me question my own part in these back-and-forths with GWG. For some strange reason, I just feel compelled to push his buttons, and that's most definitely not a recipe for good discussions in any thread.
So for that, I will refrain from interacting with GWG, no matter if I enjoy seeing him get all discombobulated.
Thank you, sir.
Meh. Definitely intentional on my part. I'm happy enough with my own shortcomings. They taste like bacon.
This word combo is the kind of shit some of us live for on BBI.
Meh. Definitely intentional on my part. I'm happy enough with my own shortcomings. They taste like bacon.
Of course my actions were also intentional, but that doesn't mean that I'm not derailing threads with my snark directed towards him. I definitely recognize my shortcomings in that regard. And yes, anything that taste like bacon is a good thing.
Other then himself. You look at every discussion thread with different people. He comes on, makes a response and then flies off the handle when the problems or counter point is made regarding his response.
How is that anyone else's fault?
RE: I really don't see anyone else being the cause of that idiots angst
Other then himself. You look at every discussion thread with different people. He comes on, makes a response and then flies off the handle when the problems or counter point is made regarding his response.
How is that anyone else's fault?
Pretty sure that was the point, no? A request for some self-reflection (probably not A-Rod style, but who knows? Might do him some good?).
Its not. You know that and I know that. Blame was far from the point ( and you know better than to think that was my point....Did you give that response out of combative mode or thoughtful mode? That's what guys like this do to good posters....get them in bad cycles far from their best)
But its easy to do if you are willing to do so and easier if you have a screw loose and get some emotional payoff from it we do not understand.
You are working 20x harder than he is and getting nothing out of it.
He has no audience. He has no voice on here.
Meanwhile we let his presence wreck good threads.
I get the temptation....I fall into it all the time. I get that driving such posters away has a civic value to the site. However there are posters that are more than missing self awareness. At that point we have the sane engaging the insane (a response on a topic or at a time or in a situation or by a certain poster)....which by definition is insane. Why volunteer to be insane ( Repeating behavior proven useless and expecting a different response)?
imho. Again...I do the same things. I am not calling you out so lets lay down firearms on the subject
I could be way off but often in life people who act in ways not conducive to less stress for themselves are afraid of something....usually being irrelevant.
I am not qualified to help the real reason for the posts...and for all I know am contributing to the self administration of toxic cortisol into a PTSD victim.
Repeated public counterproductive self abuse by a stranger is not the kind of video I want to see friends watching. Nor does the practice help us produce good videos on other subjects.
if everyone on BBI wrote as well as Bill2 does, imho. Then points being made would be clear and meanings obvious. Oh, well.
Just glad we have a Bill2 among us to lend a hand.
Hey! I think I write pretty clearly and make the meanings pretty obvious. As my students have repeated said about me in their end of course critique, I'm a master of breaking things down Barnie style to make it easily understood even for the slowest of people.
if everyone on BBI wrote as well as Bill2 does, imho. Then points being made would be clear and meanings obvious. Oh, well.
Just glad we have a Bill2 among us to lend a hand.
Hey! I think I write pretty clearly and make the meanings pretty obvious. As my students have repeated said about me in their end of course critique, I'm a master of breaking things down Barnie style to make it easily understood even for the slowest of people.
if everyone on BBI wrote as well as Bill2 does, imho. Then points being made would be clear and meanings obvious. Oh, well.
Just glad we have a Bill2 among us to lend a hand.
Hey! I think I write pretty clearly and make the meanings pretty obvious. As my students have repeated said about me in their end of course critique, I'm a master of breaking things down Barnie style to make it easily understood even for the slowest of people.
And you don't have to believe anything about me. To you, I'm a nobody. However, I'm also that nobody, who has gotten into your head to the point that you can't do anything but get irate whenever I post in response to your idiotic posts. And I do admit that I get a ton of laughs out of pushing your buttons because it's so damn easy. And all I get in response is you calling me a pogue or a terrible officer or whatever lame insults you can throw my way. But then again, your lengthy, error-ridden diatribes are always welcome, so I do have to thank you for some awesome entertainment.
Also, you can go on and insult those of us, who did do our part in these conflicts by talking about how we lost multiple wars, but in the end, the extent to your conflict while in the Corps was to decide whether you should bang that Thai hooker during a MEU. But hey, don't mind us, who actually lost friends in actual combat. I'm sure you've lost some of yours as well...well, at least to venereal disease or something similar.
And don't worry, I lead a very uneventful life, so I will definitely spend my time hounding you until you either decide to leave BBI or get banned for doing something that comes natural to you, which is to be a homophobic, racist, conspiracy theorist moron. That the least I can do for my favorite teufel hunden on BBI.
But I do wish you a fine evening. Carry on the good fight, my man!
Quote:
Do you believe his girlfriend's testimony?
Now, I have asked you repeatedly to respond to that silly ass "Not guilty means your innocent" logic you used earlier. But you keep running from answering the question i asked with regards to that. We all know why you are doing that, because it makes your point extremely silly and naive. but lets hope you can answer this simple question without running from it also
Here, I'll throw you a bone.Say for the sake or argument, you're right. say for the sake or argument it's obvious that a not guilty vote doesn't mean he's innocent. Take it a step further, and pretend that anyone with half a brain actually knows that.Yet that's not what I put out there. Now, you seem quite content to leave it at that, and come to what, for you, is the obvius conclusion, that I am of below avg intelligence. If youre good with that, then you stay there.Vut assuming that what I wrote above is self apparent, it begs the question, why would I say that?
Do you suppose I had no reason, or that I truly believe the verdicts showed Zimmerman had no blame.Lets see if you're as smart as you think.
You failed once again to answer the question that directly points to your point about his GF's testimony. If you can't back your idiocy, don't post it then because all you are doing is making a fool of yourself. You truly show your ignorance with regards to subjects when you do stupid shit like that. Don't make a claim if you can't stand behind it
And there are some here who can vouch for my bona fide nature of my background. That's enough as far as I see it.
Sweet dreams, my angry friend.
I know we break each other's balls here a lot, but I am genuinely sorry to hear that, brother.
I know we break each other's balls here a lot, but I am genuinely sorry to hear that, brother.
Thanks. Terrible things happen. We try to move on. Doesn't help to dwell on the past. But appreciate your words.
Quote:
In comment 12282181 montanagiant said:
Quote:
Do you believe his girlfriend's testimony?
Now, I have asked you repeatedly to respond to that silly ass "Not guilty means your innocent" logic you used earlier. But you keep running from answering the question i asked with regards to that. We all know why you are doing that, because it makes your point extremely silly and naive. but lets hope you can answer this simple question without running from it also
Here, I'll throw you a bone.Say for the sake or argument, you're right. say for the sake or argument it's obvious that a not guilty vote doesn't mean he's innocent. Take it a step further, and pretend that anyone with half a brain actually knows that.Yet that's not what I put out there. Now, you seem quite content to leave it at that, and come to what, for you, is the obvius conclusion, that I am of below avg intelligence. If youre good with that, then you stay there.Vut assuming that what I wrote above is self apparent, it begs the question, why would I say that?
Do you suppose I had no reason, or that I truly believe the verdicts showed Zimmerman had no blame.Lets see if you're as smart as you think.
You failed once again to answer the question that directly points to your point about his GF's testimony. If you can't back your idiocy, don't post it then because all you are doing is making a fool of yourself. You truly show your ignorance with regards to subjects when you do stupid shit like that. Don't make a claim if you can't stand behind it
And there are some here who can vouch for my bona fide nature of my background. That's enough as far as I see it.
Sweet dreams, my angry friend.
What is going to be your next handle when you get banned again?
Quote:
Aren't you then just going to throw out some lame Ring Knocker insult? I mean you are pretty predictable.
And there are some here who can vouch for my bona fide nature of my background. That's enough as far as I see it.
Sweet dreams, my angry friend.
Dont get upset and go away all mad. after all it was you who started questioning other peopels backgrounds. Dont cry you got exposed, PLC pogue.
What is your background you keep claiming? obviously its not teaching grammar, so clue us all in. you claimed you teach military tactics, where on Earth does this happen at? And please tell me we are not talking about Dungeon and Dragons tactics are we?
You can go on line like GWG like this idiot did and get all the slang. It is a term meant to degrade support staff like cooks, paper pushers, etc.. Anyone who has actually served though understands they also serve an important function, its just the wanna-be's who think they don't.
Another amusing gaywhiteghost thread - ( New Window )
1. Self-loathing gay basher
2. Conspiracy theorist
3. Racist
For his next trick, maybe he goes anti-Semitic?
1. Self-loathing gay basher
2. Conspiracy theorist
3. Racist
For his next trick, maybe he goes anti-Semitic?
I would also throw in an assault on the English language and proper logic to that list. But I'm sure Antisemitism will also be added to the list shortly.
Link - ( New Window )
Quote:
Deep in the Vietnamese jungles, he is known as the deadly White Ghost, a stealthy guerilla killer who continues to wage war against the Viet Cong, even though the war ended over a decade before. He is, in reality, Steve Shepard, a former U.S. Intelligence Officer with the Special Forces squad, a man listed MIA when his unit was slaughtered during an ambush. Since then, he has chosen to remain in the jungle. His only companion is his Vietnamese wife. This jungle actioner follows what happens when the U.S. military decides to try and bring him back to the U.S. Unfortunately, the former Green Beret officer chosen to lead the mission is Shepard's sworn enemy Walker, a man who seems more interested in bringing him back in a body bag. But will he succeed? This film went direct to video.
Link - ( New Window )
You are GWG's Walker, Ronnie. But will you succeed?
F$@^ you, Greg!
Walker, Texas Ranger is currently busy defending Texas against the unconstitutional encroachment of the federal government, so it's up to me.
But I am interested in asking...but wish the response kept private and not discussed.
GWG....for whatever reason and at this point top lost in time to be your fault or something anyone can overcome...can you take a day or so privately and ask yourself of this is worth it? It cannot be good for anyone to spend time in so much opposition. It's stress without a healthy payoff. It strikes me as unhealthy for you. I realize that opposition triggers stubborn opposition in all of us. But none of this or any one here is worth stress.
Secondly, there comes a time when the best inside any poster is lost and replaced by too much enjoyment at hammering the errant nail.
Don't misunderstand me....too many possible conversations wrecked by GWG and brownstones need to self stroke instead of discuss...but at some point none of us do well so far from our best. And we get into the practice of put down before give and take discussion that makes it hard for opposing and interesting view points to be submitted even if civilly done.
To slay the monster we become a new monster that wrecks what we originally objected to...decency and civic discourse.
No replies encouraged....just food for personal thought. I don't know what to do... but it sure seems like a lot of threads are going to be wrecked rehashing and re trying emotions long unanchored from original offense.
Just a thought
So for that, I will refrain from interacting with GWG, no matter if I enjoy seeing him get all discombobulated.
Thank you, sir.
I've attached the arrest record of this Apperson guy who reminds me of that Slingblade character.
Interesting how quickly Mark Nejame got on this case to represent Apperson. This is the same attorney that George Zimmerman first went to. Nejame declined but referred Zimmerman to Mark O'Meara whom he later hired. I guess Nejame and O'Meara are good friends.
Court record of Matt Apperson - ( New Window )
Talk about bad English...re read that question three times and tell me we are not far off course.
Hopefully see you down the road my friend.
Quote:
In comment 12281568 Johnny5 said:
Quote:
In comment 12281460 Greg from LI said:
Quote:
shooting.
Greg seriously? Not understand why you are defending him, is he a friend or something? LOL
Do you not see that this guy historically inserts himself into situations that he shouldn't be in, over and over and over and over again? Doesn't raise a red flag to you? At all?
Inserts himself in situations.....where is that in the Florida criminal code? If you can find it for me, I'll give you a round of applause.
Check out Bernie Goetz. Similar situation IF GZ was trying to instigate a 'justified' shooting. Goetz was found innocent but he was tried for murder. If he had a past like GZ and it was introduced in court what would have happened?
Wasn't Bernie Goetz being mugged? That's not similar at all, unless you are one of those people that just sees a white man shooting a black teen and lumps it all together. Which makes you part of the problem. btw.
So for that, I will refrain from interacting with GWG, no matter if I enjoy seeing him get all discombobulated.
Thank you, sir.
Meh. Definitely intentional on my part. I'm happy enough with my own shortcomings. They taste like bacon.
You wanna call me a bigot, go right ahead. Doesn't make me one. Fagots make me sick.
Of course my actions were also intentional, but that doesn't mean that I'm not derailing threads with my snark directed towards him. I definitely recognize my shortcomings in that regard. And yes, anything that taste like bacon is a good thing.
Truth. But I will still refrain from here on out. But now I'm in the mood for some bacon. Thanks, ass!
How is that anyone else's fault?
How is that anyone else's fault?
Pretty sure that was the point, no? A request for some self-reflection (probably not A-Rod style, but who knows? Might do him some good?).
But its easy to do if you are willing to do so and easier if you have a screw loose and get some emotional payoff from it we do not understand.
You are working 20x harder than he is and getting nothing out of it.
He has no audience. He has no voice on here.
Meanwhile we let his presence wreck good threads.
I get the temptation....I fall into it all the time. I get that driving such posters away has a civic value to the site. However there are posters that are more than missing self awareness. At that point we have the sane engaging the insane (a response on a topic or at a time or in a situation or by a certain poster)....which by definition is insane. Why volunteer to be insane ( Repeating behavior proven useless and expecting a different response)?
imho. Again...I do the same things. I am not calling you out so lets lay down firearms on the subject
And the circus
I am not qualified to help the real reason for the posts...and for all I know am contributing to the self administration of toxic cortisol into a PTSD victim.
Repeated public counterproductive self abuse by a stranger is not the kind of video I want to see friends watching. Nor does the practice help us produce good videos on other subjects.
Just glad we have a Bill2 among us to lend a hand.
Just glad we have a Bill2 among us to lend a hand.
Hey! I think I write pretty clearly and make the meanings pretty obvious. As my students have repeated said about me in their end of course critique, I'm a master of breaking things down Barnie style to make it easily understood even for the slowest of people.
Quote:
if everyone on BBI wrote as well as Bill2 does, imho. Then points being made would be clear and meanings obvious. Oh, well.
Just glad we have a Bill2 among us to lend a hand.
Hey! I think I write pretty clearly and make the meanings pretty obvious. As my students have repeated said about me in their end of course critique, I'm a master of breaking things down Barnie style to make it easily understood even for the slowest of people.
huh?
Well...even I have my limits. I'm not a miracle worker.
Well...even I have my limits. I'm not a miracle worker.
There, there.
Quote:
if everyone on BBI wrote as well as Bill2 does, imho. Then points being made would be clear and meanings obvious. Oh, well.
Just glad we have a Bill2 among us to lend a hand.
Hey! I think I write pretty clearly and make the meanings pretty obvious. As my students have repeated said about me in their end of course critique, I'm a master of breaking things down Barnie style to make it easily understood even for the slowest of people.
Even for PLC Pogues?
:(
I'm sorry that I don't want to post a picture of my diploma or my commissioning warrant from my alma matre. So yes, for a PLC pogue.
You can't handle the Proof!
Will you settle for a scanned copy of my DD-214? And can I black my SSN out or do you want that as well?